Asian Journal of Bio Science

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Role of Cytological Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Integrity of in Vitro Regenerated Plants


Affiliations
1 Department of Dairy and Food Microbiology, College of Dairy and Food Science Technology, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Micropropagation can be rewarding only if complete genetic fidelity of micropropagules is maintained. Genetic fidelity is the maintenance of genetic constitution of a particular clone throughout its growth span (Chatterjee and Prakash, 1996). Periodic monitoring of the degree of genetic stability of in vitro conserved plants is of utmost importance for commercial utilization of true-to-type plants of the desired genotype (Mohanty et al., 2011). The assessment of the genetic integrity of in vitro grown regenerants in regular intervals can significantly reduce or eliminate the chance of occurrence of somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981) at early or late phase of culture.

Keywords

Cytological Marker, Somaclonal Variation, Genetic Fidelity, Tissue Culture.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdalla, M.M. and El-Kawy, A.M.A. (2010). Cytological studies for date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) tissue culture derived plants. Rep. Opin., 2 (11) : 17-21.

  • Adhikary, A.K. (1974). Precise determination of centromere locations. Cytologia, 39 : 11-16.

  • Bairu, M.W., Fennell, C.W. and Van Staden, J. (2006). The effect of plant growth regulators on somaclonal variation in Cavendish banana (Musa AAA cv. ‘Zelig’). Sci. Hort., 108: 347–351.

  • Bennici, A., Anzidei,M. and Vendramin, G.G. (2004). Genetic stability and uniformity of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. regenerated plants through organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis. Plant Sci., 166: 221-227.

  • Chatterjee, G. and Prakash, J. (1996). Genetic stability in commercial tissue culture. In: Plant biotechnology-commercial prospects and problems. J. Prakash and R.L.M. Pierik (Eds.), pp. 111-121. Oxford IBH Publishing Co., NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Chittora, M. (2012). Evaluation of fidelity in tissue culture derived micro-clones of Achras sapota L. Var. ‘Cricket Ball’ using genetic markers. Ph.D. Thesis, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • D’Amato, F. (1985). Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue cultures and their regenerates. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 3: 73–112.

  • Das, A.B., Basak, V.C. and Das, P. (1995). Karyotype diversity and genomic variability in some Indian tree mangroves.Caryologia, 48: 319-328.

  • Davis, P.H. and Heywood, V.H. (1963). Principles of angiosperm taxonomy. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London, UNITED KINGDOM.

  • Evans, D.A. and Reed, S.M. (1981). Cytogenetic techniques, in plant tissue culture methods and application in agriculture. T.A. Thorpe, Ed. Academic Press, 213-240 pp., NEWYORK, U.S.A.

  • Evans, D.A., Sharp, W.R. and Medina-Filho, H.P. (1984). Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. Am. J. Bot., 71: 759–774.

  • Evans, D.A. and Sharp, W.R. (1986). Applications of somaclonal variation. Bio. Technolo., 4 :528-532.

  • Gangopadhyay, G., Gangopadhyay, S.B., Poddar, R., Gupta, S. and Mukharjee, K.K. (2003). Micropropagation ofTectona grandis: assessment of genetic fidelity. Biol. Plant., 46: 459-461.

  • Haisel, D., Hofman, P.,Vagneri, M., Lipavska, H., Ticha, L., Schafer, C. and Capkova, V. (2001).Ex vitro phenotype stability is affected by in vitro cultivation. Biol. Plant., 44: 321–324.

  • Isabel, N., Tremblay, L., Michaud, M., Tremblay, F.M. and Bousquet, J. (1993). RAPDs as an aid to evaluate the genetic integrity of somatic embryogenesis-derived populations of Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P. Theor. Appl. Genet., 86: 81-87.

  • Karp, A., Nelson, R.S., Thomas, E. and Bright, S.W.J. (1982). Chromosome variation in protoplast derived potato plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 63 : 265–272.

  • Karp, A. and Maddock, S.E. (1984). Chromosome variation in wheat plants regenerated from cultured immature embryos, Theor. Appl. Genet., 67: 249-255.

  • Karp, A. (1986). Chromosome variation in regenerated plants, In : Genetic manipulation in plant breeding. W. Horn, C.J. Jensen, W. Odenbach, and O. Schieder, Eds. Proc. Int. Symp. EUCARPIA. Walter de Gruyter, pp. 547–554, NEWYORK, U.S.A.

  • Karp, A. (1991). On the current understanding of somaclonal variation. Oxford Surv. Plant Mol. Cell Biol., 7 : 1–58.

  • Khan, K. (2010). Molecular and cytological screening of micro-clones of Wrightia tomentosa (Roxb.) Roem et Schult. Ph.D. Thesis, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, Udaipur, RAJASTHAN (INDIA).

  • Larkin, P.J. and Scowcroft, W.R. (1981). Somaclonal variation – A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet., 60: 197-214.

  • Lattoo, S.K., Berotra, S., Sapru Dhar, R., Khan, S. and Dhar, A.K. (2006). Rapid plant regeneration and analysis of genetic fidelity of in vitro derived plants of Chlorophytum arundinaceum Baker—an endangered medicinal herb. Plant Cell Rep., 25: 499–506.

  • Lee, M. and Phillips, R.L. (1988). The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.& Plant Molecular Biol., 39: 413–437.

  • Levan, A., Fredga, K. and Sandberg, A.A. (1964). Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes.Heredity, 52: 201-220.

  • Mohanty, S., Panda, M.K., Sahoo, S. and Nayak, S. (2011). Micropropagation of Zingiber rubens and assessment of genetic stability through RAPD and ISSR markers. Biol. Plant., 55 (1) : 16-20.

  • Moore, D.M. (1968). The karyotype in taxonomy. In : Modern methods of plant taxonomy. V.H. Heywood (Ed.), pp. 61-75. Academic Press, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.

  • Oono, K. (1991). In vitro mutation in rice, In : Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry. Y.P.S. Bajaj, Ed. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 14 : 285–303.

  • Panda, M.K., Mohanty, S., Subudhi, E., Acharya, L. and Nayak, S. (2007). Assessment of genetic stability of micropropagated plants of Curcuma longa L. by cytophotometry and RAPD analyses. Int. J. Integr. Biol., 1 (3): 189-195.

  • Pandey, H., Nandi, S.K., Kumar, A., Palni, U.T., Chandra, B. and Palni, L.M.S. (2004). In vitro propagation ofAconitum balfourii Stapf. : An important aconite of Himalayan alpines. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech., 7: 34–41.

  • Peredo, E.L., Arroyo-Garcia, R., Reed, B. and Revilla, M.A. (2008). Genetic and epigenetic stability of cryopreserved and cold– stored hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Cryobiology., 57: 234–241.

  • Peschke, V.M., Phillips, R.L. (1992). Genetic implications of somaclonal variation in plants. Adv. Genet., 30 : 41-75.

  • Rani, V. and Raina, S.N. (2002). Molecular DNA marker analysis to assess the genetic fidelity of micropropagated woody plants. In: Micropropagation of woody trees and fruits. S.M. Jain and K. Ishii (Eds.) pp. 222-224. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Sharma, A.K. and Sharma, A. (1999). Plant chromosome analysis-manipulation and engineering. Harwood Academic Publishers.

  • Shepard, J.F., Bidney, D. and Shahin, E. (1980). Potato protoplasts in crop improvement. Science, 208: 17–24.

  • Sibi, M. (1984). Heredity of epigenic-variant plants from culture in vitro, In : Efficiency in plant breeding.W. Lange, A.C. Zeven, and N.G. Hogenboom, Eds. Proc. 10th Congress European Assoc. Res. Plant Breed. EUCAPIA, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 196–198.

  • Singh, B.P. and Srivastava, V. (2004). Germplasm characterization and evaluation. In : Plant genetic resources in Indian perspectives - Theory and practices. Directorate of Information and Publications of Agriculture, ICAR, NEW DELHI, INDIA.

  • Skirvin, R.M. and Janick, J. (1976). Tissue culture-induced variation in scented Pelargonium spp. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 101 : 281–290.

  • Skirvin, R.M. (1978). Natural and induced variation in tissue cultures. Euphytica, 27: 241–266.

  • Skirvin, R.M., McPheeters, K.D. and Norton, M. (1994). Sources and frequency of somaclonal variation. Hort. Sci., 29: 1232-1237.

  • Skirvin, R.M. (2000). Somaclonal variation: do we know what causes it? Agric. Biotech. Net., 2: 1- 4.

  • Soliman, M.I. (2002). Karyological studies on some wild species of family Cruciferae in Egypt. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 5 : 943-947.

  • Stace, C.A. (1980). Plant taxonomy and biosystematics. Arnold, E. Ltd., LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.

  • Stace, C.A. (2000). Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20th and 21th centuries. Taxon., 49: 451-477.

  • Stelly, D.M. (1989). Cytogenetic abnormalities of cotton somaclones from callus cultures. Genome, 32: 762–770.

  • Swedlund, B. and Vasil, I.K. (1985). Cytogenetic characterization of embryogenic callus and regenerated plants of Pennisetum americanum L. K. Schum. Theoret Appl Genet., 69 : 575-581.

  • Vasil, I.K. (1988). Progress in the regeneration and genetic manipulation of cereal crops. BioTech., 6 : 397–402.

  • Vasil, I.K. (1990). The realities and challanges of plant biotechnology. BioTech., 8: 296–301.

  • Vershney,A., Lakshmikumaran, M., Srivastava, P.S. and Dhawan, Vibha (2001). Establishment of genetic fidelity on in vitroraised Lilium bulblets through RAPD markers. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 37: 227-231.

  • Wersuhn, G. (1989). Obtaining mutants from cell cultures. Plant Breed., 102: 1–9.


Abstract Views: 243

PDF Views: 2




  • Role of Cytological Markers for Evaluation of Genetic Integrity of in Vitro Regenerated Plants

Abstract Views: 243  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Manish Chittora
Department of Dairy and Food Microbiology, College of Dairy and Food Science Technology, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India
Aradhana Sukhwal
Department of Dairy and Food Microbiology, College of Dairy and Food Science Technology, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), India

Abstract


Micropropagation can be rewarding only if complete genetic fidelity of micropropagules is maintained. Genetic fidelity is the maintenance of genetic constitution of a particular clone throughout its growth span (Chatterjee and Prakash, 1996). Periodic monitoring of the degree of genetic stability of in vitro conserved plants is of utmost importance for commercial utilization of true-to-type plants of the desired genotype (Mohanty et al., 2011). The assessment of the genetic integrity of in vitro grown regenerants in regular intervals can significantly reduce or eliminate the chance of occurrence of somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981) at early or late phase of culture.

Keywords


Cytological Marker, Somaclonal Variation, Genetic Fidelity, Tissue Culture.

References