Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Nage, S. P.
- Effect of Formaldehyde Treated Concentrate, Urea and Soybean Meal on Proximate Analysis and Feed Intake in Lactating Cows
Abstract Views :199 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
Source
The Asian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 12, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 22-28Abstract
Present investigation entitled “effect of formaldehyde treated concentrate, urea and soybean meal on proximate analysis and feed intake in lactating cows” was undertaken at Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola. Feeding of 1.5 per cent formaldehyde treated 70:30 sugras : SBM concentrate mixture with 2 per cent added urea diet to lactating cows (T3) was evaluated in relation to sugras untreated ration (T1). SBM contained 49.50 and CP against a content of 17.60 per cent CP in sugras concentrate. The untreated 70:30 mixture had 27.47 per cent CP and 1.5 per cent HCHO treatment to mixture did not influence the proximate principles, though there was slight decrease in the constituents of mixture. The average DMI was 7.97, 7.78, 7.85, 7.01 and 7.21 kg/cow on feeding control (T1), 70:30 untreated (T2) and HCHO treated (T3) concentrate mixture with 2 per cent added urea and 70:30 untreated (T4) and HCHO treated (T5) concentrate mixture with 3 per cent added urea supplementation diets, respectively. Per cent BW DMI under different treatments clearly indicated that the cows received sufficient DM to fulfill the appetite and consequently supply of nutrients to the body. The unit body size intake of all the cows met out the nutritional standards of 2.5 kg DM/100 kg body weight. Hence, it seems no reason to consider the adverse effect of feeding formaldehyde treated (1.5 g/100 g CP) concentrate with added urea ration to cows in reference to express their optimum performance.Keywords
Formaldehyde, Sugras, Urea, Soybean Meal, Proximate Analysis, Feed Intake, Dry Matter Intake.
References
- Agrawal, I.S. M.L., Singh, A.K. and Pandey, Y.C. (1989). Feeding value of ammonia (urea) treated straw in term of milk production. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 6 (2) : 89-96.
- Amble, V. N. (1975). Statistical method in animal science. Ist Ed., Published by Indian Society of Agriculture Statistics. New Delhi, India, pp .199-219.
- Anonymous (2012). Area and production estimates of soybean in India Kharif (Monsoon) 2012 (Based on crop survey conducted by SOPA).
- Balaraman, N. (1995). Nutritive value of hybrid napier grass. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 12 (4) : 245-246.
- Banerjee, G.C. (2008). A Text book of animal husbandry. Ed. 8th., Oxford and IBH Publishing. Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, pp. 340-345.
- Banerji, G.C. (1998). (Reprint 2005), A textbook of animal husbandry, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co-Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, pp. 661-677.
- BIS, ISI: 7874 (Part 1) (1975). Methods of tests for animal feeds and feeding stuffs : General methods.
- Bugalia, H.L., Chaudhary, J.L. and Gupta, Lokesh (2008a). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated til cake on milk yield and composition of lactating crossbred cows. IJDS, 61(2): 116-121.
- Bugalia, H.L., Chaudhary, J.L. and Gupta, Lokesh (2008b). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cake on reproductive efficiency and physiological responses of crossbred cows. Anim. Nutr. & Feed Technol., 8: 219 - 226.
- Chatterjee, A. and Walli, T.K. (2003). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated mustard cake as bypass protein on milk yield and milk composition on Murrah buffaloes. IJDS, 56: 299 - 305.
- Compeneere, Sam De., Boever, Joha L. De, Vanacker, Jose, M. Daniel, L. and De, Brabander (2010). Reducing nitrogen excretion and soybean meal use by feeding al lower rumen degradable protein balance and protected soybean meal to dairy cattle. Anim. Nutr., 64 (2) : 85-97.
- Doskey,Kamal Noman, Dhiaa, Omar, Al-Mallah and Sulaiman, Nihet hajji (2012). Effect of feeding urea treated wheat straw and formaldehyde treated barley grains on milk composition and some blood metabolites of Meriz does. Roavs, 1(1): 700-703.
- Dust, J.M.,Grieshop, C.M., Parsons, C.M., Karr-Lilienthal, L.K., Schasteen, C.S., Quigley, J.D., III, Merchen, N.R. and Fahey, G.C. (2005). Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs. J.Anim. Sci., 83 : 2414-2422.
- Garg, M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhandari, B.M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003a). Effect of feeding rumen protected protein on milk production in lactating buffaloes. Anim. Nutr.& Feed Technol., 3: 151-157.
- Garg M. R., Sherasia P.L., Bhandari, B.M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2003b). Effect of feeding formaldehyder treated guar meal on milk production in crossbred cows. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 20 (3) : 334-338.
- Garg M.R., Sherasia, P.L., Bhandari, B.M., Gulati, S.K. and Scott, T.W. (2004). Effect of feeding protected protein on milk production and composition of lactating cows. Indian Vet. J., 81 : 48-50.
- Garg, M.R., Bhandari, B.M. and Sherasia, P.L.(2007). Assessment of macro and micro minerals status of milch animal in Jodhpur district of Rajasthan. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 60 (3) : 191-198.
- Gupta, L. and Murdia, P.C. (2007). Effect of feeding urea treated wheat straw with of without sulphur on nitrogen utilization and growth rate in crossbred heifers. Indian J. Anim. Res., 4 : 293 - 295.
- Jai Kishan and Khan, M.Y. (1990). Effect of modified practice of urea supplementation on nutrient utilization from wheat straw based diet in buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 7(4): 263-266.
- Prasad, Jagdish and Neeraj (2008). Principles and practices of animal nutrition, IInd Ed., Kalyani Publishers, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
- Reddy, G.J. and Reedy, B.S. (1986). Nutritive value of ratoon regrown Hybrid Napier (NB-21). Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 3(2): 128 - 131.
- Sahoo, B. and Walli, T.K. (2005). Effect of feeding bypass protein as formaldehyde treated mustard cake along with energy supplement on blood metabolites and milk production in lactating goats. IJDS, 58(3): 184-189.
- Sihag, Zile S., Punia, B.S., Barwal, R.S. and Sihag, Sajjan (2008). Influence of feeding urea molasses mineral blocks (UMMB0 on blood parmeters in buffaloes. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 26(1): 56 - 60.
- Vardonk, Han, Singh, G.P. and Gupta, B.N. (1989). Nutrition utilization and passage rate of digestion on feeding of urea supplemented and urea ammoniated wheat straw in crossbred cattle. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 6 (4) : 295-300.
- Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2004). Effect of feeding protected protein on nutrient utilization, milk yield and milk composition of lactating crossbred cows. IJDS, 57(6):394-399.
- Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2010). Effect of feeding protected protein on growth performance and physiological reaction in crossbred Heifers. Indian J.Anim. Nutr., 27(4): 401-407.
- Effect of Different Concentrates on Growth Performance of Crossbred Calves
Abstract Views :237 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
Source
The Asian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 12, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 102-106Abstract
The present study on effect of different concentrates on growth performance of crossbred calves was conducted for period of 90 day. Fifteen crossbred calves were divided into three groups on the basis of nearness to the age and body weight. Three feeding treatment were studies namely T1 Dry fodder (Soybean straw) + Green fodder (Hybrid napier) + Readymade concentrate (Sugras) mixture, T2 Dry fodder (Soybean straw) + Green fodder (Hybrid napier) and Homemade concentrate-I mixture and T3 Dry fodder (Soybean straw) + Green fodder (Hybrid Napier) + Homemade concentrate-II, dry fodder, green fodder and concentrate quantities was calculated as per feeding standard and provided to the crossbred calves in all treatments. Daily DMI differed significantly between the treatments. The calves from T2 groups need more DM than that of T3, and T1 groups. The average daily intake was 2.32, 2.59 and 2.47 kg/day/calves in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively. Higher intake of DM per 100 kg body weight was noticed in treatment T2 and lowest in T1 and T3. All the crossbred calves exhibited satisfactory growth rate 324 to 456 (g) per day and differences were significant. The per kg of body weight gain was higher in T2 (0.456 g.) followed by T3 (0.431 g.) and T1 (0.324 g.) treatments.Keywords
Readymade Concentrate, Homemade Concentrate, Crossbred Calves, Dry Matter, Body Weight.References
- Adangale, S. B., Mitkari, K. R., Walkunde, T. R. , Baswade, S. V. (2009). Effect of feeding Jowar straw in combination with soybean straw on the growth performance of crossbred heifer. Indian J. Anim. Res., 43 (2) : 142-144.
- Ahmed, K., Bhattacharyya, D.K. and Amonge, T.K. (2005). Seasonal and diurnal variation in parturition of Swamp buffaloes. Indian Vet. J., 82 (9): 1000-1001.
- Helal, F.I.S., Abdul Rahman, K.M., Ahmed, B.M. and Omar,S.S. (2011). Effect of feeding different levels of concentrates on buffalo calves performance, digestibility and carcass traits. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 10 (2):186-192.
- Pachauri, S.K., Singh, S.K. and Mudgal, V. (2010). Effect of feeding wheat straw and urea ammoniated straw based total mixed rations on the performance of female crossbred heifer. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 27 (1):73-76.
- Sreedhar, S. (2015). Growth performance of indigenous and cross bred calves in coastal region of Andhra Pradesh. Livestock Research Internat. Jakarya Public., 3 (4): 99-102.
- Yadav, C.M. and Chaudhary, J.L. (2010). Effect of feeding formaldehyde treated groundnut cake on dry matter intake, digestibility of nutrients and body measurements in crossbred heifers. Anim. Nutr. & Feed Technol.,10:107-113.
- Anonymous (2012). NDDB, Report, www.nddb.org.
- Effect of Various Fertilizers on Yield of Green Azolla (Azolla pinnata) and its Feeding Effect on Osmanabadi Goat Kids
Abstract Views :185 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (M.S.), IN
Source
The Asian Journal of Animal Science, Vol 14, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 23-28Abstract
The present investigation on effect of various fertilizer on yield of green azolla (Azolla pinnata) and its feeding value to Osmanabadi goat kids was conducted under Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Science, Post Graduate Institute, Dr. PDKV, Akola for period of 60 day. 03 treatments were studied namely T1 with production of azolla on soil (15 kg) pit, T2 with production of azolla on soil (15 kg) pit with fresh cow dung (2 kg), T3 with production of azolla on soil (15 kg) pit with SSP (20 g), respectively. The mean yield of azolla on wet basis under various treatments i.e.T 1 , T2 and T3 were 4.28, 5.77 and 5.13 kg/pit, respectively and yield of azolla on dry matter basis 49, 66 and 60 kg/pit, respectively. The DM and CP value 5.56, 5.68, 5.67 per cent and 23.82, 25.60, 24.89 per cent, respectively. The CF and TA value were 13.58, 14.96, 14.33 per cent and 13.77, 14.94, 14.52 per cent, respectively. The EE and NFE were 4.02, 4.16, 4.09 per cent and 44.80, 40.34, 42.17, respectively. The goat kids from T2 groups consumed more DM than that of T3 and T1 goat kids groups. The average daily DM intake was 0.570, 0.620 and 0.580 kg/day/kids in T1, T2 and T3 groups, respectively. The average daily gain in body weight of experimental kids was more in T2 (0.097 kg) followed by T3 (0.087 kg) and T1 (0.082 kg). The average total gain in body weight was more in T2 (5.15 kg), followed by T3 (4.90 kg) and T1 (3.59 kg).Keywords
Fertilizer, Soil, Cow Dung, Single Super Phosphate (SSP), Yield, Proximate Analysis, DMI, Goat Kids, Body Weight, Body Measurement.References
- Ahmed, H.A., Ganai, A.M. and Beigh, Y.A.(2015). Performance of growing sheep on azolla baased diet.Indian J. Anim. Res., 50 (5) : 721-724.
- Alalade, O.A., Iyayi, E.A. and Alalade, T.O. (2007). The nutritive value of azolla (Azolla pinnata) meal in diets for growing pullets and subsequent effect on laying performance.J.Poultry Science, 44 : 273- 277.
- Amble, V.N. (1975). Statistical methods in animal science. Indian Society Agricultural Statistics, New Delhi. (1 st Ed.), pp. 199 - 219.
- AOAC (1990). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 15 th Edn. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
- Balaji, K.A., Jalaludeen, C.R., Richard, P.A., Peethambaran and Senthilkumar, S. (2009). Effect of dietary inclusion of azolla (Azolla pinnata) on production performance of broiler chicken.Indian J. Poult. Sci., 44 (2) :195-198.
- Bhilawade, H.R.(2015). Utilisation of azolla meal as natural feed supplement for Osmanabadi kids. M.Sc.Thesis, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, M.S. (India).
- B.I.S.(1975). :7174, 7475,7874 Part 1 Bureau of Indian Standard Institute, New Delhi, India.
- Biswas, P. and Mandal, L. (1988). Growth response in crossbred (Jersey × Hariana) calves fed diets with graded levels of fresh water hyacinth (Eichhomiacrassipes). Indian J. Anim.Nutr., 5 (3) : 207-211.
- Chamber, R.(1997). Whose reality counts: Putting the First Last London: Intermediate Technology Publication.
- Cherry, D.M., Prasad, R.M.V. , Jagadeswararao, S. and Jaylaxmi, P.(2013). A study on economics of inclusion of Azolla pinnata in swine rations. Int. J. Agric. Sci & Vet. Med., 1(4): 50-56.
- Ferentinos, L., Smith, J. and Valenzuela, H.(2002). Azolla Mänoa College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai’i at Mänoa,
- Gevrek, M.N.(2001). The performances of azolla mexicana in Turkish rice field. Cahiers Options Mediterraneennes, pp. 58.
- ICAR (1985). Nutrient requirement of livestock and poultry.Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
- Indira, D., Rao, K.S., Suresh, J., Naidu, K.V. and Ravi, A. (2009). Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as feed supplement in buffalo calves on growth performance. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 26 (4) : 345-348.
- Patil(2017). Nutrient changes in azolla at different stages of harvest in Kharifseason. Internat. J. Sci. Environ. &Technol., 6 (5) : 2921 – 2924.
- Shital, S., Ghodake, A.P., Fernandes, Darade, V. Rohini and Zagade, B.(2011). Effect of different levels of azolla meal on feed intake of Osmanabadi kids. Vet. Sci. Res. J., 2(1 & 2): 22-24.
- Sujatha, T. A., Kundu, S. Jeyakumar and Kundu, M.S. (2012). Azolla supplementation: Feed cost benefit in duck ration in Andaman Islands. Tamil Nadu J. Vet. & Anim. Sci., 9 (2):130-136.
- Tamang, Y. G., Samanta, N. Chakraborty and Mandal, L. (1992). Nutritive nalue of azolla and its potentiality of feeding in goats. Env. & Eco.,10 (2) : 455-456.
- Toradmal (2017). Studies on supplementation of green azolla (Azolla pinnata) on growth performance of Osmanabadi goat kids. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 12(2) : 124-128.
- Wadhavani, K.N., Patel, A.M., Parnerkar, S. and Vora, M.S.(2007). Feed efficiency, feed cost and return ever feed cost from stall fed weaned lambs fed on azolla (Azolla pinnata)based total mixed ration. Proc III. Biennial ANA conference 2000, pp. 56-57.