Open Access Subscription Access
Open Access Subscription Access
Decision Making and Demographics:A Study of Academicians in Indian Universities
Decisions are inter-related to the organisational life of a concern. Hence, the leader is committed to decisions not from the time he/she decides, but till such time that they are successfully implemented. The purpose of this paper is to examine the perception of faculty members towards decision making of their academic leaders in the sample select universities. The data collected were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The data for the study were collected both through the primary and secondary sources. The measuring items used for the study were sourced from existing validated scales and literature. Descriptive statistics was employed to know the descriptive information across various demographic variables on a total sample of 719. The various demographic variables, which were considered for the study, were gender, age, designation and experience. The results revealed that the faculty members of the sample select universities perceived the quality of decision making of their academic leaders at an above-average level; presently, they are fairly satisfied with their academic leader’s decision-making quality. The statistical analysis also revealed a significant effect of gender, age and experience on decision making except designation. It was found that designation has no impact on decision making of leaders. The results obtained from the present study have certain significant implications. Developing leaders’ decision-making competency is paramount in order to increase their leadership behaviour. Besides, academic leaders who are involved in social interaction need decision-making competency to work effectively in a social setting. Therefore, developing the decision-making competencies might help the academic leader to improve work performance, such as maintaining high academic standards in the department/university, quality teaching and research.
Decision Making, Academic Leaders, Faculty, Higher Education.
- Chen, Y., & Sun, Y. (2003). Age differences in financial decision-making: Using simple heuristics. Educational Gerontology, 29, 627-635.
- Craik, F. I. M., & Salthouse, T. A. (1992). The handbook of aging and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Crow, S. M., Fok, L. Y., Hartman, S. J., & Payne, D. M. (1991). Gender and values: What is the impact on decision making? Sex Roles, 25, 255-268.
- de Bruin, W. B., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938-956. DOI: 10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2068.
- Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2002). School leadership in context: Societal and organisational cultures. The principles and practice of educational management, 70-85.
- Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1969). Integrative complexity: An approach to individuals and groups as information-processing systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 272-285.
- Dror, I. E., Katona, M., & Mungur, K. (1998). Age difference in decision making: To take a risk or not? Gerontology, 44, 67-71.
- Duncan, D. B. (1965). A Bayesian approach to multiple comparisons. Technometrics, 7(2), 171-222.
- Finucane, M. L., Mertz, C. K., Slovic, P., & Schmidt, E. S. (2005). Task complexity and older adults’ decision-making competence. Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 71-84. DOI: 10.1037/0882-79220.127.116.11.
- Gardner, W., Scherer, D., & Tester, M. (1989). Asserting scientific authority: Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights. American Psychologist, 44, 895-902.
- Gill, S., Stockard, J., Johnson, M., & Williams, S. (1987). Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales. Sex Roles, 17, 375-400.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5th. NY: Prentice Hall International.
- Hatala, R., & Case, S.M. (2000). Examining the influence of gender on medical students’ decision making. Journal of Women’s Health and Gender Based Medicine, 9, 617-623.
- Hawkins, K., & Power, Ch.B. (1999). Gender differences in questions asked during small decision-making group discussions. Small Group Research, 30, 235-256.
- Jullisson, E. A., Karlsson, N., Garling, T. (2005). Weighing the past and the future in decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(4), 561-575. DOI: 10.1080/09541440440000159.
- Jung, C. (1923). Psychological types. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- Krumboltz, J. D., & Hamel, D. A. (1977). Guide to career decision-making skills. Career Skills Assessment Program of the College Entrance Examination Board.
- Law, S., & Glover, D. (2000). Educational Leadership & Learning: Practice, Policy and Research. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
- Malhotra, N. K. (2003). Marketing research-An applied orientation, Pearson Education, Singapore.
- March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1970). Organizations. Wiley, New York.
- Moshman, D. (1993). Adolescent reasoning and adolescent right. Human Development, 36, 27-40.
- Perrone, P. A. (1968). A national school counselor evaluation of occupational information. Madison, Wisconsin: Center for Studies in Vocational and Technical Education, Industrial Relations Research Institute, University of Wisconsin.
- Petrides, L. A., & Guiney, S. Z. (2002). Knowledge management for school leaders: An ecological framework for thinking schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1702-1717.
- Phillips, S. D. (1997). Toward an expanded definition of adaptive decision making. The Career Development Quarterly, 45(3), 275-287.
- Reed, A. E., Mikels, J. A., & Simon, K. I. (2008). Older adults prefer less choice than young adults. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 671-675. DOI: 10.1037/a0012772.
- Rowe, A. J., & Boulgarides, J. D. (1983). Decision styles - A perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 4(4), 3-9.
- Rowe, A. J., Boulgarides, J. D., & McGrath, M. R. (1984). Managerial decision making. Science Research Associates.
- Sagi, A., & Friedland, N. (2007). The cost of richness: The effect of the size and diversity of decision sets on post-decision regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 515-524. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1685.
- Spaniol, J., & Bayen U. J. (2005). Aging and conditional probability judgments: A global matching approach. Psychology and Aging, 20, 165-181.
- Tawney, D. (1976). Curriculum evaluation today: Trends and implications: a second collection of papers from members of the Schools Council project evaluators’ group on aspects of their work. Macmillan.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 33-60.
- Weiss, C. H. (1983). Ideology, interests, and information. In Ethics, the social sciences, and policy analysis (pp. 213-245). Springer US.
- Wood, J. T. (1990). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Abstract Views: 15
PDF Views: 0