Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Personality Traits and Work Engagement: A Case Study on Female Bank Employees in Banking Sector


Affiliations
1 HP University Business School, Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla, India
 

The purpose of the present study is to explore whether there is any qualifying relationship between personality traits and work engagement, also, the level of work engagement and big five personality traits among female employees in Himachal Pradesh. Relevant data through questionnaire was collected from 150 female employees working in 3 different Public sector banks namely State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank and UCO Bank in the state of Himachal Pradesh. The results of the study specified that there was a significant positive relationship between work engagement and big five personality traits. Extraversion, Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness were significantly related to work engagement and its dimensions namely vigor, dedication and absorption whereas neuroticism was found to be negatively related to the work engagement and the three dimensions of it. The level of work engagement was high in public sector whereas extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness were average except the agreeableness trait of personality was high.

Keywords

Personality Traits, Work Engagement, Vigor, Dedication and Absorption.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alarcon G, Eschleman KJ, Bowling NA. 2009. Relationships between personality variables and burnout: a meta-analysis. Work Stress 23 (3):244–263.
  • Azeem S. M. (2007). Conscientiousness, Neuroticism and Burnout among Healthcare Employees. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 3(7)1-11.
  • Bakker A.B and Demerouti E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International. 13 (3): 209-223.
  • Bakker A.B, Zee K.I, Lewig K.A and Dollard M.F. (2006). The Relationship between the Big Five Personality Factors and Burnout: A study Among Volunteer Counselors. The Journal of Social Psychology. 146(1): 31-50.
  • Bakker, A.B., and Schaufeli, W.B. (2008), “Positive organizational behaviour: engaged employees in flourishing organizations”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 29, pp. 147-54.
  • Bakker AB, Xanthopoulou D. 2013. Creativity and charisma among female leaders: the role of resources andwork engagement. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24:2760–79.
  • Barrick M.R and Mount M.K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Personnel Psychology. 44 (1): 1-26.
  • Bleeker, M. M. E., & Roodt, G. (2002). Die verband tussen werkbetrokkenheid en werkprestasie. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28(1), 22-32.
  • Bozionelos N. (2004). The big five of personality and work involvement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19 (1) : 69-81.
  • Burke, R. J., & El-Kot, G. (2010). Work engagement among managers and professionals in Egypt: Potential antecedents and consequences. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 1(1), 42-60.
  • Burke, R. J., Koyuncu, M., Fiksenbaum, L., & Tekin, Y. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of work engagement among frontline employees in Turkish hotels. Journal of Transnational Management, 18(3), 191-203.
  • Cattell, R. B. 1965. The Scientific Analysis of Personality. London: Penguin
  • Chughtai A. A and Buckley F, (2011). Work engagement antecedents, the mediating role of learning goal orientation and job performance. Career Development International, 16(7) 684 -705.
  • Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment.4, 5-13.
  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
  • Hogan, R. 1986. Hogan Personality Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer System.
  • Inceoglu, I., & Warr, P. (2011). Personality and job engagement. Journal of Personnel.
  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp.102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Joseph, E.N, Luyten P., Corveleyn J. &witte H.D. (2011). The Relationship between Personality, Burnout, and Engagement among the Indian Clergy. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21:276–288.
  • Kaja J. M., Golonka K., Marek T. (2015). Job Burnout and Engagement among teachers- work life areas and personality traits as predictors of relationships at work. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 28 (1): 102-119.
  • Karatepe, O.M, Aga M. (2012) Work Engagement as a mediator of the effects of Personality traits on job Outcomes: A Study of Frontline Employees. Services Marketing Quarterly. 33: 343-363.
  • Kim H.J, Shin K.H, Swanger N. (2009) Burnout and engagement: A comparative analysis using the Big Five personality dimensions. International Journal of Hospitality Management 28: 96–104.
  • Kim H.J, Shin K.H, Umbreit W.T. (2007) Hotel job burnout: The role of personality characteristics .International Journal of Hospitality Management. 26:421-434.
  • Koyuncu M, Burke R.J, Fiksenbaum L. (2006) Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish Bank. Equal Opportunities Internationals.25 (4): 299-310.
  • Langelaan, S., Bakker, A.B., Doornen, L.J.P., and Schaufeli, W.B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? Personality and Individual Differences. 40:521-532.
  • Louw J. G. (2014). Burnout, vigour, big five personality traits and social support in a sample of police officers. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40 (1), 1-13.
  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W.B., & Leiter, M.P. (2001). Job Burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
  • Montgomery, A., Spânu, F., Băban, A., & Panagopoulou, E. (2015). Job demands, burnout, and engagement among nurses: A multi-level analysis of ORCAB data investigating the moderating effect of teamwork. Burnout research, 2(2-3), 71-79.
  • Neha A, Ventatesh K.G. (2015) Work Engagement and Personality. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 5(11): 1-5.
  • Olivier, A.L, Rothmann, S. (2007). Antecedents of Work Engagement in a Multinational Oil Company. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology33 (3): 49-56.
  • Ongore, O. (2014). A study of relationship between Personality Traits and Job engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141:1315-1319Psychology, 10 (4): 177–181.
  • Rantanen, J., Kinnunen, U., and Pulkkinen, L. (2008). The role of personality and role engagement in work-family balance. Horizons of Psychology. 22: 14-26.
  • Rothmann, S., Coetzer E. P. (2003). The Big Five personality Dimensions and Job performance. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology. 29(1): 68-74.
  • Sarath, P., & Manikandan, K. (2014). Work engagement and Work related wellbeing of School teachers. Selp Journal of Social Science, 5(22), 93-100.
  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job esources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 25, 293–315.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonza´ lez-Roma´, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
  • Shirom, A. (2004). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affect inorganizations. In D. Ganster & P. L. Perrewe (Eds.), Research in organizational stress and well-being (Vol.3, pp. 135–165). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Shirom A. (2007). Explaining vigor: On the antecedents and consequences of vigor as a positive affect at work. Positive organizational behaviour. 86-100.
  • Shirom, A. (2010). Feeling energetic at work: On vigor’s antecedents1, 2. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 69.
  • Sonnentag, S.and Niessen, C. (2008). Staying vigorous until work is over: The role of trait vigour, day-specific work experiences and recovery. Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology. 81: 435-458.
  • Storm, K., & Rothmann, S. (2003). A psychometric analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in the South African police service. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(4), 62-70.
  • Sulea, C., Virga, D., Maricutoiu, L.P, Schaufeli, W., Dumitru, C. Z., and Sava, F.A. (2012). Work engagement as mediator between job characteristics and positive and negative extrarole behaviors. Career Development International. 17: 188-207.
  • Wolff, H. G and Kim, S. (2011). The relationship between networking and the big five personality dimension. Career Development International. 17(1): 43-66.
  • Woods, S. A, Sofat, J.A. (2013) Personality and engagement at work: the mediating role of psychological meaningfulness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 43: 2203-2210.
  • Yalabik, Z.Y, Popaitoon P, Chowne J.A and Rayton B. A. (2013). Work engagement as a mediator between attitudes and outcomes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
  • Zaidi, N.R, Wajid R.A, Zaidi F.B, Zaidi G.B, Zaidi M.T. (2013).The big five personality traits and their relationship with work engagement among public sector university teachers of Lahore. African Journal of Business Management. 7(15): 1344-1353.
  • Zellars, K.L., Perrewé, P.L., & Hochwater, W.A. (2000). Burnout in health care: The role of the five factors of personality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(8):1570–1598.

Abstract Views: 470

PDF Views: 2




  • Personality Traits and Work Engagement: A Case Study on Female Bank Employees in Banking Sector

Abstract Views: 470  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Esha Bansal
HP University Business School, Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla, India
Puneet Bhushan
HP University Business School, Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla, India
Yashwant Gupta
HP University Business School, Himachal Pradesh University, Summerhill, Shimla, India

Abstract


The purpose of the present study is to explore whether there is any qualifying relationship between personality traits and work engagement, also, the level of work engagement and big five personality traits among female employees in Himachal Pradesh. Relevant data through questionnaire was collected from 150 female employees working in 3 different Public sector banks namely State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank and UCO Bank in the state of Himachal Pradesh. The results of the study specified that there was a significant positive relationship between work engagement and big five personality traits. Extraversion, Agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness were significantly related to work engagement and its dimensions namely vigor, dedication and absorption whereas neuroticism was found to be negatively related to the work engagement and the three dimensions of it. The level of work engagement was high in public sector whereas extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness were average except the agreeableness trait of personality was high.

Keywords


Personality Traits, Work Engagement, Vigor, Dedication and Absorption.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.23862/kiit-parikalpana%2F2020%2Fv16%2Fi1-2%2F204557