Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Ceramics of Tajul Shuhaizam Said


Affiliations
1 University of Education Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


After years of doing ceramics, which include the standard pieces of pottery with a bulbous body, a handle, a spout, incised, then glazed, fired and finally exhibited, I beginning to understand that there should be more than one way to appreciate forms. A teapot, or instance, is supposed to contain hot water into which to drop a tea bag: the form and function way of looking at things. Now, I see form as something separate from function: form as form, whose functions are unclear. I would rather insist that the function is purely visual. The object stands by itself, embodying its own objectness, celebrating its own uniqueness, inviting any number of interpretations as to what it is. Using sponge cut into shape, and then dipped in liquidized 'eco clay', I experiments with a variety of bulging forms that resemble things in nature: twisted trunk, deformed rock, petrified embryo, encrusted mushrooms, and enlarged human organ. When the viewer confers such resemblances, I have been lured into participating with nature, just as I have done, prior to, or as I create, these bulges and humps. Whatever narratives that follow henceforth enrich the viewer's appreciation of a form as a thing-in-itself, one in which ideas begat other ideas, familiar as well as unfamiliar ones, the ordinary and the sublime weaving themselves as part of the subtext, the implicit message. I wants to see whether this is one way to expand the boundaries of what is acceptable in an art I has been so long tamed in recognizable shapes, glazed, smooth, and when held on a pedestal, untouchable.

Keywords

Ceramics, Tajul Shuhaizam Said.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Frank, Janet Hammer (1997) The Potter's Dictionary of Material and Techniques 4th. Ed. London: A&C Black Publisher Limited.
  • Glosari Budaya Malaysia (1995) Corak dan Motif. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
  • Leigh, Barbara (2000) Changing Face of the Malaysia Craft: Identity, Industry and Ingenity, Shah Alam: Oxford University Press.
  • Mubin Sheepard (1992) Taman Indera. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Neil J. Salkind (2000) Exploring Research (Fourth Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
  • Nik Hassan Nik Shuhaimi Nik Abdul Rahman (ed.) (1998) The Encyclopedia Of Malaysia (Vol.4) Early History. Kuala Lumpur: Archipelago Press.
  • Nik Hassan Nik Shuhaimi Nik Abdul Rahman (ed.) (1999) Kelantan Dalam Perspektif Arkeologi Satu Kumpulan Esei. Kota Bharu: Perbadanan Muzium Negeri Kelantan.
  • Othman Mohd Yatim (1981) Penggunaan Tembikar Dalam Masyarakat Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Muzium Negara.
  • Raja Chulan Raja Hamid (1962) Misa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Pustaka Antara.
  • R. J. Wilkinson (ed.) (1909) Malay Industries. Part 1. Art and Craft. Kuala Lumpur: Federated Malay State Government Press.
  • Siti Zainon Ismail (1997) The Traditional Malay Handicraft Design. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
  • S. Othman Kelantan dalam Rahmah Bujang dan Nor Azlin Hamidon (2002) Kesenian Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Akademik Pengajian Melayu Universiti Malaya.
  • Susan Harnly Peterson (1995) The Craft And Art Of Clay. (2nd Edition) London: Laurence King Publishing.
  • Susan Harnly Peterson (1998) Working with Clay an Introduction. London: Laurence King Publishing.
  • Syed Ahmad Jamal (1992) Rupa & Jiwa. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
  • Tony Birks (1997) The Complete Potter's Companion (New Edition). London: Conran Octopus.
  • Winstead Richard (1958) The Malays, a Cultural History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
  • Zakaria Ali (1989) Seni dan Seniman, Esei-Esei Seni Halus. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
  • Zuraina Majid (2003) Archaeology in Malaysia. Pulau Pinang: Pusat Penyelidikan Arkeologi Malaysia, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
  • Adi Taha (2000) Tembikar Pra-sejarah di Malaysia-satu survei. Shah Alam: Seminar Tembikar dari Warisan ke Wawasan. Muzium Selangor.
  • Mohd Mokhtar Saidin (2004) Bukit Bunuh Lenggong Malaysia: A New Evidence of Late Pleistocene Culture in Malaysia and Southeast Asia. In: 10th European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeological Conference, 14-17 September 2004, London.
  • Othman Mohd Yatim (2000) Penggunaan Tembikar Dalam Masyarakat Malaysia, Shah Alam: Seminar Tembikar dari Warisan ke Wawasan. Muzium Selangor.
  • Siti Zainon (2000) Serpihan Tembikar Neolitik dan Kesinambungan, Shah Alam: Seminar Tembikar dari Warisan ke Wawasan. Muzium Selangor.
  • Adi Taha (1983) Recent Archaeological, Discovery In Peninsula Malaysia, JMBRAS. Vol. 56.
  • Adi Taha (1989) Archaeological, Prehistoric, Protohistoric and Historic Study of Tembeling Valley, Pahang West Malaysia, JAM. Bil. 2/1989.
  • Asyaari Muhammad (2002) Perkembangan Tembikar Pra-sejarah, dalam Jurnal Arkeologi Malaysia, Bil. 15-2002.
  • Colling, H.D (1940) Notes On The Pottery Excavated From Gol Ba'it, Sungai Siput Perak. Proc.3rd Congress of Prehistorians of the Far East.
  • Colling, H.D (1936) Report Of An Archaeological Excavation in Kedah, Malay Peninsular. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum.
  • G.DE G. Sieveking (1956) Pottery Cones From kodiang (Kedah). JMBRAS 29, Part 1.
  • G.DE G. Sieveking (1956) The Iron Age Collections of Malaya, JMBRAS 29, Part 2.
  • Ivor H. N. Evans (1928) On Slab-Built Graves in Perak.JFMS.
  • Leong Sau Heng (1977) Ancient Finds from Kampong Jenderam Hilir, Malaysia in History.
  • Leong Sau Heng (1980) Archeology in Peninsular Malaysia, 1976-1979, Indonesia Circle
  • Leong Sau Heng (1987) Recent Research on the Neolithic Peninsular Malaysia, "Seminar on Prehistory of Southeast Asia Digest."
  • Leong Sau Heng (1990) A Tripod Pottery Complex in Peninsular Malaysia in Ian Glover and Emily Glover (ed) Southeast Asian Archaelogy, BAR. International series.
  • L.Wray (1903) The Malayan Pottery of Perak, Journal Anthropological Institute.
  • Mokhtar Abu Bakar (1979) Perusahaan di Kampung Pasir Durian, Kuala Tembeling, Jerantut, Pahang. Rencana Muzium Sultan Abu Bakar, Pahang Darul Makmur.
  • Nik Hassan Shuhaimi Nik Abdul Rahman (1995) Arkeologi Di Malaysia: Antara Matlamat Dan Realiti, JAM, Bil. 8.
  • Othman Yatim (2002) Seni dan Peradaban di Perak: Satu Tinjauan Sejarah, JAM Bil 15.
  • Peacock BAV (1959) A Short Description Of Malayan Prehistoric Pottery. Asian Perspective 3.
  • Peacock BAV (1964) The Kodiang Pottery Cones, Tripod Pottery In Malay And Thailand With A Note On Bukit Tengku Lembu Black Ware. FMJ
  • Stephen Chia Ming Soon (1997) Pre Historic Pottery Sources And Technology In Peninsular Malaysia Based On Compositional And Morphological Studies. Malaysia Museum Journal. (Vol. 33 news series)
  • Tweedie, M.W.F (1940) Report on Excavations in Kelantan. JMBRAS Volume 18, part 2.
  • Tweedie, M.W.F (1953) The Stone Age in Malaya. JMBRAS Volume 26, part 2 (No. 162).
  • William-Hunt (1951) Recent Archaeological Discoveries in Malaya, JMBRAS 25, part 1.
  • Winstedt R.O. (1909) Malay Industries. Part I. Arts and Crafts. Kuala Lumpur: F.M.S Government Press.

Abstract Views: 207

PDF Views: 0




  • The Ceramics of Tajul Shuhaizam Said

Abstract Views: 207  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Tajul Shuhaizam Said
University of Education Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
Harozila Ramli
University of Education Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
Mohd Fauzi Sedon
University of Education Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia

Abstract


After years of doing ceramics, which include the standard pieces of pottery with a bulbous body, a handle, a spout, incised, then glazed, fired and finally exhibited, I beginning to understand that there should be more than one way to appreciate forms. A teapot, or instance, is supposed to contain hot water into which to drop a tea bag: the form and function way of looking at things. Now, I see form as something separate from function: form as form, whose functions are unclear. I would rather insist that the function is purely visual. The object stands by itself, embodying its own objectness, celebrating its own uniqueness, inviting any number of interpretations as to what it is. Using sponge cut into shape, and then dipped in liquidized 'eco clay', I experiments with a variety of bulging forms that resemble things in nature: twisted trunk, deformed rock, petrified embryo, encrusted mushrooms, and enlarged human organ. When the viewer confers such resemblances, I have been lured into participating with nature, just as I have done, prior to, or as I create, these bulges and humps. Whatever narratives that follow henceforth enrich the viewer's appreciation of a form as a thing-in-itself, one in which ideas begat other ideas, familiar as well as unfamiliar ones, the ordinary and the sublime weaving themselves as part of the subtext, the implicit message. I wants to see whether this is one way to expand the boundaries of what is acceptable in an art I has been so long tamed in recognizable shapes, glazed, smooth, and when held on a pedestal, untouchable.

Keywords


Ceramics, Tajul Shuhaizam Said.

References