Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Genotoxic Effect of Methyl Methacrylate and Nickelcobalt-Chromium in Dental Lab Technicians: A Micronuclei and Cytomorphometric Study of Buccal Mucosal Cells


Affiliations
1 Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Dental laboratory technicians are exposed routinely to non precious metal alloys such as chromium, cobalt, nickel, and methyl methacrylate (MMA). These chemicals are considered potentially toxic substances and are known to cause chromosomal damage and nuclear alterations. Buccal mucosa cells are very sensitive to toxicity as they readily form micronuclei (MN), in response to toxic exposure. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate MN frequency and analyze the cellular alterations, if any, using quantitative cytomorphometric analysis in the buccal mucosal cells of dental lab technicians. The study comprised 28 dental lab technicians who were exposed to acrylic (MMA) and metal (nickel, cobalt, and chromium) for a minimum of 5 years with 8h daily exposure. Twenty‑eight individuals with no known exposure were selected as control group. For MN frequency, cytosmears were prepared from both study subjects and control group and were stained with Feulgen reaction. Cytosmears were made and stained by Papanicolaou's stain, and cytomorphometric analysis was done using Caliper Pro4.2 Image Analysis Software. The MN frequency and cytoplasmic area (CA)/nuclear area (NA) was compared using one‑way ANOVA among dental lab technicians who were categorized into three groups, i.e., exposed only to acrylic (MMA), exposed only to metal (nickel, cobalt, and chromium) and exposed to both metal and acrylic. The mean occurrence of MN frequency was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the study individuals when compared to the control group. When individual exposure was considered, subjects exposed to both acrylic and metals showed an increased mean frequency of MN, which was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Quantitative analysis showed a definite increase in the NA and CA/NA (P < 0.05) and decrease in CA (P < 0.05) in study subjects when compared to the control group. Comparison of these cellular and nuclear parameters in the three divided groups did not show any significant changes. The findings of the present study signify that exposure to nickel, chromium, cobalt, and MMA induce genotoxic effect in exfoliated buccal epithelial cells, in addition, the significant quantitative cellular alterations are also seen which indicate a potential health risk for dental lab technicians. Therefore, to ensure maximum occupational safety, biomonitoring is of great value for assessing the risk for dental lab technicians.

Keywords

Cytomorphometry, Dental Lab Technicians, Feulgen Reaction, Genotoxicity, Micronuclei.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Rom WN, Lockey JE, Lee JS, Kimball AC, Bang KM, Leaman H et al. Pneumoconiosis and exposures of dental laboratory technicians. Am J Public Health. 1984; 74:1252‑7.
  • Qayyum S, Ara A, Usmani JA. Effect of nickel and chromium exposure on buccal cells of electroplaters. Toxicol Ind Health. 2012; 28:74–82.
  • Azhar DA, Syed S, Luqman M, Ali AA. Evaluation of methyl methacrylate monomer cytotoxicity in dental lab technicians using buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Dent Mater J. 2013; 32:519–21.
  • Mahimkar MB, Samant TA, Kannan S, Patil T. Influence of genetic polymorphisms on frequency of micronucleated buccal epithelial cells in leukoplakia patients. Oral Oncol. 2010; 46:761–6.
  • Rosin MP, Zhang L, Poh C. Molecular markers of oral premalignant lesion risk. Head and Neck Cancer – Emerging Perspectives. California, (USA): Elsevier Science. 2003; 245–59.
  • Stich HF, Stich W, Parida BB. Elevated frequency of micronucleated cells in the buccal mucosa of individuals at high risk for oral cancer: betel quid chewers. Cancer Lett. 1982; 17:125–34.
  • Stich HF, Rosin MP, Vallejera MO. Reduction with Vitamin A and beta‑carotene administration of proportion of micronucleated.
  • Ramaesh T, Mendis BR, Ratnatunga N, Thattil RO. Cytomorphometric analysis of squames obtained from normal oral mucosa and lesions of oral leukoplakia and squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 1998; 27:83–6.
  • Ramaesh T, Mendis BR, Ratnatunga N, Thattil RO. The effect of tobacco smoking and of betel chewing with tobacco on the buccal mucosa: a cytomorphometric analysis. J Oral Pathol Med. 1999; 28:385–8.
  • Pektas ZO, Keskin A, Günhan O, Karslioglu Y. Evaluation of nuclear morphometry and DNA ploidy status for detection of malignant and premalignant oral lesions: quantitative cytologic assessment and review of methods for cytomorphometric measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64:628–35.
  • Prasad H, Ramesh V, Balamurali P. Morphologic and cytomorphometric analysis of exfoliated buccal mucosal cells in diabetes patients. J Cytol. 2010; 27:113–7.
  • Keles M, Tozoglu U, Unal D, Caglayan F, Uyanik A, Emre H, Exfoliative cytology of oral mucosa in kidney transplant a cytomorphometric study. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43:871–5.
  • Tolbert PE, Shy CM, Allen JW. Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res. 1992; 271:69–77.
  • Thomas P, Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch‑Volders M, Bonassi S, Zeiger E, Buccal micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc. 2009; 4:825–37.
  • Babuta S, Garg R, Mogra K, Dagal N. Cytomorphometrical analysis of exfoliated buccal mucosal cells: Effect of smoking. Acta Med Int. 2014; 1:22–7.
  • Burgaz S, Demircigil GC, Yilmazer M, Ertas N, Kemaloglu Y, Burgaz Y. Assessment of cytogenetic damage in lymphocytes and in exfoliated nasal cells of dental laboratory technicians exposed to chromium, cobalt, and nickel. Mutat Res. 2002; 521:47–56.
  • Sellappa S, Prathyumnan S, Joseph S, Keyan KA. Micronucleus test in exfoliated buccal cells from chromium exposed tannery workers. Int J Biosci Biochem Bioinform. 2011; 1:58–62.
  • Benova D, Hadjidekova V, Hristova R, Nikolova T, Boulanova M, Georgieva I, Cytogenetic effects of hexavalent chromium in Bulgarian chromium platers. Mutat Res. 2002; 514:29–38.
  • Nersesyan A, Kundi M, Atefie K, Schulte‑Hermann R, Knasmüller S. Effect of staining procedures on the results of micronucleus assays with exfoliated oral mucosa cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15:1835–40.
  • Acharya S, Tayaar SA, Khwaja T. Cytomorphometric analysis of the keratinocytes obtained from clinically normal buccal mucosa in chronic gutkha chewers. J Cranio Max Dis. 2013; 2:134–41.

Abstract Views: 526

PDF Views: 3




  • Genotoxic Effect of Methyl Methacrylate and Nickelcobalt-Chromium in Dental Lab Technicians: A Micronuclei and Cytomorphometric Study of Buccal Mucosal Cells

Abstract Views: 526  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Satyajit S. Topajiche
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India
B. R. Smitha
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India
Sarvani J. Murthy
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India
Manashvini S. Patil
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India
R. Karthik Kumar
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India
Mitesh Pradip Solanki
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sri Hasanamba Dental College and Hospital, India

Abstract


Dental laboratory technicians are exposed routinely to non precious metal alloys such as chromium, cobalt, nickel, and methyl methacrylate (MMA). These chemicals are considered potentially toxic substances and are known to cause chromosomal damage and nuclear alterations. Buccal mucosa cells are very sensitive to toxicity as they readily form micronuclei (MN), in response to toxic exposure. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate MN frequency and analyze the cellular alterations, if any, using quantitative cytomorphometric analysis in the buccal mucosal cells of dental lab technicians. The study comprised 28 dental lab technicians who were exposed to acrylic (MMA) and metal (nickel, cobalt, and chromium) for a minimum of 5 years with 8h daily exposure. Twenty‑eight individuals with no known exposure were selected as control group. For MN frequency, cytosmears were prepared from both study subjects and control group and were stained with Feulgen reaction. Cytosmears were made and stained by Papanicolaou's stain, and cytomorphometric analysis was done using Caliper Pro4.2 Image Analysis Software. The MN frequency and cytoplasmic area (CA)/nuclear area (NA) was compared using one‑way ANOVA among dental lab technicians who were categorized into three groups, i.e., exposed only to acrylic (MMA), exposed only to metal (nickel, cobalt, and chromium) and exposed to both metal and acrylic. The mean occurrence of MN frequency was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the study individuals when compared to the control group. When individual exposure was considered, subjects exposed to both acrylic and metals showed an increased mean frequency of MN, which was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Quantitative analysis showed a definite increase in the NA and CA/NA (P < 0.05) and decrease in CA (P < 0.05) in study subjects when compared to the control group. Comparison of these cellular and nuclear parameters in the three divided groups did not show any significant changes. The findings of the present study signify that exposure to nickel, chromium, cobalt, and MMA induce genotoxic effect in exfoliated buccal epithelial cells, in addition, the significant quantitative cellular alterations are also seen which indicate a potential health risk for dental lab technicians. Therefore, to ensure maximum occupational safety, biomonitoring is of great value for assessing the risk for dental lab technicians.

Keywords


Cytomorphometry, Dental Lab Technicians, Feulgen Reaction, Genotoxicity, Micronuclei.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.22506/ti%2F2015%2Fv22%2Fi2%2F137655