Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Angadi, Mallikarjun
- Publication Productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences:A Scientometric Study
Abstract Views :298 |
PDF Views:12
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sir Dorabji Tata Memorial Library, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
2 Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, IN
3 Scientific Information Resource Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, IN
4 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003, IN
1 Sir Dorabji Tata Memorial Library, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
2 Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, IN
3 Scientific Information Resource Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, IN
4 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 43, No 4 (2006), Pagination: 363-374Abstract
This study attempts to analyse quantitatively 358 publications published by the social scientists of Tata Institute of Social Sciences during 2001-2004 in various Departments and Research Units for authorship pattern and collaboration trend. The results indicate that 90.22 % of papers were single authored followed by two authored papers - 5.86 % and three authored papers - 3.35 %. Most prolific authors were Shalini Bharat (21), M. M. Koganuramath (18), Mallikarjun Angadi (13), R. N. Sharma (13), Chhaya Datar (12), Siva Raju (12), and Sarthi Acharya (10). The most preferred journals by the social scientists were: Economic and Political Weekly, Indian Journal of Social Work and Indian Journal of Labour Economics, with four papers each. Publication Density observed in the present study was 1.46.Keywords
Scientometrics, Bibliometrics, Institutional Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Publication Productivity, Authorship Pattern, Collaboration Coefficient, Author Productivity, Channels of Communication, Bradford Distribution, Social Sciences.References
- Pritchard (A). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation. Vol. 25; 1969; p348-349.
- Goel (K); Garg (K C). Social Science Research in India: a bibliometric study. Collection Management. Vol. 17; 1993; p95-104.
- Goel (K). Bibliometrics of social science research in India. University News. Vol. 39; 2001; p9-15.
- Koganuramath (M M); Angadi (M); Kademani (B S). Bibliometric dimension of innovation communication productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Malayasian Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.7 (1); 2002; p69-76.
- Kalyane (V L); Kalyane (S V). Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity system. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. Vol. 38(1); 1991; p8-29.
- Kademani (B S); Vijay Kumar; Surwase (G); Anil Sagar; Lalit Mohan; Gaderao (C R); Anil Kumar; Kalyane (V L); Prakasan (E R). Scientometric dimensions of innovations communication productivity of the chemistry division at Bhabha atomic Research Centre. Malayasian Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.10 (1); 2005; p65-89.
- Yankevich (W F). Analysis of publication invention productivity in some Soviet academic institutions. Scientometrics. Vol.4; 1982; p431 - 437.
- Carpenter (M P); Harris (M). Bibliometric profiles for British academic institutions: an experiment to develop research output indicators. Scientometrics. Vol.14(3-4);1988; p213-233.
- van Ran (A). Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics. Vol.45; 1999; p417-423.
- Subramanyam (K). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of information science. Vol.6; 1983; p33-38.
- Mandatory Archiving and Copyright Issues of Open Access Resources in Institutional Repositories
Abstract Views :303 |
PDF Views:20
Authors
Affiliations
1 G.J. Advani Law College, Mumbai, IN
2 Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, IN
1 G.J. Advani Law College, Mumbai, IN
2 Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 54, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 106-112Abstract
The exponential growth of number of journals and increasing prices has engendered the idea of open access among academic communities. To boost the open access movement and to make it a success many institutions, organizations and funding agencies are framing policies making it mandatory for researchers/academicians to make their intellectual publications available on open access platform. The paper aims to examine the copyright issues related to mandatory open access self-archiving and the availability of defined policies to guide the authors of scholarly publications in mandatory deposition. The relevant data for the study was collected through published literature and websites. The result shows that along with the early advocates, many other Indian institutions and publishers are also gradually moving towards the open access platform. However, sufficient information is not available on the website of institutional repository to determine the archiving rights of the authors.Keywords
Copyright, Institutional Repository, Open Access, Self-Archiving.References
- Ahmed, S.S. & Al‐Baridi, S. (2012). An overview of institutional repository developments in the Arabian Gulf Region. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 28(2): 79-89. DOI: 10.1108/10650751211236613
- Cassella, M. & Calvi, L. (2010). New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment. IFLA Journal. 36(1): 7–15. DOI: 10.1177/0340035209359559. Retreived from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035209359559
- Hanlon, A., & Ramirez, M. (2011). Asking for permission: A survey of copyright workflows for institutional repositories. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 11(2): 683–702. DOI: 10.1353/pla.2011.0015. Retreived from: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0015
- Harter, S. P. & Kim, H. J. (1996). Electronic journals and scholarly communication: A citation and reference study. Information Research, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://www.informationr.net/ir/2-1/paper9a.html
- Hu, D., Luo, A., & Liu, H. (2013). Open access in China and its effect on academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(1), 110-112. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.009
- Rao, P. V. (2007). Institutional repositories: A key role for libraries. 5th International CALIBER -2007, Panjab University, Chandigarh, 2007 Feb 08-10. Retrieved from: http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/1944/1443/1/689-695.pdf
- Rieh, S. Y., Jean, B. S., Yakel, E., Markey, K., & Kim, J. (2008). Perceptions and experiences of staff in the planning and implementation of institutional repositories. Library Trends. 57(2): 168–190. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1353/ lib.0.0027
- Sahu, S. K., & Arya, S. K. (2013). Open access practices in India. Library Hi Tech News. 30(4): 6–12. DOI:10.1108/LHTN-03-2013-0011. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-03-2013-0011
- Spezi, V., Fry, J., Creaser, C., Probets, S. & White, S. (2013). Researchers’ green open access practice: A cross-disciplinary analysis. Journal of Documentation. 69(3): 334–359. DOI: 10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008. Retrieved from: https:// doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2012-0008
- Thorin, S. E. (2003). Global changes in scholarly communication. Libraries’ and Librarians’ Publications. Paper 17. Retrieved from: http://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=sul
- Tise, E. R. (2011). IFLA imperatives: expounding access to information. IFLA Journal. 37(2): 158–161. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352110370020602
- Utulu, S. C. A. & Bolarinwa, O. (2009). Open access initiatives adoption by Nigerian academics. Library Review. 58(9): 660–669. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530910997946
- Woutersen-Windhouwer, S. (2013). The future of open access publishing in the Netherlands: constant dripping wears away the stone. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 39(1): 105–107. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2012.11.015
- Xia, J., Gilchrist, S. B., Smith, N. X. P., Kingery, J. A., Radecki, J. R., Wilhelm, M. L., Harrison, K. C., Ashby, M. L. & Mahn, A. J. (2012). A review of open access self-archiving mandate policies. Libraries and the Academy. 12(1): 85–102. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2012.0000