Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rajendra Babu, H.
- Open Access Initiatives in Life, Biological and Medical Sciences: an Investigative Outlook
Abstract Views :240 |
PDF Views:9
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, IN
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore 570006, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 47, No 2 (2010), Pagination: 133-139Abstract
Published scientific discoveries and ideas are the foundation for future progress in science and medicine. The more widely and freely accessible the literature is, the greater its value to scientists, researchers, doctors, students and the general public. Unfettered access to research literature will allow scientists, physicians, educators, students, and the general public to find and read the latest scientific and medical discoveries. Authors have discussed various open access initiatives in this article which include OpenWetWare (OWW), The Public Library of Science (PLoS), Protocol Online, PubMed and PubMed Central (PMC), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and 3 QUARKS Daily.Keywords
Open Access Initializes, Life Sciences.
References
- Budapest Open Access Initiative. Accessed on 30th Nov 2009 from http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
- Waldrop (M M). Science 2.0 - Is open access science the future? Scientific American. May 2008. Retrieved January 11, 2009 from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0
- Science 2.0/ Brainstorming. Retrieved January 10, 2009 from http://openwetware.org/wiki/Science_2.0/ Brainstorming
- Public Library of Science (PLoS) http://www.plos.org/ Accessed on 30th Nov 2009
- Protocol Online Accessed on 30th Nov 2009 from http://www.protocol-online.org/
- PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
- PubMed Central (PMC), Accessed on 30th Nov 2009 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/intro.ht Accessed on 30th Nov 2009 from ml
- Directory of Open Access Journals Accessed on 30th Nov 2009 from http://www.doaj.org/ and http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/Directory_of_Open_Access_Journals
- 3 QUARKS Daily Accessed on 30th Nov 2009 from http://www.3quarksdaily.com/
- Citation False Practices in the Library and Information Science Theses:A Case Study of Shodhganga ETD Database
Abstract Views :298 |
PDF Views:11
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, B.H Road - 572103, Tumakuru, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, B.H Road - 572103, Tumakuru, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 56, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 13-17Abstract
Citations symbolize the conceptual association of scientific ideas published by researchers and authors. By the references they cite in their papers, authors make explicit linkages between the current research and prior work in the universe of scientific literature. The practice of citing has been there for a long time. A form of citation index was first found in 12th century Hebrew religious literature. The present study has been conducted using Shodhganga, one of the most popular theses and dissertations databases in India. The study was conducted to assess the use of popular style guides in Library and Information science theses, as library fraternity are known to be well versed with the style guides. The study was conducted by downloading the theses submitted by the departments of Library and Information Science of seven state universities in Karnataka. There are a total of 208 theses uploaded onto Shodhganga ETD database. The results show that the department of LIS, Karnatak University, Dharwad, has uploaded 89 theses. A total of 1000 referencing faults were found. 136 theses used American Psychological Association (APA) and 72 theses used Chicago reference styles. There were 32.73% spelling mistakes (mostly in the titles and headings), 25.45% numbering and 41.82% mentioning year faults found among all the theses. On a whole, it is found that theses from Karnatak University, Dharwad have more number of both intexts as well as end-text referencing faults.Keywords
American Psychological Association (APA), Chicago, End-text Reference, In-text Reference, Reference Faults, Shodhganga, Theses.References
- Bhat, M.I., Mudhol, M.V. and Mahesh, V. (2014). Importance of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETD’s) on Internet: A survey of Indian ETD repository Shodganga, International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 4(2).
- Dhanavandan, S. and Tamizhchelvan, M. (2013). Development of Shodhganga Repository for Electronic Theses and Dissertations in Tamil Nadu: A Study, International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(4).
- Gorman, G.E. (2008). “They can’t read, but they sure can count” Flawed rules of the journal rankings game, Online Information Review, 32(6), p. 705-08. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810923872
- Hapgood, M. and Knipp, D.J. (2016). Data citation and availability: Striking a balance between the ideal and the practical, Space Weather, 14(11), p. 919-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001553.
- Horkoff, Tara and McLean, S. (2015). Writing for Success 1st Canadian Edition, e-book. Data accessed 14th September 2018. Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/writingforsuccess/.
- Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in Academic Writing. Disciplinary Discourses, Michigan Classics Ed.; 232p. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6719. https://www.press.umich.edu/6719/disciplinary_discourses_michigan_classics_ed.
- Jaffe, A.B. and De Rassenfosse, G. (2017). Patent citation data in social science research: Overview and best practices, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(6), p. 1360-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23731.
- Kappetein, A.P., Head, S.J., Genereux, P., Piazza, N., Van Mieghem, N.M., Blackstone, E.H.,... and Hahn, R.T. (2012). Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 60(15), p. 1438-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.001. PMid: 23036636.
- Lal, D.D. (2012). Consortia based electronic information resource sharing in department of Biotechnology Institutes in India, ALIS, 59(3), p. 181-86. Data accessed on 27th July 2018. Retrieved from http://nopr.niscair.res.in/.
- University Grants Commission Regulations 2016: Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.PHIL./PH.D Degrees. In: supersession of the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Awards of M.Phil./Ph.D. Degree) Regulation (2009). Notified in The Gazette of India [No. 28, Part III- Section 4] for the week July 11-July 17, 2009. Retrieved from https://cbseugcnetforum.in/media/ugc-regulations-2016-minimum-standards-procedure-award-m-phil-ph-d-degrees-www-ugc-ac-in/.
- Wikipedia (2018). Citation. Data accessed on 12th September 2018. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation.
- A Correlation Comparative Analysis of Top Articles in Library and Information Science using Citation and Altmetric Attention Scores
Abstract Views :364 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library & Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru, Karnataka - 572103, IN
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library & Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru, Karnataka - 572103, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 58, No 3 (2021), Pagination: 157-164Abstract
A comparative analysis of the top articles published in library and information science journals has been carried out using correlation comparison between the traditional citations v/s modern score derived by the approach of altmetrics score. The common approach points for the study are: finding the most popular social media platform for Altmetric studies; the most popular LIS articles grabbed social media attention; and conducting the correlation comparison of citation and altmetric attention scores. Top 10 LIS journals with the highest Google scholar metrics in terms of h5-index were selected. After analysis, the top ten articles were selected on the basis of highly cited articles, altmetrics attention score, countrywise twitting. The first article has got the highest citations and AAS with 1528 and 1972 respectively and also got highest online attentions from Mendeley with 1930 readers and featured in 31 tweets. Paper-9 has got the highest of 196 tweets, followed by paper 3 & 7 with 99 and 59 tweets respectively. Overall the AAA score, outscored the citations for all articles considered for the study. USA tops the list in the tweeting these top articles with 73, with 51 UK secured second position in twitting scholarly literature. The results found that a significant difference with a negative correlation at r (9) =-.106, p=.770. The study suggests that Indian scholars need to use social media sites such as Blogs, Tweets, Facebook, Wiki, Mendeley and others to enable the scholarly literature to reach the wider audience efficiently and effectively.Keywords
Altmetrics, Online Attention Score, Top LIS Articles, Tweets.References
- Altmetrics.com. (2019). When did Altmetric start tracking attention to each attention source? DS Metrics. https://help. altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000136884-when-did-altmetric-start-trackingattention-to-each-attention-source-.
- Anne Kennan, M. (2011). Learning to share: Mandates and open access. Library Management, 32(4/5), 302-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111132301.
- Barakat, A. F., Nimri, N., Shokr, M., Mahtta, D., Mansoor, H., Mojadidi, M. K., Mahmoud, A. N., Senussi, M., Masri, A. and Elgendy, I. Y. (2018). Correlation of Altmetric Attention Score with Article Citations in Cardiovascular Research. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 72(8), 952-953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.062. PMid:30115234.
- Bornmann, L. (2014). Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.09.005.
- Costas, R., Zahedi, Z. and Wouters, P. (2015). Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective: Do “Altmetrics” Correlate With Citations? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 2003-2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23309.
- Delgado-López-Cózar, E. and Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2012). Google Scholar Metrics: An unreliable tool for assessing Scientific Journals. El Profesional de La Informacion, 21(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2012.jul.15.
- Donato, H. (2014). Traditional and alternative metrics: The full story of impact. Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, 20(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppneu.2013.11.001. PMid:24355173.
- Enago, A. (2017, October 17). Understanding Research Metrics: Journal-Level, Article-Level, and Author-Level. Enago Academy. https://www.enago.com/academy/whatare- different-research-metrics/.
- Erfanmanesh, M. (2017). Highly-alted articles in Library and Information Science. Webology, 14(2), 12. http://www.webology.org/2017/v14n2/a158.pdf.
- Hamari, J., Sjöklint, M. and Ukkonen, A. (2016). The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(9), 2047-2059. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.23552.
- Hammarfelt, B. (2014). Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1419-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3.
- Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C. R., Thelwall, M. and Larivière, V. (2014). Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature: Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 656-669. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101.
- Heydari, S., Shekofteh, M. and Kazerani, M. (2019). Relationship between Altmetrics and Citations A Study on the Highly Cited Research Papers. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(4), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.4.14204.
- HTOO, T. H. H. and NA, J.-C. (2015). Comparison of Altmetrics across Multiple Disciplines: Psychology, History, and Linguistics. International Conference of Asian Special Libraries 4th ICoASL 2015, April 22-24, 1-12. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/library_research/50.
- Huang, W., Wang, P. and Wu, Q. (2018). A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journals. PLOS ONE, 13(4), e0194962. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194962. PMid:29621253 PMCid:PMC5886419.
- J, C. (2019). Twitter: Annual growth rate worldwide 2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/303723/twitters- annual-growth-rate-worldwide/.
- Jaring, P. and Bäck, A. (2017). How Researchers use Social Media to Promote their Research and Network with Industry. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(8), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1098.
- Jason, P., Dario, T., Paul, G. and Cameron, N. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto - altmetrics.org. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
- Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P. and Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005.
- Lua, A. (2019, January 24). 21 Top Social Media Sites to Consider for Your Brand. Buffer Marketing Library. https://buffer.com/library/social-media-sites.
- Maggio, L. A., Leroux, T. C., Meyer, H. S. and Artino, A. R. (2018). Exploring the relationship between altmetrics and traditional measures of dissemination in health professions education. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/260059.
- Mongeon, P. and Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
- Nemati-Anaraki, L., Aghajani Koupaei, H. and Alibeyk, M. (2017). The relationship between altmetric score with received citations in Iranian pediatrics articles. F1000Research, 6, 1221. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12020.1.
- Phillips, A. (2010). Blog to the Future? Journal of Scholarly Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.42.1.16.
- Powell, D. A., Jacob, C. J. and Chapman, B. J. (2012). Using Blogs and New Media in Academic Practice: Potential Roles in Research, Teaching, Learning, and Extension. Innovative Higher Education, 37(4), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-011-9207-7.
- Rangaswamy and Rajendra Babu, H. (2020). An Altmetric Analysis of Top Journals in Library and Information Science. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11567901.
- Rosenkrantz, A. B., Ayoola, A., Singh, K. and Duszak, R. (2017). Alternative Metrics (“Altmetrics”) for Assessing Article Impact in Popular General Radiology Journals. Academic Radiology, 24(7), 891-897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019. PMid:28256440.
- Schramm, L. (2017). Technological Innovation: An Introduction. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429190.
- Sebastian, N. (2020). Social Media Usage and Trends 2019 GoodFirms Research. https://www.goodfirms.co/resources/social-media-usage-trends-research.
- Statista (2019). Countries with most Twitter users 2019. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/.
- Statista (2020). Number of social media users worldwide 2010-2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-networkusers/.
- Sun, X., Li, B., Ding, K. and Lin, Y. (2018). Who says what about the most-discussed articles of Altmetric? Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in Transition, 7. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/64521.
- Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236.
- Trueger, N. S., Thoma, B., Hsu, C. H., Sullivan, D., Peters, L. and Lin, M. (2015). The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 66(5), 549-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.04.022. PMid:26004769.
- UNESCO (2015). Research evaluation metrics-UNESCO Digital Library. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232210.
- Vysakh, C. and Babu, R. H. (2019). Citations v/s Altmetric Attention Score: A Comparison of Top 10 Highly Cited Papers in Nature. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1. https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1P4-2300552517/citations- v-s-altmetric-attention-score-a-comparison.
- Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007.
- Wooldridge, J. and King, M. B. (2019). Altmetric scores: An early indicator of research impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(3), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24122.
- Altmetrics Linked Scholarly Information from Dimensions.ai Datasets for the Top 100 LIS Articles
Abstract Views :248 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Studies and Research in Library and Information Science, Tumkur University, Tumakuru – 572103, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 58, No 3 (2021), Pagination: 197-208Abstract
This paper examines the presence of Library and Information Science articles in social media platforms by considering the top 100 highly socially cited articles from the Dimensions database. The study examines the association between major metrics. Data were collected from Dimensions.ai, Altmetrics.com, WoS, Google Scholar, and analyzed. The findings suggest that all the 100 LIS articles have got at least one mention from nine different social media platforms with increased attention from Mendeley and Twitter. The article “Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of Gender studies and the other social sciences” authored by Therese Soderlund et al., has been the top socially cited article in Dimensions with an altmetricss attention score of 684. The study found a weak positive correlation between social media citation with major citations from Web of Science (r=0.19), Google Scholar(r=0.18) and Dimensions(r=0.19). This is the first of its kind study to measure the social media attention of LIS articles based on the Dimensions dataset and the result gives more insights to LIS authors for evaluating the societal impact of their research using altmetricss indicators.Keywords
Altmetrics, Altmetrics Attention Score, Dimensions, Library and Information Science, Social Media Citation, Social Media Metrics, Web Citation.References
- Akella, A. P., Alhoori, H., Kondamudi, P. R., Freeman, C. and Zhou, H. (2020). Early indicators of scientific impact: Predicting citations with altmetricss. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101128.
- Alhoori, H., Choudhury, S. R., Kanan, T., Furuta, R., Fox, E. A. and Giles, C. L. (2015). On the relationship between open access and altmetricss. Proceedings of the I Conference; p. 1-8.
- Alhoori, H., Furuta, R., Tabet, M., Samaka, M. and Fox, E. A. (2014). Altmetricss for country-level research assessment. In ICADL, pp. 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12823-8_7.
- Aung, H. H., Link, N. and Sara Aw, A. (2019). Investigating Familiarity and Usage of Traditional Metrics and Altmetricss. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24162.
- Costas, R., Zahedi, Z. and Wouters, P. (2015). The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(3), 260-288. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2014- 0173.
- Dimensions. (2021). Retrieved March 2, 2021, from https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication?search_ mode=content&order=altmetrics.
- Dixon, D. L. and Baker, W. L. (2020). Short-term impact of Altmetrics Attention Scores on citation counts in selected major pharmacy journals. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 3(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.1141.
- Erfanmanesh, M. (2017). Highly-alted articles in library and information science. Webology, 14(2), 66-77.
- Erfanmanesh, M., Noorhidawati, A. and Abrizah, A. (2019). What can Bookmetrix tell us about the impact of Springer Nature’s books? Scientometrics, 121(1), 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03198-6.
- Ezema Ifeanyi, J. and Ugwu, C. I. (2017). Measuring Research Impact of Library and Information Science Journals : Citation verses Altmetricss. IFLA Library, 1-10.
- Ezema Ifeanyi, J. and Ugwu, C. I. (2019). Correlating research impact of library and information science journals using citation counts and altmetricss attention. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(3), 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-08-2018-0029.
- Galligan, F. and Dyas-Correi, S. (2013). Altmetricss: Rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review, 39(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2013.10765486
- Haustein, S., Bowman, T. D., Holmberg, K., Peters, I. and Larivière, V. (2014a). Astrophysicists on Twitter: An in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behaviour. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0081.
- Haustein, S., Peters, I., Bar-Ilan, J., Priem, J., Shema, H. and Terliesner, J. (2014b). Coverage and adoption of altmetricss sources in the bibliometric community. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1221-3.
- Holmberg, K., Hedman, J., Bowman, T. D., Didegah, F. and Laakso, M. (2019). Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetrics activity than articles in subscription- based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities. Scientometrics, 122(1), 645- 659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x.
- Jane, C. (2017). A comparative study of the impact of Korean research articles in four academic fields using altmetricss. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0005.
- Mohammadi, E. and Thelwall, M. (2013). Mendeley readership altmetricss for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071.
- Onyancha, O. B. (2017). Altmetricss of South African Journals: Implications for Scholarly Impact of South African Research. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-016-9485-0.
- Pooladian, A. and Borrego, Á. (2017). Twenty years of readership of library and information science literature under Mendeley’s microscope. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-02-2016-0006.
- Rangaswamy and Babu, R. H. (2019a). An Altmetrics Analysis of Top Journals in Library and Information Science. In Digital technologies and Transformation in Academic Libraries (pp. 352-357). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11567901.
- Rangaswamy and Babu, R. H. (2019b). An Altmetrics Analysis of Top Journals in Library and Information Science. In Digital technologies and Transformation in Academic Libraries (pp. 352-357). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11567901
- Saberi, M. K. and Ekhtiyari, F. (2019). Usage, captures, mentions, social media and citations of LIS highly cited papers : an altmetricss study. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 20(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-10-2018-0025.
- Shan, P., Juan, C. and Wolfgang, G. (2019). Comparing capture, usage and citation indicators: an altmetrics analysis of journal papers in chemistry disciplines. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1461-1473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03168-y.
- Shenavar, A. and Abbas, D. (2020). Review of Iranian Journal Articles Indexed in Web of Science-Based on Altmetrics Indicators in Scientific Social Media. Webology, 17(1), 158-170. https://doi.org/10.14704/web/v17i1/a214.
- Shrivastava, R. and Mahajan, P. (2017). An altmetrics analysis of ResearchGate profiles of physics researchers. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 18(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0033.
- Siluo, Y. and Mengxue, Z. (2019). Performance of citations and altmetricss in the social sciences and humanities. In Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (pp. 326-335). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.69.
- Syamili, C. and Rekha, R. V. (2017). Do altmetrics correlate with citation? : A study based on PLOS ONE journal. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 11(1), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737766.2016.1260815.
- Tang, Y., Tseng, H. and Vann, C. (2020). Unwrap citation count, Altmetrics Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 69(8-9), 653-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-01-2020-0005.
- Taylor, M. (2020). An altmetrics attention advantage for open access books in the humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2523-2543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03735-8.
- Thelwall, M. (2018). Altmetrics Prevalence in the Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities: Where are the Online Discussions? Journal of Altmetricss, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29024/joa.6.
- Verma, S. and Madhusudhan, M. (2019). An altmetrics comparison of highly cited digital library publications of India and China. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66(2), 71-75.
- Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Curry, S., Hill, S.,et al. (2015). The metric tide : Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473978782.