Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Maharana, Bulu
- Familiarity of Web 2.0 and its Application in Learning: A Case Study of Seven Indian Universities
Abstract Views :299 |
PDF Views:14
Authors
Affiliations
1 P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha, IN
1 P. G. Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar - 768109, Odisha, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 55, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 194-203Abstract
The changed learning environment has necessitated formation of interactive networks for sharing, participation and collaboration. The Web 2.0 tools provide avenues in this regard. The present study aims to investigate the level of integration of these tools into the learning practices of the students of seven general universities in the state of Odisha in eastern India. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 1000 postgraduate students and research scholars segregated into four major disciplines, Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, Pure Sciences, and Applied Sciences and Technology. The findings revealed that Web 2.0 awareness is high among the students of Applied Sciences and Technology as compared to the other disciplines. More than half of the students of theoretical sciences are unaware about popular tools like blogs. Because of the popularity of the tools like Wikipedia and Scribd as sources of academic content, most of the students are familiar with wiki and document sharing tools respectively. However, the use of these tools for learning has remained trivial among the students.Keywords
Social Bookmarking, Education 2.0, Learning 2.0, Social Networking, Video Sharing, Web 2.0, Wiki, Blog.
References
- Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? Educause. http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0621.pdf.
- Amir, Z. Ismail, K. & Hussin, S. (2011). Blogs in Language Learning: Maximizing Students’ Collaborative Writing, Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.079.
- Biasutti, M. (2011). The student experience of a collaborative e-learning university module. Computers and Education, 57(3), 1865–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006.
- Chan, C. & Cmor, D. (2009). Blogging toward information literacy: Engaging students and facilitating peer learning. Reference Services Review, 37(4), 395–407. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0090- 7324&volume= 37&issue=4&articleid=1823963.
- Chang, C. C. et al. (2014). Using e-portfolios to elevate knowledge amassment among university students. Computers & Education, 72, 187–95. www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.015.
- Chang, J., Wang, E. & Chao, R. (2009). Using constructivism and scaffolding theories to explore learning style and effect in blog system environment. MIS Review, 15(1), 29–61.
- Chu, S. K. W., Chan, C. K. K. & Tiwari, A. F.Y (2012). Using blogs to support learning during internship. Computers and Education, 58(3), 989-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.027.
- Downes, S. (2008). Places to Go: YouTube. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 4(5). Available at: http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=633&action=article.
- Kang, I., Curtis J. Bonk, C. J. & Kim, M. C. (2011). A case study of blog-based learning in Korea: Technology becomes pedagogy. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 227-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.002.
- Kelleher, T. & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational Blogs and the Human Voice: Relational Strategies and Relational Outcomes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 395–414. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00019.x.
- Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., Maton, K., Krause, K., Bishop, A., Chang, R. & Churchward, A. (2007). The next generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. Proceedings ASCLITE Singapore 2007, 517-25. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/ procs/kennedy.pdf.
- Kim, H. N. (2008). The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1342-52, ISSN 0360-1315 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131508000158.
- Kundi, G. M. & Nawaz, A. (2014). From e-Learning 1.0 to e-Learning 2.0: Threats and Opportunities for Higher Education Institutions in the Developing Countries. European Journal of Sustainable Development 3(1), 145-60. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n1p145.
- Kuteeva, M. (2011) Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.007.
- Mahmud, A. H. & Hassanuzzaman, M (2009). The role of Web 2.0 tools in collaborative learning. Master Thesis. School of Economics and Management. Lund University.
- Nath, K. (2014). Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 - Evolution of the Web and its Various Challenges. Proceedings of Optimization, Reliability, and Information Technology (ICROIT), 86–89. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/sububasistha/ web-10-to-web-30-evolution-of-the-web-and-its-variouscha...
- Parker & Chao (2007) Wiki as a Teaching Tool. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3. Retroeved from http://www.ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf.
- Pascu, C. (2008). An Empirical Analysis of the Creation, Use and Adoption of Social Computing Applications. IPTS Exploratory Research on Social Computing. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, EUR 23415 EN. Retroeved from http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC46431.pdf.
- Pymm, B. & Hay, L. (2013). Using Etherpads as platforms for collaborative learning in a distance education LIS course .iConference 2013 Proceedings, 965-70.
- Sidek, E. A. R. & Yunus, M. M. (2012). Students’ Experiences on Using Blog as Learning Journals. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 67, 135-43.
- Tang, E. & Lam C. (2012). Building an effective Online Learning Community (OLC) in blog-based teaching portfolios. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 79-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.12.002.
- VIRCUS (S). (2008). Use of web2.0 technologies in LIS education: Experiences at Tallin University, Estonia. Electronic Library and Information Systems, 42(3); 262-74. Retrieved on 25/04/09. Retrieved from www.emeraldinsight.com/0033-0337.htm.
- Wang K. T., Huang, Y., Jeng Y. L. & Wang T. (2008). A blogbased dynamic learning map, Computers and Education, 51(1), 262-78. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.005.
- Wang, J., Zou, B., Wang, D. & Xing, M. (2013). Students’ perception of a wiki platform and the impact of wiki engagement on intercultural communication. System, Volume, 41(2), 245-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.04.004.
- The Effects of Dimensions of Organizational Structure on Innovation in Business School Libraries in India:An Empirical Study
Abstract Views :393 |
PDF Views:9
Authors
Affiliations
1 Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamaninagar (W), Agartala - 799 022, Tripura, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Samabalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla - 768019, Sambalpur, Odisha, IN
1 Tripura University (A Central University), Suryamaninagar (W), Agartala - 799 022, Tripura, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Samabalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla - 768019, Sambalpur, Odisha, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 56, No 4 (2019), Pagination: 216-221Abstract
Purpose: In an intensely competitive and changing environment, innovation can be considered as a survival strategy. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of organization structure on innovation in business school libraries in India. Design/methodology/approach: The study focused on libraries of leading business schools, viz., IIMs,. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data for this study. The quantitative data were analyzed to test the hypothesis. Findings: The dimensions of organizational structure i.e., vertical complexity, employee participation and organizational complexity are positively related to innovation and have higher OS influence in innovation among business school libraries. On the other hand, increase in formalization, the degree of centralization and strict adherence to pre-defined roles and rigid rules in the organization are negatively related to innovation. Research Limitations: The study is limited to libraries of Indian Institutes of Management (IIM) India. Thus, other scientific and technical libraries are not in the ambit of this study. Originality/value: In India, there is no study conducted in academic management libraries. This study can be used as a guide for library administrators to accomplish the objectives of the organization by enabling innovation in the context of organizational structure.Keywords
Academic Management Library, IIMs, Indian Management Schools, Library Innovation, Organizational Structure, Organizational Innovation, Structural Dimensions.References
- Adeyoyin, S. O. (2006). Managing the library’s corporate culture for organizational efficiency, productivity, and enhanced service. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 75.
- Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. (2008). Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation. Academy of Management Annals. 2(1): 1-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211446
- Aiken, M., Bacharach, S. B., and French, J. L. (1980). Organizational structure, work process, and proposal making in administrative bureaucracies. Academy of Management Journal. 23(4): 631-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/255553
- Bandelin, J. M. (1999). “The academic library: Its context, its purpose, and its operation”. Reference & User Services Quarterly. 38(2): 220.
- Bommer, M., & Jalajas, D. S. (2004). Innovation sources of large and small technology-based firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 51(1): 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.822462
- Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. Social Science Paperback, London, Tavistock: 104-108.
- Chang, C. C., & Wu, C. C. (2013). “Multilevel analysis of work context and social support climate in libraries”. In ASLIB Proceedings: New Information Perspectives. 65(6): 644-658. https://doi.org/10.1108/AP-05-2012-0051
- Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2007). How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management-the social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information Management. 27(2): 104-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.11.001
- Daft, R. L. (2015). Organization theory and design: Cengage Learning.
- Damanpour, F. (1988). Innovation type, radicalness, and the adoption process. Communication Research. 15(5): 545-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005003
- Damanpour, F. (2010).An integration of research findings of the effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. British Journal of Management. 21(4): 996-1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678551.2009.00628.x
- Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Organizational structure and innovation revisited: From organic to ambidextrous structure. In Handbook of organizational creativity. 483-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-3747143.00019-7
- Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 15(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00029-5
- Dasgupta, M., Gupta, R. K., & Sahay, A. (2011). Linking technological innovation, technology strategy and organizational factors: A review. Global Business Review. 12(2): 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215091101200206
- Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science. 32(11): 1422-1433. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
- Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, in R. Kilman & L. Pondy (eds.) The Management of Organizational Design. New York: North-Holland: 167-188.
- Ettlie, J. E. (1983). Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing sector. Academy of Management Journal. 26(1): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/256133
- Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’keefe, R. D. (1984). Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science. 30(6): 682695. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.6.682
- Fowler, R. K. (1998). The university library as a learning organization for innovation: an exploratory study. College & Research Libraries. 59(3): 220-231. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.59.3.220
- Fredrickson, J. W. (1986). The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review. 11(2): 280-297. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283101
- Gichohi, P. M. (2014). The role of employee engagement in revitalizing creativity and innovation at the workplace: A survey of selected libraries in Meru County-Kenya. Library Philosophy and Practice, 0_1.
- Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley.
- Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967).Program change and organizational properties in a comparative analysis. American Journal of Sociology. 72(5): 503-519. https://doi.org/10.1086/224380
- Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1970). Social change in complex organizations, 41, Random House Trade.
- Heller, F. A., Pusic, E., Strauss, G., & Wilpert, B. (1998). Organizational participation: Myth and reality, 4, Oxford University Press.
- Howard, H. (1977). The relationship between certain organizational variables and the rate of innovation in academic libraries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.
- Khandwalla, P. N. (1977). The design of organizations. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.
- Lysonski, S., Levas, M., & Lavenka, N. (1995). Environmental uncertainty and Organizational Structure: A product management perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 4(3): 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429510097609
- McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8): 13891412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046349
- Menguc, B., and Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on the execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5): 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.004
- Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organization: A synthesis of the research. Prentice-Hall.
- Paswan, A. K., Dant, R. P., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1998). An empirical investigation of the linkages among rationalism, environmental uncertainty, and bureaucratization. Journal of Business Research, 43(3): 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00218-X
- Pierce, J. L., & Delbecq, A. L. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 2(1): 27-37. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1977.4409154
- Prakash, Y., & Gupta, M. (2008). Exploring the relationship between organisation structure and perceived innovation in the manufacturing sector of India. Singapore Management Review, 30(1): 55.
- Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1968). Dimensions of organization structure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1): 65-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391262
- Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1969).The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14(1): 91-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391366
- Pugh, L. (2005). Managing 21st-century libraries. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.
- Robbins, S. P., & Barnwell, N. (2006). Organisation theory: Concepts and cases. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia.
- Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press
- Rowley, J. (2011). Should your library have an innovation strategy?. Library Management. 32(4/5): 251-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111132266
- Sahay, Y. P., and Gupta, M. (2011). Role of organization structure in innovation in the bulk-drug industry. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. 46(3): 450-464.
- Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behaviour: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal. 37(3): 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
- Shadur, M. A., Kienzle, R., & Rodwell, J. J. (1999). The relationship between organizational climate and employee perceptions of involvement: The importance of support. Group & Organization Management. 24(4): 479-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199244005
- Stoffle, C. J., Allen, B., Morden, D., & Maloney, K. (2003). Continuing to build the future: academic libraries and their challenges. Portal: Libraries and the Academy. 3(3): 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0068
- Thompson, J. D. (2017). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315125930
- Tom, B. & G. M., Stalker (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock: 104-08.
- Walton, R. E. (1984). From control to commitment: transforming workforce management in the united states. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
- West, J. (2000). Institutions, information processing, and organization structure in research and development: evidence from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy. 29(3): 349-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00035-9
- West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology. 51(3): 355-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00951
- Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. John Wiley & Sons.
- Pattern of Referencing in Open Access Journals: An Analytical Study of Two Journals Indexed in SJR
Abstract Views :296 |
PDF Views:13
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur − 768019, Odisha, IN
2 H.O.D of P.G Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur − 768019, Odisha, IN
1 Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur − 768019, Odisha, IN
2 H.O.D of P.G Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Jyoti Vihar, Burla, Sambalpur − 768019, Odisha, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 57, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 73-78Abstract
Internet has brought about revolutionary changes in scholarly publishing. Open access to research is believed to improving the quality of research. This paper is based on different patterns of referencing in two open access journals.Keywords
College and Research Libraries (C&RL), Communication in Information Literacy (CIL), Open Access, Open Referencing, Pattern of Referencing, SCImago Journal and Country Rank (SJR).References
- http://www.scimagojr.com
- Singh, P. and Chander, H. (2018). Scholarly open access publishing: growth of LIS open access journals visible through directory of open access journals. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1749.
- Fatima, N. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of cited references in commerce journals. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1835:1-12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ libphilprac/1835/.
- Renjith, V. R. (2018). Scientometric indicators of open access journals in library and information science a trend analysis for 2012-2016. ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics, 1(1):45-50.
- Edward, T. E., et al. (2017). Charting the landscape of open access journals in library and information science. Webology, 14(1). http://www.webology.org/2017/v14n1/a152.pdf.
- Sahoo, J., Basudev, M. and Sahoo, L. P. (2017). Indian contribution to open access scholarly publishing in DOAJ. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1567. https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/321211036_Indian_contribution_to_open_access_scholarly_publishing_in_ DOAJ.
- Schwarz, R. R., Vitor, T. and Passos, M. F. D. (2016). Research Articles about Open Access Indexed by Scopus: A Content Analysis. Publications, 4(31), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications4040031.
- Chaudhuri, J. and Baker, S. (2015). Identifying open access articles within the top ten closed access LIS journals: A global perspective. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1245.
- Maity, A. and Teli, S. (2015). A bibliometric analysis on the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) in the subject domain of LIS from the year 2004-2014. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(4):1955-62. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJIRSET.2015.0404021.
- Awasthi, S. and Jaiswal, B. (2015). Library and information science journals in DOAJ: A bibliometric study. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 6(8):1476-81.
- Kaushik, A. (2015). Mapping marketing library services related literature in LIS open access journals. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 875:1-15.
- Nisha, F. and Ahmad, H. (2014). Analysis of open access scholarly journals in Chemistry, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1100.
- Pujar, M. S. (2014). Open access journals in library and information science: A study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61:199-202.
- Mamdapur, G. M. N., Iqbalahmad, U. R. and Mamdapur, A. K. G. (2013). Scientometric analysis of contributions to the journal college and research libraries (1997-2011). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 905:1-14. https://www.slideshare.net/ghousemodinmamdapur/scientometric-analysis-of-contributions-to-the-journal-college-and-research-libraries-1997-2011.
- Rattan, G. K. (2013). Self-citations in Annals of Library and Information Studies. Library Philosophy and Practice (ejournal), 924.
- Lihitkar, R. and Lithitkar, R. (2013). Open Access Library and Information Science Journals on DOAJ: An analytical study. International Journal of Advanced Library and Information Science, 1(1):33-61.
- Bhat, M. H. (2012). Open access repositories: A review, Library Philosophy and practice (e-journal), 356:1-8.
- Roy, B. K., Biswas, S. C. and Mukhopadhyay, P. (2012). Open Access to scholarly information in India: Trends and developments. Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(1):89-101.
- Anupama, N. J., Vatnal, R. M. and Manjunath, G. A. (2012). Open Access initiatives: A boon to academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 792:1-12.
- Rufai, G. and Shah (2011). Open Access Journals in Library and Information Science: The story so far. TRIM. 7(2):21827.
- Mukherjee, B. (2009). Scholarly research in LIS open access electronic journals: A bibliometric study. Jointly published by Akadémiai Kiadó. Budapest Scientometrics and Springer, 80(1):169-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2055-2.
- Anjanappa, M., Kattimani, M. T. and Suresh, J. (2009). Trends in ICT for Librarian 2.0: Open Courseware, Open Access Journals and Digital Library Initiatives, 7th International CALIBER; p. 279-88.
- Keisham, S. and Sophiarani, S. (2008). Open Access Journal and Open Access Initiatives in India, 6th Convention PLANNER; p. 205-15.
- Sathyanarayana, N. V. (2008). Open Access and Open J-Gate. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 28(1):57-60. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.1.153.
- Singh, B. R. and Patnaik, M. V. (2006). Open Access Movement and Open Access Initiatives in India, 4th Convention PLANNER, p. 236-46.
- Liu, Z. and Wan, G. (2007). Scholarly Journal Articles on Open Access in LIS Literature: A Content Analysis. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 23:1-10. http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl23LiuWan.htm.
- Keisham, S. and Sophiarani, S. (2008). Open Access Journal and Open Access Initiatives in India, 6th Convention PLANNER; p. 205-16.
- Joshi, A. N., Vatnal, R. M. and Manjunath, G. A. (2012). Open Access Initiatives: A Boon to Academic Libraries (2012). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1-12.
- Pandian, et al. (2008). Open Access Journals: A Study, 6th Convention PLANNER; p. 162-68.
- Knowledge Organization Approach in Online Public Access Catalogues (OPAC) for Search and Navigation
Abstract Views :167 |
PDF Views:8
Authors
Affiliations
1 Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Odisha – 768019, Assistant Librarian, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela – 769008, Odisha, IN
2 Professor & Head, Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Burla – 768019, Odisha, IN
1 Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Odisha – 768019, Assistant Librarian, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela – 769008, Odisha, IN
2 Professor & Head, Department of Library and Information Science, Sambalpur University, Burla – 768019, Odisha, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 59, No 5 (2022), Pagination: 329-335Abstract
Effective organization, discovery, and retrieval of resources have always been essential functions for any library. Libraries have implemented various new information systems along with traditional library systems such as federated search, web-scale discovery, next-generation catalogue, etc. Faceted navigation, known as faceted search, faceted browsing, or guided navigation, has been applied in many e-commerce sites and dominates features in the interaction paradigm. Faceted approach to knowledge organization in searching and navigation features in the online catalogue supports users in finding the information needed in the most effective and efficient manner.This paper discusses feceted searching and navigation application in library online public access catalogues(OPAC).Keywords
: Faceted Navigation, Faceted Search, Knowledge Organization, Online Public Access Catalogues (OPAC) Information Retrieval.References
- Anila, S. (2015). A Faceted Model for Visual Represen-tation of Information (Doctoral Thesis, Vidyasagar University). p. 5-6. Sodhaganga@INFLIBNET. http:// hdl.handle.net/10603/295347
- Anderson, J.D. (2003). In: J. Feather & Sturges, P (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science, 2nd Ed., Essay, Routledge; p. 471-490.
- Breeding, M. (2007). Next-Generation Library Catalogs. Library Technology Reports, 43(4), 1-44. https://library-technology.org/document/18344?msclkid=8dba1744ad cb11ec8e19499ed84fcb7f.
- Chase, L., Leader, W., Dygert, C. and Recorder, J.A.J. (2008). Organizing web-based resources. The Serials Librarian, 38(3-4), 277-186. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J123v38n03_11.
- Hall, C.E. (2011). Facet-based library catalogs: A survey of the landscape. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801195.
- Hearst, M.A. (2006). Clustering versus faceted categories for information exploration. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 59-61. https://doi. org/10.1145/1121949.1121983.
- Hodge, G. (2000). Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries. Systems Engineering, 11(3). https:// www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/niu/sko_DL/1knowledge. html.
- Koha: An Overview. (n.d.). Retrieved March 27, 2022. https://prosentient.com.au/koha/details.
- La Barre, K. (2007). Faceted navigation and browsing features in new opacs: Robust support for scholarly information seeking? Knowledge Organization, 34(2), 78-90. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2007-2-78.
- Madhusudhan, M. and Aggarwal, S. (2011). Web-based online public access catalogues of IIT libraries in India: An evaluative study. Program, 45(4), 415-438. https:// doi.org/10.1108/00330331111182102.
- Nahotko, M. (2021). Knowledge organization affor-dances in a faceted Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC). Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 60(1), 86-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.201573 4.
- Naik, R. and Rao, A.M. (2011). Information Search and Retrieval System in Libraries N Rupsing Naik A Madhava Rao Abstract, 8th International CALIBER - 2011, Goa University, Goa; p. 16-27. https://ir.inflibnet. ac.in/bitstream/1944/1596/1/3.pdf.
- Niu, X. (2014). Faceted Search in Library Catalogs. 173-208. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-0562(2013)0000007013.
- Rowley, J. and Hartley, R. (2017). Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Managing Access to Information. In: Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Managing Access to Information. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315247519.
- Stock, W.G.S. (2013). L .5 Faceted Knowledge Organization Systems. In: Handbook of Information Science, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Saur; p. 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110235005.707. PMid:23044860.
- Tunkelang, D. (n.d.). Facets of faceted search. Faceted search is a simple idea that…. Retrieved March 26, 2022. https://dtunkelang.medium.com/facets-of-faceted-search-38c3e1043592.
- Tunkelang, D. (2009a). Faceted Search. In: Faceted Search. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi. org/10.2200/S00190ED1V01Y200904ICR005 A2.
- Tunkelang, D. (2009b). Faceted Search. In: Part of the book series: Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services (SLICRS), 1(1), Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/ S00190ED1V01Y200904ICR005.
- Vickery, B.C. (1961). Faceted classification: A guide to the construction and use of special schemes. The Library Quarterly, 31(3), 289-289. https://doi. org/10.1086/618911.
- Vora, P. (2009). Searching and Filtering. Web Application Design Patterns, 143-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374265-0.00006-2
- Wei, B., Liu, J., Zheng, Q., Zhang, W., Fu, X. and Feng, B. (2013). A survey of faceted search. Journal of Web Engineering, 12(1-2), 041-064.
- Wells, D. (2020). Online public access catalogues and library discovery systems. International Society for Knowledge Organization. https://www.isko.org/cyclo/ opac?msclkid=6df0d875adc611ec8bac84cb69dd5548
- Yang, S.Q. and Hofmann, M.A. (2011). Next gen-eration or current generation? A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. Library Hi Tech, 29(2), 266-300. https://doi. org/10.1108/07378831111138170.
- Yang, S.Q. and Wagner, K. (2010). Evaluating and com-paring discovery tools: How close are we towards next generation catalog? Library Hi Tech, 28(4), 690-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312.