Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mukherjee, Bhaskar
- A Comparative Study of Selected Science and Social Science Ejournals of UGC Infonet Digital Library Consortium
Abstract Views :646 |
PDF Views:13
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, IN
2 Punjab National Bank, Civil Line, Delhi, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, IN
2 Punjab National Bank, Civil Line, Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 49, No 5 (2012), Pagination: 549-560Abstract
The magnitude and eminence of e-journal of the UGC-Infonet digital library consortia in five subjects of social science and science discipline have been examined and addressed. While quality issue is judged by using Science and Social Science edition of Journal Citation Report (Thompson Scientific, 2007), the quantitative issue is measured by counting number of journals available under individual subject. The result of the study indicates that there are 8265 journals available in 97 different subjects. While highest number of journals in science discipline is available in medical science followed by biology and mathematics, Highest number of journals in social science discipline is available in history followed by economics and education. Of the total journals in science, 46.35% journals of biology are indexed in JCR. Most of the journals in science discipline have impact factor between 1-5, while most of journals in social science are not indexed at all, which signifies that quality of science journals are quite high than of social science.Keywords
UGC-Infonet Digital Library Consortia, Science and Social Science, E-Journals.
References
- Striphas Ted, Books: An Outdated Technology? Weblog post. The Late Age of Print. 4 September 2009.
- Troll Denise (A). How and why are Libraries Changing?" Digital Library Federation. Library Information Technology- Carnegie Melon, 2001
- Herman (E). End-user in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age Part 1, ASLIB Proceedings. Vol. 53(9); 2001; p387-401.
- Research Support Library Group, JISC Scholarly Communications Group (SCG). 2002. from http:// www.rslg.ac.uk
- Houghton (J W); Steele (C); Henty (M). Changing research practices in the digital information and communication environment. 2004. Available at http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/respubs/changing_res_prac/ exe_summary.html
- Kopp (J). Library consortia and information technology: the past, the present and the promise. Information Technology and Libraries. Vol. 17(1); 1998; p7-12.
- Patil (Y M); Savanur (K P). Consortium approach to e-Resource sharing - A case study. Fifth Conference of the Asian Federation for Information Technology in Agriculture: AFITA: November 9-11, 2006, Bangalore. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00008593/01/savanur_patil.pdf
- Patil (Y M). Sharing e–Journals in a consortia environment: A case study of FORSA libraries. In: Sharing e- Journals through consortia in Indian libraries – A Round Table, Nov. 28-29, 2002, Bangalore, Indian Institute of Astrophysics, http://www.iiap.res.in/library/patil.ppt
- Arora (J); Agarwal (P). Building digital libraries in a consortium mode: Towards a national consortium. In International Conference on Digital Libraries: Knowledge creation, preservation, access, and management, Vol. 1; 2004; p292–311.
- Chressanthis (G A); Chressanthis (J D). The relationship between manuscript submission fees and journal quality. Serials Librarian. Vol. 24(1); 1993; p71-86.
- Schloegl (C); Stock (W G). Impact and relevance of LIS journals: A scientometric analysis of international and German language LIS journals—citation analysis versus reader survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 55(13); p1155-1168.
- Tsay (M Y). The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. Vol. 86(1); p39.
- Gonzale (L); Campanario (J M). Structure of the Impact factor of journal included in the Social Science Citation Index: Citations from documents ?editorial material?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 58(2); 2007; p252-262.
- Brooks (T A). Evidence of complex citation motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 37; 1986; p34-36.
- Cozzens (S E). What for citation counts? The rhetoric – first model. Scientometrics. 1989; p437-447.
- Harter (S P); Kim (H J). Electronic journals and scholarly communication: A citation and reference study. 1996. http://php.indiana.edu/~harter/harterasis96midyear.html.
- Kousha (K); Thelwall (M). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis. In Proceedings International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting, Nancy (France). 2006. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00006416/01/google.pdf
- Knorr-Cetina (K). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1999.
- Whitley (R). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1984.
- Users Query Through Search Engines: Librarians View
Abstract Views :283 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 NHPC Office Complex, Uri Hydel Power Station, Gingle, P.O. Mohura, Dt.Baramulla, J&K, IN
1 NHPC Office Complex, Uri Hydel Power Station, Gingle, P.O. Mohura, Dt.Baramulla, J&K, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 42, No 4 (2005), Pagination: 483-492Abstract
Points out the rate of digital explosion in present era. Defines search engines and their types. Mentions various techniques to handle various search engines for getting best results. Highlights the basic features of various individual as well as meta search engines.Keywords
Searching Techniques, Search Engines, Individual Search Engines, Meta Search Engines.- Research in Indian CSIR Laboratories:A Bibliometric Study
Abstract Views :300 |
PDF Views:35
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 54, No 4 (2017), Pagination: 165-174Abstract
India is perhaps unique amongst developing countries in having established a distinct science identity since last few centuries. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) is an autonomous body established in 1942 with the aim of providing strong S&T base for the industry, strategic sectors and advancement of fundamental knowledge. The present study is to understand the quality and quantity of research output and current state-of-the-art of CSIR laboratories using publications output data as reflected in Web of Science and Scopus. The study points out that during 2010 to 2015, although the yearly output has increased from 3940 papers to 5531 papers, the growth rate is neither linear nor exponential. The scientists of the laboratory attach more weight to foreign journals rather than Indian journals having SCI impact factor within the range of 2.0 to 4.0. The authorship trend is completely slanted towards co-authorship and CSIR is assisting considerable financial support for conducting research. The citation analysis of CSIR publications reveals that, a total of 30011 articles published during 2010-2015, received 251212 citations during 2010-2016 with an average rate of 7 citations per article. Almost 10% articles did not receive any citation and 62% articles received citation in the range of 1 to 10.
Keywords
CSIR, Indian Research Laboratories, Indian Research - Bibliometric Study, Research Output - Indian Laboratories.References
- Dwivedi S.; Kumar S and Garg K.C. (2015). Scientometric profile of organic chemistry research in India during 2004-2013. Current Science, 109(5):869−77. https://doi.org/10.18520/v109/i5/869-877.
- Garg K.C. and Rao M.K.D. (1988). Bibliometric analysis of scientific productivity: a case study of an indian physics laboratory. Scientometrics, 13(5-6):261−69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019962.
- Kademani B.S.; Kumar Vijai; Kumar Anil; Sagar Anil; Mohan Lalit; Surwase Ganesh and Gaderao, C.R. (2005). Publication productivity of the bio-organic division at bhabha atomic research centre: A scientometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 52(4):135−46.
- Kademani B.S.; Anil Sagar; Vijai Kumar and Gupta B.M. (2007). Mapping of Indian publications in S&T: A scientometric analysis of publications in Science Citation Index. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 27(1):17−34. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.28.7.120.
- Koehler W. (2001). Information science as “Little Science”: The implications of a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Scientometrics, 51(1):117–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010516712215.
- Pathak Manohar and Bharati Kumar Avinash (2014). Botanical Survey of India (1971-2010): A scientometric analysis. Current Science, 106(7):964−71.
- Qiu L. (1992). A study of interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Evaluation, 2(3):169–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/2.3.169.
- Subramanyam K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1):33–38.
- Cited and Citing Pattern of Open Access Journals:A Pilot Study with Selected Indian Journals of Physics-Chemistry-Mathematics
Abstract Views :251 |
PDF Views:10
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi − 221005, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi − 221005, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 55, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 13-19Abstract
This study is designed to assess the disciplinary difference of cited-citing references of Indic origin open access journals namely Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics (IJPAP), Journal of Chemical Science (JCS) and Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (IJPAM) in terms of source, authorship, subject diversity, accessibility, citation-age, quantity & citinglife. The sample size consist of 23 issues, 277 articles, 7004 cited references and 2349 citing sources of these 3 journals. While for cited reference, we download reference list of every published article from the official website of the journals, for citing reference, we explore Google Scholar and Scopus both to identify maximum number of citing source during April 2017. Results show that for internet enabled OA articles there is no acceleration of citing behavior; rather, on the contrary, a significant trend is revealed for an increase in authors’ citing somewhat older references. Significant main effects point also at more cited references was of journal articles and was of Indic origin; however, more citing reference was of foreign original journals. Both for cited-citing reference joint authorship were predominant. In spite of the fact that present study considered only open access articles for analysis, results indicates that PCM authors mostl.Keywords
Cited-Citing Reference, Co-Citation Pattern, Coupling, Open Access Journals.References
- Avramescu A. (1973). Science citation distribution and obsolescence, Studii Si Cercetaride Documentare. 15:345-56.
- Cole S. (1983). The hierarchy of the sciences? American Journal of Sociology. 89(1):111–39. Crossref.
- Ding Y, Liu L, Guo C and Cronin B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis, Journal of Informetrics. 7(3):583–92 Crossref.
- Garfield E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: Wiley.
- Glanzel W and Schoepflin U. (1999). A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences, Information Processing and Management, 35:31-40. Crossref.
- Glanzel W and Schoepflin U. (1994). A stochastic model for the ageing of scientific literature, Scientometrics. 30(1):49– 64. Crossref.
- Harter SP. (1986). Online information retrieval: Concepts, principles, and techniques. New York: Academic Press.
- Hatter SP, Nisonger TE and Weng A. (1993). Semantic Relationships between Cited and Citing Articles in Library and Information Science Journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(9):543-52. Crossref.
- Jones C, Champman M and Woods PC. (1972). The characteristics of the literature used by historians, Journal of Librarianship. 4(3):137–56. Crossref.
- Kessler MM. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers, American Documentation. 14:10-25. Crossref.
- Lipetz BA. (1965). Improvements of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators, American Documentation. 16:81-90. Crossref.
- Moravsik MJ, Murugesan P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations, Social Studies of Science. 5:86-92. Crossref.
- Mukherjee B. (2009).The hyper linking pattern of open-access journals in library and information science: A cited citing reference study, Library and Information Science Research. 31:113–25. Crossref.
- Pao ML. (1989). Concepts of information retrieval. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited. PMCid: PMC267254.
- Price DJD. (1965). Networks of scientific papers, Science. 149:510-15. Crossref. PMid:14325149.
- Salton G. (1963). Associative document retrieval techniques using bibliographic information, Journal of the Association of Computing. 10:440-57. Crossref.
- Small H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents, Journal of the American Society of Information Science. 24:265-69. Crossref.
- Trivison D. (1987). Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity, Information Processing and Management. 23:183-94. Crossref.
- Weinstock M. (1971). Citation indexes, Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. 5:1640.