Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Gupta, B. M.
- A Comparative Study of Mysore University and Karnatak University In S&T: Research Output, Citation Impact and Collaboration During 2001-10
Abstract Views :689 |
PDF Views:9
Authors
B. D. Kumbar
1,
B. M. Gupta
2
Affiliations
1 Karnatak University, Department of Library & Information Science, Dharwad 580 003, Karnataka, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology & Development Studies, Pusa, K.S.Krishan Road, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 Karnatak University, Department of Library & Information Science, Dharwad 580 003, Karnataka, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology & Development Studies, Pusa, K.S.Krishan Road, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 50, No 5 (2013), Pagination: 573-590Abstract
The study provides a comparative assessment of the research contribution of the Mysore University and the Karnatak University in terms of publications output in science and technology, its growth and citation impact during 2001-10. It analyses the strong and weak subject areas of universities research and their citation impact. It describes the international collaborative share of research output of the universities at the overall level, indicating the contribution of the major collaborating partner countries. It also provides analyses of the national collaborating links of the two universities; with a view to study their collaborating linkages with academic institutions, institutes of national importance, research institutions and industry. It also studies the contribution and citation impact of the top 15 most productive authors and also the productivity of their most productive journals, where the two universities authors have published.Keywords
Mysore Univeristy, Karnatak University, Comparative Study, Citation Impact, Collaboration, S&T Research Output.References
- Jeevan, V.K.J. and Gupta, B.M. (2002) A scientometric profile of research output from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Scientometrics, 53(1): 165-68
- Jeevan, V.K.J. and Gupta, B.M. (2001) R&D Performance of different departments of IIT, Kharagpur. Journal of Library & Information Science, 26(2): 129-43
- Singh, Y; Gupta, B.M. and Kumar, S. (2005) Research contributions and impact of research of Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 1993-2001. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 52(1): 8-14
- Kumbar, Mallinath; Gupta, B.M. and Dhawan, S.M. (2008) Growth and impact of research output of University of Mysore, 1996-2006: A case study. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 55(3): 185-95
- Tapaswi, M.P. (2011) Growth in the productivity of an organization-Tracing the cause. In. S.L.Sangam et al, Editors. Scientometric Studies. Dharwad; Department of Library & Information Science, Karnatak University. 56-62.
- Gupta, B.M. and Sangam, S.L. (2011) Contribution and impact of Karnatak University publications during 1999-2008: A study in comparison with three other universities in Karnatak. In. S.L.Sangam et al, Editors. Scientometric Studies. Dharwad; Department of Library & Information Science, Karnatak University. 89-113.
- Contribution and Impact of Indian Agricultural Universities: A Performance: Analysis Using Scientometric Techniques, 2007-11
Abstract Views :361 |
PDF Views:20
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
2 Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), New Delhi, IN
3 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali 140306, Punjab, IN
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (CSIR-NISTADS), Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
2 Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU), New Delhi, IN
3 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Mohali, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali 140306, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 50, No 5 (2013), Pagination: 591-618Abstract
The study examined the contribution of twenty agricultural universities to the mainstream scientific literature during 2007-20011 along two distinct, but inter-related dimensions of quantity (number of papers, number of international collaborative papers) and quality of research output (assessed through the citations received) A number of measures are used for inter-field and inter-university comparisons. Inter-field comparisons are made at the level of 10 macro subject fields.Keywords
Indian Agricultural Universities, Impact of Research, International Collaboration, Inter-Field Comparisons, Inter-University Comparison.References
- Agriculture sector in India. November 2012. http://www.ibef.org/industry/agriculture-india.aspx (Accessed on December 24, 2012).
- K.P. Singh. (2012) Growth and Development of Agricultural Education, Research, and Libraries in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 32(1): 5-14.
- Sarkhel, J.K. and Choudhury, Nitani Ray. Contribution of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidalaya to agricultural research: A bibliometric study. Annals of Library & Information Studies December 2010, 57(4): 348-55.
- Hussain, Shabahat and Mushtaq, Muzamil. (2011) Scientometric study of Indian central universities: A picture from Scopus. Journal of Indian Library Association, 47(3-4): 5-12.
- Sevukan, R.; Nagarajan, M. and Sharma, Jaideep. Research output of faculties of plant sciences in central universities of India: A bibliometric study. Annals of Library & Information Studies September 2007, 54(3), 129- 39.
- Sevukan, R and Sharma, Jaideep. Bibliometric analyses of research output of biotechnology faculties in some Indian central universities. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology November 2008, 28(6): 11-20.
- Anitha, N. Research trends of biology in selected central universities. http://www.authorstream.com/ Presentation/anitharajan-1196687-research-trends-of-biology-in-slected-central-universities-autosaved/
- Nagpal, P.S. (2005) Contribution of Indian universities to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics January, 32(1): 11-36.
- Modeling the Growth of Indian and Chinese Social Science Literature
Abstract Views :267 |
PDF Views:9
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580003, Karnataka, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
3 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, NewDelhi 110012, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580003, Karnataka, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
3 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, NewDelhi 110012, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 44, No 4 (2007), Pagination: 395-398Abstract
The paper discusses the application of growth model as suggested by Egghe and Rao(1992). The present study is aimed to study the growth and dynamics of growth and Indian and Chineese publications in three sub-disciplines of social sciences viz., Economics, Psychology and Sociology.Keywords
Social Science Literature, Growth, Dynamics of Growth, Growth Model.References
- Price (Derek De Solla). Science since Babylon. Enlarged edition. New Haven; Yale University Press. 1975.
- Granberg (A). A bibliometric survey of fibre-optics research in Sweden, West Germany and Japan. Lund; Research Policy Institute.
- Crane (Diana). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago; The University of Chicago Press, 1972
- Tague (Jean); Beheshti (J); Rees-Potter (L). The laws of exponential growth: Evidence, implications and forecasts. Library Trends Summer. 1981; p125-149.
- Egghe (L); Ravichandra Rao (I.K.) Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications. Scientometrics. Vol. 25; 1992; p5-46.
- Price (Derek De Solla). Little science, big science. New York; Columbia University Press, 1966.
- Wolfram (Dieter); et al. Growth of knowledge: Bibliometric analysis using online database data. In. L. Egghe and R. Rousseau, Eds. Informetrics, 89/90. Amsterdam; Elsevier, 1990, p355-72.
- Gupta (B.M.); et al. Modelling the growth of world social science literature. Scientometrics 2002. Vol. 53(1); p161-164.
- Distribution of Productivity among Authors in Potato (1900-1980) Research (1900-1980)
Abstract Views :219 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110012, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 33, No 3 (1996), Pagination: 127-134Abstract
Scientific productivity is measured in terms of publication in various forms. This paper presents: (1) author productivity patterns of Indian Potato Research for the period 1900-1980, and (2) application of Lotkas Law in its different forms.Keywords
Scientific Productivity, Author Productivity Pattern, Potato Research, Application of Lotka's Law.- Scientific Productivity in Theoretical Population Genetics:A Case Study in Core Journals
Abstract Views :335 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
B. M. Gupta
1,
Suresh Kumar
1
Affiliations
1 Scientometrics and Informetrics Group National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
1 Scientometrics and Informetrics Group National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr. K.S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110012, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 35, No 2 (1998), Pagination: 89-97Abstract
Examines the applicability of Lotka's Law and a few other statistical distributions for their goodness-of-fit to the author productivity data from eleven core journals in theoretical population genetics. The negative binomial and geometric distribution are found to be generally applicable in majority of the data sets and also in terms of best fit.Keywords
Population Genetics, Lotka's Law, Statistical Distribution, Author Productivity, Binomial Distribution, Geometric Distribution.- Social Sciences Research in Select Four South Asia Countries: A Quantitative Analysis of Publications, 2008-12
Abstract Views :347 |
PDF Views:14
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, IN
2 Birla Institute of Management & Technology, Noida, IN
3 31173 Sector 15 Panchkula-134113, Haryana, IN
1 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, IN
2 Birla Institute of Management & Technology, Noida, IN
3 31173 Sector 15 Panchkula-134113, Haryana, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 51, No 3 (2014), Pagination: 41-54Abstract
The overall research output in social sciences consisting of 2681 papers in Pakistan, 993 papers in Bangladesh, 521 papers in Sri Lanka and 331 papers in Nepal during 2008-12 has been analyzed with a view to study the publication growth rate and citation impact, share of international collaborative papers and leading collaborators, broad subject-wise scatter of publications, geographical distribution of publications, contribution and impact of leading institutions and identification of most productive journals contributing to social science research. The data for the study has been derived from Scopus international multidisciplinary bibliographical database.Keywords
Social Science, Research Output, Quantitative Analysis.- Science & Technology in Select Foursouth Asia Countries: A Scientometric Analysis of Publications, 1996-2011
Abstract Views :334 |
PDF Views:19
Authors
Ritu Gupta
1,
B. M. Gupta
2
Affiliations
1 SriVenkateshwar University, Meerut, IN
2 21173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134 113, IN
1 SriVenkateshwar University, Meerut, IN
2 21173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134 113, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 51, No 4 (2014), Pagination: 235-252Abstract
The comparative research output in S&T of four South Asia countries, namely Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal has been analyzed during 2001-11. It focused on their publication growth, publication share in global output, share of international collaborative publications and broad and narrow subject areas of focus. The data covered in this study has been derived from SClmago Journal and Country Rank website (http://www.scimagojr.com), which is based on Scopus database.Keywords
Science and Technology Research Output, Scientometric Analysis.- High Productivity Environmental Research Organizations in India: a Study of their Performance for the Period 2008-12
Abstract Views :326 |
PDF Views:27
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Karnataka University, Department of Library and Information Science, Dharwad-580003, Karnataka, IN
3 3#1173, Sector 15, Panchkula-134113, Haryana, IN
1 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Karnataka University, Department of Library and Information Science, Dharwad-580003, Karnataka, IN
3 3#1173, Sector 15, Panchkula-134113, Haryana, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 51, No 5 (2014), Pagination: 299-305Abstract
The publication analyses high productivity organizations in India in environmental science, using publications data from Scopus database for the period 2008 to 2012 for identifying their overall strength and weakness measured on few quantitative and qualitative indicators. It also provides a comparative evaluation and performance of different types of Indian organizations in environment research. The study concludes that IITs (Institutes of National Importance) and research institutes model of funding for research are comparatively more effective in giving performance in terms of quantity and quality. The publication also lists suggestions for national policy formulation for growth and development of environmental science research in the country.Keywords
Citation Impact, Environmental Research, High Productivity Organizations, India, International Collaboration, Productivity, Research Performance, Scientometrics.- Global Assessment of Nasal Polyps Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Publications During 2004-13
Abstract Views :276 |
PDF Views:20
Authors
Affiliations
1 House Number 1173, Sector 15, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, IN
2 Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Library, Chandigarh, IN
3 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, IN
1 House Number 1173, Sector 15, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, IN
2 Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research Library, Chandigarh, IN
3 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 52, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 101-109Abstract
The paper examines 4117 global publications in nasal polyps, as covered in Scopus database during 2004-13, experiencing an annual average growth rate of 6.92% and citation impact per paper of 3.30. The world nasal polyps research output came from 83 countries, of which the top 10 most productive countries namely USA, UK., Germany, Turkey, Japan, South Korea, China, Italy, Belgium and India accounted for 63.15% and 91.24% share of the global publication and citation output during 2004-13. USA again contributed the largest citation share to the global citations in nasal polyps, followed by UK, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Japan, China, South Korea, Turkey and India during 2004-13. The top 10 most productive countries share of international collaborative papers in nasal polyps varied from 6.25% to 53.70% during 2004-13, with highest share coming from Belgium, followed by UK, China, Germany, Italy, USA, Japan, South Korea, India and Turkey during 2004-13. Medicine contributed the largest publication share (90.72%), followed by immunology&microbiology (10.98% share), biochemistry, genetics&molecular biology (5.68% share) and pharmacology, toxicology&pharmaceutics (3.13% share) during 2004-13. The 15 most productive Indian organizations contributing to global nasal polyps research have contributed 690 publications, accounting for 16.76% to its total output during 2004-13. The average productivity per organization, average citation impact per publication, h-index and share of international collaborative publications of the top 15 most productive global organizations were 46, 8.99, 16.67 and 28.70%, respectively during 2004-13. The top 15 most productive journals contributing to global nasal polyps research have contributed 652 publications, accounting for 35.73% share to its global output during 2004-13.Keywords
Global Publications, Nasal Polyps Research, Scientometic Analysis, Scopus Databases.- Social Media Research in India: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications Output during 2004-13
Abstract Views :321 |
PDF Views:17
Authors
Ritu Gupta
1,
B. M. Gupta
2
Affiliations
1 Shri Venkateshwar University, Tirupati, IN
2 1173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, IN
1 Shri Venkateshwar University, Tirupati, IN
2 1173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 52, No 4 (2015), Pagination: 233-243Abstract
Examines 733 Indian publications on social media research, as covered in Scopus database during 2004-13, experiencing an annual average growth rate of 168.31% and citation impact of 1.27. The world social media research output came from several countries, of which the top 15 accounts for 81.95% share of the global output during 2004-13. India's global publication share was 1.97% during 2004-13 and hold 13th rank in global publication output. Only 37.38% of Indian publications on social media were cited one or more times since their publication till March 2015. India's social media research output came from several organizations and authors, of which the top 10 contributed 30.42% and 17.87% share respectively of its total output during 2004-13. India's international collaborative share in social media was 22.10% during 2004-13. The paper stressed the need for the development of a national social media policy by Indian government.Keywords
Publications, Scientometric Assessment, Social Media Research.- Indian Cloud Computing Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications Output During 2004-13
Abstract Views :302 |
PDF Views:21
Authors
B. M. Gupta
1,
Ritu Gupta
2
Affiliations
1 1173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, IN
2 Shri Venkateswar University, Meerut, IN
1 1173 Sector 15, Panchkula 134113, Haryana, IN
2 Shri Venkateswar University, Meerut, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 52, No 5 (2015), Pagination: 315-326Abstract
The paper is the result of the examination of 1206 publications on Indian cloud computing research, as covered in Scopus database during 2004-13, experiencing an annual average growth rate of 25.51% during 2008-13 and citation impact per paper of 11.69. The world cloud computing research output (21316 publications) came from several countries, of which the top 10 countries (China, USA, Germany, India, UK, Taiwan, Australia, Italy, Japan etc) accounted for 80.57% share of the global output during 2004-13. The major institutional contribution to cloud computing research comes from universities, followed by engineering colleges, institutes of national importance, industrial enterprises and research institutes during 2004-13. India's global publication share was 5.66% and occupied 4th rank in global publication output during 2004-13. The Indian cloud computing output comes from several organizations and authors, of whom the top 15 and 10 authors contributed 33.25% and 7.30%, share respectively during 2004-13. India's international collaborative share in cloud computing was 11.69% during 2004-13. Computer science accounted for the largest publication share (79.44%) of the output in cloud computing, followed by engineering (22.80%), mathematics (7.30%), social science (2.57%), etc during 2004-13. Suggest the need for the development of a cloud economy and the adoption of cloud services and build suitable policy and regulation to encourage migration of IT services towards the cloud.Keywords
Cloud Computing, India, Publications, Scientometrics.- Social Media and Libraries:A Scientometric Assessment of World Output, 2003-2014
Abstract Views :289 |
PDF Views:22
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110 012, IN
2 National Physical Lab, New Delhi, IN
3 Indian Institute of Science, Education and Research, Mohali - 140 306, Punjab, IN
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110 012, IN
2 National Physical Lab, New Delhi, IN
3 Indian Institute of Science, Education and Research, Mohali - 140 306, Punjab, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 53, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 1-10Abstract
The paper examines 1472 global publications on "social media and libraries" covering the period 2003-14 on a series of indicators. The publications output averaged 62% annual growth. These 1472 global publications received 5350 citations since their publication, averaging 1.68 citations per paper. Only 47.55% publications were cited one or more times. The contribution of top most productive countries (namely USA, U.K., Canada, Spain, Germany, China, Australia, India, Netherlands and Singapore) together accounted for 74.86% share. Netherlands registered the highest share (38.89%) of international collaborative papers among the top 10 countries during 2003-14. The top 15 organizations out of 293 accounted for 12.57% share. The top 10 authors out of 410 accounted for 4.96% share during 2003-14. Journals (57%) and conference proceedings (26.09%) contributed the largest share to global output during 2003-14. The top 15 journals contributed 290 publications(34.20%) during 2003-14. The top 10 most highly cited papers received 1094 citations, from 51 to 401 citations per paper. Blogs contributed the largest share (34.99%) of publications among social media sites, followed by Wikipedia (19.97%), Facebook (13.65%) and others.Keywords
Assessment, Citation Analysis, Library, Social Media, Scintometrics.References
- Social media (2015). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media on 6 April 2015.
- Kaplan, A.M. andHaenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1): 61.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
- Kietzmann, H.J. and Kristopher, H. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54: 241–251. doi:10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2011.01.005.
- Davis, III C.H.; Deil-Amen, R.; Rios-Aguilar, C. and Gonzalez Canche, M.S. (2012). Social media in higher education: A literature review and research direction. Claremont Graduate University. Retrieved fromhttp//works.bepress.com/egi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=hfdavis(Accessed on 22 August 2014).
- Constantinides, E. and Fountain, S.J. (2008). Web 2.0: Cenceptual foundation and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3): 231–244.
- White, M.G. (2006-15). What Types of Social Networks Exist?Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.co/search?q=cache:mzNacrIimegJ:socialnetworking.lovetoknow.com/What_Types_of_Social_Networks_Exist+& cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
- Rutherford, L.L. (2008). Building participative library services: The impact of social software use in public libraries.Library High Tech, 26(3): 411–423.
- Tiffen, B. and England, A. (2011) Engaging with clients and personalizing services at UTS Library: Measuring the value of libraries and their clients. The Australian Library Journal, 60(3): 237–247.
- Mack, D.;Behler, A.B.R. and Rimland, E. (2007). Reaching students with Facebook: Data and best practices.Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship, 8(2). Retrieved from. http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/ v08n02/mack_d01.htmlon 6 July 2015
- Phillips, N.K. (2011). Academic library use of Facebook: Building relationship with students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6): 512–522.
- Xia, Z.D. (2009). Marketing library services through face book groups. Library Management, 30(6-7): 469–47.
- London, L. and Hall, H. (2010). From triviality to business tool: The case of Twitter in library and information services delivery. Business Information Review, 27(4): 236–241.
- Breeding, M. (2009).Social networking strategies for professionals. Computers in Libraries October, 29(9): 29–31.
- Hall, H.(2011). Relationship and role transformations in social media environments. The Electronic Library, 29(4): 421–28.
- Bradley, P. (2015). Social media for creative libraries: How to maximise Impact and Reach. London; Facet Publishing. July 2015.
- American Library Association. (2012). State of America’s Libraries Report 2012.Section on social networking. Chicago. 2012, p. 34.
- Jain, P. (2014). Application of social media in marketing library and information services: A global perspective. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 2(2): 25.
- Khan, S.A. andBhatti, R. (2012). Application of social media in marketing of library and information services: A case study from Pakistan. Webology, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.webology.org/2012/v9n1/a93.html
- Taylor and Francis Group. (2014). Use of social media by library: Current practices and future opportunities. October 2014.
- Coursaris, C.K. and Van Osch, W. (2014). A scientometric analysis of social media research(2004-2011). Scientometrics, 101(1): 357–389.
- Chunmei, G. and Weijun, W. (2014). A Bibliometric Analysis of Social Media Research from the Perspective of Library and Information Science. Digital Services and Information Intelligence. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 445:23–32.
- Scientometric Assessment of Indian Publications on Rare Earths during 2005-14
Abstract Views :266 |
PDF Views:6
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Physical Lab., New Delhi, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 S. V. University, Tirupati, IN
1 National Physical Lab., New Delhi, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi 110 012, IN
3 S. V. University, Tirupati, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 53, No 4 (2016), Pagination: 271-279Abstract
This paper analyzes India's research output in rare earths on a series of scientometric indicators. India published a total of 11,838 publications in the area of rare earths in 10 years during 2005-14 registering an average annual growth of 11.38%, citation impact of 7.44 citations per paper, and accounted for 5.18% global publications in rare earths for the period ranking as the 6th most productive country in the world. The paper profiles 15 most productive countries in rare earths, 20 most productive organizations and 20 most productive authors on a series of indicators including global publications share, global citation share, average productivity, citations per paper, h-index, and share of international collaborative papers during 2005-14. The paper also identifies top 20 most productive journals reporting India's research in rare earths during 2005-14. Suggests the needs for developing a national policy for catalyzing R& D on rare earths research in the country, increased investments in R& D, identification of areas of strategic interest and identification of top R& D institutions wherein future research could be conducted.Keywords
India, Rare Earths, Scientometrics.References
- Rare earth elements.31 May 2015.http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Rare_earth_element (Accesses on February 15, 2015)
- UNCTAD. Commodities at a Glance. New York and Geneva.2014. Special Issue on Rare Earths, No.5. Scarce supply – the word’s rare earth metal producers. 3 July 2014.http://www.mining-technology.com/features/featurescarcesupplythe-worlds-biggest-rare-earth-metal-producers4298126/ (Accesses on February 20, 2015)
- Rare Earth Technology Alliance. What are rare earths? 2013-15. American Chemical Council, Inc. http://www.rareearthtechalliance.com/What-are-Rare-Earths( Accesses on 25 February 2015)
- Rare earth elements. http://www.periodni.com/rare_earth_ elements.html (Accesses on 25 February 2015)
- Barth, Andreas and Marx, Werner. (1979). Stimulation of ideas through compound-based bibliometrics: Counting and mapping chemical compounds for analyzing research topics in chemistry, physics, and materials science. Scientometrics, 1(4):339-57
- Brozek, V. and Karen, P. (1979). Dynamics of information flow in the field of rare earth carbide research. Scientometrics, 1(4):339-57.
- Adachi, Gin-ya, Imanaka, Nobuhito and Tamura, Shinji. (2010). Research trends in rare earths: A preliminary analysis. Journal of Rare Earths, 28(6):843-46
- Ju, Yonghan and Sohn, So Young. (2015). Identifying patterns in rare earth elements patents based on text and data mining. Scientometrics, 102(1):389-410.
- Ranking of Indian Universities in Social Sciences: A Scientometric Analysis
Abstract Views :290 |
PDF Views:11
Authors
Affiliations
1 AC Joshi Library (Central Library), Panjab University, Chandigarh - 160014, IN
2 Department of Mathematics, Panjab University, Sector -14, Chandigarh - 160014, IN
3 NISSTADS-CSIR, New Delhi - 110012, Delhi. Res. Address - 1173/15, Panchkula - 134113, Haryana, IN
1 AC Joshi Library (Central Library), Panjab University, Chandigarh - 160014, IN
2 Department of Mathematics, Panjab University, Sector -14, Chandigarh - 160014, IN
3 NISSTADS-CSIR, New Delhi - 110012, Delhi. Res. Address - 1173/15, Panchkula - 134113, Haryana, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 55, No 5 (2018), Pagination: 254-264Abstract
The present study aims to rank Indian universities in social sciences based on their research output during 2007-2016, citations, international collaboration and a few qualitative and quantitative indicator. Data is collected from the SCOPUS database and a new composite performance indicator, the p-index is used to measure research performance.Keywords
Citations, India, Publications, Ranking, Social Sciences, Universities.References
- Center for World University Rankings. Retrieved on February 5, 2018 from www.cwur.org/methodology/subject-rankings.php.
- Gupta, B.M. (2010). Ranking and performance of Indian universities based on publication and citation data. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(7), 837-43.
- Gupta, R., Kumber, B.D. and Tiwari, Rishi (2014). Ranking of Indian universities in social sciences using bibliometric indicators during 2008-12. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34(3), 197-205. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.7340.
- World University Rankings (2018). Retrieved on February 5, 2018 from www.timeshighereducation.com/world-universityrankings/2018/subject-ranking/social-sciences/.
- Pagell, Ruth A. (2014). Bibliometrics and university research rankings demystified for librarians. In: Chen & Larsen (Eds.). Library and Information Sciences. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; p. 137-60. Retrieved on February 5, 2018 from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-54812-3_10.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783-642-54812-3_10.
- Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84(1),153-65. Retrieved on February 12, 2018 from https://doi.org/10.1007/3/1192-009-0066-2.
- Prathap, G. and Gupta, B.M. (2011). Ranking of Indian medical colleges for their research performance during 1999-2008. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58(3), 203-10.
- QS World University Rankings. Retrieved on February 5, 2018 from www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/ world-university-rankings/2018.
- Shanghai Rankings Global Ranking of Academic Subjects (2017). Retrieved on February 5, 2018 from www.shanghairanking.com/shanghairanking-subject-rankings/index.html.