Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scale Development Approach to the Influence of Gifting Behavior on Store Choice


Affiliations
1 Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University, India
2 Government Arts College for Women, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu, India
 

A gift is understood as more an expression of a feeling rather than the monetary value it connotes to. The intangible part of the gift is more valuable and hence customers exercise great care in the process of selection of a gift. This identifies the significance to gifting behavior as an exclusive part of consumer behavior. The descriptive study was carried out with a questionnaire comprised nineteen Likert scales reflecting the components of gifting behavior on which an exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation was conducted. The survey was carried out with 150 respondents shopping for gift articles in the town of Pondicherry using convenience sampling method. In this paper gifting behavior has been identified to classify under six dimensions namely merchandise, emotion, atmospheric, convenience, social and service. Gift items are a major market for a retailer and this scale would be useful for retailers to check their gift shopper satisfaction preparedness level. This study in future can be extended to other cities in India and can also be carried for specific demographic variables like gender or age.

Keywords

Gifting Behavior, Merchandise, Emotion Attributes, Atmospherics, Convenience Attributes, Service Attributes, Retailing, Store Choice.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Backstrom, K., & Johansson, U., (2006). Creating and consuming experiences in retail store environments: Comparing retailer and consumer perspectives Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, pp 417-430.
  • Banks, S.K., (1979). Gift-giving: a review and interactive paradigm. Advances in Consumer Research, 6(1), pp 319-324.
  • Bearden, William. O., (1977). Determinant Attributes of Store Patronage: Downtown Versus Outlying Shopping Centers, Journal of Retailing, 53(summer): 15-22, pp 92-95.
  • Belk, Russell (1976), It's the Thought that Counts: A Signed Digraph Analysis of Gift-Giving, Journal of Consumer Research, 5(3), 155-162.
  • Belshaw, Cybil (1965), Traditional Exchange and Modem Markets, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as Economic Signals and Social Symbols, American Journal of Sociology, 94 (suppl.), pp 180-214.
  • Carmines, E.G, & Mclver, J.P, (1981). Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables, In G.W. Bohmstedt & E.F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Cheal, D., (1987). Showing them you love them: gift giving and the dialectic of intimacy. Sociological Review, 35 (1), pp 150-169.
  • Frasquet M, Vallet T, Gil I (2002). Key factors in shopping centre management: Evidence from Spain. Int. Rev. Ret. Distrib. Consum. Res.,12(4): pp 337-354.
  • Howard, Daniel J. (1992). Gift-wrapping effects on product attitudes: A mood-biasing explanation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(3), pp 197-223.
  • Joreskog, K.G., and Sorbom,D. (1984). USREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
  • Langer, E. J., 2000. How taking may be giving. Psychology Today, 33 (6), pp 28.
  • Larson, D., and Watson, J., (2001). A guide map to the terrain of gift value, psychology and marketing, 18(August), pp 889-906.
  • Lowes, B., J. Turner, and Gordon Wills (1971), Patterns of Gift-Giving, in G. Wills (ed.), Explorations in Marketing Thought, London: Bradford University Press, 82-102.
  • Mauss, M., (1954). The gift, forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohen and West.
  • Mick, D.G., & De Moss, M. (1992). Further findings on self-gifts: products, qualities, and Socio-economic correlates. Advances in Consumer Research, 19 (1), pp 140-146.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Olshavsky, Richard. (1985) "Perceived Quality in Consumer Decision-Making: An integrated theoretical Perspective." In J. Jacoby and J. Olson (ells.). Perceived Quality. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, pp. 267-296.
  • Robben, H.S., and Verhallen, T.M.M. (1994). Behavioural costs as determinants of costs perception and preference formation for gifts to receive and gifts to give. Journal of Economic Psychology, (15), 333-350.
  • Sharma, Shailendra Kumar., Pragyendu ,Parvender . Negi, Aastha Kapoor (2015). Nature and dynamics of gift-giving in India: A study of gift-giving habits among youth in Delhi, Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4(4) pp 113-118.
  • Sherry, J.F., 1983. Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), pp 157-168.
  • Vincent, M., and Zikmund, W. (1975). An Experimental Investigation of Situational Effects on Risk Perception, In M. J. Schlinger, ed., Advances in Consumer Research, Chicago: Association for Consumer Research.
  • Wolfinbarger, M.F., (1990). Motivations and symbolism in gift-giving behavior, Advances in Consumer Research, 17( 1), pp 699-706.
  • Young, Scott H. (2010), Winning At Retail: Insights from 35 Years of Packaging and Shopper Research. Skokie, Illinois: In-Store Marketing Institute.

Abstract Views: 146

PDF Views: 78




  • Scale Development Approach to the Influence of Gifting Behavior on Store Choice

Abstract Views: 146  |  PDF Views: 78

Authors

T. Frank Sunil Justus
Department of Business Administration, Annamalai University, India
T. Sunitha
Government Arts College for Women, Pudukottai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


A gift is understood as more an expression of a feeling rather than the monetary value it connotes to. The intangible part of the gift is more valuable and hence customers exercise great care in the process of selection of a gift. This identifies the significance to gifting behavior as an exclusive part of consumer behavior. The descriptive study was carried out with a questionnaire comprised nineteen Likert scales reflecting the components of gifting behavior on which an exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation was conducted. The survey was carried out with 150 respondents shopping for gift articles in the town of Pondicherry using convenience sampling method. In this paper gifting behavior has been identified to classify under six dimensions namely merchandise, emotion, atmospheric, convenience, social and service. Gift items are a major market for a retailer and this scale would be useful for retailers to check their gift shopper satisfaction preparedness level. This study in future can be extended to other cities in India and can also be carried for specific demographic variables like gender or age.

Keywords


Gifting Behavior, Merchandise, Emotion Attributes, Atmospherics, Convenience Attributes, Service Attributes, Retailing, Store Choice.

References