SAMVAD: International Journal of Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Resources in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation Process on Users’ Performance


Affiliations
1 Prestige Institute of Management and Research, Indore, India
 

ERP is latest software meant for improving the business on the whole and its implementation methodologies are in the developing stage. ERP implementation involves amendments in business process and software configuration for better compatibility. Besides, ERP systems is not as much a technological exercise as it is an organizational revolution since it interacts with actors (users) of the organization. Hence, this study was undertaken that focuses on understanding the effect of different resources during ERP implementation on user performance. Data was collected from 67 manufacturing organizations that fulfilled the above criteria's and the sample of the study constituted of 750 individuals working in these manufacturing companies. Structural Equation Modeling through PLS software was used for the analysis. The study found that project management and hardware resources used during ERP implementation affect the employee performance of an organization.

Keywords

ERP Implementation, Hardware, Performance, Project Management.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Akkermans, H. & Helden, K.V. (2002). Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: A case study of interrelations between critical success factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 11, 35–46.

  • Akkermans, H.A., Bogerd, P., Yucesan, E. & Wassenhove Van, L.N. (2003). The impact of ERP on Supply Chain Management: Exploratory Findings from a European Delphi Study. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2), 284–301.

  • Al-Mashari, M. (2000). Constructs of Process Change Management in ERP Context: A Focus on SAP R/3. Proceedings of the Americans Conference on Information Systems.

  • Al-Mashari, M. (2003). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems: A Research Agenda. Industrial Management, Data Systems, 103(1), 22–7.

  • Al-Mudimigh, A., Zairi, M. & Al-Mashari, M. (2010). ERP Implementation: an Integrative Methodology. European Centre for Best Practice Management.

  • Amoako-Gyampah, K. & Salam, A.F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP Implementation environment, Information, Management, 41(6), 731–745.

  • Barki, H., Rivard, S. & Talbot, J. (1993). Toward an assessment of software development risk. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 203–225.

  • Bergstrom, M. & Stehn, L. (2005). Benefits and Disadvantages of ERP in Industrialized Timber Frame Housing in Sweden. Construction Management and Economics, 23, 831–838.

  • Bingi, P., Sharma, M. & Godla, J. (1999). Critical Issues Affecting an ERP Implementation. Information Systems Management, 16(3), 7–14.

  • Boehm, B.W. (1989). Software Risk Management. IEEE Computer Society Press

  • Boudreau, M.C. (2003). Learning to Use ERP Technology: A Causal Model. 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.

  • Brown, C. & Vessey, I. (1999). ERP Implementation Approaches: Toward a Contingency Framework. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, 411–416.

  • Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. (1995). Information Technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3(4), 183–200.

  • Brynolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. & Yang, S. (2000). How the interaction of computers and organizational structure affects stock market valuations? MIT Working Paper.

  • Calisir, F. & Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with Enterprise Resources Planning (ERP) Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 505–515.

  • Caruso, D. (2003). ERP as Infrastructure? MSI, 21–28.

  • Chin, W.W. (1998a). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation ModellingModeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7–16.

  • Chin, W.W. (1998b). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modellingmodeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 2295–336.

  • Chin, W.W. & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modellingmodeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 307–341.

  • Chin, W.W. & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. Database Advances, 26(2–3), 42–64.

  • Daft, R.L. (2001). Organization Theory and Design. (6th ed.). Cincinnati, Ohio: South Western College Publishing.

  • Daoud H. & Triki M. (2013). Accounting Information Systems in Anan ERP Environment and Tunisian Firm Performance. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 13, 1–35.

  • Davenport, T.H. (2000). Mission critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems. Harvard Business School Press.

  • Dewar, R.D., & Dutton, J.E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.

  • Ehie, I.C. & Madsen, M. (2005). Identifying critical issues in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation. Computers in Industry, 56(6), 545–57.

  • Evans, H., Ashworth, G., Chellew, M., Davison, A. & Towers, D. (1996). Exploiting activity-based information: Easy as ABC. Management Accounting, 74(7), 24–29.

  • Ewusi, M.K. (1997). Critical Issues in Abandoned Information Systems Development Projects. Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 74–80.

  • Ferratt, T.W., Ahire, S., & De, P. (2006). Achieving success in large projects: Implications from a study of ERP Implementations. Interfaces, Informs, 36(5), 458–469.

  • Fichman, R. (2004). Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for Theory and Practice. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 132–154.

  • Fisher, D.M., Kiang, M.Y., Fisher, S.A., & Chi, R.T. (2004). Evaluating mid-level ERP Software. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(1), 38–46.

  • Fornell, C. & Bookstein, F.L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440–452.

  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(1), 39–50.

  • Garret, E. & Woodworth, R. (1981). Statistic in psychology and Education, Bombay: Vakils, Feffer and Simons Ltd.

  • Gattiker, T.F., & Goodhue, D.L. (2005). What happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the impact of inter-dependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. outcomes? MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 559–585.

  • George & Mallery (2006). SPSS for Windows Step by Step. A Simple Guide and Reference 13.0 Update, New Delhi: Pearson Edition, Inc., 151.

  • George & Mallery (2009). SPSS for Windows Step by Step. A Simple Guide and Reference 15.0 Update, New Delhi: Pearson Edition, Inc., 98–99.

  • Gibson, N., Holland, C.P. & Light, B. (1999). Enterprise Resource Planning: A Business Approach to System Development. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1-9.

  • Grabski, S.V., Leech, S.A. & Pamela, S.J. (2011). A review of ERP Research: A future agenda for accounting information systems. Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 37–78.

  • Hasan, M., Trinh, N.T., Chan, F.T.S, Chan, H.K., Chung, S.H. (2011). Implementation of ERP of the Australian Manufacturing Companies 2010. Industrial Management, Data Systems, 111(1), 132–145.

  • Hinton, P.R., Brownlow, C., McMurray, I. & Cozens, B. (2004). SPSS Explained. Routledge Inc., East Sussex.

  • Hoffman, T. (1998). Extending ERP’s Reach. Computerworld, 32(6), 75–6.

  • Holland, C. & Light, B. (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP Implementation. IEEE Software, 30–35.

  • Huang, S.M., Chang, I.C., Li, S.H. & Lin, M.T. (2004). Assessing risk in ERP projects: Identify and prioritize the factors. Industrial Management, Data Systems, 104(8), 681–689.

  • Ifinedo, P. (2007). An empirical study of ERP success evaluations by Business and IT Managers. Information Management, Computer Security, 15(4), 270–2-82.

  • Ifinedo, P. & Nahar, N. (2009). Interactions between Contingency, Organizational IT Factors, and ERP Success. Industrial Management, Data Systems, 109(1), 118–137.

  • Iso. (1998). Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. Part 11: Guidance on Usability, International Standards Organization, 9211–41.

  • Jarrar, Y.F., Al-Mudimigh, A. & Zairi, M. (2000). ERP Implementation Critical Success Factors - –The Role and Impact of Business Process Management. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference.

  • Kamhawi, E.M. (2008). Enterprise resource-planning systems adoption in Bahrain: Motives, Benefits, & Barriers. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(3), 310–3-34.

  • Karimi, J., Somers, T.M. & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The impact of ERP Implementation on Business Process Outcomes: A factor-based study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 101–134.

  • Keil, M. & Montealegre, R. (2000). Cutting your losses: Extricating your organization when a big project goes away. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 56–58.

  • King, W. (2005). Ensuring ERP Implementation Success. Information Systems Management, 22(3), 83–85.

  • Klaus, H., Rosemann, M. & Gable, G. (2000). What is ERP? Information Systems Frontiers, 141–157.

  • Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O. & Osei-Bryson, K.M. (2006). An exploration of factors that impact individual performance in an ERP environment: An analysis using multiple analytical techniques. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 556–568.

  • Lall, V. & Teyarachakul, S. (2006). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Selection: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Approach. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47(1), 123–127.

  • Lang, S., Masoner, M. & Nicolaou, A. (2001). An empirical examination of the influence of organizational constraints on information systems development. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2, 75–102.

  • Light, B., Holland, C.P. & Wills, K. (2001). ERP and Best of Breed: A Comparative Analysis. Business Process Management Journal, 7.

  • Longinidis, P. & Gotzamani, K. (2009). ERP user satisfaction issues: Insights from a Greek Industrial Giant. Industrial Management, Data Systems, 109(5), 628–6-45.

  • Lui, K.M. & Chan, K.C.C. (2008). Rescuing troubled software projects by team transformation: A case study with an ERP Project. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 171–184.

  • Markus, M.L., Tanis, C. & Fenma, P. C. (2000). Multisite ERP Implementations. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 42–46.

  • Motwani, J., Mirchandani D., Madan, M. & Gunasekara, A. (2002). Successful Implementation of ERP Projects: Evidence Fromfrom two case studies. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1–2), 83–96.

  • Muscatello, J.R. & Chen, I.J. (2008). Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementations: Theory and Practice. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 4 (1), 63–77.

  • Nah, F. & Delgado, S. (2006). Critical success factors for ERP Implementation and Upgrade. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(5), 99–113.

  • Nah, F., Zuckweiler, K. & Lau, J. (2003). ERP Implementation: Chief Information Officers’ perceptions of critical success factors. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 5–22.

  • Nicolaou, A. I. (2004a). Quality of Post-Implementation Review in ERP Systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(1), 25–49.

  • Nicolaou, A.I. (2004b). Firm performance effects in relation to the implementation and use of enterprise resource planning systems. Journal of Information Systems, 18 (2), 79–105.

  • Oliver, D. & Romm, C. (2002). Justifying Enterprise Resource Planning Adoption. Journal of Information Technology, 17, 199–213.

  • Palaniswamy, R. & Frank, T. (2000). Enhancing manufacturing performance with ERP Systems. Information Systems Management, 17, 43–55.

  • Peak, D. (2000). Project Management. International Encyclopedia of Business, Management. The Handbook of IT in Business, In: Zeleny, M., editor. London.

  • Ragowsky, A. & Gefen, D. (2008). What makes the competitive contribution of ERP Strategic? The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 39(2).

  • Rainer, R.K., Synder, C.A. & Carr, H.H. (1991). Risk analysis for Information Technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(1).

  • Rockart, J. (1979). Chief Executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 81–93.

  • Saini, S., Nigam, S. & Misra, S.C. (2010). Success factors for implementing ERP: A Conceptual Model. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, China.

  • Sammon, D. & Adam, F. (2004). ERP Software selection - widening the debate. The Enterprise Resource-Planning Decade: Lessons Learned and Issues for the Future, Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Group, Hershey, PA.

  • Scott, J.E. & Vessey, I. (2002). Managing Risks in Enterprise Systems Implementations. Communications of the ACM, 45, 74–81.

  • Seddon, P.B. & Kiew, M.Y. (1994). A Partial Test and Development of the Delone and Mclean Model of IS Success. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Canada. 99–110.

  • Sedera, D., Gable, G. & Chan, T. (2003). Knowledge Management for ERP Success. Proceedings of the 7th PACIS, Adelaide, Australia.

  • Singh, A. & Wesson, J. (2009). Evaluation criteria for assessing the usability of ERP Systems. Communications of ACM.

  • Siriginidi, S.R. (2000a). Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Needs and Technologies. Industrial Management, Data Systems, 100, 81.

  • Somers, T. & Nelson, K. (2001). The Impact of Critical Success Factors across the Stages of Enterprise Resource Planning Implementations. International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, IEEE.

  • Somers, T., Nelson, K. & Ragowsky, A. (2000). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) for the next millennium: Development of an integrative framework and implications for research. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Atlanta: Association for Information Systems. 998–1004.

  • Sumner, M. (2000). Risk Factors in Enterprise-Wide/ERP Projects. Journal of Information Technology, 15, 317–327.

  • Stadtler, H. & Kilger, C. (2000). Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning: Concepts, Models, Software and Case Studies. Berlin: Springer.

  • Themistocleous, M., Irani, Z. & Keefe, R.M. (2001). ERP and application integration: An exploratory survey. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 195–204.

  • Tsai, W-H., Chien, S-W, Hsu, P-Y. & Leu, J-D. (2005). Identification of critical failure factors in the implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system in Taiwan’s industries. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2(2), 219–39.

  • Umble, E. & Umble, M. (2002). Avoiding ERP Implementation failure. Industrial Management, 44(1), 25–34.

  • Uwizeyemungu, S. & Raymond, L. (2010). Linking the Effects of ERP to organizational performance: Development and initial validation of an evaluation method. Information Systems Management, 27, 25–41.

  • Wright, S. & Wright, A.M. (2001). Information system assurance for enterprise resource planning systems: Assurance for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementation and Unique Risk Considerations. Journal of Information Systems, 16, 5–15

  • Wold, H. (1982). Soft Modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In: JoeReskog, K.G. & Wold, H.E., editors, Systems Under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

  • Yeh, J-Y. (2006). Evaluating ERP performance from user perspective. IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Services Computing.

  • Yen D.C, Chou D.C., & Chang J. (2002). A synergic analysis for web-based Enterprise Resources Planning Systems. Computer Standards Interfaces, 24, 337– 346.

  • Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaranb, A., & Abthorpec, M.S. (2004). Enterprise information systems project implementation: A case study of ERP in Rolls-Royce. International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 251–266.

  • Zhang, Z., Lee, M.K.O., Huang, P., Zhang, L. & Huang, X. (2005). A framework of ERP Systems Implementation success in China: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 98(1), 56–80.

  • Zhang, L., Lee M.K.O., Zhang, Z. & Banerjee, P. (2002). Critical Success Factors of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Implementation Success in China. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society.

  • Ziad. M.S. & Al-Jedaiah, N. (2010). User’s factors affecting an enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP) Implementation Success in Jordan a Study in Alhassan Industrial City. Interdisciplinary Journal Of Contemporary Research In Business, 2(3), 133–168.

  • Zviran, M., Pliskin, N. & Levin, R. (2005). Measuring user satisfaction and perceived usefulness in the ERP context. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(3), 43–52.


Abstract Views: 250

PDF Views: 90




  • Impact of Resources in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation Process on Users’ Performance

Abstract Views: 250  |  PDF Views: 90

Authors

Bharti Motwani
Prestige Institute of Management and Research, Indore, India
R. K. Sharma
Prestige Institute of Management and Research, Indore, India

Abstract


ERP is latest software meant for improving the business on the whole and its implementation methodologies are in the developing stage. ERP implementation involves amendments in business process and software configuration for better compatibility. Besides, ERP systems is not as much a technological exercise as it is an organizational revolution since it interacts with actors (users) of the organization. Hence, this study was undertaken that focuses on understanding the effect of different resources during ERP implementation on user performance. Data was collected from 67 manufacturing organizations that fulfilled the above criteria's and the sample of the study constituted of 750 individuals working in these manufacturing companies. Structural Equation Modeling through PLS software was used for the analysis. The study found that project management and hardware resources used during ERP implementation affect the employee performance of an organization.

Keywords


ERP Implementation, Hardware, Performance, Project Management.

References