Mody University International Journal of Computing and Engineering Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Performance Comparison and Analysis of On-Demand, Table-driven and Hybrid Routing Protocols in 3D


Affiliations
1 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The interaction between randomly distributed sensor nodes in an underground environment can lead to establishment of a network system with efficient data delivery. There has been an increasing interest in building mobile sensor networks due to its favorable advantages and applications. This paper focuses on the analysis of factors like data received, end-to-end delay, throughput, jitter and energy consumed by sink node when different routing protocols viz. On-Demand, Table-Driven and Hybrid are applied in the same 3D network design and the sink node is kept static. It is shown here how the performance of data communication is affected when using IEEE 802.15.4 standard. The analysis is done to show the applicability of various routing protocols for agricultural monitoring. Extensive simulations are done using QualNet 6.1 network simulator to validate the results.

Keywords

Sensor Nodes, Mobility, Routing Protocols, Qualnet 6.1.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Manju, Ranjana Thalore, Jyoti, M. K. Jha. “Performance evaluation of Bellman-Ford, AODV, DSR and DYMO protocols using QualNet in 1000m× 1000m terrain area” International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE), vol. 2(6), 2013, pp. 2231-2307.

  • Ranjana Thalore, Jyoti Sharma, Manju Khurana, Manish Kumar Jha. “QoS evaluation of energy-efficient ML-MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks” AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, vol. 67(12), 2013, pp. 1048-1053.

  • Manju Khurana, Jyoti Sharma, Ranjana Thalore, Manish Kumar Jha. “Direction determination in wireless sensor networks using grid topology” Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence, vol. 5(2), 2013.

  • Priyanka Rawat, Kamal Deep Singh, Hakima Chaouchi, Jean Marie Bonnin. “Wireless sensor networks: a survey on recent developments and potential synergies” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 68(1), 2014, pp. 1-48.

  • Jianqi Liu, Jiafu Wan, Qinruo Wang, Pan Deng, Keliang Zhou, Yupeng Qiao. “A survey on position-based routing for vehicular ad hoc networks” Telecommunication Systems, vol. 62(1), 2016, pp. 15-30.

  • Bakht Humayun. “A comparative study of maoddp with ZRP and DSR routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc network” Computer Science and Telecommunications, 2016, pp. 47.

  • Bakht Humayun. “Comparative study of on-demand data delivery with tables driven and on-demand protocols for mobile ad-hoc network” Computer Science and Telecommunications, vol. 49(3), 2016.

  • Jonathan Loo, Jaime Lloret Mauri, Jesús Hamilton Ortiz, eds. “Mobile ad hoc networks: current status and future trends” CRC Press, 2016.

  • Amit Kumar Jaiswal, Pardeep Singh. “Optimizing velocity based adaptive zone routing protocol” International Conference on Computer and Communication Technology (ICCCT), 2010, IEEE, pp. 149-152.

  • Roberts, Ashish Allen, Rajeev Paulus, A. K. Jaiswal. “WSN performance parameters of AODV, DYMO, OLSR and IERP in RWP mobility model through QualNet” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 65(22), 2013.

  • Surinder Singh, B. S. Dhaliwal, Rahul Malhotra. “Impact of node density and mobility on performance of DSR routing protocol in mobile ad hoc network” International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, vol. 7(1), 2016.

  • Parvinder Kaur, Dalveer Kaur, and Rajiv Mahajan. “A review and comparison of AODV, DSR and ZRP routing protocols on the basis of qualitative metrics” 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), 2016, IEEE, pp. 3262-3266.

  • Ranjana Thalore, Partha Pratim Bhattacharya, Manish Kumar Jha. “Performance comparison of homogeneous and heterogeneous 3D wireless sensor networks” Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, vol. 2, 2017, pp. 32.

  • Yildiz, Huseyin Ugur, Kemal Bicakci, Bulent Tavli, Hakan Gultekin, Davut Incebacak. “Maximizing wireless sensor network lifetime by communication / computation energy optimization of non-repudiation security service: node level versus network level strategies” Ad Hoc Networks, 37, 2016, pp. 301-323.


Abstract Views: 152

PDF Views: 96




  • Performance Comparison and Analysis of On-Demand, Table-driven and Hybrid Routing Protocols in 3D

Abstract Views: 152  |  PDF Views: 96

Authors

Raunak Monir
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India
Ranjana Thalore
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India
Partha Pratim Bhattacharya
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-332311, India

Abstract


The interaction between randomly distributed sensor nodes in an underground environment can lead to establishment of a network system with efficient data delivery. There has been an increasing interest in building mobile sensor networks due to its favorable advantages and applications. This paper focuses on the analysis of factors like data received, end-to-end delay, throughput, jitter and energy consumed by sink node when different routing protocols viz. On-Demand, Table-Driven and Hybrid are applied in the same 3D network design and the sink node is kept static. It is shown here how the performance of data communication is affected when using IEEE 802.15.4 standard. The analysis is done to show the applicability of various routing protocols for agricultural monitoring. Extensive simulations are done using QualNet 6.1 network simulator to validate the results.

Keywords


Sensor Nodes, Mobility, Routing Protocols, Qualnet 6.1.

References