Refine your search
Collections
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dhinahar, S.
- Accuracy of Beta Angle in Assessment of Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy in Chennai Population – A Cephalometric Study
Abstract Views :279 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Nagar, Potheri, Kancheepuram District 603203, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College & Hospital, SRM Nagar, Potheri, Kancheepuram District 603203, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), Vol 31, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 43-46Abstract
Diagnosis and treatment planning in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopaedics have heavily relied on technology. Imaging is one of the most ubiquitous tools used by an orthodontist to measure and record the size and form of the craniofacial structures. Though introduced by Broadbent, cephalometrics might best be ascribed to J.A.W. Van Loon of Holland who described a technique, which related the teeth to the rest of the face, which showed the true picture of the patient's malocclusion. Both angular and linear measurements have been incorporated into the various cephalometric analyses to measure the anteroposterior discrepancies and come to a treatment plan.
References
- Moyer RE, Bookstein FL, Guire KE. The concept of pattern in craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:136–148.
- Freeman RS. Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:162–711.
- Binder RE. The geometry of cephalometrics. J Clin Orthod. 1979;13:258–263.
- Moore AW. Observation on facial growth and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod. 1959;45:399–423.
- Enlow DH. A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:283–299.
- Nanda RS. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms. Am J Orthod. 1955;41:658–673.
- Jacobson A. The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 2001;3:85–95.
- Jacobson A. The application of the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:179–189.
- Haynes S, Chau M. The reproducibility and repeatability of the Wits analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:640–647.
- Demisch A, Gebauer U, Zila W. Comparison of three cephalometric measurements of sagittal jaw relationship – angle ANB, Wits appraisal and AB-occlusal angle. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1977;269–281.
- Rushton R, Cohen AM, Linney FD. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:225–231.
- Franks S. The Occlusal Plane: Reliability of Its Cephalometric Location and Its Changes With Growth. [thesis] Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma; 1983.
- Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancy: the beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:100–105.
- Prasad M, Reddy KP, Talapaneni AK, Chaitanya N, Bhaskar Reddy MV, Patil R. Establishment of norms of the beta angle to assess the sagittal discrepancy for Nellore district population. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:409–413.
- Singh C, Kumar H, Verulkar A, Joshi R, Garg H. Norms for antero-posterior of jaw relationship for North Indian population. Indian J Dent Sci. 2014;6(June (2)).
- Prasad PN, Ansari R, Rana T, Rawat N. Assessment of beta angle among the various facial types in Garhwali population – a cephalometric evaluation. Orthod J Nepal. 2013;3(June (1)).
- Qamruddin I, Shahid F, Fizok H, Maryam B, Tanwir A. Beta angle: a cephalometric analysis performed in a sample of Pakistan population. J Pak Dent Assoc. 2012;21:206–209.
- Aggarwal A, Shivalinga. Bhagyalakshmi. Subbiah P. Reliability of beta angle as an indicator of skeletal base discrepancy in Mysore population – a cephalometric study. J Orofac Health Sci. 2014.