Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rana, S. S.
- Exploring the Potential of Segmental T-Loop in Two Different Clinical Situations
Abstract Views :185 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, IN
1 Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, IN
Source
Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), Vol 31, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 55-63Abstract
This report describes the successful orthodontic treatment of two cases of highly placed canine with different clinical situations using segmental T-loop. The objective of this study was to evaluate the modification in T-loop on differently angulated canine. Orthodontic treatment of highly placed canine is justified as its aberrant position may damage the ischolar_mains of adjacent teeth. In addition to it, functional occlusion and esthetic balance are achieved after orthodontic treatment. Malocclusion with severe crowding is difficult to treat without extraction as it compromises the patient's profile. Cases were managed with extraction of both maxillary and mandibular first premolars followed by Canine retraction with 0.017 in. × 0.025 in. TMA wire segmented T-loop spring using 0.022 in. × 0.028 in. (edgewise appliance). Different moments were applied for canine retraction at different axial inclinations. After treatment, satisfactory improvements in facial profile and lip competency with normal overjet and overbite without marked gingival recession and anchorage loss were observed.Keywords
Highly Placed Canine, Segmental T Loop, Severe Crowding.
References
- Burstone CJ. The segmented arch approach to space closure. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:361–378.
- Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Optimizing anterior and canine retraction. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:1–19.
- Faulkner MG, Lipsett AW, El-Rayes K, Haberstock DL. On the use of vertical loops in retraction systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1991;99:328–336.
- Burstone CJ. Rationale of the segmented arch. Am J Orthod. 1962;48:805–822.
- Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ. Holographic determination of centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:396–409.
- Kharbanda OP. Inter-disciplinary management of cleft lip and palae. In: Kharbanda OP, ed. Diagnosis and Management of Maloclusion and Dentofacial Deformities 2nd ed. India: Elesevier; 2013:405.
- Kuhlberg AJ, Burstone CJ. T-loop position and anchorage control. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:12–18.
- Braun S, Marcotte MR. Rationale of the segmented approach to orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:1–8.
- A Robust Method of Bonding Fixed Lingual Retainer
Abstract Views :247 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, IN
1 Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Deformities, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, IN
Source
Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), Vol 31, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 64-66Abstract
Flexible spiral wire (FSW) is commonly used as a bonded retainer. Accurate and passive placement of a FSW requires a lot of skill and dexterity. Stabilizing the retainer wire with a plier or finger pressure is very demanding and various auxiliaries like elastics, dental floss and silicone transfer tray aid in securing the retainer in place, however their precision is questionable. We used a simple bonding technique, using a laboratory-prepared Memosil 2, is an accurate, effective, and predictable method for bonding fixed multistranded wire retainer.Keywords
FSW, Retainer, Simple Bonding.References
- Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. J Clin Orthod. 1983;17:838–844.
- Meyers CE, Vogel S. Stabilization of retainer wire for direct bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1982;16:412.
- Lubit EC. The bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1979;13:311–313.
- Sinclair PM, Little RM. Maturation of untreated normal occlusions. Am J Orthod. 1983;83:114–123.
- Bishara SE, Treder JE, Damon P, Olsen M. Changes in the dental arches and dentition between 25 and 45 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:417–422.
- Bantleon HP, Droschl H. A precise and time-saving method of setting up an indirectly bonded retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:78–82.
- Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1982;15:247–255.
- Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van't Hof MA. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:300– 304.
- Tacken MP, Cosyn J, De Wilde P, Aerts J, Govaerts E, Vannet BV. Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:117–123.
- Sfondrini MF, Fraticelli D, Castellazzi L, Scribante A, Gandini P. Clinical evaluation of bond failures and survival between mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of flexible spiral wire and fiberreinforced composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6:e145–e149.a
- Salehi P, Zarif Najafi H, Roeinpeikar SM. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:25.