Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Pooja Chaturvedi
- Identification of Factors Influencing Investors’ Perception Towards Investment in Mutual Fund
Abstract Views :200 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Management Department, Gitarattan International Business School, (Affiliated to GGSIPU), Delhi, IN
1 Assistant Professor, Management Department, Gitarattan International Business School, (Affiliated to GGSIPU), Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, Vol 8, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 18-24Abstract
Mutual funds have opened new vistas to millions of investors by virtually taking investment to their doorstep. In India, retail investors in general rely on the information which neither provides hedge against inflation nor have positive real returns. He finds himself to be an odd man out in the investment game. Mutual funds have come, as a much needed help to these investors. Thus, the success of mutual funds is in essence the outcome of the collective endeavors of proficient fund managers and vigilant investors. Therefore, in the present circumstances, it is imperative to recognize the requirements of mutual funds investors along with their inclination for mutual funds schemes and their performance evaluation. This research study has an objective to analyze the perception of investors towards mutual funds as an investment avenue. The survey is undertaken on 100 educated investors of Delhi/NCR and the findings revealed that the major factors that influence buying behavior of mutual funds investors are fund characteristics, creditability, convenience, success factors, and fund family. The study will be enormously valuable for academicians, AMC's, brokers, distributors and other potential investors.Keywords
Investor Buying Behavior, Investment, Investors Perception, Mutual Funds.References
- Agrawal, G., & Jain, M. (2013). Investor’s preference towards mutual funds in comparison to other investment avenues. Journal of Indian Research, 1(4), 115-131.
- Bahl, S., & Rani, M. (2012). A comparative analysis of mutual fund schemes in India. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research, 1(7), 67-79. http://www.amfiindia.com.
- Goel, A., & Khatik, R. (2017). A study on investors’ awareness and preference towards mutual funds as an investment option. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 3(3), 61-65.
- Goel, S., Sharma, R., & Mani, M. (2012). A Review of performance indicators of mutual funds. Asian Journal of Management Research, 3(1), 116-124.
- Kaur, S., Batra, G. S., & Anjum, B. (2013). Investor’s perception towards selection of mutual funds rather than stock market. International Research Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 53-63.
- Kumar, R., & Goel, N. (2014). An empirical study on investors’ perception towards Mutual Funds. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 1(4), 83-91.
- Mane, P. (2016). A Study of Investors Perception towards Mutual Funds in the city of Aurangabad. Financial & Business Management (IFBM), 4(2), 38-44.
- Murugan, V. G. (2012). Evaluation of investor’s behavior in mutual funds. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 2(1), 274-285.
- Bahl, S., & Rani, M. (2012). A comparative analysis of mutual fund schemes in India. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research, 1(7), 67-79. http://www.amfiindia.com.
- Goel, A., & Khatik, R. (2017). A study on investors’ awareness and preference towards mutual funds as an investment option. International Journal of Commerce and Management Research, 3(3), 61-65.
- Goel, S., Sharma, R., & Mani, M. (2012). A Review of performance indicators of mutual funds. Asian Journal of Management Research, 3(1), 116-124.
- Kaur, S., Batra, G. S., & Anjum, B. (2013). Investor’s perception towards selection of mutual funds rather than stock market. International Research Journal of Business and Management, 5(2), 53-63.
- Kumar, R., & Goel, N. (2014). An empirical study on investors’ perception towards Mutual Funds. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 1(4), 83-91.
- Mane, P. (2016). A Study of Investors Perception towards Mutual Funds in the city of Aurangabad. Financial & Business Management (IFBM), 4(2), 38-44.
- Murugan, V. G. (2012). Evaluation of investor’s behavior in mutual funds. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 2(1), 274-285.
- Pandey, P., & Kishore, R. (2013). Investor’s preferences towards mutual funds and future investments: A case study of India. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(11), 1-3.
- Radhamani, V. (2013). Investor’s preferences towards mutual fund industry in Trichy. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 14-29.
- Reddy, R., & Sudhakar, D. (2016). The perception of individual investors towards the performance of mutual funds. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 18(9), 9-14.
- Saini, S., Anjum, B., & Saini, R. (2011). Investor’s awareness and perception about mutual funds. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 1(1), 14-29.
- Sharma, A., & Agrawal, D. (2015). Investor’s perception and attitude towards mutual fund as an investment option. Business Management & Social Science Research, 4(3), 51-59.
- Sharma, N. (2012). Indian investor’s perception towards mutual funds. Journal of Business Management Dynamics, 2(2), 1-9.
- Singh, B. K. (2012). A study on investors’ attitude towards mutual funds as an investment option. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(2), 61-70.
- Sustainable Finance in Emerging Markets: Rational for Indian Stock Market and Decision Making for Sustainable Future
Abstract Views :176 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Institute of Management and Research, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), New Delhi, IN
2 Gitarattan International Business School (Affiliated to GGSIPU), New Delhi, IN
1 Institute of Management and Research, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), New Delhi, IN
2 Gitarattan International Business School (Affiliated to GGSIPU), New Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, Vol 9, No 4 (2020), Pagination: 18-30Abstract
This study is committed to address the global concern of sustainability by bringing in the discussion on sustainability of earnings as a new approach to measure earnings. The given research work attempts to analyse the deviations in the normal profit margin by examining operating and non-operating elements of earnings. Further, the operating and non-operating elements of earnings have been analysed to check if operating elements of earnings are superior to non-operating elements of earnings. The sustainability of earnings is also assessed by the way of Firm-Specific Approach (Time series) and Industry-Based Approach (Cross-sectional), which is called as Intensity of Operating Earnings. The analysis of data is done through advanced techniques of Dynamic Panel Data. Our findings show that the Operating Elements of earnings are higher than the non-operating elements of earnings in a significant way. Also, there is a positive association between intensity of operating earnings measures and sustainability of earnings. Therefore, this study provides evidences, which are substantial enough to project the earnings’ sustainability in Indian stock market with respect to financial sector, which can be of immense use to Assets Management Companies, Security Analysts, Organisations and Investors.Keywords
Sustainability, Intensity of Operating-Earnings, Transitory Earnings, Dynamic Panel, Cross-Sectional.- Factors Affecting Investment Decision of Working Women of Emerging Nations: Special Reference to Indian Metro Cities
Abstract Views :299 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Management Department, Gitarattan International Business School, New Delhi, IN
1 Assistant Professor, Management Department, Gitarattan International Business School, New Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, Vol 10, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 58-66Abstract
Indian women are now actively participating in all fragments of society such as education, politics, media, science and technology; in the process, they are becoming financially independent also. With a changing scenario, women have started actively participating in investing their surplus money, although it all depends upon various parameters such as degree of their risk-taking capability, influence of family members and friends and the challenge to get exposed to modern and innovative investment avenues. This research study is focused on the identification of various factors affecting investment decision of working women of six metro cities of India namely Delhi/NCR, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Bangalore and Hyderabad. The survey is undertaken on a sample of 2680 educated women investors of the selected regions and the results highlight that certain factors like attachment, source of information, risk, quality of life and independent decisions make significant impact while deciding the investment avenues. The study is based on personal interviews with working women using a structured questionnaire. The study will be immensely useful to investment advisors, distributors, potential investors and academicians.Keywords
Investment, Perception, Working Women, Emerging Economies, India, Exploratory Factor Analysis.References
- Awais, M., & Laber, H. (2016). Impact of financial literacy and investment experience tolerance and investment decision. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(1), 73-79.
- Bahl, S. (2012). Investment behaviour of working women of Punjab. ArthPrabhand: A Journal of Economics and Management, 1(6), 56-69.
- Baker, H. K., Hargrove, M. B., & Haslem, J. A. (1974). An empirical analysis of the risk-return preferences of individual investors. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12(3), 377-389.
- Buddhapriya, S. (2009). Work family challenges and their impact on career decision. Institute of Economics and Finance, 34(1), 31-45.
- Budhwar, P., Bhatnagar, J., & Saini, D. (2005). Women in management in the new economic environment: The case of India. Asia Pacific Business Review, 11(2), 179-193.
- Chandra, A., & Kumar, S (2019). Factors influencing Indian individual investor behaviour. Department of Commerce and Business Studies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 129-151.
- Davis, H. L. (1976). Decision making within the household. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(4), 241-260.
- Duflo, E. (2011). Women’s empowerment and economic development. Department of Economics MIT. Journal of Political Economy, 116(5), 52-252.
- Gaur, A., Sukijha, J., & Sharma, S. (2011). Difference in gender attitude in investment decision making in India. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(12), 215-234.
- Glogger, M. (2008). Risk and return. Retrieved from http://university.akelius.de/library/pdf/risk_and_return_martin_glogger.pdf
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New York, Macmillan.
- Hedlund, J. (2000). Risky business: Safety regulations, risk compensations, and individual behavior. Inquiry Prevention, 6(3), 82-90.
- Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-121.
- Kansal, N., & Zaidi, P. K. (2015). Investment behavior of women in India. Proceedings of International Conference on Business Innovation and IT, 41, 939-962.
- Kappal, J. M., & Rastogi, S. (2020). Investment behaviour of women entrepreneurs. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 12(4), 485-504.
- Newton, L., & Cottrell, A. (2002). Female investors in the first English and welsh commercial joint stock bank. Journal of Banking and Research, 7, 54-61.
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Riley, W. B., & Chow, K. V. (1992). Asset allocation and individual risk aversion. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(6), 32-37.
- Sharma, A., & Douglas, J. (2017). Market research on factors influencing women’s preferences in investment decision making. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 3(8), 79-86.
- Sharma, C. P. (2019). Identification of factors influencing investors’ perception towards investment in mutual funds. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 8(3), 18-24.
- Vasagadekar, P. (2014). A research paper on investment awareness among indian working women with reference to Pune region. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5(6), 59-73.
- Veluchamy, R., & Thangaraj, V. (2020). Determinants of investment behaviour among women executives. Third International Conference on Contemporary Issues on Management and International Technology (ICMIT), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Warren, W. E. E., Stevens, R. E., & McConkey, C. W. (1990). Using demographic and lifestyle analysis to segment individual investors. Financial Analysts Journal, 46(2), 74-77.
- Mutual Fund Flow Scale: A Multi-item Scale for Measuring Perception of Mutual Fund Investors
Abstract Views :98 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Apeejay School of Management, Delhi, IN
1 Assistant Professor, Apeejay School of Management, Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, Vol 11, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 82-93Abstract
With an ever-increasing amount of information related to the stock market or various investment avenues, misperception or no perception regarding mutual funds is becoming a norm for investors and marketers. To date no perception measuring scale has been developed for mutual fund investors, to assist investors, marketers, and promoters to focus on the most crucial factors for mutual fund market application. This paper discovers the dimensions of investor perception and its relevance for investment practitioners. A five-factor conceptual model of mutual fund flow is developed, operationalised and validated, using a sample of 3,738 investors. Using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis techniques, results of this study support all the five dimensions of risk, return, fund characteristics, fund manager, and fund family, and confirms that they have a significant impact on investor perception regarding mutual fund investment decision. This work makes an equivalent influence on academic, as well as practical, domainsKeywords
Fund Characteristics, Fund Family, Fund Manager, Investor Behaviour, Investor Perception, Mutual Funds, Return, RiskReferences
- Alekhya, P. (2012). A study on performance evaluation of public & private sector mutual funds in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing & Management Review, 1(2), 147-168.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
- Baker, H. K., Hargrove, M. B., & Haslem, J. A. (1977). An empirical analysis of the risk return preferences of individual investors. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12(3), 377-389.
- Balaji, I. S., & Kumar, B. R. (2002). Investor’s psychology: A study of investor behaviour in the Indian capital market. Finance India, 16(4), 1357-1375.
- Blake, D., & Timmermann, A. (1998). Mutual fund performance: Evidence from the UK. European Finance Review, 2(1), 55-77.
- Brinson, P., Hood R., & Beebower, L. (1991). Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 42, 39-48.
- Capon, N., Fitzsimons, G., & Prince, R. (1996). An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decision. Journal of Financial Services Research, 10(1), 59-82.
- Chakrabarti, A., & Rungta, H. (2000). Mutual fund industry in India: An in-depth look in to the problems of credibility, risk and brand. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 6(2), 27-45.
- Chevalier, J., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167-1200.
- Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for emerging better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
- Connor, G., & Korajczyk, R. A. (1988). Risk and return in equilibrium apt: Application of a new test methodology. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(2), 255-289.
- Das, S., & Sundaram, R. (1998a). Fee speech: Adverse selection and the regulation of mutual fund fees. NBER Working Paper 6644.
- Das, S., & Sundaram, R. (1998b). On the regulation of fee structures in mutual funds. NBER Working Paper 6639.
- Das, S., & Sundaram, R. (2002). Fee speech: Signaling, risk-sharing and the impact of fee structures on investor welfare. Review of Financial Studies, 15(5), 1465-1497.
- Del G. D., & Tkac, P. A. (2002a). The determinants of the row of funds of managed portfolios: Mutual funds versus pension funds. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 523-557.
- Edward, F., & Zhang, X. (1998). Mutual funds and stock and bond market stability. Journal of Financial Services Research, 13(3), 257-282.
- Ferson, W. E., & Kim, M. S (2012). The factor structure of mutual fund flows. International Journal of Portfolio Analysis and Management, 1(2), 112-143.
- Fischhoff, B., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1983). Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review, 90, 239-260.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Geoffrey, F. C., & Sapp, R. A. (2007). Mutual fund flows and investor returns: An empirical examination of fund investor timing ability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2796-2816.
- Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
- Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192.
- Giambona, E., & Golec, J. (2007). Incentive fees and mutual fund volatility timing. SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Goetzmann, W., & Peles, N. (1997). Cognitive dissonance and mutual fund investors. Journal of Financial Research, 20(2), 145-158.
- Golec, H. J. (1996). The effects of mutual fund managers’ characteristics on their portfolio performance, risk and fees. Financial Services Review, 5(2), 133-147.
- Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1989). Portfolio performance evaluation: Old issues and new insights. Review of Financial Studies, 2, 393-421.
- Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1994). A study of monthly mutual fund returns and performance evaluation techniques. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(3), 419-444.
- Gruber, M. J. (1996). Another puzzle: The growth in actively managed mutual funds. Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783-810.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Macmillan.
- Hussein, A. T. (2006). Factors influencing individual investor behaviour: An empirical study of the UAE financial markets. The Business Review, 5(2), 225-232.
- Ippolito, R. A. (1992). Consumer reaction to measures of poor quality: Evidence from the mutual fund industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 35(1), 45-70.
- Jagongo, A., & Mutswenje, V. S. (2014). A survey of the factors influencing investment decisions: The case of individual investors at the NSE. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4, 92-102.
- Jones, M. A., Vance P. L. & Thomas I. S. (2005). Financial advisors and mutual fund selection. Journal of Financial Planning, 18(3), 64-70.
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (pp. 294-316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Judith, C., & Ellison, G. (1997). Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 105(6), 1167-1199.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
- Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundation and extensions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Kaur, K. (2021). Evaluation of mutual fund schemes in India – Does prolonged existence rewards performance. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 10(2), 23-29.
- Kempf, A., & Ruenzi, S. (2004). Family matters: The performance flow relationship in the mutual fund industry. Econ WPA, Finance. 10.2139/ssrn.549121.
- Khorana, A., & Servaes, H. (1999). The determinants of mutual fund starts. Review of Financial Studies, 12(5), 1043-1074.
- Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Methodology in the social sciences). Guilford Press.
- Kopsch, F., Song, H., & Wilhelmsson, M. (2015). Determinants of mutual fund flows. Managerial Finance, 41(1), 10-25.
- Koski, J., & Pontiff, J. (1996). How are derivatives used? Evidence from the mutual fund industry. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 791-816.
- Lehman, B., & Modest, D. (1988). The empirical foundations of the arbitrage pricing theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(2), 213-254.
- Li, C., & Tiwari, A. (2009). Incentive contracts in delegated portfolio management. Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4681-4714.
- March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 587-608.
- Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
- Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya B, 35, 115-128.
- Nelson, J. C., & Quick, D. L. (1997). Organizational behavior: Foundations, realities, and challenges (1st ed.). New York: West Publishing Company.
- Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures - Issues and applications (1st ed.). New Delhi: Sage Publications.
- Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of human problem solving. Psychol. Rev., 65, 151-166.
- Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1990). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
- Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53, 1775-1798.
- Pollet, J. M., & Wilson, M. (2008). How does size affect mutual fund behavior? The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2941-2969.
- Prabhu, G., & Vechalekar, N. M. (2012). Perception of Indian investor towards investment in mutual funds with special reference to MIP Funds. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 66-74.
- Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2003). Evaluating mutual funds in an emerging market: Factors that matter to financial advisors. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(3), 122-136.
- Roll, R. (1992). A mean/variance analysis of tracking error. Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(4), 13-22.
- Sankaran, S. (2012). Indian mutual funds handbook (3rd ed.). Vision Book.
- Santhi, N., & Gurunathan, B. (2012). Risk and return analysis of equity linked savings schemes of mutual funds in India. BVIMR’s Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 70-81.
- Sharma, C. P. (2021). Factors affecting investment decision of working women of emerging nations: Special reference to Indian metro cities. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 10(1), 58-66.
- Sharma, C. P. (2019). Identification of factors influencing investor perception towards investment in mutual funds. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 8(3), 18-24.
- Shefrin, H., & Statmen, M. (1985). The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 777-790.
- Shukla, R., & Singh, S. (1994). Are CFA charter holders better equity fund managers? Financial Analysts Journal, 50, 68-74.
- Shukla, R. K., & Inwegen, G. B. (1995). Do locals perform better than foreigners?: An analysis of UK and US mutual fund managers. Journal of Economics and Business, 47(3), 241-254.
- Sikidar, S., & Singh, A. P. (1996). Financial services: Investment in equity and mutual funds – A behavioural study. In B. S. Bhatia & G. S. Batra (Eds.), Management of Financial Services (Chapter 10, pp. 136-145). New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications.
- Sirri, E., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly search and mutual fund flows. Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1589-1622.
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
- Volkman, D. (1999). Determinants of persistence in relative performance of mutual funds. Journal of Financial Research, 18(4), 415-430.
- Warther, V. A. (1995). Aggregate mutual fund flows and security returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2), 209-235.
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 56-75). CA: Sage.
- www. mutualfundsindia.com
- www.amfi.com
- www.cii.in/publications.aspx
- Zadra, R. J., & Clore L. G. (2011). Emotion and perception: The role of affective information. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci., 2(6), 676-685.