Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Corporate Governance Facets on Financial Performance of Indian Banks


Affiliations
1 Faculty, Department of MBA, Institute of Management and Information Technology, Cuttack, Odisha, India
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research aimed to study the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of Indian public sector banks. Corporate governance continues to gain momentum in the ever changing business environment and has become sine qua non for corporate sustainability and greater financial performance. The economic environment is increasingly dynamic and uncertain, and this is why banks need to reassess their corporate governance practices. Banks are the main intermediaries in the financial system, and facilitate resource allocation. This requires trust from all the stakeholders, and trust emanates good governance. This makes corporate governance of banks crucial, especially for financial performance and economic advancement. The empirical analysis was conducted using multivariate regression models based on balanced panel data. Our findings show that CEO duality and audit committee size have a positive and significant impact on the return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). The tenure of the CEO also has a positive effect on the net interest margin (NIM) and market-based performance measure (Tobin’s Q). We have also found that none of the board facets of corporate governance have a positive and significant impact on the performance of public sector banks. Based on the findings, we suggest to increase the number of independent directors on the board of the public sector banks. The study contributes to the corporate governance literature by introducing some new facets relating to various committees formed by a corporate board.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Board, CEO, Committee, Banks
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agyemang-Mintah, P. (2015). The nomination committee and firm performance: An empirical investigation of UK financial institutions during the pre/post financial crisis. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 11(3), 176-190.

  • Ajanthan, A., Balaputhira, S., & Nimalathashan, B. (2013). Corporate governance and banking performance: A comparative study between private and state banking sector in Sri Lanka. European Journal of Business and Management, 5(20), 92-100.

  • Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., & Kelly, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 52, 971-1000.

  • Amran, N. A., Yusof, M., Atef, M., Ishak, R., & Aripin, N. (2014). Do characteristics of CEO and chairman influence government-linked companies performance? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 799-803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.546

  • Belkhir, M. (2009). Board of directors’ size and performance in the banking industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2), 201-221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910947903

  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 257-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorp

  • Bhatt, R. R., & Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Do board characteristics impact firm performance? An agency and resource dependency theory perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 11(4), 274-287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510x15602973

  • Bolinger, A., Brookman, J., & Thistle, P. (2019). The relative importance of CEOS and non-CEOS over firm performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 1-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.47

  • Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V., & Mare, C. (2017). Board characteristics and firm performances in emerging economies: Lessons from Romania. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 30(1), 55-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1291359

  • Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005

  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034

  • Chauhan, S., & Pasricha, J. S. (2010). Corporate governance structure and performance of Indian companies. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 3(2), 110-121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220100202

  • Elsayed, K. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1203-1214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00641.x

  • Garg, A. K. (2007). Influence of board size and independence on firm performance: A study of Indian companies. Vikalpa, 32(3), 39-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920070304

  • Ghosh, S. (2006). Do board characteristics affect corporate performance? Firm-level evidence for India. Applied Economics Letters, 13(7), 435-443. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500398617

  • Guest, P. M. (2009). The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Finance, 15(4), 385-404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13518470802466121

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Quigley, T. J. (2013). Toward more accurate contextualization of the CEO effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 473-491. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj

  • Jackling, B., & Johl, S. (2009). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from India’s top companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 492-509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00760.x

  • Jermias, J., & Gani, L. (2014). The impact of board capital and board characteristics on firm performance. British Accounting Review, 46(2), 135-153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.12.001

  • Kalsie, A., & Shrivastav, S. M. (2016). Analysis of board size and firm performance: Evidence from NSE companies using panel data approach. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 9(2), 148-172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686216666456

  • Kathuria, V., & Dash, S. (1999). Board size and corporate financial performance: An investigation. Vikalpa, 24(3), 11-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919990303

  • Kaur, A., & Singh, B. (2018). Corporate reputation: Do board characteristics matter? Indian evidence. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 122-134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686218797758

  • Kaur, R., & Singh, B. (2018). CEOs’ characteristics and firm performance: A study of Indian firms. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(2), 185-200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686218806714

  • Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55-66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01.003

  • Li, D., Lin, A., & Zhang, L. (2019). Relationship between chief executive officer characteristics and corporate environmental information disclosure in Thailand. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6(4), 564-574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0067-7

  • Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3), 508-551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2018-0211

  • Mishra, R. K., & Kapil, S. (2018). Board characteristics and firm value for Indian companies. Journal of Indian Business Research, 10(1), 2-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2016-0074

  • Narwal, K. P., & Jindal, S. (2018). Working capital management impact on corporate profitability relation with corporate governance: Evidence from Indian manufacturing sector. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 7(3), 8-12.

  • Palaniappan, G. (2017). Board characteristics relating to firms performance: A study on manufacturing firms in India. Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 6(1), 26-36.

  • Palaniappan, G. (2017). Determinants of corporate financial performance relating to board characteristics of corporate governance in Indian manufacturing industry: An empirical study. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 26(1), 67-85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-005

  • Pareek, R., Pandey, K. D., & Sahu, T. N. (2019). Corporate governance, firms’ characteristics and environmental performance disclosure practices of Indian companies. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(2), 142-155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686219881091

  • Pathan, S., & Faff, R. (2013). Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(5), 1573-1589. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.016

  • Peni, E. (2014). CEO and chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(1), 185-205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9224-7

  • Rani, A. (2018). Audit committee effectiveness: Relationship between audit committee characteristics and audit fees and non-audit service fees. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 7(3), 35-44.

  • Saibaba, M. D., & Ansari, V. A. (2012). Impact of board size: An empirical study of companies listed in BSE 100 index. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 5(2), 108-119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220120202

  • Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2018). Bank ownership, board characteristics and performance: Evidence from commercial banks in India. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1), 17. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6010017

  • Sidhu, M. K. (2016). Corporate governance and stock market liquidity. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research, 5(3), 22-31.

  • Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113-142. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5

  • Zhou, H., Owusu-Ansah, S., & Maggina, A. (2018). Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 31, 20-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018.03.002


Abstract Views: 176

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Corporate Governance Facets on Financial Performance of Indian Banks

Abstract Views: 176  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Debabrata Sharma
Faculty, Department of MBA, Institute of Management and Information Technology, Cuttack, Odisha, India
Sanjeeb Kumar Dey
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, India

Abstract


This research aimed to study the relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of Indian public sector banks. Corporate governance continues to gain momentum in the ever changing business environment and has become sine qua non for corporate sustainability and greater financial performance. The economic environment is increasingly dynamic and uncertain, and this is why banks need to reassess their corporate governance practices. Banks are the main intermediaries in the financial system, and facilitate resource allocation. This requires trust from all the stakeholders, and trust emanates good governance. This makes corporate governance of banks crucial, especially for financial performance and economic advancement. The empirical analysis was conducted using multivariate regression models based on balanced panel data. Our findings show that CEO duality and audit committee size have a positive and significant impact on the return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). The tenure of the CEO also has a positive effect on the net interest margin (NIM) and market-based performance measure (Tobin’s Q). We have also found that none of the board facets of corporate governance have a positive and significant impact on the performance of public sector banks. Based on the findings, we suggest to increase the number of independent directors on the board of the public sector banks. The study contributes to the corporate governance literature by introducing some new facets relating to various committees formed by a corporate board.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Board, CEO, Committee, Banks

References