Journal of Biological Control

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Fate of the Released Trichocards in Sugarcane Vis-a-vis Ant Predation


Affiliations
1 Division of Crop Protection, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, Tamil Nadu, India
 

The egg parasitioid Trichogramma chilonis is released as Trichocards during inundative releases against sugarcane borers. A study was undertaken to assess the fate of these cards in the field after their release. Results revealed that the eggs, whether they were unparasitized or freshly parasitized or those had turned black due to parasitization had failed to deter the predators, regardless of the age of the crop on which the cards were placed. In the present study, the ant species found predating on the eggs in the Corcyra cephalonica cards and Trichocards were Monomorium aberrans Forel., Camponotus compressus F., and Solenopsis geminata (F.). The predation did not vary based on the time interval allowed to lapse in the field. These findings show that the predator activity was random and that the encounter was by chance. When the cards were placed in net bags and tied to the plant, there was complete protection of the Corcyra cards and Trichocards. However, the time required for handling and tying these guarded bags for each release rendered it impractical. Hence, the Trichocards should either be released after the cards show at least 2% of the parasitoid emergence or had completed emerging just before release, to have maximum safety on the field.

Keywords

Trichogramma Chilonis, Corcyra Cephalonica, Safety, Parasitoids, Predation, Ants, Sugarcane.
User
Notifications

  • Ananthanarayana, K. and David, H. 1982. Construction of life table for shoot borer. Annual Report, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, 163–164.

  • Bento, A., Torres, L., Carvalho, J. P. and Lopes, J. 1998. Resultados da utilizac¸a˜o de Trichogramma cacoeciae March. Contra a gerac¸a˜o carpo´faga de Prays oleae (Bern.) em Tra´s-os-Montes. Revista Cieˆncias Agra´rias, 21: 207–211.

  • Bento, A., Torres, L., Carvalho, J. P. and Lopes, J. 1999. Biological control of Prays oleae Bern. by chrysopids in Tra´s-os-Montes region (North-eastern Portugal). Acta Horticulturae, 474: 535–539.

  • Bonhof, M. J., Overholt, W. A., Van Huis, A. and Polaszek, A. 1997. Natural enemies of cereal stem borers in East Africa. Insect Science and its Application, 17: 19–35.

  • David, H. and Banerji, D. K. 1981. Some observations on the white fly, Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett infesting sugarcane. Pestology, 5: 7–8.

  • Easwaramoorthy, S., Nandagopal, V. and David, H. 1983. Seasonal importance of parasites and predators on sugarcane inter node borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (K.). In: pp. 55-61, Proceedings of Symposium on Insect Ecology and Resource Management.

  • Easwaramoorthy, S., Nandagopal, V. and David, H. 1984. Predators of sugarcane inter node borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (K.) Proceedings of Annual Convention of Sugar Technologists Association of India, 48: 179–181.

  • Geetha, N. 2010. Compatibility of pheromones and Trichogramma chilonis Ishii for the management of inter node borer Chilo sacchriphagus indicus (Kapur) in sugarcane. Journal of Insect Science, 23: 301–307.

  • Geetha, N., Shekinah, E. D. and Rakkiappan, P. 2009. Comparative impact of release frequency of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii against Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur) in sugarcane. Journal of Biological Control, 23: 343–351.

  • Goebel, F. R., Roux, E., Marquier, M. Frandon, J., Do Thi Khanh, H. and Tabone, E. 2010. Biocontrol of Chilo sacchariphagus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), a key pest of sugarcane: Lessons from the past and future prospects. Sugarcane International, 3: 128–132.

  • Goebel, F. R. 1999. Caractéristiques biotiques du foreur de la canne à sucre Chilo sacchariphagus (Bojer, 1856) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) à l’île de la Réunion. Facteurs de régulation de ses populations et conséquences pour la lutte contre ce ravageur. Thèse de Doctorat de l’Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse). 229 pp.

  • Goebel, R., Fernandez, E., Tibere, R. and Alauzet, C. 1999. Dégâtset pertes de rendement sur la canne à sucre dus au foreur Chilo sacchariphagus (Bojer) à l’île de la Réunion (Lep.: Pyralidae). Annales de la Sociétéentomologique de France, 35 (suppl.): 476–481.

  • Gomez, L. A .L., Lastra, L. A. B., Gutierrez, Y. and De Pulido, C. L. 1998. Survey of ants detrimental to Trichogramma establishment for sugarcane borer control in the Cauca Valley, Colombia. Mitt. Biol. Bundesanst. Land- Forstwirtschaft, 356: 35–38.

  • Itioka ,T. and Inoue, T. 1996.The consequences of ant attendance to the biological control of the red wax scale insect Ceroplastes rubens by Anicetus beneficus. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 609–618.

  • Jayanthi, R. 1986. Mealy bugs. pp. 259–275. In: David, H., Easwaramoorthy, S., Jayanthi, S. (Eds.). Sugarcane Entomology in India. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore.

  • Kalyanasundaram, M., Justin, C. G. L., Swamiappan, M., Sundara Babu, P.C. and Jayaraj, S. 1993. Efficacy of Trichogramma chilonis against sugarcane internode borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 21: 149–151.

  • Mukunthan, N. 2006. Efficacy of inundative release of Trichogramma chilonis in the management of the sugarcane inter node borer, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (K.). Sugar Technology, 8: 36–43.

  • Orr, D. B. 1993. Biological control tactics for European corn borer. pp. 51–62 In: Proceedings of the Illinois Crop Protection Workshop, 3-5 March 1993, Champaign, Illinois.

  • Orr, D. B., Suh, C. P. C., McGravy, K.W., Berisford C. W. and Debarr, G. L. 2000. Evaluation of inundative releases of Trichogramma exiguum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) for suppression of Nantucket Pine tip moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Pine (Pinaceae) plantations. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 373–386.

  • Pereira, J. A., Bento, A., Cabanas, J. E., Torres, L. M., Herz A. and Hassan, S. A. 2004. Ants as predators of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma cacoeciae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) applied for biological control of the Olive moth, Prays oleae (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) in Portugal. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 14: 653–664.

  • Prasad, V. G. 1954. Neomaskellia bergii Sign., another white fly on sugarcane in Bihar. Indian Journal of Entomology, 16: 254–260.

  • Ram Mohan Rao, S. 1942. Life history and bionomics of Pseudococcus saccharicola Takh.-A new pest of sugarcane in India. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences, (B) 16: 79–85.

  • Rossi, M. N. and Fowler, H. G. 2002. Manipulation of fire ant density, Solenopsis spp., for short term reduction of Diatraea saccharalis larval densities in Brazil. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz.) 59(2). Available on line: Scientia Agricola ISSN 0103-9016 doi: 10.1590/S0103- 90162002000200027.

  • Smith, S. M. 1996. Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use. Annual Review of Entomology, 41: 375–406.

  • Suh, C.P. C., Orr, D. B. and Van Duyn, J. W. 1998. Reevaluation of Trichogramma releases for suppression of heliothine pests in cotton. pp. 1098–1101. In: Proceedings of Beltwide Cotton Production and Research Conference. Memphis: National Cotton Council.

  • Suh, C. P. C., Orr, D. B. and Vanduyn, J. W. 2000. Trichogramma releases in North Carolina cotton: Why releases fail to suppress Heliothine pests? Journal of Economic Entomology, 93: 1137–1145.

  • Teran, F. O. 1980. Natural control of Diatraea saccharalis (Fabr.) eggs in sugarcane fields of Sao Paulo. Proceedings of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists, 17: 1704– 1714.


Abstract Views: 230

PDF Views: 136




  • Fate of the Released Trichocards in Sugarcane Vis-a-vis Ant Predation

Abstract Views: 230  |  PDF Views: 136

Authors

N. Geetha
Division of Crop Protection, Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore 641007, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


The egg parasitioid Trichogramma chilonis is released as Trichocards during inundative releases against sugarcane borers. A study was undertaken to assess the fate of these cards in the field after their release. Results revealed that the eggs, whether they were unparasitized or freshly parasitized or those had turned black due to parasitization had failed to deter the predators, regardless of the age of the crop on which the cards were placed. In the present study, the ant species found predating on the eggs in the Corcyra cephalonica cards and Trichocards were Monomorium aberrans Forel., Camponotus compressus F., and Solenopsis geminata (F.). The predation did not vary based on the time interval allowed to lapse in the field. These findings show that the predator activity was random and that the encounter was by chance. When the cards were placed in net bags and tied to the plant, there was complete protection of the Corcyra cards and Trichocards. However, the time required for handling and tying these guarded bags for each release rendered it impractical. Hence, the Trichocards should either be released after the cards show at least 2% of the parasitoid emergence or had completed emerging just before release, to have maximum safety on the field.

Keywords


Trichogramma Chilonis, Corcyra Cephalonica, Safety, Parasitoids, Predation, Ants, Sugarcane.

References