Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kaaria, Rosalid Kinya
- Evaluating Information Services Offered to Physically Challenged Users to Satisfy Their Information Needs: The Case of Kenya National Library Services, Headquarters, Nairobi
Abstract Views :100 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Head Librarian, Alliance High School, KE
2 Lecturer, Kisii University, Kenya and Adjunct. Lecturer, Kenyatta University, KE
1 Head Librarian, Alliance High School, KE
2 Lecturer, Kisii University, Kenya and Adjunct. Lecturer, Kenyatta University, KE
Source
Journal of Applied Information Science, Vol 9, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 20-29Abstract
Library users who are physically challenged have continued to face challenges in accessing and utilizing libraries in Kenya. Libraries have always played a significant role, enabling people to engage with all kinds of information and knowledge resources. A library has a role to serve all members of its community, providing a wide range of materials and services which may be used for education, information or recreation. Accordingly, the study sought to evaluate information services offered to physically challenged users to satisfy their information needs at Kenya National library services, Nairobi. The study sought to determine the information sources offered to physically challenged users. The researcher used a case study research design and the whole population was used to carry out the study. The data was collected using questionnaires, interviews, observation and documentary analysis were used as secondary data collection methods. Data analysis was done quantitatively and qualitatively and presented using frequency tables, graphs and figures to give a clear visual presentation. Findings show that respondents used the library for several reasons including reading newspapers, reading text book, research, internet, looking for personal information and leisure. There was a general observation that the facilities and equipment for physically challenged users need to be improved. The study recommends that every library should provide a service which caters for every one of its users, including clientele who have a disability.Keywords
Disability, Information, Patrons, Physical Disability
References
- P. E. Agre, “Surveillance and capture: Two models of privacy,” The Information Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 101-127, 1994.
- J. Allen, Topologies of Power: Beyond Territory and Networks. London: Routledge, 2016.
- B. Bratton, The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. MIT Press, 2015.
- T. Bucher, If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2018.
- L. Castañeda, and N. Selwyn, “More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2018.
- M. Decuypere, “Open education platforms: Theoretical ideas, digital operations and the figure of the open learner,” European Educational Research Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 439-460, 2019a.
- M. Decuypere, “Researching educational apps: Ecologies, technologies, subjectivities and learning regimes,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 414-429, 2019b.
- M. Decuypere, “STS in/as education: Where do we stand and what is there (still) to gain? Some outlines for a future research agenda,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 136-145, 2019c.
- M. Dieter, C. Gerlitz, A. Helmond, N. Tkacz, F. Vlist, V. Der, and E. Weltevrede, “Store, interface, package, connection: Methods and propositions for multi-situated app studies,” CRC Media of Cooperation Working Paper Series No. 4, 2018.
- J. Drucker, Visualization and Interpretation: Humanistic Approaches to Display. MIT Press, 2020.
- M. Decuypere, “The topologies of data practices: A methodological introduction,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.
- F. Gromme, and E. Ruppert, “Population geometries of Europe: The topologies of data cubes and grids,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 235-261, 2020.
- K. N. Gulson, S. Lewis, B. Lingard, C. Lubienski, K. Takayama, and P. T. Webb, “Policy mobilities and methodology: A proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies,” Critical Studies in Education, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 224-241, 2017.
- K. N. Gulson, and S. Sellar, “Emerging data infrastructures and the new topologies of education policy,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 350-366, 2019.
- S. Hartong, “The power of relation-making: Insights into the production and operation of digital school performance platforms in the US,” Critical Studies in Education, pp. 1-16, 2020.
- S. Hartong, and A. Förschler, “Opening the black box of data-based school monitoring: Data infrastructures, flows and practices in state education agencies,” Big Data & Society, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019.
- S. Lash, “Deforming the figure: Topology and the social imaginary,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 261-287, 2012.
- B. Latour, “Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands,” Knowledge & Society, vol. 6, pp. 1-40, 1986. [Online]. Available: http://hci.ucsd.edu/10/readings/Latour(1986).pdf
- J. Law, After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Psychology Press, 2004.
- S. Lewis, “Providing a platform for “what works”: Platform-based governance and the reshaping of teacher learning through the OECD’s PISA4U,” Comparative Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 484-502, 2020.
- S. Lewis, and I. Hardy, “Tracking the topological: The effects of standardised data upon teachers’ practice,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 219-238, 2017.
- B. Light, J. Burgess, and S. Duguay, “The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps,” New Media and Society, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 881-900, 2018.
- M. Lindh, and J. Nolin, “Information we collect: Surveillance and privacy in the implementation of Google apps for education,” European Educational Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, 2016.
- C. Lury, R. Fensham, A. Heller-Nicholas, and S. Lammes, Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods. London: Routledge, 2018.
- C. Lury, L. Parisi, and T. Terranova, “Introduction: The becoming topological of culture,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 3-35, 2012.
- C. Lury, M. Tironi, and R. Bernasconi, “The social life of methods as epistemic objects: Interview with Celia Lury,” Diseña, vol. 16, pp. 32-55, 2020.
- C. Lury, and N. Wakeford, “Introduction: A perpetual inventory,” in C. Lury, and N. Wakeford, (eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Culture, Economy and the Social (CRESC). London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 1-24.
- L. Martin, and A. J. Secor, “Towards a post-mathematical topology,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 420-438, 2014.
- N. Piattoeva, and A. Saari, “Rubbing against data infrastructure(s): Methodological explorations on working with(in) the impossibility of exteriority,” Journal of Education Policy, pp. 1-21, 2020.
- J. C. Plantin, C. Lagoze, P. N. Edwards, and C. Sandvig, “Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook,” New Media and Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 293-310, 2018.
- R. Prince, “Local or global policy? Thinking about policy mobility with assemblage and topology,” Area, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 335-341, 2017.
- H. Ratner, “Topologies of organization: Space in continuous deformation,” Organization Studies, pp. 1-18, 2019.
- H. Ratner, and C. Gad, “Data warehousing organization: Infrastructural experimentation with educational governance,” Organization, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 537-552, 2019.
- H. Ratner, and E. Ruppert, “Producing and projecting data: Aesthetic practices of government data portals,” Big Data & Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-16, 2019.
- E. Ruppert, J. Law, and M. Savage, “Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 22-46, 2013.
- L. Suchman, “Configuration,” in C. Lury, and N. Wakeford, (eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Taylor and Francis, 2012, pp. 48-60.
- G. Thompson, and I. Cook, “Becoming-topologies of education: Deformations, networks and the database effect,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 732-748, 2015.
- G. Thompson, and S. Sellar, “Datafication, testing events and the outside of thought,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 139-151, 2018.
- K. van de Oudeweetering, and M. Decuypere, “Understanding openness through (in)visible platform boundaries: A topological study on MOOCs as multiplexes of spaces and times,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2019.
- K. van de Oudeweetering, and M. Decuypere, “In between hyperboles: Forms and formations in open education,” Learning, Media and Technology, Advance Online Publication, pp. 1-18, 2020.
- B. Williamson, “Learning in the “platform society”: Disassembling an educational data assemblage,” Research in Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 59-82, 2017.
- K. Fedorova, Tactics of Interfacing: Encoding Affect in Art and Technology. MIT Press, 2020.
- O. Goriunova, “The digital subject: People as data as persons,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 125-145, 2019.
- C. Lury, and S. Day, “Algorithmic personalization as a mode of individuation,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 17-37, 2019.