Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Namande, Ben Wekalao
- Contributions of Kenya Library and Information Service Consortium (KLISC) in Expanding Access to Information Resources: Case Study of St. Paul’s University, Limuru, Kenya
Abstract Views :152 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 St. Paul’s University, KE
2 Department of Library Studies, Kenyatta University, KE
1 St. Paul’s University, KE
2 Department of Library Studies, Kenyatta University, KE
Source
Journal of Applied Information Science, Vol 6, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 28-33Abstract
It is not possible for a library to hold full stock of information resources or procure all information which may be in demand by its users. To solve this problem, library cooperation started long ago such as interlibrary loan, document delivery, library network, etc. Consortia are commonly formed to increase the purchasing ability of collaborating institutions to expand the resources availability and offer automated services. In Kenya, there is KLISC which has carried out commendable activities to support research in Kenya. Kenya has over 600 institutions but only 112 are KLISC members and also very little has been documented about the contributions KLISC has had to the member institutions. The study therefore tried to identify the contributions that KLISC membership has had to its member institutions. The study objective was to assess the contributions of KLISC towards access to information resources. Descriptive survey design was used and a population comprising of the University Librarian and post graduate students from Faculty of Theology. Through purposive sampling and simple random sampling technique, a sample size of 51 respondents was obtained; the University Librarian and 50 post graduate students. The study established that the respondents were familiar with a few of KLISC’s databases. The study also found out that out of the 58 databases provided through KLISC, the respondents were only familiar with and used 4 databases. Poor ICT infrastructures and poor internet connectivity were the major challenges. The study therefore recommends that KLISC together with the information managers promote the Consortium services and products to the non-members in Kenya and also create awareness of the various databases to information users.Keywords
Information Resources, Library, Library Consortium, Library Cooperation.References
- M. A. Islam, and M. Mezbah-ul-Islam, “Concept, issues and importance of library consortium: Problems and prospects of university library consortium in Bangladesh,” University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2000.
- R. Chander, and A. Gupta, “Library consortia in India,” Knowledge Librarian, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 252-263, 2015.
- F. A. Chadwell, “Assessing the value of academic library consortia,” Journal of Library Administration, vol. 51, no. 7-8, pp. 645-661, October 2011.
- B. E. Posigha, V. Z. Godfrey, and F. D. Seimode, “The trend of academic libraries consortia in the north central and south east geo-political zones of Nigeria,” Library Review, vol. 64, no. 4/5, pp. 305-320, July 2015.
- F. Kibet, “KLISC Background | Kenya Library & Information Services Consortium (KLISC),” KLISC, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://klisc.org/maktaba/klisc-background. [Accessed: 29-May-2017].
- P. Dzandza, and A. Alemna, “Challenges and prospects of consortia: A case study of the Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Ghana (CARLIGH),” Alexandria: The Journal of National and International Library and Information Issues, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19-37, April 2011.
- A. M. B. Fresnido, and J. M. Yap, “Academic library consortia in the Philippines,” Library Management, vol. 35, no. 1/2, pp. 15-36, 2014.
- G. Galyani, and V. G. Talawar, “Library consortia in developing countries: An overview,” Program, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 94-104, February 2009.
- D. K. Kombo, and D. Tromp, Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction, Nairobi: Paulines Publications Africa, 2006.
- Awareness Levels of Kenya Library and Information Service Consortium’s (KLISC) Services and Resources at University of Nairobi and Kenya National Library Services
Abstract Views :139 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 St Paul’s University, Limuru, KE
2 Kisii University, Kisii, KE
1 St Paul’s University, Limuru, KE
2 Kisii University, Kisii, KE
Source
Journal of Applied Information Science, Vol 7, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 38-43Abstract
Kenya Library and Information Service Consortium (KLISC) has done outstanding activities such as shared acquisition and ICT trainings of librarians to support information service providers in Kenya. Kenya has over 600 institutions but only 123 are KLISC members, irrespective of their memberships, their subscribed information resources remain under-utilized. The study therefore tried to interrogate the awareness levels of the KLISC’s information resources and services by the users of member institutions. The purpose of the study was therefore to establish awareness levels of KLISC services and resources by users of KLISC member libraries. The study was conducted in University of Nairobi, KLISC headquarters and Kenya National Library Services (KNLS), Nairobi headquarters. The study used descriptive survey. The target population was KLISC’s member libraries in Nairobi County. Purposive sampling and stratified sampling techniques were used to obtain a representative sample size. Data were collected using interviews and questionnaires and analysed using Microsoft excel and narrative method. The study discovered that most respondents were only aware of the multi-disciplinary databases. Majority of them used the KLISC’s resources and stated the need for training on the access, use and search within these databases. The study concluded that majority of the library users were aware of the KLISC’s resources and consulted them alongside other sources. The study recommended that rigorous trainings on use and access to KLISC’s resources should be done regularly. The study also recommended that libraries should create awareness of all the KLISC’s information resources for full utilization of these resources.Keywords
Awareness, Digital libraries, Electronic resources, Library consortium.References
- M. A. Islam, and M. Mezbah-ul-Islam, “Concept, issues and importance of library consortium: Problems and prospects of university library consortium in Bangladesh,” University Dhaka Bangladesh, 2000.
- R. Chander, and A. Gupta, “Library consortia in India,” Knowledge Librarian, vol. 2, no. 3, 2015.
- F. A. Chadwell, “Assessing the value of academic library consortia,” Journal of Library Administration, vol. 51, no. 7-8, pp. 645-661, Oct. 2011.
- G. Galyani, and V. G. Talawar, “Library consortia in developing countries: An overview,” Program, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 94-104, Feb. 2009.
- B. E. Posigha, V. Z. Godfrey, and F. D. Seimode, “The trend of academic libraries consortia in the north central and south east geo-political zones of Nigeria,” Library Review, vol. 64, no. 4/5, pp. 305-320, Jul. 2015.
- University of Nairobi, “UON Profile | University of Nairobi,” University of Nairobi, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://uonbi.ac.ke/about/profile [Accessed Aug. 24, 2017].
- L. Namugera, “Users’ awareness, perceptions and usage of Makerere library services in the main and selected branch libraries,” Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 741-758, 2017.
- M. S. Boateng, and R. B. Lamptey, “Assessing the training needs of academic and research libraries staff in Ghana,” Journal of Applied Information Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2018.
- Z. Chepukaka, “Access and use of electronic information resources by technical staff at Kenya agricultural and livestock research organization in Nairobi county,” Journal of Applied Information Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7-23, 2017.
- A. M. B. Fresnido, and J. M. Yap, “Academic library consortia in the Philippines,” Library Management, vol. 35, no. 1/2, pp. 15-36, 2014.
- S. Veenapani, K. Singh, and R. Devi, “Use of E-resources and UGC-Infonet consortium by the teachers and research scholars in Manipur university,” International CALIBER, p. 563, 2008.
- R. H. Walmiki, K. C. Ramakrishnegowda, and K. R. Prithviraj, “Awareness and use of UGC-Infonet digital library consortium by thefaculty members of Karnataka state universities,” Annals of Library and Information Studies, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 33-43, Mar. 2010.
- A. H. Amunga, “Accessibility and use of online databases: A case study of INASP/PERI initiative in Kenyan university library,” Thesis, 2011.
- G. Israel, “Determining sample size.” University of Florida, 2003.
- N. Gathoni, J. Gikandi, F. Ratanya, E. M. Njoroge, E. Wasike, and D. Kiilu, “Monitoring and evaluation of electronic resources in academic and research institutions in Kenya,” INASP/KLISC, 2011.
- Evaluating Information Services Offered to Physically Challenged Users to Satisfy Their Information Needs: The Case of Kenya National Library Services, Headquarters, Nairobi
Abstract Views :97 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Head Librarian, Alliance High School, KE
2 Lecturer, Kisii University, Kenya and Adjunct. Lecturer, Kenyatta University, KE
1 Head Librarian, Alliance High School, KE
2 Lecturer, Kisii University, Kenya and Adjunct. Lecturer, Kenyatta University, KE
Source
Journal of Applied Information Science, Vol 9, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 20-29Abstract
Library users who are physically challenged have continued to face challenges in accessing and utilizing libraries in Kenya. Libraries have always played a significant role, enabling people to engage with all kinds of information and knowledge resources. A library has a role to serve all members of its community, providing a wide range of materials and services which may be used for education, information or recreation. Accordingly, the study sought to evaluate information services offered to physically challenged users to satisfy their information needs at Kenya National library services, Nairobi. The study sought to determine the information sources offered to physically challenged users. The researcher used a case study research design and the whole population was used to carry out the study. The data was collected using questionnaires, interviews, observation and documentary analysis were used as secondary data collection methods. Data analysis was done quantitatively and qualitatively and presented using frequency tables, graphs and figures to give a clear visual presentation. Findings show that respondents used the library for several reasons including reading newspapers, reading text book, research, internet, looking for personal information and leisure. There was a general observation that the facilities and equipment for physically challenged users need to be improved. The study recommends that every library should provide a service which caters for every one of its users, including clientele who have a disability.Keywords
Disability, Information, Patrons, Physical DisabilityReferences
- P. E. Agre, “Surveillance and capture: Two models of privacy,” The Information Society, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 101-127, 1994.
- J. Allen, Topologies of Power: Beyond Territory and Networks. London: Routledge, 2016.
- B. Bratton, The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. MIT Press, 2015.
- T. Bucher, If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press, 2018.
- L. Castañeda, and N. Selwyn, “More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 15, no. 1, 2018.
- M. Decuypere, “Open education platforms: Theoretical ideas, digital operations and the figure of the open learner,” European Educational Research Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 439-460, 2019a.
- M. Decuypere, “Researching educational apps: Ecologies, technologies, subjectivities and learning regimes,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 414-429, 2019b.
- M. Decuypere, “STS in/as education: Where do we stand and what is there (still) to gain? Some outlines for a future research agenda,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 136-145, 2019c.
- M. Dieter, C. Gerlitz, A. Helmond, N. Tkacz, F. Vlist, V. Der, and E. Weltevrede, “Store, interface, package, connection: Methods and propositions for multi-situated app studies,” CRC Media of Cooperation Working Paper Series No. 4, 2018.
- J. Drucker, Visualization and Interpretation: Humanistic Approaches to Display. MIT Press, 2020.
- M. Decuypere, “The topologies of data practices: A methodological introduction,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.
- F. Gromme, and E. Ruppert, “Population geometries of Europe: The topologies of data cubes and grids,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 235-261, 2020.
- K. N. Gulson, S. Lewis, B. Lingard, C. Lubienski, K. Takayama, and P. T. Webb, “Policy mobilities and methodology: A proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies,” Critical Studies in Education, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 224-241, 2017.
- K. N. Gulson, and S. Sellar, “Emerging data infrastructures and the new topologies of education policy,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 350-366, 2019.
- S. Hartong, “The power of relation-making: Insights into the production and operation of digital school performance platforms in the US,” Critical Studies in Education, pp. 1-16, 2020.
- S. Hartong, and A. Förschler, “Opening the black box of data-based school monitoring: Data infrastructures, flows and practices in state education agencies,” Big Data & Society, vol. 6, no. 1, 2019.
- S. Lash, “Deforming the figure: Topology and the social imaginary,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 261-287, 2012.
- B. Latour, “Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands,” Knowledge & Society, vol. 6, pp. 1-40, 1986. [Online]. Available: http://hci.ucsd.edu/10/readings/Latour(1986).pdf
- J. Law, After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Psychology Press, 2004.
- S. Lewis, “Providing a platform for “what works”: Platform-based governance and the reshaping of teacher learning through the OECD’s PISA4U,” Comparative Education, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 484-502, 2020.
- S. Lewis, and I. Hardy, “Tracking the topological: The effects of standardised data upon teachers’ practice,” British Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 219-238, 2017.
- B. Light, J. Burgess, and S. Duguay, “The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps,” New Media and Society, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 881-900, 2018.
- M. Lindh, and J. Nolin, “Information we collect: Surveillance and privacy in the implementation of Google apps for education,” European Educational Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, 2016.
- C. Lury, R. Fensham, A. Heller-Nicholas, and S. Lammes, Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods. London: Routledge, 2018.
- C. Lury, L. Parisi, and T. Terranova, “Introduction: The becoming topological of culture,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 29, no. 4-5, pp. 3-35, 2012.
- C. Lury, M. Tironi, and R. Bernasconi, “The social life of methods as epistemic objects: Interview with Celia Lury,” Diseña, vol. 16, pp. 32-55, 2020.
- C. Lury, and N. Wakeford, “Introduction: A perpetual inventory,” in C. Lury, and N. Wakeford, (eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Culture, Economy and the Social (CRESC). London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 1-24.
- L. Martin, and A. J. Secor, “Towards a post-mathematical topology,” Progress in Human Geography, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 420-438, 2014.
- N. Piattoeva, and A. Saari, “Rubbing against data infrastructure(s): Methodological explorations on working with(in) the impossibility of exteriority,” Journal of Education Policy, pp. 1-21, 2020.
- J. C. Plantin, C. Lagoze, P. N. Edwards, and C. Sandvig, “Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook,” New Media and Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 293-310, 2018.
- R. Prince, “Local or global policy? Thinking about policy mobility with assemblage and topology,” Area, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 335-341, 2017.
- H. Ratner, “Topologies of organization: Space in continuous deformation,” Organization Studies, pp. 1-18, 2019.
- H. Ratner, and C. Gad, “Data warehousing organization: Infrastructural experimentation with educational governance,” Organization, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 537-552, 2019.
- H. Ratner, and E. Ruppert, “Producing and projecting data: Aesthetic practices of government data portals,” Big Data & Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-16, 2019.
- E. Ruppert, J. Law, and M. Savage, “Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 22-46, 2013.
- L. Suchman, “Configuration,” in C. Lury, and N. Wakeford, (eds.), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Taylor and Francis, 2012, pp. 48-60.
- G. Thompson, and I. Cook, “Becoming-topologies of education: Deformations, networks and the database effect,” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 732-748, 2015.
- G. Thompson, and S. Sellar, “Datafication, testing events and the outside of thought,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 139-151, 2018.
- K. van de Oudeweetering, and M. Decuypere, “Understanding openness through (in)visible platform boundaries: A topological study on MOOCs as multiplexes of spaces and times,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 1, 2019.
- K. van de Oudeweetering, and M. Decuypere, “In between hyperboles: Forms and formations in open education,” Learning, Media and Technology, Advance Online Publication, pp. 1-18, 2020.
- B. Williamson, “Learning in the “platform society”: Disassembling an educational data assemblage,” Research in Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 59-82, 2017.
- K. Fedorova, Tactics of Interfacing: Encoding Affect in Art and Technology. MIT Press, 2020.
- O. Goriunova, “The digital subject: People as data as persons,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 125-145, 2019.
- C. Lury, and S. Day, “Algorithmic personalization as a mode of individuation,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 17-37, 2019.