Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mali, B Y
- Computer Assisted Learning in Clinical Physiology Practical: Perception and Understanding by Ist Year Medical Students, Advantages and Limitations
Abstract Views :426 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physiology
2 Associate Professor, Dept. of Physiology, Shri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Pondicherry
3 Associate Professor, Dept. of Physiology, RCSM, Government Medical College
1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physiology
2 Associate Professor, Dept. of Physiology, Shri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Pondicherry
3 Associate Professor, Dept. of Physiology, RCSM, Government Medical College
Source
International Journal of Physiology, Vol 1, No 2 (2013), Pagination: 33-37Abstract
Clinical examination of human subject in physiology clinical practicals is a part of MBBS curriculum. In present scenario; in most of the medical institutions clinical examination is conducted in physiology laboratory or demo room where patients are usually not available. Due to this Ist MBBS students may feel difficulty in assessing clinical signs, therefore in understanding applied physiology. To overcome this problem in present study attempt has been made to teach different aspects of clinical physiology with the help of computer assisted learning (CAL). Aim and objective was to find out whether CAL enhances understanding of clinical physiology in Ist MBBS students and to assess their cognitive skills (knowledge acquired and perceptions). Advantages and limitations of CAL as a teaching tool were also assessed. In this study hundred and seven Ist MBBS students participated voluntarily. Self designed and prestructured questionnaire on clinical examination was prepared after going through literature review. Non CAL-test conducted after traditional way of teaching and CAL-test conducted after teaching with traditional method plus use of computer. They also filled a survey questionnaire on the CAL outcomes, advantages and limitations of CAL. The data collected and statistically analyzed for proportion test using SPSS (version 16). In present study 92% students perceived CAL better and 85% students claimed that their understanding improved which was reflected in the CAL-test as improvement in the knowledge. It was found that along with traditional method of learning; CAL is useful in learning clinical physiology practical.Keywords
Computer Assisted Learning (cal), Clinical Physiology Practical, Perception, Advantages And Limitations
References
- Simpson B. Web-based and computer-assisted instruction in physical therapy education. J Phys Ther Educ. 2003; 17(2):45-9.
- Trisha Greenhalgh Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical Education. BMJ 2001; 322:40–4.
- Chamberlain N, Yates H. Use of a computer assisted clinical case (CACC) SOAP note exercise to assess students’ application of osteopathic principles and practice. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000; 100:437-40.
- Scott-Smith W. The development of reasoning skills and expertise in primary care. Educ Prim Care. 2006; 17:117-29.
- Ford G, Mazzone M, Taylor K. Effect of computerassisted instruction versus traditional modes of instruction on student learning of musculoskeletal special tests. J Phys Ther Educ. 2005; 19(2):22-30.
- Besson S, Kring D. The effects of two teaching methods on nursing students’ factual knowledge and performance of psychomotor skills. J Nurs Educ. 1999;38:357-9
- Smith A, Jones J, Cavanaugh C, Venn J, Wilson W. Effect of interactive multimedia on basic clinical psychomotor skill performance by physical therapy students. J Phys Ther Educ. 2006; 20(2):61-7.
- Brahler J, Quitadamo I, Johnson E. Student critical thinking is enhanced by developing exercise prescriptions using online learning modules. Adv Physiol Educ. 2002; 26(3):210-21.
- Bajpai R. and Indrayan A., Computer-assisted learning package for frequency distribution of physiological variables. Indian J Physiol Pharmacology 1996; 40(4): 330-334.
- Plasschaert AJ, Wilson NH, Cailleteau JG, Verdonschot EH. Opinions and experiences of dental students and faculty concerning computerassisted learning. J Dent Educ1995: 5: 1034–1040.
- Preston JD. Computers in dental education. J Calif Dent Assoc 1997: 25: 729–733.
- Plasschaert AJ, Cailleteau JG, Verdonschot EH. The effect of a multimedia interactive tutorial on learning endodontic problem solving. Eur J Dent Educ 1997: 1: 66–69.
- Hawley GM, Hamilton FA, Murray F, Baggett FJ. Evaluation of a teaching aid for dental students. Eur JDent Educ 1998:2: 133–137.
- Ayoub JL, Vanderboom C, Knight M, Walsh K, Briggs R, Grekin K. A study of the effectiveness of an Interactive Computer Classroom. Computers in Nursing 1998: 6: 333– 338.
- Lyon HC, Healy JC, Bell JR, O’Donnel JF, Moore- West M, Wigton RS, Hirai F, Beck JR. Plan Alyzer, an interactive computer-assisted program to teach clinical problem solving in diagnosing anemia and coronary artery disease. Academic Medicine 1992: 67: 821–828.
- Govindaraja. et al.: CAL in a Malaysian Medical School. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology 2011: 2: 63 – 67.