Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kammar, Soumya
- Comparison of Rural and Urban Pre-School Children for Cognitive Abilities
Abstract Views :200 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Lata Pujar
1,
Soumya Kammar
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Community Science University of Agricultural sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Community Science University of Agricultural sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
International Journal of Education and Management Studies, Vol 8, No 3 (2018), Pagination: 381-383Abstract
The pre-school children develop a wide range of cognitive abilities and use of different learning materials help young children to use their cognitive ability and creativity in developing their imagination and mental development. The aim of the present study was to know the comparison between rural an urban pre-school children for cognitive abilities. The samples for the study comprised of 120 preschool children in the age group of 4 to 6 years from two anganwadies of Dharwad and two anganwadies of Gadag taluks of UAS jurisdiction. Bracken Basic Concept scale (2006) was used to assess the cognitive abilities of preschool children. The results revealed that majority of the preschool children belonged to average level in all the dimensions of cognitive abilities in rural and urban areas. Gender had significant influence on cognitive abilities of pre-school children among rural area. It was observed that in rural area girls had higher level of cognitive abilities than boys.Keywords
Pre-School, Cognitive Abilities, Learning Material.
References
- Barnett, W. S., & Frede, E. (2010). The promise of preschool: Why we need early education for all. American Educator, 34(1), 21-29.
- Bracken, B. A. (2006). Bracken basic concept scale expressive examiners manual NCS Pearson. Banglore.
- Cryer, D. (2003). Materials/ equipment list for preschool child care centre. Healthy Child Manitoba, pp. 1-23.
- Cryer, D., Clifford, M. R., & Harms, T. (2005). Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale. Revised edition of the ECERS was released in 1998.
- Domitrovich, C. E., Morgan, N. R, Moore, J. E., Cooper, B. R, Shah, H. K., Jacobson, L., & Greenberg, M. T. (2013). One versus two years: Does length of exposure to an enhanced preschool program impact the academic functioning of disadvantaged children in kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 704-713.
- Hall, J., Sylva,K., Sammons,P.,Melhuish, E., Siraj-Blatchford, I., &Taggart,B. (2013). Can pre-school protect young children's cognitive and social development: variation by centre quality and duration of attendance. The School Effect School Improve, 24(2), 155-176.
- Hoffman, A. (2013). Positive psychology the science of happiness and flourishing (2nd ed.). Belmont, CAWadsworth.
- Madhavalatha, K., & Mayuri, K. (2000). Intellectual abilities of rural children ofAndhra Pradesh. Indian Psychology Review, 54(2), 66-73.
- Mandeler, J. M. (2007). On the origins of the conceptual system. American Psychology, 52(8), 741-751.
- Influence of Selected Factors on Psychological Well-Being of Rural and Urban PUC Students
Abstract Views :255 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Soumya Kammar
1,
Lata Pujar
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies College of Community Science, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
International Journal of Education and Management Studies, Vol 8, No 4 (2018), Pagination: 393-396Abstract
A study on "Influence of selected factors on psychological well being of rural and urban PUC students" was carried out in the year 2016-2017 in rural and urban areas of Dharwad taluk, Karnataka. The sample for the study comprised of 160 PUC students were from rural area and 160 from urban area of Dharwad taluk. The respondents' age ranged from 16 to 18 years studying in PUC-I year and PUC-II year from Arts and Commerce streams. Ryff s psychological well being scale (1995) was used to assess the psychological well being of PUC students. The results revealed that there exists a significant difference between class, gender, types of college and types of stream with regard to psychological well being of pre-university college students. Class wise comparison revealed that PUC II year college students had better psychological well being than PUC-I students. Gender wise comparison indicated that girls had better psychological well being than boys in both rural and urban areas. Significant association was observed between government and aided colleges in urban area with regard to psychological well being. There was significant association as well as difference observed between arts and commerce streams students with regard to psychological well being in rural area.Keywords
Pre-University College Students, Psychological Well-Being.References
- Abbott (2005). Participant development in sport: An academic review. The National Coaching Foundation, 27, 145-151.
- Chetan, V. S. (2015). Family environment and psychological well-being among private college and government college students. International Journal of Applied Research, 5(1), 528-531.
- Huppert, A. F. (2009). Psychological well being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. AppliedPsychologyHealth and Well-being, 7,178-193.
- Ludban, M., & Gitimu, N. P. (2017). Psychological well-being of college students. UndergraduateResearchJournalfortheHumanSciences, 14, 1-9.
- Nihiral, J. (2007). Self-concept of adolescents and its relationship with their social and emotional adjustment. Scholars Research Journal, 14(3), 42-51.
- Patel, A. H. (2015). Emotional intelligence and psychological well-being of adolescents. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 2(10), 2333-2337.
- Perez, A. J. (2012). Gender difference in psychological well-being among Filipino college student samples. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 84-93.
- Punia, L., & Malaviya, R. (2015). Juvenile delinquents in an observation home in north India: Perceptions and issues. Journal of Educational Psychology Research, 3(1).32-37.
- Rathi, N., & Rastogi, R. (2007). Meaning in life and psychological well-being in pre- adolescents and adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 33(l),31-38.
- Rozen, D. (2013). Transition in family environment and adolescent well being. Journal of Public Health, 72(4), 97-107.
- Ryan, M. R., & Deci, L. E. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141-146.
- Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
- Salami, O. S. (2010). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and student's attitudes: Implications for quality education. European Journal of Education Studies, 2(3), 247-257.
- Sharma, G. (2014). Effect of demographic variables on psychological well-being and quality of'life. International Journal of Humanities andSocialScience, 2(3), 290-298.
- Van Wei, F. (2000). The parental bond and the well-being of adolescents and young adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescent, 28, 307-318.
- Vataliya, P. A. (2014). Psychological well-being in adolescence of gender difference. Global Journal for Research Analysis, i(3), 144-142.