Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Singh, Poonam
- Role of Organizational Justice in Determination of Job Satisfaction: an Empirical Examination
Abstract Views :419 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
International Journal of Education and Management Studies, Vol 5, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 113-118Abstract
Organizational justice is one of the widely researched areas in Industrial/Organizational psychology and it refers to the extent to which employees perceive outcomes, procedures and interactions to be fair. Perception of fairness is a crucial concept for employees because it determines their attitudes and behaviours which ultimately have an impact on productivity of the organization. Employees who perceive equality and feel that they are rewarded fairly for their genume contributions towards organization are satisfied. Employees having satisfaction tend to exert higher level of performance, commitment and reduced retention rates. A lot of work has been done on organizational justice in western countries but studies are lacking in Indian context. The present study is aimed at assessing the perception of organizational justice and its effect on job satisfaction on employees. The sample consists of 50 managerial level employees from various banks of Uttar Pradesh. Perception of justice has been assessed by using questionnaire designed by Neihoof and Moorman(1993) which consists of 20 items. Findings revealed that there is significant and positive relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. Further, result suggests that organizational justice is strong predictor of job satisfaction. The study is a useful addition in literature that would help the organizations to increase job satisfaction of their employees.
References
- Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L Berkowitz (Eds), Advances in social Psychology. Newyork: Academic Press.
- Bies, R J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). International justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Greenberg, J. (1996). The quest for justice on the job: Essays and experiments.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P.E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
- Colquitt, J.A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. (2005). What is organizational justice: An historical analysis. In Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, JA. (2004). Handbook of organizational justice. Mahwah.NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Hackman, J.R, & Oldham, G.R (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.
- Leventhal, G.S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, & R. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. NewYork: Plenum Press.
- Niehoff, B.P., & Moorman, RH. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
- Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The role of distributive, procedural, and international justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52,434-443.
- Performance Appraisal:Participation of Employees
Abstract Views :180 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IN
1 Department of Psychology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, IN