Informatics Publishing Limited

Krishna Gopal ¹, Hari Om Verma ¹, Suyash Tripathi ¹

Affiliations
1 The Academy of Environmental Biology, Lucknow (U.P.), IN

Abstract

Water quality information in aquatic ecosystem is crucial in setting up guideline for resource management. The biota in the surface water is governed entirely by various environmental conditions that determine the selection of species as the physiological performance of the individual organisms. This study explores the water quality status and pollution sources in Sur Sarovar (Keetham) Lake, Agra (Uttar Pradesh), water quality parameters analyze of five sampling zone was done from water samples collected monthly from September 2014 to July 2015. The primary production of organic matter, in the form of phytoplankton and macrophytes is more intense in Sur Sarovar (Keetham) Lake. In contrast to the chemical quality of water bodies, which can be measured by suitable analytical methods, biological quality is a combination of both qualitative and quantitative characterization. The present piece of research work is initiated on pollution status at Sur Sarovar (Keetham) Lake by interference and increase in the population of phytoplankton and microbe. We were selected keys physico chemical parameters for analysis like, temperature 19.50 to 38.00 °C, pH 7.39±0.04 to 8.21±0.06, dissolve oxygen 5.90 ± 0.55 mg/L to 6.48 ± 0.87 mg/L, alkalinity 93.73 ± 5.09 mg/L to 124.27 ± 5.05 mg/L, hardness 119.33 ± 9.06 mg/L to 138.93 ± 8.07 mg/L, ammonia 0.52± 0.03 mg/L to 0.64 ± 0.032 mg/L, nitrate 0.71 ± 0.02 mg/L to 1.79 ± 0.02 mg/L, nitrite 0.21 ± 0.01 to 0.47 ± 0.02 mg/L, phosphate 0.22 ± 0.03 mg/L to 0.36 ± 0.05 mg/L and heavy metal concentration like Zn 0.023 ± 0.00 mg/L to 0.27 ± 0.00 mg/ L, Cr 0.022 ± 0.00 to 0.036 ± 0.00 mg/L , Cd 0.002 ± 0.00 mg/L to 0.010 ± 0.00 mg/L, Pb 0.013 ± 0.00 mg/L to 0.033 ± 0.00 mg/L, Hg 0.015 ± 0.00 to 0.02 ± 0.00 mg/L in the water were undertaken.

Keywords

Sur Sarovar (Keetham) Lake, Water Quality, Desirable Limit, Heavy Metals.

Full Text

   

Suyash Tripathi ¹, Krishna Gopal ¹

Affiliations
1 The Academy of Environmental Biology, Lucknow (U.P.), IN

Abstract

Critics showed objections on the genetic engineering process on the some points whish were both ethical and ecological. This happened because it was sure that these genetic engineering processes must have been causing the gene flow and raise alarm against intellectual property rights. Problems also evolved on using GMOs in the form of food because fishes are being used as a nutritive food worldwide. So it raised a question in the mind of critics that it can cause many forms of lethal allergies to the consumers as the GM fishes were labelled. These issues caused a check over the trade of these GM fishes internationally. Thus due to all these prominent issues FDA has a power to restrict these GM fishes as 1) food 2) conditions in which they are used 3) a check after the approval. Public is confident if the above written three points have positive outcome. So these three points are the backbone for the approval of GM as food for public. So the potential research benefits of genetically modified fish will be fruitful only if these transgenic fish are kept separate from genetic pool of the wild species. There is possibility of transmission of the transgenes to the wild fishes which can make these transgenes a permanent resident of an environmental ecosystem.

Keywords

Transgenic, GMO, Germline.

Full Text