Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Salil, S.
- NIRF: Regional Realities for Intervention
Abstract Views :251 |
PDF Views:75
Authors
G. Srinivas
1,
S. Salil
1
Affiliations
1 University Grants Commission, South Eastern Regional Office, Fourth Floor, APSFC Building, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad 500 001, IN
1 University Grants Commission, South Eastern Regional Office, Fourth Floor, APSFC Building, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad 500 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 120, No 4 (2021), Pagination: 614-616Abstract
No Abstract.Full Text
References
- Cattell, J. K., American Men of Science: A Biographical Directory, Bowker, New York, USA, 1910, 2nd edn; https://archive.org/details/Americanmenofsci03catt
- Pranab, M., Murari, P., Tapaswi, P. and Sudarsan, K., Curr. Sci., 2018, 114(6), 1167–1172.
- Prathap, G., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(4), 550– 553.
- Prathap, G., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(7), 1420–1423.
- Philip, A. G., Inside Higher Ed, 11 November 2010; https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/11/11/state-rankings (accessed on 11 July 2020).
- https://www.nirfindia.org/2020/Ranking2020.html (accessed on 10 July 2020).
- http://aishe.nic.in/aishe/home (accessed on 8. https://www.ugc.ac.in/page/Annual-Report.aspx (accessed on 11 July 2020).
- Innovation Barriers and a Possibility Kaleidoscope: The NEP Imperative
Abstract Views :167 |
PDF Views:74
Authors
Archana Takur
1,
S. Salil
2
Affiliations
1 University Grants Commission, New Delhi 110 002, IN
2 University Grants Commission, Hyderabad 500 001, IN
1 University Grants Commission, New Delhi 110 002, IN
2 University Grants Commission, Hyderabad 500 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 122, No 1 (2022), Pagination: 18-20Abstract
In the context of research and innovation objectives of National Education Policy (NEP), this note elicits five innovation barriers prevailing in the higher education institutions in India and presents an innovation possibility matrix based on two dimensions of resources (lightweight versus resource-intensive) and openness (open versus closed). At the policy level, this approach helps as a lens for informed resource allocation that is balanced across different institutions and kinds of innovations. At the institution level, it helps us understand what kind of innovation direction can institutions take in different projects, the gaps to be filled and capabilities to be built.Keywords
No Keywords.Full Text
References
- Berkun, S., The Myths of Innovation, O’Reilly, Canada, 2010, p. 54.
- Christensen, C. M., Using aggregate project planning to link strategy, innovation, and the resource allocation process, Harvard Business School Background Note, USA, 2000, pp. 301–041.
- GoI, National Education Policy 2020, Ministry of Education, Government of India, 2020, p. 45; https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/nep/NEP_Final_English.pdf (retrieved on 5 November 2021).
- Townsend, A., The future of lightweight innovation, Institute for the future, Palo Alto, CA, 2009, pp. 3–7.
- Bhaduri, S., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(1), 18–20.
- Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B. and Clayton, M. C., Harvard Bus. Rev., 2009, 87(12), 60–67.
- Cancino, C. A., Merigó, J. M. and Coronado, F. C., Curr. Sci., 2017, 113(8), 1507–1518.