Refine your search
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dhaka, S. K.
- Variations in the Cloud-Base Height over the Central Himalayas during GVAX:Association with the Monsoon Rainfall
Abstract Views :460 |
PDF Views:192
Authors
Narendra Singh
1,
Raman Solanki
1,
N. Ojha
2,
M. Naja
1,
U. C. Dumka
1,
D. V. Phanikumar
1,
Ram Sagar
1,
S. K. Satheesh
3,
K. Krishna Moorthy
4,
V. R. Kotamarthi
5,
S. K. Dhaka
6
Affiliations
1 Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Nainital 263 002, IN
2 Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, DE
3 Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
4 ISRO Head Quarters, Bengaluru 560 231, IN
5 Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, US
6 Radio and Atmospheric Physics Lab., Rajdhani College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 015, IN
1 Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Nainital 263 002, IN
2 Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, DE
3 Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
4 ISRO Head Quarters, Bengaluru 560 231, IN
5 Environmental Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, US
6 Radio and Atmospheric Physics Lab., Rajdhani College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 015, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 111, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 109-116Abstract
We present the measurements of cloud-base height variations over Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Science, Nainital (79.45°E, 29.37°N, 1958 m amsl) obtained from Vaisala Ceilometer, during the nearly year-long Ganges Valley Aerosol Experiment (GVAX). The cloud-base measurements are analysed in conjunction with collocated measurements of rainfall, to study the possible contributions from different cloud types to the observed monsoonal rainfall during June to September 2011. The summer monsoon of 2011 was a normal monsoon year with total accumulated rainfall of 1035.8 mm during June-September with a maximum during July (367.0 mm) and minimum during September (222.3 mm). The annual mean monsoon rainfall over Nainital is 1440 ± 430 mm. The total rainfall measured during other months (October 2011-March 2012) was only 9% of that observed during the summer monsoon. The first cloud-base height varied from about 31 m above ground level (AGL) to a maximum of 7.6 km AGL during the summer monsoon period of 2011. It is found that about 70% of the total rain is observed only when the first cloud-base height varies between surface and 2 km AGL, indicating that most of the rainfall at high altitude stations such as Nainital is associated with stratiform low-level clouds. However, about 25% of the total rainfall is being contributed by clouds between 2 and 6 km. The occurrences of high-altitude cumulus clouds are observed to be only 2-4%. This study is an attempt to fill a major gap of measurements over the topographically complex and observationally sparse northern Indian region providing the evaluation data for atmospheric models and therefore, have implications towards the better predictions of monsoon rainfall and the weather components over this region.Keywords
Ceilometer, Central Himalaya, Cloud-Base, GVAX, Monsoon.- Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Interaction for Growth and Earliness Traits of Eggplant in Rajasthan
Abstract Views :485 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Research Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji, Ajmer (Rajasthan), IN
2 Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), IN
3 Department of Horticulture, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), IN
1 National Research Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji, Ajmer (Rajasthan), IN
2 Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), IN
3 Department of Horticulture, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur (Rajasthan), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 13, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 192-203Abstract
Numerous common eggplant varieties have been developed in India, which when grown under variable environments, the magnitude of the growth and flowering is influenced by them. In order to determine the reasons for such variations the effect of the growing conditions on growth and flowering from the eggplant cultivars with the region specific in production were investigated. The cultivars were investigated during four successive environments at two different locations in Rajasthan with contrasting environmental components such as soil and climate. The phenotypic response of the genotypes was followed with a focus on the size of the growth and the direction of flowering within the group of genotypes as a result of each factor: season, location of growing, genotype and their complex interactions. The collected data were analyzed and provided sufficient information on the genotype×environment interaction. Significant differences were found among the investigated genotypes by growth and earliness traits regardless of their specific response to the year conditions and the location. The genotype×environment interaction was significantly high and non-linear. This means that under changeable environments the different cultivars react differently and can, therefore, be grouped according to the growth and earliness stability. This is very clear from the environmental mean scores, environments E1 was more stable with a lowest mean value for earliness traits and highest mean value had the highest genotypic response for growth traits. Seven genotypes were found to be stable across the environments for days to anthesis of first flower, eight genotypes were found stable for days to 50 per cent flowering and ten genotypes were also found stable for days to first fruit picking. Among the stable genotypes for earliness the Pusa Upkar and Punjab Sadabahar×Pusa Upkar were found to be stable for all the earliness traits. They earliness below the average mean days of all the genotypes under test, with a slope of unity and the mean square due to deviation from regression equal to zero. The five genotypes were identified for leaf area, four genotypes for plant height, three genotypes for plant spread and two genotypes for number of branches per plant as most widely adapted genotypes for growth parameters based on stability analysis. Thus, these stable genotypes can be recommended for commercial cultivation over wide range of environments or can be used in further breeding programmes.Keywords
Eggplant, Environment, Genotype, Interaction.References
- Basford, K.E. and Cooper, M. (1998). Genetic environment interactions and some considerations of their implications for wheat breeding. Aust. J. Agric Res., 49(2): 153-174.
- Becker, H.C. and Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed., 101: 1-23.
- Chadha, M.L. and Singh, B.P. (1982). Stability analysis of some quantitative characters in egg plant (Solanum melongena L.). Indian J. Hort., 69: 74-81.
- Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci.,6:36-40.
- Falconer, D.S. (1952). The problem of environment and selection. Amer. Naturalist, 86: 293-298.
- Fasahat, P., Rajabi, A., Mahmoudi, S.B., Noghabi, M.A. and Rad, J.M. (2015). An overview on the use of stability parameters in plant breeding. Biometrics & Biostatistics Int. J.,2(5): 1-11.
- Fernandez, G.C.J. (1991).Analysis of genotype × environment interaction by stability estimates. Hort.Sci.,26: 947-950.
- Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res., 14 : 742-754.
- Freeman, G.H. (1985). The analysis and interpretation of interaction. J. App. Stat., 12: 3-10.
- Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd Ed. Wiley, NEWYORK, U.S.A.
- Krishna Prasad, V.S.R., Singh, D.P., Pal, A.B., Gangopadhyay, K.K. and Pan, R.S. (2002). Assessment of yield stability and ecovalence in eggplant. Indian J Hort., 59(4): 386-394.
- Kumar, S.J., Arora, D. and Ghai, T.R. (2008).Stability analysis for earliness in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]. J. Res, 45 (3&5): 156-160.
- Mehta, N., Khare, C.P., Dubey, V.K. and Ansari, S.F. (2011). Phenotypic stability for fruit yield and its components in rainy season brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Electronic J. Pl. Breed., 2(1): 77-79.
- Mohanty, B.K. and Prusti, A.M. (2000).Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis for yield and its components in brinjal (Solanum melongena). Indian J. Agril. Sci., 70: 370-373.
- Mohanty, B.K. (2002). Phenotypic stability of brinjal hybrid. Prog. Hort., 34(2): 168-173.
- Rai, N., Singh, A.K. and Tirkey, T. (2000). Stability in round shaped brinjal hybrids. Ann. Agric. Res., 21 : 530-532.
- Rao, Y.S.A.(2003). Diallel analysis over environments and stability parameters in brinjal. Ph.D. Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Dantiwada, Sardarkrishinagar, GUJARAT (INDIA).
- Sharma, S.K., Tallukar, P. and Barbara, M. (2000).Genotype × environment interacton and phenotypic stability in brinjal. Annl. Bio., 16: 59-65.
- Sivakumar, V., Uma Jyothi, K., Venkata Ramana, C., Paratpara Rao, M., Rajyalakshmi, R. and Uma Krishna, K. (2015). Genotype×environment interaction of brinjal genotypes against fruit borer. Internat. J. Sci. &Nat., 6(3): 491-494.
- Suneetha, Y., Patel, J.S., Khatharia, B., Bhanvadia, A.S., Kaharia, P.K. and Patel, S.T. (2006). Stability analysis for yield and quality in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Indian J. Gen., 66(4) : 210-216.
- Vadivel, E. and Bapu, J.R.K. (1989).Genotype×environment interaction for fruit yield in egg plant. South Indian Hort., 37: 141-143.
- Vadodaria, M.A., Kulkarni,G.H., Madariya,R.B. and Dobariya, K.L. (2009). Stability for fruit yield and its components traits in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Crop Imp., 36(1): 81-87.
- Detection of Solar Cycle Signal in the Tropospheric Temperature using COSMIC Data
Abstract Views :432 |
PDF Views:161
Authors
Affiliations
1 Radio and Atmospheric Physics Lab, Rajdhani College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 015, IN
2 Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Nainital 263 002, IN
3 Department of Applied Physics, Delhi Technical University, Delhi 110 042, IN
4 Department of Geophysics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606850, IN
1 Radio and Atmospheric Physics Lab, Rajdhani College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 015, IN
2 Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Nainital 263 002, IN
3 Department of Applied Physics, Delhi Technical University, Delhi 110 042, IN
4 Department of Geophysics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606850, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 115, No 12 (2018), Pagination: 2232-2239Abstract
Influence of the solar cycle on temperature structure is examined using radio occultation measurements by COSMIC/FORMASAT-3 satellite. Observations from January 2007 to December 2015 comprising 3,764,728 occultations, which are uniformly spread over land and sea, have been used to study temperature changes mainly in the troposphere along with the solar cycle over 60°N–60°S geographic latitudes. It was a challenging task to identify the height at which the solar cycle signal could be observed in temperature perturbations as different atmospheric processes contribute towards temperature variability. Using a high spatial resolution dataset from COSMIC we are able to detect solar cycle signal in the zonal mean temperature profiles near surface at 2 km and upward. A consistent rise in the interannual variation of temperature was observed along with the solar cycle. The change in the temperature structure showed a latitudinal variation from southern to northern hemisphere over the period 2007–2015 with a significant positive influence of sunspot numbers in the solar cycle. It can be concluded that the solar cycle induces changes in temperature by as much as 1.5°C. However, solar cycle signal in the stratospheric region could not be identified as the region is dominated by large-scale dynamical motions like quasi-biennial oscillation which suppress the influence of solar signal on temperature perturbations due to its quasi-periodic nature.Keywords
Radio Occultation, Solar Cycle, Sunspot Number, Tropospheric Temperature.References
- Rind, D., Lean, J. and Healy, R., Simulated time-dependent climate response to solar radiative forcing since 1600. J. Geophys. Res., 1999, 104, 1973–1990.
- Shindell, D., Rind, D., Balachandran, J., Lean, J. and Lonergran, P., Solar cycle variability ozone and climate, Science, 1999, 284, 305–308.
- Meehl, G. A., Washington, W. M. and Wigley, T. M. L., Arblaster, J. M. and Dai, A., Solar and green house gas forcing and climate response in the twentieth century. J. Climate, 2003, 16, 426–444.
- Lean, J., Rottman, G., Harder, J. and Kopp, G., SORCE contributions to new understanding of global change and solar variability. Sol. Phys., 2005, 230(1–2), 27–53; doi:10.1007/s11207-005-1527-2.
- Larkin, A., Haigh, J. D. and Djavidnia, S., The effect of solar UV irradiance variations on the Earth’s atmosphere. Space Sci. Rev., 2000, 94, 199–214.
- Keckhut, P., Cagnazzo, C., Chanin, M. L., Claud, C. and Hauchecorne, A., The 11-year solar-cycle effects on temperature in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. Part I: Assessment of observations. J. Atmos. Solar-Terrest. Phys., 2004, 67, 940–947; http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.01.008.
- Hood, L. L., Effects of solar UV variability on the stratosphere in solar variability and its effects on climate. Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 2004, 141, 283–304.
- Austin, J. et al., Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of the solar cycle in ozone and temperature. J. Geophys. Res., 2008, 113, D11306; doi:10.1029/2007JD009391.
- Marsh, D. R., Garcia, R. R., Kinnison, D. E., Boville, B. A., Sassi, F., Solomon, S. C. and Matthes, K., Modeling the whole atmosphere response to solar cycle changes in radiative and geomagnetic forcing. J. Geophys. Res., 2007, 112, D23306; doi:10.1029/ 2006JD008306.
- Randel, W. J. et al., An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends. J. Geophys. Res., 2009, 114, D02107, doi:10.1029/ 2008JD010421.
- Dunkerton, T. J., Delisi, D. P. and Baldwin, M. P., Middle atmosphere cooling trend in historical rocketsonde data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 1998, 25, 3371–3374.
- Keckhut, P. F., Schmidlin, J., Hauchecorne, A. and Chanin, M.-L., Stratospheric and mesospheric cooling trend estimates from US rocketsondes at low latitude stations (8°S–34°N), taking into account instrumental changes and natural variability. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 1999, 61, 447–459.
- Anthes, R., Rocken, C. and Kuo, Y. H., Applications of COSMIC to meteorology and climate. Terr. Atmos. Ocean Sci., 2000, 11, 115–156.
- Foelsche, U. et al., Observing upper troposphere–lower stratosphere climate with radio occultation data from the CHAMP satellite. Climate Dyn., 2007, 31(1), 49–65.
- Kursinski, E. R., Hajj, G. A., Schofield, J. T., Linfield, R. P. and Hard, R. R., Observing earth’s atmosphere with radio occultation measurements using the global positioning system. J. Geophys. Res., 1997, 102, 23429–23465.
- Hajj, G. A., Kursinski, E. R., Romans, L. J., Bertiger, W. I. and Leroy, S. S., A technical description of atmospheric sounding by GPS occultation. J. Atmosph. Solar-Terr. Phys., 2002, 64(4), 451– 469; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-236826(01)00114-6.
- Hajj, G. A., Lee, I. C., Pi, X., Romans, L. J., Schreiner, W. S., Straus, P. R. and Wang, C., COSMIC GPS ionospheric sensing and space weather. Terr. Atmosp. Ocean. Sci., 2000, 11(1), 235– 272.
- Kuo, Y.-H., Sokolovskiy, S. V., Anthes, R. A. and Vandenberghe, F., Assimilation of GPS radio occultation data for numerical weather prediction. Terr. Atmosp. Ocean. Sci., 2000, 11(1), 157– 186.
- Anthes, R. A. et al., The COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 mission: early results, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2008, 89, 313–333; doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313.
- Ho, S. P. et al., Estimating the uncertainty of using GPS radio occultation data for climate monitoring: intercomparison of CHAMP refractivity climate records from 2002 to 2006 from different data centers. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmosp., 2009, 114, 20; doi:10.1029/2009JD011969.
- Dhaka, S. K., Kumar, V., Choudhary, R. K., Ho, S. P., Takahashi, M. and Yoden, S., Indications of a strong dynamical coupling between the polar and tropical regions during the sudden stratospheric warming event January 2009: a study based on COSMIC/ FORMASAT-3 satellite temperature data, Atmos. Res., 2015, 166, 60–69; doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.06.008.
- Kumar, V., Dhaka, S. K., Singh, N., Singh, V., Reddy, K. K. and Chun, H. Y., Impact of inter-seasonal solar variability on the association of lower troposphere and cold point tropopause in the tropics: observations using RO data from COSMIC. Atmos. Res., 2017, 198, 216–225; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.08.026.
- Kishore, P., Namboothiri, S. P., Jiang, J. H., Sivakumar, V. and Igarashi, K., Global temperature estimates in the troposphere and stratosphere: a validation study of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2009, 9, 897–908.
- Chun, H.-Y., Goh, J.-S., Song, I.-S. and Ricciardulli, L., Latitudinal variations of convective source and propagation condition of inertio-gravity waves in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci., 2007, 64, 1603–1618.
- Kumar, V., Dhaka, S. K., Reddy, K. K., Gupta, A., Prasad, S. B., Panwar, V. and Singh, N., Impact of quasi-biennial oscillation on the inter-annual variability of the tropopause height and temperature in the tropics: a study using COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 observations. Atmos. Res., 2014, 139, 62–70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.12.014.
- Randel, W. J., Wu, F. and Gaffen, D. J., Interannual variability of the tropical tropopause derived from radiosonde data and NCEP reanalyses. J. Geophys. Res., 2000, 105(D12). 15509–15523.
- Marsh, N. D. and Svensmark, H., Low cloud properties influenced by cosmic rays. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2000, 85, 5004–5007.