Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kapoor, Rohit
- A Literature Review on Demand Models in Retail Assortment Planning
Abstract Views :827 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Source
International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, Vol 2, No 4 (2013), Pagination: 1-11Abstract
A retailer assortment is defined as the mix of products carried by a retail store. Assortment planning (AP) is a process of selecting types and number of product to be kept from a given product line and also to determine the optimal level of inventory of these products. The assortment optimization problem in the literature varies because of the type of demand models considered by the authors or because of the context of the problem considered. Various authors have developed models in past that cater to various objectives associated with shelf-space allocation and assortment decisions. It has been observed that the demand estimation in any assortment planning problem mostly considered shelf-space and substitution parameters. In the current work, the assortment planning problem dealt by various researchers primarily with shelf-space and substitution effect consideration will be reviewed.Keywords
Assortment Planning, Demand Models, Shelf-space, Substitution
References
- Abbott, H. & Palekar, U. S. (2008). Retail replenishment models with display-space elastic demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2), 586-607.
- Agrawal, N., Smith, S. A. & Tsay, A. A. (2002a). Multi vendor sourcing in a retial supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 11(2), 157-182.
- Agrawal, N., Smith, S. A. & Tsay, A. A. (2002b). Multi vendor sourcing ina retail supply chain. Production and Operations Management, 11(2), 157-182.
- Anderson, E. E. & Amato, H. N. (1974a). A mathematical model for simultaneously determining the optimal brand-collection and display-area allocation. Operations Research, 22(1), 13-21.
- Anderson, E. E. & Amato, H. N. (1974b). A mathematical model for simultaneously determining the optimal brand-collection and display-area allocation. Operations Research, 22(1), 13-21.
- Arkader, R. & Ferreira, C. F. (2004). Category management initiatives from the retailer perspective: A study in the Brazilian grocery retail industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(1), 41-51.
- Aydin, G. & Hausman, W. H. (2009). The role of slotting fees in the coordination of assortment decisions. Production and Operations Management, 18(6), 635-652.
- Ayd?n, G. & Hausman, W. H. (2009). The role of slotting fees in the coordination of assortment decisions. Production and Operations Management, 18(6), 635-652.
- Bai, R. & Kendall, G. (2005a). An investigation of automated planograms using a simulated annealing based hyper-heuristic. Metaheuristics: Progress as Real Problem Solvers, 32(3), 87-108.
- Bai, R. & Kendall, G. (2005b). An investigation of automated planograms using a simulated annealing based hyper-heuristics. Metaheuristics: Progress as Real Problem Solver- Operations Research/Computer Science Interface Serices, 32(3), 87-108.
- Baumol, W. J. & Ide, E. A. (1956). Variety in retailing. Management Science, 3(1), 93-101.
- Bookbinder, J. H. & Zarour, F. H. (2001). Direct product profi tability and retail shelf space allocation models. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 183-208.
- Borin, N. & Farris, P. (1995). A sensitivity analysis of retailer shelf management models. Journal of Retailing, 71(2), 153-171.
- Borin, N., Farris, P. W. & Freeland, J. R. (1994). A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf-space allocation. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 359-384.
- Brown, W. & Tucker, W. (1961). The marketing center: Vanishing shelf space. Atlanta Economic Review, 11(10), 9-13.
- Bultez, A. & Naert, P. (1988a). SH. ARP: Shelf allocation for retailers’ profi t. Marketing Science, 7(3), 211-231.
- Bultez, A. & Naert, P. (1988b). SH.A.R.P. Shelf allocation for retailers’ profi t. Marketing Science, 7(3), 211-231.
- Bultez, A., Naert, P., Gijsbrechts, E. & Abelle, P. V. (1989). Asymmetric cannibalism in retail assortments. Journal of Retailing, 65(2), 153-192.
- Cachon, G. P. & Kök, A. G. (2007). Category management and coordination in retail assortment planning in the presence of basket shopping consumers. Management Science, 53(6), 934-951.
- Cachon, G. P., Terwiesch, C. & Xu, Y. (2005). Retail assortment planning in the presence of consumer search. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 7(4), 330-346.
- Cairns, J. P. (1963). Allocate space for maximum profi ts. Journal of Retailing, 39(2), 43-55.
- Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E., Goossens, T. & Verhetsel, A. (2000). The impact of location factors on the attractiveness and optimal space shares of product categories. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17(4), 255-279.
- Chen, Y. L., Chen, J. M. & Tung, C. W. (2006). A data mining approach for retail knowledge discovery with consideration of the effect of shelf-space adjacency on sales. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1503-1520.
- Chong, J. K., Ho, T. H. & Tang, C. S. (2001). A modeling framework for category assortment planning. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 3(3), 191-210.
- Corstjens, M. & Doyle, P. (1981). A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management Science, 27(7), 822-833.
- Corstjens, M. & Doyle, P. (1983). A dynamic model for strategically allocating retail space. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34(10), 943-951.
- Cox, K. (1964). The responsiveness of food sales to shelf space changes in supermarkets. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(2), 63-67.
- Cox, K. K. (1970). The effect of shelf space upon sales of branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(1), 55-58.
- Desmet, P. & Renaudin, V. (1998). Estimation of product category sales responsiveness to allocated shelf space. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(5), 443-457.
- Dreze, X., Hoch, S. J. & Purk, M. E. (1995). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301-326.
- Drèze, X., Hoch, S. J. & Purk, M. E. (1994). Shelf management and space elasticity. Journal of Retailing, 70(4), 301-326.
- Europe, P. (1998). The POPAI Europe consumer buying habits study. Point-of-Purchase Advertising Institute. Co-ordination by Retail Marketing In-Store Services Limited. Watford, Herts: POPAI Europe.
- Frank, R. E. & Massy, W. F. (1970). Shelf position and space effects on sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 7(1), 59-66.
- Gajjar, H. K. & Adil, G. K. (2010). A piecewise linearization for retail shelf space allocation problem and a local search heuristic. [Article]. Annals of Operations Research, 179(1), 149-167.
- Gaur, V. & Honhon, D. (2005). Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions under a Locational Choice Model. Working Paper, New York University.
- Gaur, V. & Honhon, D. (2006). Assortment planning and inventory decisions under a locational choice model. Management Science, 52(10), 1528-1543.
- Goyal, V., Levi, R. & Segev, D. (2009). Near-Optimal Algorithms for the Assortment Planning Problem under Dynamic Substitution and Stochastic Demand.
- Guadagni, P. M. & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203-238.
- Hansen, P. & Heinsbroek, H. (1979). Product selection and space allocation in supermarkets. European Journal of Operational Research, 3(6), 474-484.
- Hariga, M. A., Al-Ahmari, A. & Mohamed, A. R. A. (2007). A joint optimisation model for inventory replenishment, product assortment, shelf space and display area allocation decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 239-251.
- Irion, J., Al-Khayyal, F. & Lu, J. C. (2004). A Piecewise Linearization Framework for Retail Shelf Space Management Models. Retrieved from http://www.optimizationonline. org/DB_FILE/2004/10/967.pdf (accessed on May 6, 2006.)
- Kok, A. G. & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Operations Research- Baltimore, 55(6), 1001-1021.
- Kök, A. G. & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Demand estimation and assortment optimization under substitution: Methodology and application. Operations Research, 55(6), 1001-1021.
- Kök, A. G., Fisher, M. L. & Vaidyanathan, R. (2009). Assortment planning: Review of literature and industry practice. Retail Supply Chain Management, 1-55.
- Kotzan, J. A. & Evanson, R. V. (1969). Responsiveness of drug store sales to shelf space allocations. Journal of Marketing Research, November, 6, 465-469.
- Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157.
- Lee, W. (1961). Space management in retail stores and implications to agriculture. Marketing Keys to Profi ts in the 1960’s, 523-533.
- Li, Z. (2007a). A single period assortment optimization model. Production and Operations Management, 16(3), 369-380.
- Li, Z. (2007b). A single period assortment optimization model. Production and Operations Management, 16(3), 369-380.
- Mahajan, S. & Van Ryzin, G. (2001a). Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Operations Research, 49(3), 334-351.
- Mahajan, S. & van Ryzin, G. (2001b). Stocking retail assortments under dynamic consumer substitution. Operations research, 49(3), 334-351.
- McFadden, D., University of California, B. I. O. U. & Development. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.
- Miller, C. M., Smith, S. A., McIntyre, S. H. & Achabal, D. D. (2010). Optimizing and evaluating retail assortments for infrequently purchased products. Journal of Retailing, 86(2), 159-171.
- Quelch, J. A. & Kenny, D. (1994). Extend profi ts, not product lines. Harvard Business Review, 72(5), 153-160.
- Rajaram, K. (2001). Assortment planning in fashion retailing: Methodology, application and analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 186-208.
- Ryzin, G. & Mahajan, S. (1999). On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefi ts in retail assortments. Management Science, 45(11), 1496-1509.
- Shah, J. & Avittathur, B. (2007). The retailer multiitem inventory problem with demand cannibalization and substitution. International Journal of Production Economics, 106(1), 104-114.
- Smith, S. A. & Agrawal, N. (2000a). Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50-64.
- Smith, S. A. & Agrawal, N. (2000b). Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50-64.
- Taylor, C. G. (1970). Merchandise Assortment Planning: The Key to Retailing Profi t. Merchandising Division, National Retail Merchants Association.
- Urban, T. L. (1998). An inventory-theoretic approach to product assortment and shelf-space allocation. Journal of Retailing, 74(1), 15-35.
- Van Ryzin, G. & Mahajan, S. (1999). On the relationship between inventory costs and variety benefi ts in retail assortments. Management Science, 45(11), 1496-1509.
- Yang, M. H. (2001). An effi cient algorithm to allocate shelf space. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1), 107-118.
- Yücel, E., Karaesmen, F., Salman, F. S. & Türkay, M. (2009). Optimizing product assortment under customer- driven demand substitution. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 759-768.
- Zufryden, F. S. (1986). A dynamic programming approach for product selection and supermarket shelf-space allocation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37(4), 413-422
- Retrospective Analysis of the Occupational Injuries in Eye Patients in E.S.I. Hospital
Abstract Views :511 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
A. D. Mehta
1,
Rohit Kapoor
1
Affiliations
1 Eye Department, E.S.I. Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, IN
1 Eye Department, E.S.I. Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, IN
Source
Medico-Legal Update, Vol 14, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 80-81Abstract
The E.S.I. Scheme has the largest medical infrastructure under one umbrella, in India .Medical care is provided through its huge network of 150 hospitals, 1403 E.S.I. Dispensaries/ISM Units, 1447 Panel clinics and 6536 IMOs. The E.S.I. Corporation incurred about Rs. 2689.62 crore on the delivery of medical care in year 2012-13.Eye trauma is number one cause of vision loss in industrial workers2. We are presenting a retrospective analysis of eye injuries coming in the EYE DEPARTMENT of E.S. I. Hospital, basaidarapur, New Delhi 110015.Keywords
Employee State Insurance (E.S.I.), Occupational, Injuries, Eye Trauma- Information Content of Share Repurchase Program:A Study of Select Indian Firms
Abstract Views :354 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Senior Educational Counselor, BYJU's, IN
2 Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, Delhi, IN
1 Senior Educational Counselor, BYJU's, IN
2 Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management, Delhi, IN
Source
International Journal of Financial Management, Vol 9, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 9-17Abstract
Corporates use share repurchases as a part of overall corporate restructuring strategy of distributing excess funds and building promoters’ stakeholding. It provides a mechanism to adjust the capital structure and financial position of a firm. Repurchase of shares by Indian firms is on the rise in recent years. This paper is an attempt to examine the impact of repurchase announcements made by Information Technology (IT) companies on the wealth of the shareholders. All the recent repurchase announcements made by IT companies fall in the scope of this study. Results of event study methodology have found that there is a positive significant impact of repurchase announcements on the shareholders’ wealth.Keywords
Share Repurchase, Buyback of Shares, Event Study, Stock Price Performance.References
- Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1980). Measuring security price performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(3), 205-258.
- Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event study. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31.
- Chakraborty, T. (2008). Buyback of shares in India. New Delhi: New Century Publications.
- Comment, R., & Jarrell, G. (1991). The relative signalling power of Dutch-auction and fixed-price selftender offers and open-market share repurchases. The Journal of Finance, 46, 1243-1271.
- Dann, L. Y. (1981). Common stock repurchases: An analysis of returns to bondholders and stockholders. Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 113-138.
- Ekanayake, S. (2004). Information signalling of common stock repurchase programs. The Journal of Finance, 59, 651-680.
- Ikenberry, D. L., & Vermaelen, T. (1996). The option to repurchase stock. Financial Management, 25(4), 9-24.
- Lakonishok, J., & Vermaelen, T. (1990). Anomalous price behaviour around repurchase tender offers. The Journal of Finance, 45(2), 455-477.
- MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39.
- Maulis, R. W. (1980). Stock repurchase by tender offer: An analysis of the causes of common stock price changes. The Journal of Finance, 35(2), 305-319.
- Nohel, T., & Tarhan, V. (1998). Share repurchases and firm performance: New evidence on the agency costs of free cash flow. Journal of Financial Economics, 49, 187-222.
- Pugh, W., & Jahera, J. S. Jr. (1990). Stock repurchases and excess returns: An empirical examination. The Financial Review, 25(1), 127-142.
- Rees, W. (1996). The impact of open market equity repurchases in UK equity prices. The European Journal of Finance, 2(4), 353-370.
- Stephens, C. P., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Actual share reacquisition in open market repurchase programme. The Journal of Finance, 53(1), 313-333.
- Vermaelen, T. (1981). Common stock repurchases and market signalling: An empirical study. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(2), 139-183.