Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Thakur, Priyanka
- Surgical Removal of Lingual foreign Body in a Buffalo - A Clinical Case Study
Abstract Views :174 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Surgery and Radiology, Dr. G C Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur -176062, HP, IN
1 Department of Surgery and Radiology, Dr. G C Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur -176062, HP, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 41, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 189-190Abstract
This report pertains to a successful surgical removal of a sewing needle that was ingested by an eight years old buffalo. The animal was not able to ingest anything after the needle ingested. The radiographic examination on lateral and dorsal-ventral views revealed the presence of the needle in the sub mandibular area. After preparing the animal for operation, the genioglossus muscle was incised. The foreign body was reached which was too sharp and move along with movement of tongue. A flat instrument was put in the oral cavity to stabilise the tongue. The foreign body was then removed with help of long artery foreceps. Antiseptic dressing with ointment Neosporin and topicure spray locally was advised till the complete healing of the wound. Retrieval of the needle seems easy but it was still difficult as it was embedded in genioglossus muscle and was moving along with the movement of tongue.Keywords
Buffalo, Foreign Body, Radiographic Examination, Genioglossus Muscle, Surgical Retrieval.- Surgical Retrieval of a Needle from the Pharynx of a Dog
Abstract Views :166 |
PDF Views:6
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Surgery and Radiology, Dr. G C Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Surgery and Radiology, Dr. G C Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 42, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 99-100Abstract
Ingestion of foreign bodies due to indiscriminate eating habit is one of the common problems in animals and specially canines (Easom, 1983, Kumar et al. 2015, Prasad et al. 2010). The present study report is the evidence where sewing needle pierced and occupied at pharyngeal area and was retrieved successfully from a dog.References
- Fossum TW. 2013. Small Animal Surgery, Mosby Co. 4th ed.
- Easom M G. 1983. Oesophagus. In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery (Ed. Bojrab M GF), pp. 129.
- Kumar A, Tyagi SP, Thakur P and Kumar R. 2015. Surgical removal of lingual foreign body in a buffalo. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41(2): 189-190.
- Prasad B Chandra, Prasad V and Rao TT. 2010. Oesophageal foreign body in a pup. Intas Polivet 10.
- Bio-Chemicals Triggering Host Preference Mechanism against Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)
Abstract Views :253 |
PDF Views:236
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Entomology, Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni – 173230, Himachal Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Entomology, Dr. Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni – 173230, Himachal Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 33, No 4 (2019), Pagination: 365-371Abstract
Mechanism of host plant resistance in tomato varieties was evaluated and compared against tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) attack in the Solan district known to be 'Tomato bowl of Himachal Pradesh'. Eight varieties utilized for the experiment included three self pollinating indeterminate varieties developed by selection (Solan Lalima, Solan Vajar, Palam Pink) and four hybrids (Naveen 2000+, Heem Sohna, Red Gold, Rakshita Yash Tomato). In order to locate the sources for resistance in tomato foliage various macro and micro- nutrients were extracted from these varieties and chemical composition of tomato fruits viz., content of total phenols, titrable acidity, reducing sugars and total sugars were also estimated to compare for varying levels of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera. The content of phenol and sugars in tomato fruits was found to be negatively correlated with fruit infestation with values of correlation coefficient (r = - 0.895) and (r = - 0.650), respectively, indicating that susceptible varieties were low in phenols as well as in sugars. Nitrogen (r = 0.660), potassium (r = 0.679), magnesium (r = 0.698), iron (r = 0.547) and manganese (r = 0.546) content were found to be optimistically correlated with per cent fruit infestation while, phosphorous (r = - 0.857) and zinc (r = - 0.801) content did not favor the fruit borer attack. This observed resistance can be exploited for developing crop cultivars, which readily produce the inducible response upon mild infestation, and can act as important components of integrated pest management compatible with other approaches like biological control, cultural control as well as chemical control.Keywords
Correlation, Helicoverpa armigera, Micronutrients, Resistance, Susceptible, Tomato.References
- Adam P. 1986. Mineral nutrition in tomato crop, scientific basis for improvement. pp. 284-334. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J. (Eds.). Mineral Nutrition. eBook, Springer Life Sciences.
- Ashfaq M, Sajjad M, Ane MNU, Rana N. 2012. Morphological and chemical characteristics of tomato foliage as mechanisms of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. African J Biotech. 11: 7744-7750.
- Banerjee MK, Kaloo L. 1989. Role of phenols in resistance to tomato leaf curl virus (Fusarium wilt) and tomato fruit borer in Lycopersicon. Curr Sci. 58: 575-576.
- Chapman HD. 1964. Suggested foliar sampling and handling techniques for determining the nutrient status of some field horticultural and plantation crops. Indian J Hort. 21: 97-119.
- Foss LK, Rieske LK. 2003. Species specific differences in oak foliage affect preference and performance of gypsy moth caterpillars. Entomol Exp Appl. 108: 87–93.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2003.00067.x
- Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Isman MB, Duffey SS. 1982. Phenolic compounds in foliage of commercial tomato cultivars as growth inhibitors to the fruit worm, Heliothis zea. J Am Soc Horti Sci. 107: 167-170.
- Jackson ML. 1967. Soil Chemical Analysis. Asia Publising House, Bombay, India, 498 pp.
- Jallow MFA, Matsumura M, Suzuki Y. 2001. Oviposition preference and reproductive performance of Japanese Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl Ent Zool. 36: 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1303/ aez.2001.419
- Johnson MTJ, Smith SD, Rausher MD. 2009. Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 106: 18079–18084. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904695106 PMid:19617572 PMCid:PMC2775293
- Kaloo 1986. Chemical composition in tomato Delhi Publising House, New Delhi, India, 238 pp.
- Kashyap RK, Verma AN. 1987. Factors imparting resistance to fruit damage by Heliothis armigera (Hubner) in some tomato genotypes. Int J Trop Insect Sci. 8: 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742758400007086
- Lane JH, Eynon L. 1923. Determination of reducing sugars by means of Fehling’s solution with methylene blue as internal indicator. J Soc Chem Ind Trans. 32-36.
- Mahadevan A, Sridhar R. 1982. Methods of physiological plant pathology Sivakami Publications, Madras, India, 328 pp.
- Minkenberg OPJM, Ottenheim JGW. 1990. Effect of leaf nitrogen content of tomato plant on preference and non preference of leaf mining fly. Oceologia 83: 291-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317551 PMid:28312998
- Nicholas DJD. 1946. Detection of manganese deficiency in plants by tissue test using tetra-methyl-diaminophenyl methane. Nature 157: 696-698. https://doi.org/10.1038/157696b0 PMid:20984246
- Ranganna S. 1997. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, India, 1112 pp. PMid:9437188
- Sahu IK, Shaw SS, Gupta AK. 2005. Relative preference of tomato genotypes by fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hubner. Nat J Plant Imp. 6: 89-91.
- Sankhyan S, Verma AK. 1997. Field screening of tomato germplasm for resistance against the fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Pest Manage Eco Zool. 5: 107.
- Selvanarayan V, Narayanasamy P. 2006. Factors of resistance in tomato accessions against the fruit worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Crop Prot. 25: 1075-1079. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.02.008
- Sharma KC, Bhardwaj SC, Kumar S. 2008. Bio-chemical factors of resistance in tomato varieties against fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Environ Ecol. 26: 1135-1137.
- Simmons AT, Gurr GM, McGrath D, Martin PM, Nicol HI. 2004. Entrapment of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on glandular trichomes of Lycopersicon species. Aust J Ento. 43: 196-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-6055.2004.00414.x
- Singh D, Narang DD. 1990. Control of tomato fruit borer Heliothis armigera (Hubner) with synthetic pyrethroids. Indian J Ent. 52: 534-540.
- Thakur Priyanka, Rana RS, Sharma KC, Sharma N. 2018. Host preference of the fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato varieties in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. J Ent Zool Studies. 6: 1186-1189
- Usman A, Khan IA. 2012. Ovipositional response of tomato fruit worm (Helicoverpa armigera) (Hubner) to different tomato genotypes under agroecological conditions of Pakistan. Sarhad J Agr. 28: 277-281.