Refine your search
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Roy, Pinaki
- Why Organic Farms do not Give Potential Yield?
Abstract Views :213 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 S.D. Agricultural University, Mundra, Kachchh (Gujarat), IN
2 Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat), IN
3 Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, IN
1 S.D. Agricultural University, Mundra, Kachchh (Gujarat), IN
2 Navsari Agricultural University, Navsari (Gujarat), IN
3 Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, IN
Source
Rashtriya Krishi (English), Vol 12, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 84-85Abstract
From the time immemorial, humans are growing food crops, presumably in the organic manner. The yield so produced sufficed the needs of the population, however, during and after both first and second world war, we needed additional food to overcome the need and we have gone for green revolution with new varieties, chemical fertilizers and monoculture of crops.
- Can farm mechanization enhance small farmers’ income? Lessons from Lower Shivalik Hills of the Indian Himalayan Region
Abstract Views :159 |
PDF Views:108
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012, India
1 Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 110 012, India
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 5 (2022), Pagination: 667-676Abstract
Indian agriculture being fraught with fragmented land holdings, the economic viability of farm mechanization has forever remained a debatable issue. Here we determine the socio-agro-economic impact of seed-cum-fertilizer drill and zero tillage through different methods with ex-ante and ex-post approaches. Results depict that labour costs had reduced by almost 80% and seed usage by 20%. The seed-cum-fertilizer drill and zero tillage adopter saved Rs 3764.10 and 4047.54 respectively, from 1 ha. The machinery also increased the yield of HD 2967 wheat variety by 13.39 and 6.0 q/ha, and decreased seed rate by 27.71 and 24.20 kg/ha respectively, as evident from the results of the SUR model. The growth of the farm machinery sector is hindered by machine cost, resource-poor farmers and inaccessibility of agricultural technology. A few suggestions on the critical aspects are made here based on the application of technology in different states of India to implement suitable policies for the economic benefit of farmersKeywords
Efficacy measure, farm mechanization, labour cost, socio-agro-economic impact, synchronous bootstrap-ping.Full Text
References
- Bhattacharyya, S., Venkatesh, P., Aditya, K. S. and Burman, R. R., The macro and micro point of view of farmer suicides in India. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett., 2020, 6(164), 489–495; https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40009-020-00920-4
- Prasad, Y. G. et al., Smart practices and technologies for climate re-silient agriculture. Central Research Institute for Dryland Agricul-ture, Hyderabad, 2014.
- Mittal, S., Cost–benefit analysis of agriculture interventions in An-dhra Pradesh. Working draft on Andhra Pradesh Priorities, An Indian Consensus Prioritization Project, Copenhagen Consensus Center, Creative Commons Attribution CC BY. 4.0, 2018.
- Feder, G., Richard, J. and David, S., Adoption of Agricultural Innova-tions in Developing Countries: A Survey, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1985, vol. 2, pp. 255–295; https://www. journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/451461
- Beyene, A. D. and Menale, K., Speed of adoption of improved maize varieties in Tanzania: an application of duration analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2015, 96, 298–307; https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.techfore.2015.04.007.
- Verma, P. D. and Tamrakar, S. K., A comparison of zero-tillage technology and traditional techniques for sowing of wheat: evidence from farmers field by front line demonstration. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res., 2017, 180(4), 1–13.
- Loon, J. V., Lennart, W., Timothy, J., Krupnik, F., Maria, B. and Bram, G., Scaling agricultural mechanization services in smallholder farming systems: case studies from sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. Agric. Syst., 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agsy.2020.102792.
- Arun, G. C., Jun-Ho, Y. and Kiran, G., Determinants of farm mecha-nization in Nepal. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol., 2019, 7, 87; https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i1.87-91.2131.
- Does Socio-Economic Dynamics Influence Crop Yield Variability?
Abstract Views :47 |
PDF Views:36
Authors
Affiliations
1 Maricopa County Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85040, US
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sitamarhi 843 320, IN
3 Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, US
4 Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Coochbehar, West Bengal 736 165, IN
5 Plants, Soils and Climate Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, US
1 Maricopa County Cooperative Extension, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85040, US
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Sitamarhi 843 320, IN
3 Department of Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, US
4 Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Coochbehar, West Bengal 736 165, IN
5 Plants, Soils and Climate Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, US
Source
Current Science, Vol 125, No 8 (2023), Pagination: 846-852Abstract
The present study examines the current research on how socio-economic factors affect the decision-making process and adoption of agricultural technologies by farmers in crop production scheduling. It reviews existing literature to identify gaps in knowledge and determine the most relevant factors influencing crop production in Northwest India from 2016 to 2021. The study finds that socio-economic factors, such as education, age, awareness and financial limitations, significantly impact farmers’ decision-making when it comes to crop planning. Additionally, societal issues like politics and religion also influence crop output. The study suggests that government policies and subsidies can help improve farmers’ livelihoods, and effective communication from agricultural scientists can encourage the adoption of affordable and environmentally friendly production technologies. However, the study emphasizes the need for more primary data to address socio-economic constraints in intervetion efforts.Keywords
Agricultural Technologies, Crop Production, Farmers, Policies and Subsidies, Socio-Economic Factors.Full Text
References
- Roy, P. and Bhattacharyya, S., Doubling farmers’ income: its necessity and possibilities in Indian context. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 2020, 90(9), 3–9.
- Roy, P. and Kaur, M., Status and problems of paddy straw management in West Bengal. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Eng., 2015, 1, 44–48.
- Ramakrishnan, P. S., Shifting agriculture and sustainable development: an inter-disciplinary study from north-eastern India. Parthenon Publishing Group, Paris, France, 1992.
- Giller, K. E., Rowe, E. C., De Ridder, N. and Keulen, V. H., Resource use dynamics and interactions in the tropics; scaling up in space and time. Agric. Syst., 2006, 88, 8–27.
- Stoorvogel, J. J., Antle, J. M., Crissman, C. C. and Bowen, W., The tradeoff analysis model: integrated bio-physical and economic modeling of agricultural production systems. Agric. Syst., 2004, 80, 43–66.
- Mittal, S., Gandhi, S. and Tripathi, G., Socio economic impact of mobile phones on Indian agriculture. ICRIER Working Paper No. 246, International Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, 2010.
- Norman, D. W., Simmons, E. B. and Hays, H. M., Farming Systems in the Nigerian Savanna: Research and Strategies for Development, Westview Press, Boulder, USA, 1982, p. 275.
- Chavas, J. P., Structural change in agricultural production: economics, technology and policy. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics (eds Gardner, B. and Rausser, G.), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001.
- Paul, C. M., Nehring, R., Banker, D. and Somwaru, A., Scale economies and efficiency in US agriculture: are traditional farms history? J. Prod. Anal., 2004, 22, 185–205.
- Dimitri, C., Effland, A. and Conklin, N., The 20th century transformation of US agriculture and farm policy. In Economic Information Bulletin 3, Economic Research Service of the USDA, Washington DC, USA, 2005; No. 1476-2016-120949.
- Hoppe, R. A., Korb, P., O’Donoghue, E. J. and Banker, D. E., Structure and finances of US farms: family farm report, 2007 edition. In Economic Information Bulletin 24, Economic Research Service of the USDA, Washington DC, USA, 2007.
- Williams, S. K. T. and Williams, C. E., The relationship of farmers characteristic to the sources of information on improved farm practices in western states of Nigeria. Bull. Rural Econ. Socio., 1971, 6(2), 162–186.
- Dervin, R., The everyday information needs of the average citizens. A taxonomy for analysis. In Information for the Community (ed. Kochen, M.), American Library Association, IL, Chicago, USA, 1976.
- Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York, USA, 1995, p. 12.
- McNamara, K. T. and Weiss, C., Farm household income and on-and-off farm diversification. J. Agric. Appl. Econ., 2005, 37, 37–48.
- Mukherjee, A., Wang, S. Y. S. and Promchote, P., Examination of the climate factors that reduced wheat yield in Northwest India during the 2000s. Water, 2019, 11(2), 343.
- Bhattacharyya, S., Burman, R. R., Sharma, J. P., Padaria, R. N., Paul, S. and Singh, A. K., Model villages led rural development: a review of conceptual framework and development indicators. J. Commun. Mobil. Sustain. Dev., 2018, 13(3), 513–526.
- Birthala, P. S., Negia, D. S., Jha, A. K. and Singh, D., Income sources of farm households in India: determinants, distributional consequences and policy implications. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2014, 27(1), 37–48.
- Junakar, P. N., Land tenure and Indian agricultural productivity. J. Dev. Stud., 1976, 13(1), 42–60.
- Agriculture Census, 2023; www.agcensus.nic.in (accessed on 24 April 2023).
- Just, R. E. and Antle, J. M., Interactions between agricultural and environmental policies: a conceptual framework. Am. Econ. Rev., 1990, 80, 197–202.
- Swinton, S. M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G. P. and Landis, D. A., Ecosystem services from agriculture: looking beyond the usual suspects. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 2006, 88, 1160–1166.
- Smith, K. R., Public payments for environmental services from agriculture: precedents and possibilities. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 2006, 88, 1167–1173.
- Roy, P., Hansra, B. S., Burman, R. R., Bhattacharyya, S., Roy, T. N. and Ahmed, R., Can farm mechanization enhance small farmers’ income? Lessons from Lower Shivalik Hills of the Indian Himalayan Region. Curr. Sci., 2022, 123(5), 667–676.
- Roy, P., Hansra, B. S., Burman, R. R., Roy, T. N., Bhattacharyya, S. and Ahmed, R., An introspection into impact of combine harvester: a tale of sustainable livelihood security. Indian J. Extens. Educ., 2022, 58(1), 66–72.
- Singh, I., Squire, L. and Strauss, J. (eds), Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA, 1986, p. 335.
- McCann, E., Sullivan, S., Erickson, D. and Young, R. de., Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: a comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environ. Manage., 1997, 21, 747–758.
- Knowler, D. and Bradshaw, B., Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: a review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy, 2007, 32, 25–48.
- Bisaliah, S., Capital formation, agriculture growth, and poverty: conceptual and empirical constructs, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy, 2017; www.fao.org (accessed on 20 October 2021).
- incometaxindia.gov.in/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 21 April 2023).
- Akber, N. and Paltasingh, K. R., Public financing in Indian agriculture and its return – some panel evidence. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2020, 33, 1–15.
- Gulati, A. and Sharma, A., Subsidy syndrome in Indian agriculture. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 1995, 30(39), 93–102.
- https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/comment/punjabs-agri-policy-must-be-all-encompassing-472846 (accessed on 24 April 2023).
- Hardie, I. W., Parks, P. J. and Van Kooten, J. C., Land use decisions and policy at the intensive and extensive margins. In Intern Yearbook of Environment and Resource Economics, Edward Elgar, London, UK, 2004, pp. 101–139.
- Goetz, R. U. and Zilberman, D., The economics of land use regulation in the presence of an externality: a dynamic approach. Optim. Control Appl. Methods, 2007, 28, 21–43.
- Lichtenberg, E., Agriculture and the environment. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics (eds Gardner, B. and Rausser, G.), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002, vol. 2, pp. 1249–1313.
- Singh, K. M., Agricultural price policy in India. In Market-led Agricultural Extension: Concept and Practices, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, 2017, pp. 147–156; www.researchgate.net (accessed on 22 May 2020).
- Agarwal, T., Horons, M. and Hardy, A. G., Understanding farmers’ cropping decisions and implications for crop diversity conservation: Insights from Central India. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain., 2021, 3, 100068.
- Khan, N. and Khan, M. M., Marketing of agricultural crops in rural Indian economy: a case study. J. Econ. Sustain. Dev., 2012, 3(2), 1–9.
- Manjunatha, S. and Kannan, E., Effect of rural infrastructure on agricultural development: a district level analysis of Karnataka, India. J. Infrastruct. Dev., 2017, 9(2), 1–14.
- Yogi, V., Farm mechanization in India. Biotech Article, Category: Agriculture, 2017; www.biotecharticles.com (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Singh, G., Farm mechanization in Punjab: social, economic and environmental implications, 2021; www.un-csam.org (accessed on 30 October 2022).
- Basuroy, T., Internet usage activities across rural India. 2022; www.statistika.com (accessed on 17 November 2022).
- Saroj, N., ICT usage by farmers of Punjab. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res., 2019, 6(6), 692–695.
- Agarwal, R. G., How technology can benefit Indian farmers, 2020; www.businessworld.in (accessed on 2 January 2023).
- Chavas, J. P. and Kim, K., Economies of diversification: a generalization and decomposition of economies of scope. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2010, 126, 229–235.
- Chavas, J. P., Chambers, R. G. and Pope, R. D., Production economics and farm management: a century of contributions. Am. J. Agric. Econ., 2010, 92, 356–375.
- Dhondayal, S. P., Farm Management – An Economic Analysis, Aman Publishing House, Meerut, 2002.
- Emran, S. A., Krupnik, T. J., Aravindakshan, S., Kumar, V. and Pittelkow, C. M., Factors contributing to farm-level productivity and household income generation in coastal Bangladesh’s rice-based farming systems. PLoS ONE, 2021, 16(9); https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 19 March 2022).
- Hassan, I., Chattha, M. B., Chattha, T. H. and Ali, M. A., Factors affecting wheat yield: a case study of mixed cropping zone of Punjab. J. Agric. Res., 2010, 48(3), 403–408.
- Serra, T., Zilberman, D. and Gil, J., Differential uncertainties and risk attitudes between conventional and organic producers: the case of Spanish arable crop farmers. Agric. Econ., 2008, 39, 219–229.
- Takahashi, K., Muraoka, R. and Otsuka, K., Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture: a review of the recent literature. Agric. Econ., 2020, 51(1), 31–45.
- Pillay, D. P. K. and Kumar, T. M., Food security in India: evolution, efforts, and problems. Strat. Anal., 2018, 42(6), 595–611.
- Saxena, N. C., Hunger, under-nutrition and food security in India. In Poverty, Chronic Poverty, and Poverty Dynamics, Springer, Singapore, 2018, pp. 55–92.
- Das, S., Agricultural products exports in India. Agricultural Marketing, 2014, p. 339.
- www.devdiscourse.com (accessed on 10 March 2023).
- www.indiabudget.gov.in (accessed on 29 April 2023).
- https://core.ac.uk/reader/188049490 (accessed on 29 April 2023).
- Sethy, V., Top three causes of low agricultural productivity in India; www.yourarticlelibrary.com (accessed on 7 January 2023).