Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sinu, Neethu
- Temporal Consistency in Foraging Time and Bouts of a Carpenter Bee in a Specialized Pollination System
Abstract Views :322 |
PDF Views:103
Authors
Affiliations
1 438/XIIIA, Mutthappanarkavu, Kanhangad South 671 531, IN
2 438/XIIIA, Mutthappanarkavu, Kanhangad South 671 531, India; Department of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Padannakad 671 314, IN
1 438/XIIIA, Mutthappanarkavu, Kanhangad South 671 531, IN
2 438/XIIIA, Mutthappanarkavu, Kanhangad South 671 531, India; Department of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Padannakad 671 314, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 122, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 213-216Abstract
While site and plant fidelity are reported for bees, consistency in foraging pattern is less studied in field conditions. We monitored three marked carpenter bees – one female and two males – on the sword bean for 25 straight days of flowering to examine whether (1) the bee is consistent on the time of its first visit and the number of foraging bouts and (2) the number of flowers on the plant predicts foraging bouts of the bees. The female bee was consistent on the first arrival time and the number of visitation bouts, but the male bees were not. The median first arrival time of the female bee was 06:22 h. Number of visitation bouts of female bee was unaffected by the crop size. The duration the bees spent on the plant on subsequent visits increased with the duration they spent on the first visit. This study suggests that the carpenter bee, in particular the female, has a consistent visitation pattern to the flowersKeywords
Carpenter Bees, Flower Constancy, Foraging, Sword Bean, Visitation Rate.Full Text
References
- Brosi, B. J., Pollinator specialization: from the individual to the community. New Phytol., 2016, 210, 1190–1194.
- Heinrich, B., The foraging specializations of individual bumble bees. Ecol. Monogr., 1976, 46, 105–128.
- Cecala, J. M. and Rankin, E. E. W., Mark–recapture experiments reveal foraging behavior and plant fidelity of native bees in plant nurseries. Ecology, 2020, 101, e03021.
- Ogilvie, J. E. and Thomson, J. D., Site fidelity by bees drives pollination facilitation in sequentially blooming plant species. Ecology, 2016, 97, 1442–1451.
- Ohashi, K. and Thomson, J. D., Efficient harvesting of renewing resources. Behav. Ecol., 2005, 16, 592–605.
- Aleixo, K. P., Menezes, C., Fonseca, V. L. I. and da Silva, C. I., Seasonal availability of floral resources and ambient temperature shape stingless bee foraging behavior (Scaptotrigona aff. depilis). Apidologie, 2017, 48, 117–127.
- Ohashi, K. and Yahara, T., Effects of variation in flower number on pollinator visits in Cirsium purpuratum (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot., 1998, 85, 219–224.
- Thompson, J. D., How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia, 2001, 126, 386–394.
- Bronstein, J. L., Barker, J. L., Lichtenberg, E. M., Richardson, L. L. and Irwin, R. E., The behavioral ecology of nectar robbing: why be tactic constant? Curr. Opin. Insect Sci., 2017, 21, 14–18.
- Balfour, N. J., Gandy, S. and Ratniek, F. L. W., Exploitative competition alters bee foraging and flower choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 2015, 69, 1731–1738.
- Ohashi, K., Leslie, A. and Thomson, J. D., Trapline foraging by bumble bees: V. Effects of experience and priority on competitive performance. Behav. Ecol., 2008, 19, 936–948.
- Gross, C. L., The reproductive ecology of Canavalia rosea (Fabaceae) on Anak Krakatau, Indonesia. Aust. J. Bot., 1993, 41, 591– 599.
- Solomon Raju, A. J. and Rao, S. P., Nesting habits, floral resources and foraging ecology of large carpenter bees (Xylocopa latipes and Xylocopa pubescens) in India. Curr. Sci., 2006, 90, 1210–1217.
- Ma, X. L., Milne, R. I., Fang, J. Y. and Zha, H. G., Floral nectar of the obligate outcrossing Canavalia gladiata (Jacq.) DC. (Fabaceae) contains only one predominant protein, a class III acidic chitinase. Plant Biol., 2017, 19, 749–759.
- Thomson, J. D., Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators of Aralia hispida. Evol. Ecol., 1988, 2, 65–76.
- Ginsberg, H. S., Foraging ecology of bees in an old field. Ecology, 1983, 64, 165–175.
- Morse, D. H., Behavior and ecology of bumble bees. In Social Insects (ed. Hermann, H. R.), Academic Press, New York, USA, 1982, pp. 245–322.
- Manning, A., Some aspects of the foraging behaviour of bumblebees. Behaviour, 1956, 9, 164–201.
- Ribbands, C. R., The foraging method of individual honey bees. J. Anim. Ecol., 1949, 18, 47–66.
- Zhao, Z., Lu, N. and Conner, J. K., Adaptive pattern of nectar volume within inflorescences: bumblebee foraging behavior and pollinator-mediated natural selection. Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 34499; doi:10.1038/srep34499.
- Lihoreau, M., Chittka, L. and Raine, N. E., Travel optimization by foraging bumblebees through readjustments of traplines after discovery of new feeding locations. Am. Nat., 2010, 176, 744–757.
- Fisogni, A., Cristofolini, G., Rossi, M. and Galloni, M., Pollinator directionality as a response to nectar gradient: promoting outcrossing while avoiding geitonogamy. Plant Biol., 2011, 13, 848–856.