Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Singh, Nahar
- An Economic Analysis of Marketing of Banana (Musa paradisica L.) in Durg District of Chhattisgarh
Abstract Views :272 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 9, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 1-8Abstract
The paper attempts to study the disposal pattern, marketing cost, marketing margins and price spread of banana in Dhamdha blockof Durg district of Chhattisgarh state for the year 2017-18. The marketing of banana has been studied by three marketing channels, viz., I: Producer wholesaler → retailer → consumer; II: Producer → wholesaler (through commission agent) → retailer → consumer; III: Producer → retailer (through commission agent) → consumer. The net price received by the producer was 58.75 per cent, 53.08 per cent and 62.43 per cent in marketing channel I, II and III, respectively. The producer’s share in marketing channel III was the maximum because of direct sale by the producer to the retailer through commission agent. In the marketing cost, expenditure was highest on commission charges followed by transportation in all the channels. The marketing channel I has been found most efficient because its marketing efficiency was 1.42 as compared to 0.96 and 1.36 in marketing channel II and III, respectively. The low marketing efficiency in supply chain II was on account of a higher number of market intermediaries in this chain. High price fluctuations followed by unremunerative prices, high commission charge, lack of regulated market and high transportation cost were the major problem reported by the banana growers. Whereas lack of cold storage facilities followed by non - availability of banana processing units, inadequate market infrastructure and shortage of electricity supply were the marketing problems highlighted by the intermediaries.Keywords
Marketing Channels, Marketing Cost, Market Efficiency, Marketing Intermediaries, Price Spread.References
- Chandrakar, K., Choudhary, V.K. and Koshta, A.K. (2015). Constraints in banana cultivation and supply chain management in Raipur district of Chhattisgarh. Internat. Res. J. Agric. Econ. & Stat., 6 (2): 410-413.
- Gajanana, T.M., Sreenivasa Murthy, D. and Sudha, M. (2002). Marketing practices and post-harvest loss assessment of banana var. Poovan in Tamil Nadu. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 15 (1) : 56-65.
- Jaffer, Mohamed A., (2002). Marketing of banana in Theni district, Ph.D. Thesis, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, T.N. (INDIA).
- Kathirvel, N. and Chandrasekaran, N. (2008). Marketing of banana in Tamil Nadu: A case study, Southern Economist., 46 (23 & 24): 12-14.
- Mali, B.K., Bhosle, S.S., Shendage, P.N. and Kale, P.V. (2003). Economics of production and marketing of banana in Jalgaon district of Western Maharashtra. Indian J. Agric. Mktg., 17 (1) :173-179.
- Muthupandi, V. (2009). Cultivation and marketing problems of banana in Tamil Nadu: A study with Reference to Madurai District, Ph.D. Thesis, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, T.N. (INDIA).
- Pawar, B.R., Landge, P.P., Yeware, P.P. and Deshmukh, D.S. (2010). Marketed surplus and price spread in marketing of banana in Nanded district of Maharashtra. Internat. J. Comm. & Busi. Mgmt., 3 (1): 100-104.
- Rane, A.A. and Bagade, S.R. (2006). Economics of production and marketing of banana in Sindhudurg district, Maharashtra. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 20 (1): 38-45.
- Sidhu, R.S., Sidhu, M.S. and Singh, J.M. (2011). Marketing efficiency of green peas under different supply chains in punjab. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 24 : 267-273.
- Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana, T.M. and Sudha, M. (2003). Estimation of postharvest loss and marketing efficiency in banana var. yelakki in Karnataka, Bihar J. Agric. Econ., 10 (3) : 221-230.
- An Economic Study of Post-Harvest Losses of Banana in Durg District of Chhattisgarh
Abstract Views :205 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 9, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 82-89Abstract
An attempt has been made in the present study to estimate the physical post-harvest losses in banana and to identify the causes of losses in Durg district of Chhattisgarh. The explicit evaluation of the impact of post-harvest losses at different stages of marketing on farmers’ net price, marketing costs, margins and efficiency have been presented. The results indicated that there are two major marketing channels viz., wholesaler channel and commission agent channel. The post-harvest losses were as high as 18 kg per quintal in the wholesale channel; comprising 31.67 per cent at the field and assembly level, 33.06 per cent at the wholesale market level and 35.28 per cent at the retail level. The total physical losses in the second marketing channel which was through commission agent were 18.95 kg per quintal with 28.50, 33.25 and 38.26 per cent in the corresponding stages. Small fruits, sun burn, harvesting injury and cracks and cankers at farm level; physiological dryness, physical damage and pressed and crushed fruits, over ripening loss at wholesale market level; physically damaged fruit and over ripened fruit at retailers level were the major causes responsible for post-harvest losses in banana. Further it was found that by separating out marketing loss at each stage of marketing, the producers’ net share and wholesaler and retailer margins have been reduced substantially. It can be inferred that marketing efficiency is inversely proportional to the volume of post-harvest losses.Keywords
Post-Harvest Losses, Marketing Channel, Banana Growers, Farmers’ Net Price, Marketing Efficiency, Intermediaries’ Margin.References
- Acharya, S.S. and Agarwal, N.L. (2001). Agricultural marketing in India, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India.
- Anonymous (2006). Postharvest management of fruit and vegetables in the Asia-pacific region. Asian productivity Organization, Japan. ISBN: 92-833-7051-1.
- Gajanana, T.M., Sreenivasa Murthy, D. and Sudha, M. (2002). Marketing practices and post-harvest loss assessment of banana var. Poovan in Tamil Nadu, Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 15 (1) : 56-65.
- Gauraha, A.K. (1997). Economic assessment of post-harvest lossess in vegetable crops, Indian J. Agric. Mktg., 11 (1&2) : 38-39.
- Hodges, R.J., Buzby, J.C. and Bennett, B. (2011). Postharvest losses and waste in developed and less developed countries: opportunities to improve resource use. J. Agric. Sci., 149 : 37-45.
- Ilic, Z., Fallik, E. and Dardiæ, M. (2009). Harvest, sorting, packaging and storage of vegetables. Agric. Conspectus Scientificus, 77 (1): 1-4.
- Kader, A. A. (2002). Postharvest biology and technology: An overview, In: Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Special Public, 3311: 39-47.
- Kader, A.A. (2005). Increasing food availability by reducing postharvest losses of fresh produce, Proceeding of 5th International Postharvest Symposium, pp. 2169-2175.
- Kantor, L.S., Lipton, K., Manchester, A. and Oliveira, V. (1997). Estimating and addressing America’s food losses. Food Review, 20: 3-11.
- Kohls, R.L. and Uhl, J.N. (2002). Marketing of agricultural products, 9th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
- Madan, M.S. and Ullasa, B.A. (1991). Post-harvest losses in mango: causes and control measures. Mysore J. Agril. Sci., 25: 458-463.
- Mitrannavar, D.H. and Yeledalli, R.A. (2014). Estimation of post-harvest losses of majorfruits in Karnataka- A management appraisal. Internat. J. Proc. & Post Harvest Technol., 5 (2): 179-183.
- Murthy, D.S., Gajanana, T.M., Sudha M. and Dakshinamoorthy (2007). Marketing losses and their impact on marketing margins: A case study of banana in Karnataka. Agric.Econ. Res. Rev., 20 : 47 – 60.
- Ramesh, M., Palanikumar, K.,Reddy, K. Hemachandra (2013). Comparative evaluation on properties of hybrid glass fiber-sisal/jute reinforced epoxy composites, Procedia Engg., 51:745 – 750.
- Rao, K.K. and Manohar, K.R. (1995). Losses in packing and transportation of fruits: causes and remedies. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Post-harvest Technology of Fruits, pp. 318-320.
- Roy, S.K. and Pal, R.K. (1991). Multi locational studies to reduce post-harvest losses during harvesting, handling, packaging, transpiration and marketing of mango in India. Acta Horticulture, 291: 499-503.
- Salami, P., Ahmadi, H., Keyhani, A. and Sarsaifee, M. (2010). Strawberry postharvest energy losses in Iran. Researcher, 4 : 67-73.
- Singh, V., Md. Hedayetullah, Zaman, P. and Meher, J. (2014). Postharvest technology of fruits and vegetables: An overview. J. Postharvest Technol., 2 (2): 124-135.
- Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana,T.M. and Sudha,M. (2003) Estimation of postharvest loss and marketing efficiency in banana var. yelakki in Karnataka, Bihar J. Agric. Econ, 10 (3) : 221-230.
- Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana,T.M. and Sudha, M. (2004). Post-harvest loss estimation and its impact on marketing cost, margin and efficiency: A study in grapes in Karnataka. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 59 (4): 770-786.
- Sreenivasa Murthy, D., Gajanana, T.M., Sudha, M. and Dakshinamoorthy, V. (2007). Marketing losses and their impact on marketing margins: A case study of banana in Karnataka. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 20 : 47-60.
- Srinivas, R.N., Venkatesha Reddy, T., Ravi, P.C., Achoth, Lalith and Reddy, B.V. Chinnappa (1997). Post-harvest loss assessment in totapuri and alphanso mangoes, J. Food Sci. & Technologies, 34(1) : 70-71.
- Subrahmanyam, K.V. (1986). Post-harvest losses in horticultural crops: An appraisal. Agricultural Situation India, 41 : 339 - 343.
- Sudha, M., Ganjana, T.M. and Sreenivasmurthy, V. (2002). Post harvest loss assessment of pinepapple in Kerala, Indian J. Agric.Mktg., 16 (1) : 10-21.
- Sudheer, K.P. and Indira, V. (2007). Post-harvest technology of horticultural crops, pp. 01-05.
- Economics and Resource Use Efficiency of Organic and Inorganic Cucumber in Bengaluru
Abstract Views :194 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
C. Kavya
1,
Nahar Singh
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Management, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Management, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 14, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 292-298Abstract
A growing interest in environmentally friendly goods and services has been expressed together with concerns for the risks, and broader environmental problems, associated with intensive agriculture. Today, organic production is a combination of new technology and traditional methods. The present study was conducted in Bengaluru district, one of the major vegetable producing district of south Karnataka. In recent years the large numbers of farmers started practicing the organic cultivation of vegetables in the district. For the study, 45 farmers each practicing organic and inorganic cultivation of cucumber spread over the district of Bengaluru rural were selected randomly. The data collected from respondents was analysed using budgeting technique and Cobb-Douglas Production Function Analysis according to the objectives. The estimated per acre cost of cultivation of organic and inorganic cucumber was Rs. 3,14,454.75 and Rs. 2,55,139.91, respectively. The gross returns of organic cucumber were Rs. 4,50,000 per acre as against Rs. 3,00,000 for inorganic cucumber. The B:C ratio for organic cucumber was 2.60 as against 1.91 for inorganic cucumber. The resource use efficiency was higher in organic farming than that of inorganic farming practice. Hence, it is advisable for the farmers to switch over to organic farming which minimizes the environmental degradation and also brings higher net returns.Keywords
Costs and Return Analysis, Resource Use Efficiency, Cobb-Douglas Production Function, Conventional Farming, Organic Vegetables Farming, NPOP, CucumberReferences
- Anonymous (2004). Karnataka State Policy on Organic Farming Report.pp.1-5. (www.raitamitra.kar.nic.in).
- Anonymous (2009). Organic Bazars : an appropriate tool for recognizing small organic Farmers. Organic, 1(1) : 1-5.
- Bal, K.K., Singh, B. and Bal, H.S. (1983). Resource productivity and factor share in crop production in central districts of Punjab. Indian J. Agric. Econ.,38 (3): 436-437.
- Bhardwaj, M.L., Harender Raj and Koul, B.L. (2000). Yield response and economics of organic sources of nutrients as substitute to inorganic sources in tomato, okra, cabbage and cauliflower. J. Agric. Sci., 70(10) : 653-656.
- Chiara, Grotti (2015). Comparative analysis of organic and conventional farming in Italy.Environmental Economics and Management - Master’s Programme Degree thesis No.915ISSN 1401-4084. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Economics, Uppsala. (http://stud.epsilon.slu.se).
- Elisa, Morgera, Carmen Bullón Caro and Gracia Marín Durán (2012). Organic agriculture and the Law – FAO Legislative Study 107.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 232 pp.
- Emily, Post and Jeff, Schahczenski (2012). Understanding organic pricing and costs of production. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, ATTRA, pp:1-12. (www.attra.ncat.org).
- Federica, Cisilino and Fabio, A. Madau (2007). Organic and conventional farming: a comparison analysis through the Italian FADN. Paper presented at the I Mediterranean Conference of Agro-Food Social Scientists. 103rd EAAE Seminar ‘Adding Value to the Agro-Food Supply Chainin the Future Euromediterranean Space’ April 23rd - 25th Barcelona, Spain.1
- Gurung, Kritika, Sharma, Prerna and Dhalor, Mandeep (2013). Comparative study of India’s organic agriculture with the Leading Countries: Europe and U.S.A. IOSR J. Agric. & Vet. Sci., 2 (4) : 26-39.
- Nadia Scialabba (2000). Factors influencing organic agriculture policies with a focus on developing countries. IFOAM 2000 Scientific Conference, Basel, Switzerland, 28-31 August.pp.11.
- Naik, V.R., Kunnal, L.B., Patil, S.S. and Guledgudda, S.S. (2012). Organic and inorganic cultivation of chilli and its marketing- An economic analysis. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 25 (2) : 203-207.
- Pandey, A.K., Gopinath, K.A., Chattacharya, P., Hooda, K.S., Sushil, S.N., Kundu, S., Selvakumar and Gupta, H.S. (2006). Effect of source and rate of organic manures on yield attributes, pod yield and economics of organic garden pea (Pisum sativum subsp. hortense) in north west Himalaya. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 76 (4) : 230-234.
- Patil, Mallikarjun, Bheemappa, A., Angadi, J.G. and Arvindkumar, B.N. (2010). Production and post harvest management practices followed in organic vegetable cultivation. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (2): 269-273.
- Robin, G. Brumfield, Arbindra Rimal and Steve Reiners (2000). Comparative cost analyses of conventional, integrated crop management, and organic methods. Hort. Technol., 10(4): 785-793.
- Shrestha, Kamal, Shrestha, Gautam and Pandey , Pradyumna, R. (2014). Technical paper on economic analysis of commercial organic and conventional vegetable farming in Kathmandu Valley. J. Agric. & Environ., 15 : 58-71.
- Sen, S.R. (1979). Agricultural Economics. Oxford and IBM publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. pp:363.
- Verma, A.R. (2002). Economics of production, resource use efficiency and constraints – A case study of onion in Shajapur district of Madhya Pradesh. Bihar J. Agric. Mktg., 10 (4): 429-439.
- Yadav, A.K. (2009). Training Manual Certification and Inspection Systems in Organic Farming in India, National Centre of Organic Farming Report, Ghaziabad, U.P.
- Anonymous (2005). APEDA, National Programme on Organic Production report, 6th Ed., Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.(www.apeda.gov.in/.../national_programme_for_organic_production.html).
- www.mosesorganic.org
- www.pgsorganic.in