Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Amsaveni, N.
- Scientometric Measures in Scientometric, Technometric, Bibliometrics, Informetric, Webometric Research Publications
Abstract Views :325 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Asst. Librarian, A.U.C.B. Public Library, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu, IN
2 AMET University, Chennai-603 112, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 DLIS, BDU, Trichy, IN
1 Asst. Librarian, A.U.C.B. Public Library, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu, IN
2 AMET University, Chennai-603 112, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 DLIS, BDU, Trichy, IN
Source
International Journal of Librarianship and Administration, Vol 3, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 87-94Abstract
This study has been carried out to analyze the research field of Scientometrics, technometric, bibliometrics, informetric, webometrics in terms of publication output as per Science Citation Index (1978-2012) from Web of Science. During 1999- 2011 a total of 2325 papers were published by the scientists in the field of scientometrics. The average number of published per year 13 %.The highest number of papers 413 were published in 2011. There were 49 countries involved in the research in this field. USA is the top producing country with 377 publications. The most productive author is Glanzel W with 53 papers dealing with Scientometrics. The most productive Journal is Scientometrics with 560 papers dealing with Scientometrics.Keywords
Scientometrics, Technometric, Bibliometrics, Informetric, WebometricsReferences
- Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42(6), 1513–1531.
- Takeda, Y., et al. (2009). Nanobiotechnology as an emerging research domain from nanotechnology: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 80(1), 23–38.
- Garg, K. C., et al. (2009). Bibliometrics of global malaria vaccine research. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 22–31.
- Bhattacharya, S., & Nath, P. (2002). Using patent statistics as a measure of ‘‘technologies assertiveness’’? A China-India comparison. Current Science, 83(1), 23–29.
- Schummer, J. (2007). The global institutionalization of nanotechnology research: A bibliometric approach to the assessment of science policy. Scientometrics, 70(3), 669–692.
- Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84, 365–371.
- Pouris, A. (2007). Nanoscale research in South Africa: A mapping exercise based on scientometrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 541–553.
- Chen, H., & Roco, M. C. (2009). Mapping nanotechnology innovations and knowledge (p. 330). New York, USA: Springer.
- Prathap, G. (2010). The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics, 84, 167–172.
- Internet Use Pattern among the Students in Annamalai University
Abstract Views :253 |
PDF Views:5
Authors
Affiliations
1 Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 43, No 3 (2006), Pagination: 265-270Abstract
The use of Internet is an inevitable part and there is increasingly centered effect on the part of Government, Education Ministry to fulfill the special needs of the students. The extent and pattern of usage of the Internet amongst students in Annamalai University is the primary focus of this study. This study investigates the relationship between motivational variables (intrinsic and extrinsic), demographic variable and the Internet usage activities (messaging, downloading, browsing and purchasing). The finding also shows that perceived usefulness is an important driver of Internet usage.Keywords
Internet, Use, Use Pattern, Students, Annamalai University.References
- Adams (D A); Nelson (R R) and Todd (P A). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information and Technology. A Replication MIS Quarterly. Vol. 16(2); 1992; p227-247.
- Ajzen (I) and Fishbein (M). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
- Baasyir (A). A Model of Consumers’ Acceptance of Internet shopping. MBA thesis, School of Management, University Sains, Penang, 2000.
- Chang (M K) and Cheung (W). Determinants of the intention of use Internet/WWW at work: A confirmatory study. Information and Management. Vol. 39; 2001; p1-14.
- Ono (H) and Zavodny (M). Gender and the Internet. SSE/EFI Working paper Series in Economics and Finance, 495, Stockholm: Sweden, 2002.
- Prahalad (C K). Management discontinuities: The emerging challenges. Research Technology Management. Vol. 41; 1998; p14-22.