Refine your search
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar, Mukul
- Sustainable Development in the Field of Agriculture Using the Remote Sensing and GIS Technology
Abstract Views :167 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Satya Prakash
1,
Satyam Kumar Singh
1,
Mukul Kumar
2,
Naveen Dwivedi
3,
Shubha Dwivedi
3,
Prashant Kumar Sharma
3,
Prashant Ankur Jain
4,
Preetam Verma
5,
Ved Kumar Mishra
4
Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, S.D. College of Engineering and Technology, Muzaffarnagar (U.P.), IN
2 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour (Bihar), IN
3 Department of Biotechnology, S.D. College of Engineering and Technology, Muzaffarnagar (U.P.), IN
4 Department of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Jacob School of Biotechnology and Bio-Engineering, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
5 Department of Molecular and Cellular Engineering, Jacob School of Biotechnology and Bio-Engineering, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Civil Engineering, S.D. College of Engineering and Technology, Muzaffarnagar (U.P.), IN
2 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour (Bihar), IN
3 Department of Biotechnology, S.D. College of Engineering and Technology, Muzaffarnagar (U.P.), IN
4 Department of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Jacob School of Biotechnology and Bio-Engineering, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
5 Department of Molecular and Cellular Engineering, Jacob School of Biotechnology and Bio-Engineering, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad (U.P.), IN
Source
Asian Journal of Bio Science, Vol 11, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 212-216Abstract
Sustainable agricultural development requires a systematic effort towards the planning of land use activities in the most appropriate way, apart from several other institutional and policy programmed initiative. Remote sensing can provide valuable and timely information about natural resources and environment as an important basis for sustainable development. Geographic information systems (GIS) can provide effective tools for decision makers. Both RS and GIS techniques are important geometric tools which are extensively utilized in developed countries. This technology is also used for land use planning and soil mapping. Modern tools such as satellite remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) have been providing newer dimensions to effectively monitor and manage land uses in an integrated manner for agricultural characterization. Remote sensor and G.I.S. is an excellent tool that is increasingly important in the detection, description, quantification and monitoring environmental changes is remote sensing, which, in combination with geographic information systems and fieldwork, is an effective management tool.
Keywords
Remote Sensing, GIS, Geometric, Tools, Agricultural, Sustainability.
- Effect of Different Levels of Phosphorus on the Yield and Yield Components of Maize Under Agro-Climatic Zone-II of Bihar
Abstract Views :195 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Ajeet Kumar
1,
Mukul Kumar
2
Affiliations
1 Regional Research Station, Madhopur, West Champaran (Bihar), IN
2 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Agwanpur, Saharsa (Bihar), IN
1 Regional Research Station, Madhopur, West Champaran (Bihar), IN
2 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Agwanpur, Saharsa (Bihar), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 13, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 266-270Abstract
An explorative experimental trial was conducted to study the effect of different levels of phosphorus on the yield and yield components of maize in North-East Alluvial plains of Bihar, was conducted at Regional Research Station, Agwanpur, Saharsa (India). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications having a plot size of 5.40 m×6.7 m with row to row distance of 0.75 m and plant to plant distance of 0.25 m. The levels of phosphorus were 0 (control), 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha-1. Results indicated that the different levels of phosphorus significantly affected maize plant height, number of cobs plant-1, number of grains cob-1 and grain yield, however, the effect was non-significant on number of plants m-2, thousand grain weight and biological yield of maize. Application of phosphorus at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 resulted in maximum plant height (161 cm), number of cobs plant-1 (1.25), number of grain cob-1 (343), thousand grain weight (253 g), grain yield (2535 kg ha-1) and biological yield (8398 kg ha-1) as compared to the minimum values in control plots i.e. 148cm, 0.88, 290, 197 g, 1370 kg ha-1 and 6041 kg ha-1, respectively. It is concluded that phosphorus should be applied at the rate of 100 kg ha-1 for best grain yield in the agro-climatic conditions of Bihar.Keywords
Phosphorus, Zea mays L., Plant Height, Grain Yield.References
- Ali, J., Bakht, J., Shafi, M., Khan, S. and Shah, W.A. (2002). Uptake of nitrogen as affected by various combinations of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian J. Pl. Sci., 1: 367-369.
- Amin, R., Zia, M.S., Berger, K.C. and Aqil, K. (1989). Effect of fertilizer rateand phosphorus placement methods on corn production. Sarhad J. Agric., 5: 221-227.
- Arain, A.S., Aslam, S.M. and Tunio, A.K.G. (1989).Performance of maize hybrids under varying NP fertilizer environments. Sarhad J. Agric., 5 (6) : 623-626.
- Ayub, M., Nadeem, M.A., Sharar, M.S. and Mahmood, N. (2002). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian J. Pl. Sci., 1: 352-354.
- Bakht, J., Ahmad, S., Tariq, M., Akber, H. and Shafi, M. (2006). Response of maize to planting methods and fertilizer N. J. Agric. & Biological Sci., 1: 8-14.
- Chen, M.L., Jiang, X.L., Zoov, B.Y. and Zheri, Z.Y. (1994). Mathematical models and best combination of high yield cultivation technique for rapeseed variety Zhenyouyoum. Acta. Agric. Zhejiiangenesis, 6 : 22-26.
- Hussain, N., Khan, A.Z., Akbar, H. and Akhtar, S. (2006). Growth factors and yield of maize as influenced by phosphorus and potash fertilization. Sarhad J. Agric., 22(4): 579-583.
- Leon, L.A. (1999). Phosphorus and potassium interactions in acid soils of the eastern plains of Colombia. Better Crops Int’1., 13(2): 8-10.
- Maqsood, M., Abid, A.M., Iqbal, A. and Hussain, M.I. (2001). Effect of various rates of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of maize. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 19-20.
- Onasanya, R.O., Aiyelari, O.P., Onasanya, A., Oikeh, S., Nwilene, F.E. and Oyelakin, O.O. (2009). Growth and yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in southern Nigeria.World J. Agric. Sci., 5: 400-407.
- Rashid, A. and Memon, K.S. (2001).Soil and fertilizer phosphorus. Soil Sci. B. Elenaand R. Bantel (Eds). National Book Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan. pp. 300-302.
- Sharma, J.P. and Sharma, U.C. (1989). Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the yield and severity of turcicum blight in maize Nagaland. Indian Phytopath., 44: 383-385.
- Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. NEW YORK, U.S.A.
- Wojnowska, T., Panak, H. and Seikiewiez, S. (1995). Reaction of winter oilseed rape to increasing levels of nitrogen fertilizer application under condition of Ketizyn Chernozem. Rosling Oleiste., 16:173-180.
- Impact of Climate Change and their Mitigation for Better Sugarcane Production
Abstract Views :166 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Regional Research Station (RRS), Madhopur, West Champaran (Bihar), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Agwanpur, Saharsa (Bihar), IN
3 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Agwanpur, Saharsa (Bihar), IN
1 Regional Research Station (RRS), Madhopur, West Champaran (Bihar), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Agwanpur, Saharsa (Bihar), IN
3 Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, Agwanpur, Saharsa (Bihar), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 14, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 431-441Abstract
Sugarcane is a climate sensitive crop; its spatial distribution on the globe is restricted as per the suitability of various climatic parameters. The climate change is now accelerated due to natural, as well as enormous human activities disturbing the composition of atmosphere. The predications of various climatic models for probable rise in temperature, rainfall, sea level show an alarming condition in forthcoming decades. As the sugarcane is very sensitive to climatic parameters therefore, a significant effect on its production and sugar yield is expected in future. Sugarcane is one of the precious crops of the world and its end products i.e. sugar and ethanol has a continuous growing demand. Hence, the studies on good production of sugarcane in changing climate has become front line area of research and is a major concern of sugarcane scientist. An advance agronomic practice seems to be the effective measures for obtaining high production of sugarcane with good quality juice.Keywords
Sugarcane, Climate Change, Agronomy, Soil.References
- Agarwal, R.A., Sharma, D.P. and Kindaswamy, P.A. (1959). Feeding habit of sugarcane scale (Targionia glomerata Green). Curr Sci., 28: 462-463.
- Agnhotri, V.P. (1983). Diseases of sugarcane. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
- Ananthanarayana, K. and Balasubramanian, M. (1980). Distribution and intensity of inter-node borer of sugarcane, Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (K.) during different periods of plant growth. Proc. Ann. Conven. Deccan. Sugar Technol. Assoc., 30: 81-88.
- Binbol, N.L., Adebayo, A.A. and Kwon-Ndung, E.H. (2006). Influence of climatic factors on the growth and yield of sugar cane at Numan, Nigeria. Climate Res., 32: 247–252.
- Birch, R.G. (2011). Xanthomonas albilineans and the antipathogenesis approach to disease control. Molecular Pl. Pathol., 2 (1) : 1-11.
- Cerri, C.E.P., Sparovek, G., Bernoux, M., Easterling, W.E., Melillo, J.M. and Cerri, C.C. (2007). Tropical agriculture and global warming: impacts and mitigations options. Scientia Agricola., 64 : 83-99.
- Chattha, M.U., Ali, A. and Bilal, M. (2007). Influence of planting techniques on growth and yield of spring planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 44 (3): 452-455.
- Cheavegatti-Gianotto, A., de Abreu, H.M. and Arruda, P. (2011). Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum): A reference study for the regulation of genetically modified cultivars in Brazil. Trop. Pl. Biol., 4 (1): 62-89.
- Cherry, R.H., Schueneman, T.J. and Nuessly, G.S. (2011). Insect management in sugarcane. Entomology and Nematology Department Document ENY-406. University of Florida/ IFAS, Gainesville, FL.
- Clark, L.G., Zhang, W. and Wendel, J.F. (1995). A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Syst. Bot., 20 (4): 436-460.
- Damayanti, T.A., Putra, L.K. and Giyanto (2010). Hot water treatment of cutting cane infected with Sugarcane streak mosaic virus. J. Intl. Soc. Southeast Asian Agric. Sci., 16 (2): 17-25.
- David, H., Sithanantham, S. and Velayutham, B. (1979). Some aspects of losses due to internode borer in sugarcane in Tamil Nadu. Proc. Ann. Conven. Deccan. Sugar Technol. Assoc., 29: 27-40.
- David, I.L. and Ranganathan, V. (1960). Influence of inter-node borer on the quality of juice in sugarcane. Indian J. Sugarcane Res. Dev. , 4: 209-212.
- Duke, S.O. and Powles, S.B. (2008). Mini-review: Glyphosate: a once-in-a century herbicide. Pest Manage Sci., 64 : 319-325.
- Duttamajumder, A.K. (2008). Red rot of sugarcane. IISR, Lucknow Publication, India.
- Eid, M.A., El-Shabrawy, H.A. and Yakoub, R.S. (2011). An attempt to study the impact of Pink Mealy-bug infestation Saccharicoccus sacchari Ckll. on chemicals and allele-chemicals of some sugarcane cultivars. Acad bJ Entomol., 4 (1): 23-29.
- Fageria, N.K., Virupax, C. and Baligar Jones, C.A. (2010). Growth and mineral nutrition of field crop. 3rd Ed. CRC Press, 437-456.
- FAO (2005). Major food and agricultural commodities and major producers. FAO, Rome.
- FAOSTAT. (2005). Primary Crops. FAO, Rome.
- FNP (2009). Anurio da Agricultura Brasileria, Sao Paulo, P497.
- Garside, A.L. and Bell, M.J. (2009). Row spacing and planting density effects on the growth and yield of sugarcane. 1. Responses in fumigated and non-fumigated soil. Crop Past Sci., 60 (6): 532-543.
- Gawander, J. (2007). Impact of climate change on sugarcane production in Fiji.WMO Bull., 56 (1): 34-39.
- Gbetibouo, G.A. and Hassan, R.M. (2005). Measuring the economic impact of climate change on major South African field crops: a Ricardian approach. Glob Planet Change, 47: 143-152.
- Gouvea, J.R.F., Sentelhas, P.C., Gazzola, S.T. and Santos, M.C. (2009). Climate changes and technological advances: impacts on sugarcane productivity in tropical southern Brazil. Scientia Agricola., 66 (5): 593- 605.
- Gupta, B.D. (1957). A note on the scientific and common names of sugarcane pests in India. Indian J. Sugarcane Res. Dev., 2: 9-13.
- Gupta, S.K. and Tripathi, S.C. (2011). Fungi-toxic activity of Solanum torvum against Fusarium sacchari. Plant Protect. Sci., 47: 83–91.
- Hannah, L., Lovejoy, T.E. and Schneider, S.H. (2005). Biodiversity and climate change in context. In: Lovejoy TE, Hannah L. (eds.) Climate change and biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven.
- Hartemink, A.E. (1998). Soil chemical and physical properties as indicators of sustainable land management under sugarcane plantation in Papua New Guinea. Geoderma, 85: 283-306.
- Huang, B. (2000). Role of ischolar_main morphological and physiological characteristics in drought resistance of plants. In: Wilkinson, R.F. (Ed.) Plant-Environment Interactions, Mercel Dekker, pp. 39-63
- Humbert, R.P. (1968). The growing of sugarcane, Elsevier publishing company, New York, USA, page 27-38.
- ICAR (2000). Indian Council of Agricultural Research. Handbook of Agriculture, 5th Ed., New Delhi.
- ICRISAT (2009). Training manual on sustainable sugarcane initiative: Improving sugarcane cultivation in India, An initiative of ICRISAT.WWF Project, Patancheru, A P, India. 30P.
- IISR (2008). Annual Report, 2007-2008. Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow.
- IISR (2011). Vision 2030. Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow.
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2005). The science of climate change. Working Group 1, WMO and UNEP, New York.
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007). The Physical science basis. Summary for Policy makers. Working Group I,WMO and UNEP, New York.
- Jain, R., Solomon, S., Shrivastava, A.K. and Chandra, A. (2010). Sugarcane bud chips: A promising seed material. Sugar Technol., 12 (1): 67-69.
- Jain, R., Solomon, S., Shrivastava, A.K. and Chandra, A. (2011). Effect of ethephon and calcium chloride on growth and biochemical attributes of sugarcane bud chips. Acta Physoiol. Plant., 33: 905-910.
- Jain, S.K. (2011). Population rise and growing water scarcity in India - revised estimates and required initiatives. Curr. Sci., 101 (3): 271-276.
- Jaipal, S. (2000). An IPM module for the management of major insect pests of sugarcane in Indian Subtropics. Sugar Technol., 2 (3): 1-8.
- Kapur, R., Duttamajumder, S.K. and Krishna Rao, K. (2011). A breeder’s perspective on the tiller dynamics in sugarcane. Curr. Sci., 100 (2): 183- 189.
- Kimball, B.A.,Kobayashi, K. and Bindi, M. (2002). Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Advan. Agron., 77: 293-368.
- Kumar, K.K.,Patwardhan, S.K., Kulkarni, A., Kamla, K., Rao, K.K. and Jones, R. (2011). Simulated projections for summer monsoon climate over India by a higher resolution regional climatic model (PRECIS).Curr. Sci., 101 (3): 312-326.
- Lawlor, D.W. and Mitchell, R.A.C. (1991). The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity-a review of field studies. Plant Cell Environ., 14: 807-818.
- Mann, R.S., Suri, K.S. and Sharma, S. (2006). Population dynamics of insect pests of sugarcane in Punjab. Indian J. Plant Protect., 34 (2): 198-201.
- Masih, J. (2010). Causes and consequences of global climatic change. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res., 2 (2): 100-105.
- Meyer, J.H., van Antwerpen, E.R. and Meyer, E. (1996). A review of soil degradation and management research under intensive sugarcane cropping. Proc. South African Sugar Technol. Assoc., 70: 22-28.
- Nazir, M.S. (2000). Crop production, National book foundation, Islamabad, Page-421-422.
- NCIWARD (1999). Report of the National Commission for integrated Water Resources Development, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, New Delhi.
- Nelson, V.,Morton, J., Chancellor, T., Burt, P. and Pound, P. (2010). Climate change, agricultural adaptation and fair trade, identifying the challenges and opportunities. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich.
- Ng Kee Kwong, K.F. (2002). The effects of potassium on growth, development, yield and quality of sugarcane. In: Pasricha and Bansal (eds.). Potassium for Sustainable Crop Production: Potash Research Institute of India (PRII) and International Potash Institute (IPI), Horgen, Switzerland, pp. 430-444.
- Nikolaos, C., Stott, P.A. and Brown, J.S. (2011). The role of human activity in the recent warming of extremely warm daytime temperatures. J. Climate, 24 (7): 1922-1930.
- Nzioki, H.S., Jamoza, J.E., Olweny, C.O. and Rono, J.K. (2010). Characterization of physiological races of sugarcane smut (Ustilago scitaminea) in Kenya. African J. Microbiol. Res., 4 (16): 1694-1697.
- Odero, D.C. and Dusky, J.A. (2010). Weed management in Sugarcane. SS-AGR- 09, Agronomy Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida
- Rahmstorf, S., Cazenave, A., Church, J.A., Hansen, J.E., Keeling, R.F., Parker, D.E. and Somerville, R.C.J. (2007). Recent climate observations compared to projections. ScIe, 316 : 709.
- Raid, R.N. (1990). Fungicidal control of pineapple disease of sugarcane. J. Amer. Soc. Sugarcane Technol., 10: 45-50.
- Rao, V.L.V.P., Rao, N.V. and Rao, S.S. (1991). Influence of seasons on buildup of scale insect Melanaspis glomerata (G.), insecticidal performance and their effect on yield and quality in sugarcane. Indian J. Plant Protect., 19 (1): 17-22.
- Rao, V.P. (1970). The sugarcane scale insect, Melanaspis glomerata Green. Indian Sugar, 20: 279-282.
- Reddy, S.R. (2004). Agronomy of field crops, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India, Page: 545-605.
- Rice, R.W., Gilbert, R.A. and Lentini, R.S. (2002).Nutritional requirements for Florida sugarcane. Florida Cooperative Extension Service Publication SS -AGR – 228.
- Rosegrant, M.W.,Ewing, M., Yohe, G., Burton, I., Huq, S. and Valmonte-Santos, R. (2008). Climate protection programme for developing countries. German Technical Cooperation Publication, Germany.
- Sallam, M.S. (2006). Reviews of sugarcane stem borers and their natural enemies in Asia and Indian Ocean Island: an Australian perspective. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 42 (3-4): 263-283.
- Segalstad, T.V. (1996). The distribution of CO2 between atmosphere, hydrosphere, and lithosphere; minimal influence from anthropogenic CO2 on the global “Greenhouse Effect”. In Emsley, J. (Ed.): The Global Warming Debate. The Report of the European Science and Environment Forum. Bourne Press Ltd., Bournemouth, Dorset, U.K.
- Singh, M., Chhiliar, B.S. and Madan, Y.P. (1996). Biology of sugarcane ischolar_main borer Emmalocera depressella Swinhoe. Indian Sugar, 45: 12.
- Srikant, J. and Singaravelu, B. (2011). White grub (Holotrichia serrata) as a pest of sugarcane and its management. Extension Publication 197, SBI, Coimbatore Publication, pp.1-5.
- Srivastava, A.K. (1984). Soil compaction: a problem in sugarcane culture. Indian Sugar, 34: 503-504.
- Tiwari, A.K., Bharti, Y.P., Tripathi, S., Mishra, N., Lal, M., Rao, G.P., Sharma, P.K. and Sharma, M.L. (2010). Biotechnological approaches to improve sugarcane crop with special reference to disease resistance. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hun., 45 : 235-249.
- Tripathi, N. and Omkar Shukla, G.S. (1985). Role of air currents in the dispersal of sugarcane scale insect crawlers. Agric Sci Digest, India, 5 (3): 148- 149.
- Vijaya, H.K., Kulkarni, S., Yashoda, R. and Hedge, Y.R. (2007). Chemical control of sett rots of sugarcane caused by Ceratocystis paradoxa. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 20 (1): 62-64.
- Vishwanathan, R. and Padnabhan, P. (2008). Handbook on sugarcane diseases and their management. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore Publication.
- Wood, A.W., Schroeder, B.L. and Stewart, R.L. (2003). Soil-specific management guidelines for sugarcane production: Soil reference booklet for the Herbert District. CRC Sugar Technical Publication, CRC for Sustainable Production, Townsville.
- World Bank (2004). Cities, seas and storms: Managing change in the Pacific Islands, Volume II Managing Pacific Towns. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
- Yadav, R.A. (2003). Assessment of losses caused by black bug Cavlelerius (Excavatus) sweeti to sugarcane in yield and quality parameters. Indian J. Entomo., 65 (3): 409-415.
- CPC [Crop Protection Compendium] (2012). Melanaspis glomerata. CABI Intl. www.cabi.org/cpc.
- Paul, A.V.N. (2007). Insect pests and their management (online), Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.nsdl.niscair.res.in//revised+insect+pest+and+ their+management.pdf.