A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ponnusamy, K.
- Responsiveness of Dairy Research in Generating Improved Dairy Practices in West Shewa Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia
Authors
1 Department of Rural Development and Agricultural Extension, Ambo University, AMBO, ET
2 National Dairy Research Institute, KARNAL (HARYANA), IN
Source
Research Journal of Animal Husbandry & Dairy Science, Vol 7, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 39-46Abstract
Dairy research has been undertaking since 1960s in Ethiopia. However, the majority of the farmers still continue to adopt traditional dairy practices. This study was made to look into the current status of dairy research in generating responsive improved dairy practices. To achieve the objective of the study, cross sectional survey was employed using 50 researchers in the area of livestock sector. A systematic sampling technique was employed to identify the sample respondents. Holistically, to capture all the relevant information, mixed methods such as focus group discussion, key informant interview, questionnaire and observation were used for data collection. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis and ranking. The study clearly indicated that the improved dairy practices generation process of the study area was less responsive mainly due to lack of clear dairy research strategy. Evidently, low dairy productivity and low level use of improved dairy practices are the key indicators. Likewise, inadequate laboratory equipments, inadequate laboratory facility (building) and inadequate budget support were the central constraints of the dairy research in order of their importance. Generally, in the dairy research efforts of several decades, the numbers of generated, disseminated and adopted improved dairy practices were not worth mentioning. It necessitates formulation of dairy research strategy that leads to the generation of responsive improved dairy practices which, in turn, brings significant impact on the dairy development.Keywords
Dairy Research, Improved Dairy Practices, Livestock, Responsive.References
- Alfares, H.K. (2006). Determining criteria weights as a function of their ranks in multiple-criteria decision making. Systems Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, SAUDI ARABIA.
- AIi, Tanvir, Khan, Saeed A., Malik, Niaz H., Ahmad, Munir and Saleem, Imran (1994). Investigation into some common factors which affect agricultural research and extension work in developing countries. Pak. J. Agri. Sa., 31 (3): 245-249.
- Azage, Tegegne, Berhanu, Gebremedin, Dirk, Hoekstra and Nigatu, Alemayehu (2006). Rural urban linkage in marketoriented dairy development in Ethiopia: Lessons from Ada’a Dairy Cooperative, ADDISABABA.
- Belay, Kassa (2003). Agricultural extension in Ethiopia: The case of participatory demonstration and training extension system. J. Soc. Develop. Africa, 18 (1) : 49-84.
- Central Statistical Authority (CSA) (2008). Agricultural sample survey. Volume 2 Livestock, and livestock characteristics ). CSA, ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA.
- CIMMYT Economics Programme (1993). The adoption of agricultural technology: AGuide for Survey Design. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
- EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization) (2006). Research-Extension- Farmer linkages strategy document. ADDIS ABABA.
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2011). Statistical Database.Future Agricultures Consortium (FAC) Policy Brief 04, Future Agricultures Consortium Secretariat at the University of Sussex, BRIGHTON.
- KAM (Knowledge Assessment Methodology) (2012). The World Bank Knowledge for Development (K4D) website Roling, N. (2006). Conceptual and Methodological Developments in Innovation. In: Pascal, C.S.Waters-Bayer, A., Kaaria, S., Njuki, J. and Wettasinha, C. (Eds), Innovation Africa: enriching farmers’ livelihoods. Earthcan, London, 934pp.
- Storck, H., Bezabih Emana, Berhanu Adenew, Borowieck, A. and Shimelis, Hawariat W. (1991). Farming systems and farm management practices of small holders in the Hararge high lands. Farming systems and resource economics in the tropics, 11.Wissenschaft surlang vauk,kiel, GERMANY.
- Tesafye, Lemma R., Puskur, Azage T. and Hoekstra, D. (2008). April 7-9. “Exploring innovation capacity in the Ethiopian dairy systems.” Paper presented on the international conference on: Advancing Agriculture in Developing Countries through Knowledge and Innovation, International Food Policy Research Institute, ADDIS ABABA.
- Vince, Ashworth (2005).The challenges of change for agricultural extension in Ethiopia, a discussion paper, ADDIS ABABA
- Yilma, Z., Emannuelle, G.B. and Ameha, S. (2011). A Review of the Ethiopian Dairy Sector. Ed. Rudolf Fombad, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Sub Regional Office for Eastern Africa (FAO/SFE), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 81pp.
- Social Engineering of Societal Knowledge in Livestock Science:Can we be More Empathetic?
Authors
1 National Innovation Foundation-India, Satellite Complex, Ahmedabad-380015, Gujarat, IN
2 Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension Education, Dr. GC Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062, Himachal Pradesh, IN
3 Division of Dairy Extension, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, IN
4 Department of Clinical Medicine, Ethics & Jurisprudence, Nagpur Veterinary College, Maharashtra Animal & Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur-440001, Maharashtra, IN
5 Veterinary College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, Hassan-573202, Karnataka, IN
Source
Veterinary World, Vol 10, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 86-91Abstract
Questions are raised in effective utilization of farmer’s wisdom by communities in their farming. Planners support to livelihood emphasize mostly of inputs from outside and not setting up sustainable goals. Formal institutions and planners of program are finding constraints and sceptical in wider dissemination of indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS). This is in spite of evidence that considerable number of farmer’s in livestock sector depends on IKRS. In this context, it is pertinent to showcase dissemination potential of these knowledge system(s) in larger geographical areas. The review illustrates different challenges encountered while control of livestock ailments like ectoparasite infestation through IKRS. Several times, it was opinioned to provide or share IKRS to thwart ailments in a specific region. This is interesting as it was narrated how formal system is unable to recognize farmer’s problem and challenges in integrating these sustainable practices. It has to be noted that disseminating activities seldom takes into account the experimental potential of farmers. This review paper articulates various evidences generated in enhancing diffusion thereby dissemination of IKRS. The nature of support extended by IKRS in entrepreneurial activity of smallholder farming units did not get adequate recognition. There needs to be minimum standard protocol in deriving benefit from such low-cost alternative technologies. This will enrich incremental innovation activities as per location specific need and provide scope for wider dissemination.Keywords
Health, Indigenous Knowledge, Innovation, Institution, Livestock, Technology.References
- Abate, G.T., Rashid, S., Borzaga, C. and Getnet, K. (2016) Rural finance and agricultural technology adoption in Ethiopia: Does the institutional design of lending organizations matter? World Dev., 84: 235-253.
- Grabowski, P.P., Kerr, J.M., Haggblade, S. and Kabwe, S. (2016) Determinants of adoption and disadoption of minimum tillage by cotton farmers in eastern Zambia. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 231: 54-67.
- Bensch, G., Grimm, M. and Peters, J. (2015) Why do households forego high returns from technology adoption? Evidence from improved cooking stoves in Burkina Faso. J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 116: 187-205.
- Ibrahim, M.A.R., Dorina, M. and Abdelrazek, I. (2014) How rural agricultural development projects (animal production) can use projects benefits for improving the economics states of farmers. Procedia Econ. Finance, 8: 484-489.
- Cock, J., Oberthur, T., Isaacs, C., Laderach, P.R., Palma, A., Carbonell, J., Victoria, J., Watts, G., Amaya, A., Collet, L., Lema, G. and Anderson, E. (2011) Crop management based on field observations: Case studies in sugarcane and coffee. Agric. Syst., 104(9): 755-769.
- Hauser, M., Lindtner, M., Prehsler, S. and Probst, L. (2016) Farmer participatory research: Why extension workers should understand and facilitate farmers role transitions. J. Rural Stud., 47(A): 52-61.
- Birhanu, M.Y., Girma, A. and Puskur, R. (2016) Determinants of success and intensity of livestock feed technologies use in Ethiopia: Evidence from a positive deviance perspective. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change, In Press. (23 September 2016). Available from: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.010.
- Magnan, N., Spielman, D.J., Lybbert, T.J. and Gulati, K. (2015) Leveling with friends: Social networks and Indian farmers demand for a technology with heterogeneous benefits. J. Dev. Econ., 116: 223-251.
- Sharma, P., Ponnusamy, K. and Kale, R.B. (2014) Study on behavioural changes among women SHGs and their impact on adoption of scientific practices in dairying. Indian J. Anim. Res., 46(6): 855-859.
- Ponnusamy, K., Kale, R.B., Ravi, K.N., Arulmozhi, D.M.C. and Sharma, P. (2015) Cross-regional analysis on usage of indigenous technical knowledge in dairy farming. Indian J. Anim. Res. DOI: 10.18805/ijar.8599.
- Devgania, B.S., Khordia, D., Chodvadiya, M.B., Patel, R., Patel, D., Kinhekar, A.S., Singh, P.K., Kumar, V., Bhojne, G.R., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2015) Reverence of community towards grassischolar_main livestock innovation: Responding to stakeholders need against sub-clinical mastitis in Amreli District, Gujarat, India. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 3(12): 689-693.
- Raot, U.S., Parmar, M., Patel, P., Patel, R., Gogoi, D.M., Patel, J., Sivapregasam, V., Kumar, V., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2016) Value addition of novel herbal livestock medication mastiherb in treatment of mastitis sustained by creative communities from the regions of Dang, Gujarat. Int. J. Bioresour. Stress Manage., 7(3): 501-507.
- Chander, M., Dutt, T., Ravikumar, R.K. and Subrahmanyeswari, B. (2010) Livestock technology transfer service in India: A review. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 80(11): 1115-1125.
- Fitzpatrick, J.L. (2013) Global food security: The impact of veterinary parasites and parasitologists. Vet. Parasitol., 195(3-4): 233-248.
- Ndyabawe, K. and Kisaalita, W.S. (2014) Diffusion of an evaporative cooler innovation among smallholder dairy farmers of Western Uganda. Technol. Soc., 38: 1-10.
- Rangnekar, D.V. (2006) Livestock in the Livelihoods of the Underprivileged Communities in India: A Review. International Livestock Research Institute Nairobi, Kenya. p72.
- Gupta, A.K. (2016) Grassischolar_mains Innovation: Minds on the Margin Are Not Marginal Minds. Penguin Books India Pvt., Ltd., Gurgaon, Haryana, India. p1-54, 103-147.
- Warren, C.R., Burton, R., Buchanan, O. and Birnie, R.V. (2016) Limited adoption of short rotation coppice: The role of farmers socio-cultural identity in influencing practice. J. Rural Stud., 45: 175-183.
- Zander, K.K., Mwacharo, J.M., Drucker, A.G. and Garnett, S.T. (2013) Constraints to effective adoption of innovative livestock production technologies in the Rift Valley (Kenya). J. Arid Environ., 96: 9-18.
- Huang, Z.H., Wu, B., Xu, Z.C. and Liang, Q. (2016) Situation features and governance structure of farmer cooperatives in China: Does initial situation matter? Soc. Sci. J., 53(1): 100-110.
- Rathore, O., Rathore, G., Patel, C., Kinhekar, A.S., Mangwani, N., Kumar, V., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2016) Clinical evaluation of an indigenous practice against subclinical mastitis. Rumin. Sci., 5(1): 95-98.
- Sungirai, M., Moyo, D.Z., Clercq, P.D. and Madder, M. (2016) Communal farmers perceptions of tick-borne diseases affecting cattle and investigation of tick control methods practiced in Zimbabwe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis., 7(1): 1-9.
- Ponnusamy, K., Gupta, J. and Nagarajan, R. (2009) Indigenous technical knowledge (ITK) in dairy enterprise in coastal Tamil Nadu. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl., 8(2): 206-211.
- Marzban, S., Allahyari, M.S. and Damalas, C.A. (2016) Exploring farmers orientation towards multifunctional agriculture: Insights from northern Iran. Land Use Policy, 59: 121-129.
- Velde, F.V., Claerebout, E., Cauberghe, V., Hudders, L., Van Loo, H., Vercruysse, J. and Charlier, J. (2015) Diagnosis before treatment: Identifying dairy farmers determinants for the adoption of sustainable practices in gastrointestinal nematode control. Vet. Parasitol., 212(3-4): 308-317.
- Ponnusamy, K. and Ambasankar, K. (2006) Technological interventions for socio-economic enrichment of dairy farmers. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 59(1): 33-36.
- de Loe, R.C., Murray, D. and Simpson, H.C. (2015) Farmer perspectives on collaborative approaches to governance for water. J. Rural Stud., 42: 191-205.
- Ton, G., Klerkx, L., Grip, K.D. and Rau, M.L. (2015) Innovation grants to smallholder farmers: Revisiting the key assumptions in the impact pathways. Food Policy, 51: 9-23.
- Schindler, J., Graef, F. and Konig, H.J. (2016) Participatory impact assessment: Bridging the gap between scientists theory and farmers practice. Agric. Syst., 148: 38-43.
- Bellotti, B. and Rochecouste, J.F. (2014) The development of conservation agriculture in australia-farmers as innovators. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 2(1): 21-34.
- Dolinska, A. and D’aquino, P. (2016) Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice. Agric. Syst., 142: 122-130.
- Roling, N. (2009) Pathways for impact: Scientists different perspectives on agricultural innovation. Int. Agric. Sustain., 7(2): 83-94.
- Thirunavukkarasu, D. and Narmatha, N. (2016) Lab to land-factors driving adoption of dairy farming innovations among Indian farmers. Curr. Sci., 111(7): 1231-1234.
- Baldwin, C.Y. (2012) Organization Design for Distributed Innovation, Working Paper, 12-100, Harvard Business School. Available from: http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/12-100.pdf. Accessed on 13-10-2016.
- Sawhney, M. and Prandelli, E. (2000) Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. Calif. Manage. Rev., 42(4): 24-54.
- Lakhani, K.R. and Panetta, J.A. (2007) The principles of distributed innovation. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob., 2(3): 97-112.
- Bhikane, A.U., Hase, P.B., Syed, A.M., Ghoke, S.S., Devangare, A.A. and Awandkar, S.P. (2011) Efficacy of herbomineral formulation in subclinical mastitis in crossbred cows. Indian Vet. J., 88(10): 171-172.
- Siegmund-Schultze, M., Lange, F., Schneiderat, U. and Steinbach, J. (2012) Performance, management and objectives of cattle farming on communal ranges in Namibia. J. Arid Environ., 80: 65-73.
- Rich, K.M. and Perry, B.D. (2011) The economic and poverty impacts of animal diseases in developing countries: New roles, new demands for economics and epidemiology. Prev. Vet. Med., 101: 133-147.
- Raza, M.A., Younas, M., Buerkert, A. and Schlecht, E. (2014) Ethno-botanical remedies used by pastoralists for the treatment of livestock diseases in Cholistan desert, Pakistan. J. Ethnopharmacol., 151(1): 333-342.
- Joshi, D.D. (1991) Traditional Veterinary Medicine in Nepal, Animal Production and Health Commission for Asia and the Pacific (APHCA) Information Exchange Unit, No. 10. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Ghorai, S., Ghorai, N., Dutta, L., Bera, A., Ghorui, S., Kinhekar, A.S., Ingle, V.C., Sonkusale, P., Awandkar, S.P., Tembhurne, P.A., Kumar, V., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2016) Protective and immuno-modulatory effect of low cost locally available technology from West Bengal, India under indigenous knowledge research system. J. Immunol. Immunopathol., 18(1): 19-23.
- Beynon, S.A. (2012) Potential environmental consequences of administration of ectoparasiticides to sheep. Vet. Parasitol., 189(1): 125-135.
- Taylor, M.A. (2013) Parasite control in sheep: A risky business. Small Rumin. Res., 110(2-3): 88-92.
- Kadivendi, M., Maheswari, R., Ravikumar, R.K., Chauhan, M.M., Kinhekar, A.S., Kumar, V. and Kumar, V. (2015) Integrated approach for engaging farming community - Opportunities and challenges for low cost inputs. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res., 3(6): 1691-1695.
- Thakur, D., Sharma, A.K., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2016) Benefit to end users: Appraisal of extending technology at farm fields from regions of Himachal Pradesh, India. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 4(Spl 2-SSPN): 1-8.
- Kumar, V. and Ravikumar, R.K. (2016) Realistic aspiration for livestock health care through indigenous veterinary system in India, Dairy of India, 216-17, Sadana Publishers & Distributors, Ghaziabad, India. p162-164.
- Ravikumar, R.K., Kinhekar, A.S., Ingle, V.C., Sonkusale, P., Awandkar, S.P., Tembhurne, P.A. and Kumar, V. (2016) Effect of heat stress on haematological and immunological parameters in broiler chicken. Indian J. Vet. Sci. Biotechnol., 11(3): 40-42.
- Munda, S., Pandey, R., Bhojne, G.R., Dakshinkar, N.P., Kinhekar, A.S., Kumar, V., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2016) Indigenous knowledge research system [IKRS] for treatment of bloat and its significance towards greenhouse gas emission: Jharkhand, India. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4(5): 241-249.
- Ravikumar, R.K., Petharajanna, B., Govindan, N., Vivekanandan, P., Alagumalai, V., Subramanium, Y., Patel, J., Patel, H., Hariharan, M., Kumar, V. and Kumar, V. (2016) Science, society and humanity in mainstreaming indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS) from southern regions of India: An evidence for honey bee network (HBN) philosophy. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4(1s): 20-31.
- Ravikumar, R.K., Kumar, V., Khuman, L.Y., Kinhekar, A.S., Thakur, D. and Kumar, V. (2016) Integrating indigenous knowledge research system (IKRS) and/with livestock health intervention program to complement natural resource conservation. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4(1s): 32-42.
- Choudhary, H., Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2016) Assessing behaviour of farmers in linking to village institution: Dairy society’s perspective from semiarid regions, Gujarat, India. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 4(Spl 2-SSPN): 9-16.
- Simula, H., Hossain, M. and Halme, M. (2015) Frugal and reverse innovations - Quo Vadis? Curr. Sci., 109(9): 1567-1572.
- Swaans, K., Boogaard, B., Bendapudi, R., Taye, H., Hendrickx, S. and Klerkx, L. (2014) Operationalizing inclusive innovation: Lessons from innovation platforms in livestock value chains in India and Mozambique. Innov. Dev., 4(2): 239-257.
- Singh, J., Gupta, S.K., Singh, R. and Hussain, S.A. (2014) Etiology and haemato-biochemical alterations in cattle of Jammu suffering from anaemia. Vet. World, 7(2): 49-51.
- Wall, R. (2007) Ectoparasites: Future challenges in a changing world. Vet. Parasitol., 148: 62-74.
- Ravikumar, R.K., Kumar, V., Choudhary, H., Kinhekar, A.S. and Kumar, V. (2015) Efficacy of indigenous polyherbal ectoparasiticide formulation against hard tick infestation in cattle (Bos indicus). Rumin. Sci., 4(1): 43-47.
- Ravikumar, R.K. and Kumar, V. (2015) New frontiers for indigenous knowledge research system [IKRS]: Non linear innovation system [NLIS] and open source innovation system [OSIS]. In: Singh, J., Verma, H.K., Singh, N., Singh, S. and Kasrija, R., editors. Lead Paper: Technologies and Proven Practices for Sustainable Livestock Production, Push to the Livestock Farming through Knowledge Empowerment of the Farmers, First National Conference, SVAHE, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University [GADVASU], Ludhiana, India, 18-20 November. p239-242.
- Athilakshmy, S. and Rao, S.V.N. (2013) Rearing of day old Swarnadhara chicks by farmers in Karaikal - Evidence from an action research project. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 48: 209-214.
- Hagmann, J., Chuma, E., Connolly, M. and Murwira, K. (1998) Agricultural Extension: An action Learning Experience from Zimbabwe, Network Paper, 78. Agricultural Research and Extension Network. p1-13.
- Kumar, V. and Ravikumar, R.K. (2016) Indigenous innovations in livestock production systems: NIF initiatives, In: Reddy, S.K., Prasad, R.M.V., Rao, A.K., editors. Invited Papers: Innovative Designs and Implements for Global Environment and Entrepreneurial Needs Optimizing Utilitarian Sources, Indigenous, International Livestock Conference and Expo, 23rd Annual Convention, ISAPM, Hyderabad, India, 28-31 January. p28-35.
- Dhamale, M., Mahajan, A., Kinhekar, A.S., Rajurkar, G., Ravikumar, R.K., Ksheersagar, V.H. and Kumar, V. (2016) Reviving technology demonstration in farmers field - An appraisal. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci., 4(Spl 2-SSPN): 39-47.
- Andreopoulou, Z., Tsekouropoulos, G., Theodoridis, A., Samathrakis, V. and Batzios, C. (2014) Consulting for sustainable development, information technologies adoption, marketing and entrepreneurship issues in livestock farms. Procedia. Econ. Finance, 9: 302-309.
- Koschorreck, J., Koch, C. and Rönnefahrt, I. (2002) Environmental risk assessment of veterinary medicinal products in the EU-a regulatory perspective. Toxicol. Lett., 131(1-2): 117-124.
- Yadav, V. and Goyal, P. (2015) User innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from rural India. J. Innov. Entrep., 4(5). DOI: 10.1186/s13731-015-0018-4.
- Ayele, S., Duncan, A., Larbi, A. and Khanh, T.T. (2012) Enhancing innovation in livestock value chains through networks: Lessons from fodder innovation case studies in developing countries. Sci. Public Policy, 39(3): 333-346.
- Ravikumar, R.K., Periyaveeturaman, C., Selvaraju, D., Kinhekar, A.S., Dutta, L. and Kumar, V. (2016) Community oriented ectoparasite intervention system: Concepts for on-farm application of indigenous veterinary medication. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci., 4(1s): 9-19.
- Elmgren, L., Li, X., Wilson, C., Ball, R., Wang, J., Cichutek, K., Pfleiderer, M., Kato, A., Cavaleri, M., Southern, J., Jivapaisarnpong, T., Minor, P., Griffiths, E., Sohn, Y. and Wood, D. (2013) A global regulatory science agenda for vaccines. Vaccine, 31(2): B163-B175.
- Fan, T.P., Deal, G., Koo, H.L., Rees, D., Sun, H., Chen, S., Dou, J.H., Makarov, V.G., Pozharitskaya, O.N., Shikov, A.N., Kim, Y.S., Huang, Y.T., Chang, Y.S., Jia, W., Dias, A., Wong, V.C. and Chan, K. (2012) Future development of global regulations of Chinese herbal products. J. Ethnopharmacol., 140(3): 568-586.
- Knoss, W. (2015) Harmonization of regulatory requirements in Europe to ensure quality, safety and efficacy of herbal medicinal products. Evidence-Based Validation of Herbal Medicine. Ch. 9. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier. p201-216.
- Technical Efficiency of Cooperative Member Vis-A-Vis Non-Member Dairy Farms in Gujarat-Application of Data Envelopment Analysis
Authors
1 Division of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal - 132 001, Haryana, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Economics and Development, Vol 6, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 1-9Abstract
Objectives: To compare the technical efficiency scores of dairy cooperative member and non-member farms across the districts in Gujarat selected from regions having different level of dairy development.
Methods/Statistical Analysis: The present study has analyzed and compared the technical efficiency of 180 dairy farmers using a non-parametric approach i.e., Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The study is based on the primary data collected during 2016-17 using a well-structured, comprehensive and pre-tested interview schedule. Apart from conventional analysis, box-plot and scatter-plot were used to compare the efficiency scores.
Findings: The investigation identified regional disparities in efficiency scores based on dairy development. The DEA results showed that member farmers of the district selected from low (Tapi), moderate (Bharuch) and highly (Anand) dairy developed regions were more efficient than their respective non-member counterpart. Similarly, the overall comparison between dairy cooperative members and non-members showed that the efficiency of member farmers was 83.27% while for non-members it was 75.31%. Further, the results revealed that small herd size farmers were most efficient in both member (87.21%) and non-member (81.59%) categories. The paper established that membership in dairy cooperatives; herd size as well as status of dairy development in a region greatly influences the technical efficiency of farmers.
Application/Improvements: Overall, the study concludes that 24.69% and 16.73% inefficiency exist respectively in dairy cooperatives non-member and member farms indicating the scope for increasing the realized output with same level of resources and production technology.
Keywords
Gujarat, Technical Efficiency, Dairy Cooperatives, Member, Non-Member, Data Envelopment Analysis.References
- F. Karanja, D. Gilmour,I. Fraser. Dairy productivity growth, efficiency change and technological progress in Victoria. Agricultural and Resource Economics Society. 2012; 1-27.
- D. Bardhan, M.L. Sharma. Technical efficiency in milk production in underdeveloped production environment of India. Springer Plus. 2013, 2(65).
- K.B. Kale, K. Ponnusamy, A.K. Chakravaty, R. Sendhil, A. Mohmmad. Assessing resource and infrastructure disparities to strengthen Indian dairy sector. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2016, 86, 720-725.
- I. Fraser, D. Cordina. An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia. Agricultural Systems. 1999, 59(3), 267-282.
- I. Fraser, P. Hones. Farm level efficiency and productivity measurement using panel data. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.2001, 215-232.
- J.R. Stokes, P.R. Tozer, J. Hyde. Identifying efficient dairy producers using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2007, 90(5), 2555-2562.
- D. Mahida, R. Sendhil. Data analysis tools and approaches (data) in agricultural sciences. ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research. 2017, 54-56.
- A. Gelan, B. Muriithi. Measuring and explaining technical efficiency of dairy farms: a case study of smallholder farms in East Africa. 2010.
- Data Envelopment Analysis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321824482_Data_Envelopment_Analysis. Date accessed: 16/12/2017.
- E. Silva, A. Arzubi, J. Berbel. An application of data envelopment analysis (Dea) in Azores dairy farms. New Medit. 2004, 3, 39-43.
- V. Saravanakumar. Factor demand output supply and technical efficiency of milk production in Tamil Nadu. National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal. 2005, 1-246.
- S. Sirohi, D. Bardhan. Costs and returns in milk production: developing standardized methodology and estimates for various production systems. Project Report submitted to Department of Animal Husbandry. 2015.
- S. Mor, S. Sharma. Technical efficiency and supply chain practices in dairying: the case of India. Agricultural Economics (CZECH).2012, 8(2), 85–91.
- Tracking the Disparities in Gujarat Dairy Development – An Application of Biplot Analysis
Authors
1 ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132 001, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 114, No 10 (2018), Pagination: 2151-2155Abstract
Gujarat, despite being a highly progressive state of India in terms of dairying, has great potential to enhance its milk production and make dairying a more lucrative enterprise. It is home to many high quality dairy animal breeds and has a very active milk cooperative structure which can accelerate the possibilities of uplifting the level of milk production further, if proper and balanced micro level development policies are promoted. The present study depicts the causes for disparities besides analysing the strengths and weaknesses in dairying across 26 districts in Gujarat. To identify and capture the variation in resource use which causes disparities in dairy development, the principal component analysis-based biplot technique was employed. Data on different variables like resource availability, infrastructure and veterinary facilities, and, milking animals and their yields have been sourced from 26 districts of Gujarat for tracing the disparity. The conclusions drawn from the biplot imply that promoting the quality of animal breeds and increasing the population of high yielding cattle breeds in low-developed districts can lead to high milk production. In the setting of increased milk production, the cooperative milk marketing structure will become more dynamic and result in enhanced income for dairy producers.Keywords
Biplot, Eigen Value, Gujarat Dairy Development, PCA, Regional Disparity.References
- NDDB, 2015–16; http://dahd.nic.in/sites/default/files/NDDB%-20AR%202015-16.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2017).
- Belhekar, S. and Dash, S., Role of dairy industry in rural development in India. Indian J. Res., 2016, 5(11), 509–510.
- Chakraborty, S., On world milk day, a look at how India became the largest producer and why it continues to be so. Financial Express, 2017; http://www.financialexpress.com/economy/on-world-milk-day-a-look-at-how-india-became-the-largest-producer-and-why-it-continues-to-be-so/695991/
- Statistics Times, 2015; http://statisticstimes.com/economy/gdp-of-indian-states.php (accessed on 26 April 2017).
- Times of India, 2014; http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Centre-studies-Modis-animal-hostel-scheme/articleshow/37878661.cms (accessed on 18 May 2017).
- Kale, R. B., Ponnusamy, K., Chakravarty, A. K., Sendhil, R. and Mohammad, A., Assessing resource and infrastructure disparities to strengthen Indian dairy sector. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 2016, 86(6), 720–725.
- Gabriel, K. R., The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 1971, 58(3), 453–467.
- Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-Garcia, N., Jimenez-Contreras, E., Herrera, F. and Lopez-Cozar, E. D., On the use of Biplot analysis for multivariate bibliometric and scientific indicators. J. Am. Soc. Infor. Sci. Technol., 2013, 64, 1468–1479; doi:10.1002/asi.22837.
- Jacoby, W. G., Statistical Graphics for Visualizing Multivariate Data, Sage publication, New Delhi, 1998.
- Kroonenberg, P. M., Applied Multiway Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Publication, 2007.
- Rana, V., Ram, S., Sendhil, R., Nehra, K. and Sharma, I., Physio-logical, biochemical and morphological study in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) RILs population for salinity tolerance. J. Agric. Sci., 2015, 7, 119–128; doi:0.5539/jas.v7n10p119.
- Yan, W. and Rajcan, I., Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci., 2002, 42, 11–20.
- Rubio, J., Cubero, J. I., Martın, L. M. and Suso, M. J., Flores, F., Biplot analysis of trait relations of white lupin in Spain. Euphytica, 2004, 135, 217–224; doi:10.1023/B:EUPH.0000014911.70355.c9
- Shah, J. and Dave, D., Regional trends and pattern in milk production and drivers for future growth in Gujarat state. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2010, 23, 259–302.