Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Biswas, H.
- Assessing the Impact of Watershed Development on Energy Efficiency in Groundnut Production Using DEA Approach in the Semi-Arid Tropics of Southern India
Abstract Views :254 |
PDF Views:86
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Bellary 583 104, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 195, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Bellary 583 104, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Dehradun 248 195, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 109, No 10 (2015), Pagination: 1831-1837Abstract
The present study is aimed at assessing the impact of watershed development on the energy efficiency in groundnut cultivation. Overall technical, pure technical and scale efficiency increased by 11, 3 and 12% over the pre-watershed scores due to watershed development. Estimated potential for saving input energy was 3608, 3223 and 2907 MJ ha-1 for marginal, small and large farmers respectively, in groundnut production while maintaining status quo for energy output. Farm size, age of farmer, number of livestock owned and implementation of watershed activities were identified as key determinants for higher overall energy efficiency.Keywords
Data Envelopment Analysis, Energy Efficiency, Groundnut, Soil and Water Conservation.Full Text
References
- Pimentel, D. et al., Achieving a secure energy future: environmental and economic issues. Ecol. Econ., 1994, 9(3), 201–219.
- Tabatabaeefar, A., Emamzadeh, H., Varnamkhasti, M. G., Rahimizadeh, R. and Karimi, M., Comparison of energy of tillage systems in wheat production. Energy, 2009, 34(1), 41–45.
- Dyer, J. A. and Desjardins, R. L., Carbon dioxide emissions associated with the manufacturing of tractors and farm machinery in Canada. Biosyst. Eng., 2006, 93(1), 107–118.
- Rahman, S. and Rahman, M. S., Energy productivity and efficiency of maize accounting for the choice of growing season and environmental factors: an empirical analysis from Bangladesh. Energy, 2013, 49(1), 329–336.
- Lal, R., Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ. Int., 2004, 30(7), 981–990.
- Ozkan, B., Fert, C. and Karadeniz, C. F., Energy and cost analysis for greenhouse and open-field grape production. Energy, 2007, 32(8), 1500–1504.
- Mulwa, R., Emrouznejad, A. and Muhammad, L., Economic efficiency of smallholder maize producers in western Kenya: a DEA meta-frontier analysis. Int. J. Oper. Res., 2009, 4(3), 250–267.
- Nassiri, S. M. and Singh, S., Study on energy use efficiency for paddy crop using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique. Appl. Energy, 2009, 86(7), 1320–1325.
- Mandal, K. G., Saha, K. P., Hati, K. M., Singh, V. V., Misra, A. K., Ghosh, P. K. and Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Cropping systems of central India: an energy and economic analysis. J. Sustain. Agric., 2005, 25(3), 117–140.
- Singh, K. P., Prakash, V., Srinivas, K. and Srivastva, A. K., Effect of tillage management on energy-use efficiency and economics of soybean (Glycine max) based cropping systems under the rainfed conditions in North-West Himalayan Region. Soil Tillage Res., 2008, 100(1), 78–82.
- Singh, H., Mishra, D. and Nahar, N. M., Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India – part I. Energy Convers. Manage., 2002, 43(16), 2275–2286.
- Singh, H., Singh, A. K., Kushwaha, H. L. and Singh, A., Energy consumption pattern of wheat production in India. Energy, 2007, 32(10), 1848–1854.
- Joshi, P. K., Jha, A. K., Wani, S. P., Joshi, L. and Shiyani, R. L., Meta-analysis to assess impact of watershed program and people’s participation. Research Report 8, International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2005.
- MoA, Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2012, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. 2012.
- Mondal, B., Loganandhan, N. and Raizada, A., Meteorological drought and coping strategies by small and marginal farmers in semi-arid Karnataka. Indian J. Soil Conserv., 2014, 42(1), 54–61.
- Devasenapathy, P., Senthilkumar, G. and Shanmugam, P. M., Energy management in crop production. Indian J. Agron., 2009, 54(1), 80–89.
- Ghosh, P. K., Mohanty, M., Bandyopadhyay, K. K., Painuli, D. K. and Misra, A. K., Growth, competition, yield advantage and economics in soybean/pigeonpea intercropping system in semi-arid tropics of India: I. Effect of sub soiling. Field Crops Res., 2006, 96(1), 80–89.
- Kitani, O., Jungbluth, T., Peart, R. M. and Ramdani, A., CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering, Vol. V: Energy and Biomass Engineering, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1999.
- Malana, N. M. and Malano, H. M., Benchmarking productive efficiency of selected wheat areas in Pakistan and India using data envelopment analysis. Irrig. Drain., 2006, 55(4), 383–394.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 1978, 2(6), 429–444.
- Farrell, M. J., The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc., Series A, 1957, 120, 253–290.
- Angulo-Meza, L. and Lins, M. P. E., Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis. Ann. Oper. Res., 2002, 116(1–4), 225–242.
- Thanh Nguyen, T., Hoang, V. N. and Seo, B., Cost and environmental efficiency of rice farms in South Korea. Agric. Econ., 2012, 43(4), 369–378.
- Heidari, M. D., Omid, M. and Mohammadi, A., Measuring productive efficiency of horticultural greenhouses in Iran: a data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Syst. Appl., 2012, 39(1), 1040–1045.
- Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J. and Battese, G. E., An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer, 2005.
- Sarıca, K. and Or, I., Efficiency assessment of Turkish power plants using data envelopment analysis. Energy, 2007, 32(8), 1484–1499.
- Thanassoulis, E., Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001.
- Rockström, J. and Falkenmark, M., Semiarid crop production from a hydrological perspective: gap between potential and actual yields. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 2000, 19(4), 319–346.
- Chauhan, N. S., Mohapatra, P. K. and Pandey, K. P., Improving energy productivity in paddy production through benchmarking – an application of data envelopment analysis. Energy Convers. Manage., 2006, 47(9), 1063–1085.
- Singh, G., Singh, S. and Singh, J., Optimization of energy inputs for wheat crop in Punjab. Energy Convers. Manage., 2004, 45(3), 453–465.
- Sidhu, H. S., Singh, S., Singh, T. and Ahuja, S. S., Optimization of energy usage in different crop production system. Agric. Eng., 2004, 85, 2071–1050.
- Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M. and Mousazadeh, H., Reduction of CO2 emission by improving energy use efficiency of greenhouse cucumber production using DEA approach. Energy, 2013, 55, 676–682.
- Rahman, S. and Hasan, M. K., Energy productivity and efficiency of wheat farming in Bangladesh. Energy, 2014, 66, 107–114.
- Mondal, B., Singh, A. and Jha, G. K., Impact of watershed development programmes on farm-specific technical efficiency: a Study in Bundelkhand Region of Madhya Pradesh. Agric. Econ. Res.
- Rev., 2012, 25(2), 299–308.
- Abdulai, A. and Eberlin, R., Technical efficiency during economic reform in Nicaragua: evidence from farm household survey data. Econ. Syst., 2001, 25(2), 113–125.
- Groundwater Management and Achieving Equity by Direct Transfer of Electricity Subsidy:A Workable Option
Abstract Views :257 |
PDF Views:87
Authors
Suresh Kumar
1,
A. Raizada
1,
H. Biswas
1,
A. S. Morade
1,
K. K. Reddy
1,
W. Murlidhar
1,
K. S. Rao
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Bellary 583 104, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Bellary 583 104, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 01 (2017), Pagination: 22-23Abstract
The policy decision to provide free or subsidized electricity has been a key driver for widespread groundwater exploitation in India. Groundwater utilization has immensely enhanced crop productivity and employment generation, which has led to poverty reduction and rural prosperity. To boost rural development in the 1970s, state government, initially began unmetered electricity supply for irrigation, which is still being continued in different states as part of their rural development policy. Policy planners and administrators are now faced with the challenge to design and implement a workable mechanism to manage the evergrowing complexity of groundwater - energy nexus. Groundwater extraction has already surpassed sustainable utilization limits in most parts of India.Full Text
- Economic Incentives for Sustainable Legume Production in India: A Valuation Approach Internalizing Risk Sharing and Environmental Benefits
Abstract Views :212 |
PDF Views:88
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Bellary 583 104, IN
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre, Bellary 583 104, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 119, No 7 (2020), Pagination: 1184-1189Abstract
The present study estimates the social cost of growing paddy, wheat and legumes as Rs 9484, 8804 and 1281 per ha respectively. Monetized value of overall risk in paddy, wheat and legumes is Rs 716, 650 and 1738 per ha respectively. An economic incentive consisting of risk and social benefits, to the tune of Rs 8611 and 9225 per ha over wheat and paddy respectively, should be provided for the production of legumes. The study highlights the need to internalize environmental benefits of legumes vis-à-vis competing crops, and accordingly cultivation of legumes needs to be encouraged through a proper mechanism of incentivization.Keywords
Economic Incentive, Environmental Benefits, Legumes, Risk Sharing, Rice, Wheat.Full Text
References
- FAO, Pulses and climate change. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 2016; http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pulses-2016/docs/factsheets/Climate_EN_PRINT.pdf.
- Lal, R., Improving soil health and human protein nutrition by pulses-based cropping systems. Adv. Agron., 2017, 145, 167–204.
- McDermott, J. and Wyatt, A. J., The role of pulses in sustainable and healthy food systems. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 2017, 1392(1), 30– 42.
- Singh, K. K., Ali, M. and Venkatesh, M. S., Pulses in Cropping Systems, Technical Bulletin. ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulse Research, Kanpur, 2009, p. 39; https://iipr.icar.gov.in/pdf/pulses_in_cropping_systems.pdf
- Chand, R. and Raju, S. S., Instability in Indian agriculture during different phases of technology and policy. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2009, 64(2), 187–207.
- Dequiedt, B. and Moran, D., The cost of emission mitigation by legume crops in French agriculture. Ecol. Econ., 2015, 110, 51– 60.
- Singh, V. K., Sharma, B. B. and Dwivedi, B. S., The impact of diversification of a rice–wheat cropping system on crop productivity and soil fertility. J. Agric. Sci., 2002, 139(4), 405–412.
- Pande, S., Sharma, M. and Ghosh, R., Role of pulses in sustaining agricultural productivity in the rainfed rice-fallow lands of India in changing climatic scenario. 2012, 5370; http://oar.icrisat.org/ 6150/1/Role_of_pulses_spande_et.al.2012.pdf
- Zander, P. et al., Grain legume decline and potential recovery in European agriculture: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2016, 36, 26.
- Lal, R., Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ. Int., 2004, 30(7), 981–990.
- Bhatia, A., Pathak, H., Jain, N., Singh, P. K. and Singh, A. K., Global warming potential of manure amended soils under rice–wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Atmos. Environ., 2005, 39(37), 6976–6984.
- Pathak, H., Bhatia, A. and Jain, N., Greenhouse Gas Emission from Indian Agriculture: Trends, Mitigation and Policy Needs. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 2014, p. 39; https://krishi.icar.gov.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/32431/1/GreenhouseGasEmissionfromIndianAgricultureHPathaketal% 20%281%29.pdf
- Bhatia, A., Jain, N. and Pathak, H., Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Indian rice paddies, agricultural soils and crop residue burning. Greenhouse Gases: Sci. Technol., 2013, 3(3), 196–211.