Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Hallur, Giri
- Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks: A Study of Three Sector Regulators in India
Abstract Views :414 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Symbiosis International University, Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
1 Symbiosis International University, Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
Source
Telecom Business Review, Vol 7, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 47-54Abstract
This paper aims to study and analyze the institutional framework of three Indian sector regulators Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI).The study highlights the differences and commonalities in regulatory frameworks for different sector regulators in India. It broadly addresses the two important attributes of regulatory systems (1) Institutional Framework and (2) Extent of autonomy given to the Regulator. The research methodology adopted is qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Among the three regulators, it is found that the TRAI is relatively less empowered in terms of reporting structure, tenure of the Chairman, funding mechanism and capacity building. Participation of DoT in TRAI consultation process, publication of minutes of meeting and the need for institutions for capacity building in telecom regulation come out as the key recommendations for improving the policy&regulation process in Indian Telecom.Keywords
Infrastructure Regulation, Legislation, Policy, Transparency.
References
- Brown, A. C., Stern, J., Tenenbaum, B., & Gencer, D. World Bank. Handbook For Evaluating Infrastructure Regulation. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTENERGY/Resources/336805-1156971270190/Handbook For Evaluating Infrastructure Regulation 062706.pdf
- Levy, B., & Spiller, P. (1994). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. Journal of Law, Economics & Organisation, 10(2).
- Ragin, C. (1994). Using qualitative methods to study commonalities. Constructing social research: The unity and diversity of method. Charles Ragin, Sage Publications, pp. 84
- http://www.sebi.gov.in/chairmen.pdf
- Information on the profile of the chairman of RBI. Retrieved from http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/governors.aspx
- Information on the tenure of the chairman of RBI is available at http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/RBIA1934170510.pdf
- Information regarding the fi nancial autonomy of RBI can be found at http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Annual Report/PDFs/01FLAR22082013.pdf
- Information regarding the ombudsman for RBI. Retrieved from http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs /Content/PDFs/ 67933.pdf
- Information regarding the ombudsman for SEBI. Retrieved from http://www.sebi.gov.in/cms/sebi_data/attachdocs/1293102862086.pdf.
- Information regarding the policy formation of RBI. Retrieved from http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Content /PDFs/FUNCWWE080910.pdfhttp://rbidocs.rbi.org. in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/RBIB140520012.pdf.
- Information regarding the policy formation of SEBI. Retrieved from http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/ WP-2011-008.pdf
- Stern, J. (1997). What makes an Independent Regulator Independent? Business Strategy Review, 8(2), 67-74.0
- Prado, M. M. The challenges and risks of creating independent regulatory agencies: A cautionary tale from Brazil.
- Samarajiva, R., Galpaya, H., Goswami, D., & Ratnadiwakara, D. (2007). Telecom Regulatory Environment (TRE) assessment: Methodology and implementation results from fi ve emerging economies”, Presentation at the 35th Telecom Policy Research Conference, Fairfax VA, USA
- Scope of RBI as a regulator. Retrieved from http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Content/PDFs/FUNCWWE080910.pdf.
- Wallsten, S. Regulation and Internet Use in Developing Countries. World Bank e-library. Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content /working paper /10.1596/1813-9450-2979
- Telecom Consumers Complaint Redressal Regulations. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.tccms.gov.in/ accessed on 30th September 2013.
- Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. Retrieved from http://www.trai.gov.in/Content/act_1997.aspx
- The role of the finance ministry in the regulator. Retrieved from http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/RBIA1934170510.pdf
- Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Competition Environment in Five Countries
Abstract Views :196 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Symbiosis International University, Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management, Pune - 412115, Maharashtra, IN
1 Symbiosis International University, Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management, Pune - 412115, Maharashtra, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 8, No 34 (2015), Pagination:Abstract
This paper presents a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of the telecom market in five countries namely USA, UK, Australia, Japan and Brazil. It highlights the diversity and similarity in competition environments across the countries. The paper brings out a set of common policy initiatives that these five countries have implemented called as the necessary conditions. It also provides a set of alternative combination of policy initiatives that some of the countries have implemented, this set is the sufficient conditions. Thus this paper shows that different causal paths – each path being relevant, in a distinct way – may lead to the same outcome in competition regulation. For the five countries studied, it is found that Opening up of Essential Facilities (OEF), Regulating Prices (RP), Unified and Multi-service Licensing (UML), Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO), Infrastructure Sharing (IS) and Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) are the necessary pre-conditions for a country to have an Effective Environment for Competition.The combination of variables like Opening up of Essential Facilities (OEL), Regulating Prices (RP), Spectrum Trading and Leasing (STL), Unified and Multi-service Licensing(UML), Mobile Virtual Network Operator( MVNO),Infrastructure Sharing (IS) and Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) are observed in four countries USA,UK, Brazil and Australia. Whereas, combination of variables like Opening up of Essential Facilities(OEL), Regulating Prices (RP), Unified and Multi-service Licensing (UML), Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO),Infrastructure Sharing (IS) and Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) is observed in Japan.Keywords
Competition, Convergence, Regulatory FrameworkFull Text