Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Mariappan, G.
- Evaluating the Effect of Coated DAP (Diammonium Phosphate) in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)
Abstract Views :327 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Space Research Organisation, Climate Change Observatory, HRS, Ooty, NILGIRI (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey and Land Use Organization, VELLORE (T.N.), IN
1 Indian Space Research Organisation, Climate Change Observatory, HRS, Ooty, NILGIRI (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey and Land Use Organization, VELLORE (T.N.), IN
Source
International Journal of Forestry and Crop Improvement, Vol 6, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 96-99Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the efficiency of coated DAP in sugarcane crop at M/s Sakthi Sugars Ltd., experimental farm, Appakudal, Erode district with 12 treatments comprising coated and uncoated DAP applications at three levels of P (100, 80 and 60% of recommended P for sugarcane) with three replications. The design adopted was Randomized Block Design The results indicated that the treatment receiving coated DAP at 80 percent of recommended P registered higher cane yield when compared with treatment receiving uncoated DAP at 100 percent of recommended P. Among the sources of P, the treatments receiving coated DAP with nimin coated urea maintained their superiority in recording higher available N, P and K at post harvest stage followed by the treatments receiving coated DAP and uncoated DAP. However, with respect to available phosphorus at post-harvest stage, a marked increase in the available P status of the soil with the increasing levels of P as coated DAP was noticed.Keywords
Coated DAP, P Availability, Sugarcane Yield.References
- Asokan, S. (1981). Influence of N, P and K on growth, yield, nutrient content and juice quality in sugarcane var. CO6304, Ph.D. Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, T.N. (INDIA).
- Kamaraj, S. (1999). Assessment of coated DAP in rice. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, T.N. (INDIA).
- Mahapatra, I.C., Singh, K.N., Pillai, K.G. and Bapat, S.R. (1985). Rice soils and their management. Indian J. Agron., 30 (1): 1-41.
- Rao, Gopal P., Reddy, S.R., Reddy, G.V. and Rao, K.R. (1991). Relative efficiency of phosphate and single super phosphate sources and levels of P on growth and yield of rice. Indian J. Agron., 36 (2): 165-168.
- Rao, S.R., Rao, K.V., Papu, M. Padmanabham, M. and Rao, M.R. (1987). Relative efficiency of urea and urea super granules (USG) in sugarcane production. Indian Sugarcane, 37: 201-206.
- Roy, S.R. and Jha, J. N. (1987). Slow release urea fertilizers in sodic soils. IRRN, 12(1): 32-33.
- Shahi, H. N. (1999). Sugarcane diversification in order. Hindu Survey Indian Agric., 101-103.
- Sunilkumar, N. (1997). Yield maximization of Palghar variety of rice through agronomic manipulations. M.Sc.(Ag.)Thesis, Maharastra Agricultural Univeristy, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, M.S. (INDIA).
- Viswanathan, T.R. and Bennette, J. (1979). Trials with slow release water soluble phosphatic fertilizers. A lecture delivered under the auspices of the fertilizers. Association of India (Southern Region). Hyderabad (A.P.) INDIA.
- Yadav, D.V. (2000). Nutrient management in sugarcane and sugarcane based cropping systems during 2000-2010. Fert. News, 45 (4): 43-48.
- Cost, Returns and Economic Viability of Cashew Plantations in Tamil Nadu
Abstract Views :418 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Agriculture, Vellore (T.N.), IN
4 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Adhiparasakthi Agricultural College, Kalavai (T.N.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Agriculture, Vellore (T.N.), IN
4 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Adhiparasakthi Agricultural College, Kalavai (T.N.), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 7, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 76-85Abstract
Cashew cultivation in India dates back to over 400 years, when the Portuguese who arrived in Kerala in the 16th century introduced it. Initially it was cultivated to arrest soil erosion, afforestation and wasteland development programmes, but later it becomes an important cash crop. The total area under cashew in the world was 35.12 lakh hectares during 2009. In terms of area under cultivation, India ranked first with 8.93 lakh hectares constituting about one - fourth of the area under cashew in the world. To find out the costs and returns of the cashew cultivation among dry cashew cultivated farmers and irrigated cashew cultivated farmers. To estimate the economic viability of dry cashew/irrigated cashew plantations. Cashew was being cultivated as a dry crop in Cuddalore and Ariyalur districts to a larger extent. In Pudukkottai district, cashew was cultivated as both irrigated and dry crop and obviously the yield under dry condition was lesser than that of cashew grown under irrigated conditions. In the next stage, top six villages were purposively selected for the study. In each of the selected villages, 10 cashew growers were randomly selected. However, in Gandharvakkottai block of Pudukkottai district, cashew was cultivated as dry crop, while it was raised as an irrigated crop in Alangudy block of Pudukkottai district. Therefore, 30 dry cashew farms in Gandharvakkottai block and 30 irrigated cashew farms in Alangudy block were selected for the study. Thus, totally 150 dry cashew farms and 30 irrigated cashew farms were selected. Cost and returns like (i) Establishment costs and (ii) Maintenance costs were worked out. Yield and returns like, the yield and prices realized by the growers for the nuts were used to calculate the gross returns, net returns and the returns per hectare of cashew plantation. Economic viability of dry cashew varieties/irrigated cashew varieties the capital budgeting techniques like Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) were employed to assess the economic viability of cashew farms and also for cashew processing units. The gross returns were also more in irrigated farms (Rs. 43650) than that of the dry farms (Rs. 33288). The output-input ratio was 1.85, 2.03 for dry cashew farms, irrigated cashew farms, respectively. These would indicate the high profitability of cashew production was found only in irrigated farms and this was achieved by gap filling and following modern farming techniques. The Net Present Value was higher for irrigated farms (Rs. 80,027) than that of the dry farms (Rs. 57,911). In case of Benefit Cost Ratio, irrigated farms had higher ratio of 2.28 than that of the dry farms 2.03. Similarly, the Internal Rate of Return was also more for irrigated farms (42 %) when compared to that of the dry farms (37 %). This would highlight that the cashew plantation would be a financially worthwhile venture in the study area and there is a vast potential for taking up the cultivation of high yielding varieties of cashew plantation, especially in the irrigated conditions of Pudukkottai district of Tamil Nadu.Keywords
Cashew Nut, Cost and Returns, Establishment Costs, Maintenance Costs, Economic Viability, Net Present Value (NPV), Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR), Internal Rate of Return (IRR).References
- Balasubramanian, D. (2001). Cashew processing Industries in Kerala, (Quilon and Calicut). The Cashew, 15(2): 28-35.
- Balasubramanian, D. (2001). Cashew Processing Industries in India, (Overall analysis). The Cashew, 15(2): 14-20.
- Balasubramanian, D. (2002). Performance of Cashew nut Processing in Mozambique. Agric. Mechanization Asia, Africa & Latin America, 33(2): 67-70.
- Horticulture at a Glance (2008-09). Joint Director of Agriculture office, Pudukkottai district.
- Indian Cashew Statistics (2010). Cashew nut Export Promotion Council, Cochin.
- Season and Crop Report of Tamil Nadu (2008-09) (Fasli1418), Department of Economics and Statistics, Chennai, T.N. (INDIA).
- Selvarajan, M. and Dharmalingam, V. (1998). Production technologies for cashew for different agro climatic tracts of Tamil Nadu. The Cashew, 12(3): 93-102.
- Selvaraj, K.N. and Sundaravaradarajan, K.R. (1999). Cashew cultivation- problems, prospects and opportunities. Abstract of 19th Annual conference of Association of Economists of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry, Department of Economics, pp. 20-21.
- Sundaravaradarajan, K.R. and Jahanmohan, K.R. (2002). Marketing cost, margin, price spread and marketing efficiency of cashew in Tamil Nadu. Agric. Situ. India, 59(1) : 9-16.
- Effect of Intercropping System, Mycorrhizal Inoculation and Fertilizer Levels on the Yield of Hybrid Maize (Zea mays L.)
Abstract Views :304 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of e-Extension Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Agriculture (SSLUO), Vellore (T.N.), IN
1 Department of e-Extension Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Agriculture (SSLUO), Vellore (T.N.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 12, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 288-293Abstract
Field experiment was conducted at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the effect of hybrid maize (Zea mays) under different intercropping systems, mycorrhizal inoculation and fertilizer levels on the yield component and yield of maize. The experiment was laid out in split - split plot design during winter 2011-12. The results indicated that among the cropping systems, sole maize recorded significantly better yield attributes and higher yield that was comparable with maize + cowpea intercropping system. With respect to mycorrhiza, mycorrhizal inoculated treatments recorded higher grain and stover yield. Among the fertilizer levels, 125 per cent RDF recorded higher grain yield. Regarding the treatment combinations, sole maize along with mycorrhizal inoculation and 125 per cent RDF recorded significantly higher yield parameters and yield. However, the yield was comparable with maize intercropped with cowpea along with mycorrhizal inoculation and application of 100 per cent RDF.Keywords
Hybrid Maize, Intercropping Systems, Mycorrhiza, Fertilizer Levels, Yield Attributes, Yield.References
- Alom, M.S., Paul, N.K. and Quayyum, M.A. (2010). Performances of different hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) varieties under intercropping systems with groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Bangladesh J. Agril. Res., 34 : 585-595.
- Ananthi, T., Mohamed Amanullah, M. and Subramanian, K.S. (2011). Influence of fertilizer levels and mycorrhiza on yield attributes, yield and grain quality of hybrid maize. Madras Agric. J., 98 : 362-366.
- Barry, D.A.J. and Miller, M.H. (1989). Phosphorus nutritional requirement of maize seedlings for maximum yield. Agron. J., 81 : 95-99.
- Choudhary, V.K., Suresh Kumar, P. and Bhagawati, R. (2012). Production potential, soil moisture and temperature as influenced by maize- legume intercropping. Internat. J. Sci. Nature., 3 : 41-46.
- Haque, M., Sharma, R.P. and Prasad, S. (2008). Weed control in maize based intercropping system under rainfed condition. ISWS Biennial Conference on Weed Management in Modern Agriculture, February 27-28, 2008, Pusa, Bihar. 118 pp.
- Karim, M.A., Zaman S.S. and Quayyum, M.A. (1990). Study on groundnut rows grown in association with normal and paired row of maize. Bangladesh J. Agric. Sci., 17: 99-102.
- Khan, A.G. (1975). Growth effects of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhiza on crops in the field. In: Sanders, F.E., Mosse, B., Tinker, P.B. (Eds.), Endomycorrhizas. pp. 419-435, Academic Press, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.
- Lauzon, J.D. and Miller, M.H. (1997). Comparative response of corn and soybean to seed-placed phosphorus over a range of soil test phosphorus. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 28: 205-215.
- Maddonni, G.A., Cirilo, A.G. and Otegui, M.E. (2006). Row width and maize grain yield. Agron. J., 98: 1532-1543.
- Maqsood, M., Abid, A.M., Iqbal, A. and Hussain, M.I. (2001). Effect of variable rate of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of maize (golden). Online J. Biol. Sci., 1 : 19-20.
- Mayra, E., Gavito and Miller, M.H. (1998). Early phosphorus nutrition, mycorrhizae development, dry matter partitioning and yield of maize. Plant & Soil, 199 : 177-186.
- Mukhtar, T., Arif, M., Hussain, S., Tariq, M. and Mehmood, K. (2011). Effect of different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on growth and yield of maize. J. Agric. Res., 49 : 333-339.
- Muok, B.O., Matsumura, A., Ishii, T. and Odee, D.W. (2009). The effect of intercropping Sclerocarya birrea (A. Rich.) Hochst., millet and corn in the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Afr. J. Biotech., 8 : 807-812.
- Nye, P.H. and Tinker, P.B. (1977). Solute movements in the soil system. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, OXFORD, UK.
- Pandey, I.B., Bharati, V. and Mishra, S.S. (2003). Effect of maize (Zea mays L.)-based intercropping systems on maize yield and associated weeds under rainfed condition. Indian J. Agron., 48 : 30-33.
- Quayyum, M.A. and Maniruzzaman, A.F.M. (1995). Effect of maize (Zea mays L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) with blackgram (Phaseolus mungo). Indian J. Agron., 40 : 20-25.
- Saleem, A., Javed, H.I. and Ullah, I. (2003). Response of maize cultivars to different NP-levels under irrigated condition in Peshawar Valley. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 6 : 1229-1231.
- Sankaran, N., Meena, S. and Sakthivel, N. (2005). Input management in maize. Madras Agric. J., 92 : 464-468.
- Singh, D., Tyagi, R.C., Hooda, I.S. and Verma, O.P.S. (1997). Influence of plant population, irrigation and nitrogen levels on the growth of spring maize. Haryana J. Agron.,13 : 54-58.
- Srikanth, M., Mohamed Amanullah, M., Muthukrishnan, P. and Subramanian, K.S. (2009). Nutrient uptake and yield of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.) and soil nutrient status as influenced by plant density and fertilizer levels. Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 5 : 193-196.
- Subramanian, K.S., Bharathi, C. and Jegan, A. (2008). Response of maize to mycorrhizal colonization at varying levels of zinc and phosphorus. Biol. Fertil. Soils., 45 : 133-144.
- Subramanian, K.S. and Charest, C. (1997). Nutritional, growth and reproductive responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation during and after drought stress at tasselling. Mycorrhiza., 7: 25-32.
- Uddin, M.S., Rahman, M.J., Begum S.A. and Ali, M.R. (2003). Intercropping of maize with soybean in saline area under rainfed condition. Bangladesh J. Agril. Res., 28 : 451-455.
- Vaseghmanesh, T., Kordlagha, K.P., Neia, G.M. and Kelidari, A. (2013). The response of yield components of sunflower to mycorrhiza inoculation and phosphorus fertilizer. Ann. Biol. Res., 4 : 101-104.
- Yilmaz, S., Atak, M. and Erayman, M. (2008). Identification of advantages of maize-legume intercropping over solitary cropping through competition indices in the East Mediterranean Region. Turk. J. Agric., 32 : 111-119.
- Influence of Amino Acid Formulation on Okra and Brinjal
Abstract Views :273 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
1 Department of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
Source
An Asian Journal of Soil Science, Vol 11, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 115-119Abstract
Amino acids form the building blocks of protein, the basic component of every living cell and are well known to increase the yield and overall quality of crops. In this context, the product amino acid formulation with 10 per cent free amino acids manufactured by Trade Corporation International, Spain and supplied by M/s. Mahamaya Life Sciences Ltd., New Delhi was evaluated to study its influence on growth, yield, quality parameters and uptake of nutrients by the crops, okra and brinjal. The field experiment on okra was conducted at farmer's field at Poosaripalayam, Coimbatore and that with brinjal was conducted in farmer's field at Urmandampalayam, Coimbatore. Amino acid formulation with 10 per cent free amino acid was tried at two doses, @ 2.0 l ha-1 x 4 sprays at flowering and @ 4.0 l ha-1 x 2 sprays at flowering. In okra, the treatment T1, amino acid formulation at 2.0 l ha-1 (4 times spray) recorded the maximum pod yield of 12.9 t ha-1 and registered an increase of 24.8 per cent over control. In brinjal, the treatment T2, amino acid formulation at 4.0 l ha-1 (2 times spray) recorded the maximum fruit yield of 47.4 t ha-1 and registered an increase of 19.7 per cent over control. The available NPK status of post harvest soil was lower in the treatments with amino acid formulation due to enhanced crop removal.Keywords
Amino Acids, Okra, Brinjal, Yield, Quality Parameters.References
- Abo Sedera, F., Amany, A., Abd El-Latif, L.A., Bader, A. and Rezk, S.M. (2010). Effect of NPK against Meloidogyne incognita on soybeans. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 30 : 1097-1103.
- Al-Said, M.A. and Kamal, A. M. (2008). Effect of foliar spray with folic acid and some amino acids on flowering, yield and quality of sweet pepper. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 33 :
- Hedge, J.E. and Hofreiter, B.T. (1962). Determination of reducing sugar and CH2O. In: Carbohydrate chemistry 17 (Eds. Whistler, R.L. and Be Miller, JN) Academic Press, NEW YORK, U.S.A.
- Kowalczyk, K. and Zielony, T. (2008). Effect of aminoplant and Asahi on yield and quality of lettuce grown on rock wool. In: Conference of Bio-stimulators on Modern Agriculture, 78 February.
- Mahmood Pooryousef and Khoshnood Alizadeh (2014). Effect of foliar application of free amino acids on alfalfa performance under rainfed conditions. Res. Crops, 15(1): 254-258.
- Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1978). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR, NEW DELHI, INDIA.
- Porter, D.R. (1960). Quality criteria and their evaluation in a breeding programme for processing type tomatoes. Proc. Plant Soil Seminar, Cambell Soup 10, CALIFORNIA.
- Roy, R.N., Finck, A., Blair, G.J. and Tandon, H.L.S. (2006). Plant nutrition for food security. A guide for integrated nutrient management. Fertilizer and plant nutrition bulletin. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, Rome. 5-19pp.
- Sachdeva, Sandeep, Sachdev, Tilak R. and Sachdeva, Ruchi (2013). Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption: challenges and oppurtunities. Indian J.Comm. Med., 38 (4) : 192-197.
- Sadasivam, S. and Theymoli, Balasubramanian (1987). In : Practical manual in biochemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.) INDIA.
- Shehata, S.M., Heba, S., Abdel-Azem, A., Abou El-Yazied, A. and El-Gizawy, M. (2011). Effect of foliar spraying with amino acids and seaweed extract on growth chemical constitutes, yield and its quality of celeriac plant. European J. Sci. Res., 58 : 257-265.
- Somogyi, M. (1952). Determination of reducing sugars by Nelson – Somogyi method. J. Biol. Chem., 200 -245.
- Theymoli, Balasubramanian and Sadasivam, S. (1987). Estimation of total free amino acids. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 37: 41.
- www. nutrition and you. com.
- Evaluation of Maize Fertilizer Mixture Performance on Post Harvest Soil Fertility
Abstract Views :275 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Hebbal, Bengaluru (Karnataka), IN
2 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey and Land Use Organization, Vellore (T.N.), IN
1 National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning, Regional Centre, Hebbal, Bengaluru (Karnataka), IN
2 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey and Land Use Organization, Vellore (T.N.), IN
Source
An Asian Journal of Soil Science, Vol 11, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 132-136Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to study the effect of fertilizer mixture on soil available nutrient content. The experiment was conducted at Maize Research Station, Vagarai, Dindigul district, Tamil Nadu in Randomized BlockDesign with seven treatments replicated thrice. The treatments included the application of 120 kg urea+ 50 kg DAP -Farmers' practice (T1), Farmers' practice with Tamil Nadu state Dept. of Agriculture micronutrient mixture @ 25 kg ha-1 as straight chemical fertilizers (T2) as well as EFYM (T3), recommended dose of fertilizer (T4), RDF with TNAU -micronutrient mixture @ 12.5 kg ha-1 as straight chemical fertilizers (T5), RDF with TNAU - micronutrient mixture @25 kg ha-1 as straight chemical fertilizers (T6) as well as EFYM (T7). The availability of macro and micronutrients were recorded at different stages of maize crop growth like knee high stage, tasseling and at harvest stage. The experimental result has revealed that though the availability of nutrients decreased with the advancement of crop growth, application of recommended dose of fertilizer with 25 kg ha-1 of TNAU micronutrient mixture as enriched FYM has registered the increased availability of macro and micro nutrients even in post harvest soil.Keywords
Micronutrient Mixture, Recommended Dose of Fertilizer, Enriched Farm Yard Manure.References
- Agricultural Statistics at aGlance (2014). Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of agriculture and Cooperation, Directorate of economics and Statistics.
- Amujoyegbe, B.J., Opabode, J.T. and Olayinka, A. (2007). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on yield and chlorophyll content of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L.). African J. Biotechnol., 6 (16):1869-1873.
- Barker, A.V. and Pilbeam, D.J. (2007). Handbook of plant nutrition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Farshid, Aref (2010). Application of different levels of zinc and boron on concentration and uptake of zinc and boron in the corn grain. J. Am. Sci., 6(5): 767-772.
- Kumar, Alok and Yadav, D.S. (2003). Long -term nutrient management for sustainability in rice – wheat cropping system. Fert. News., 48 (8) : 27-34.
- Lee, K.E. ( 1985). Earthworms, their ecology and relationships with land use, Academic press, Sydney. pp. 411.
- Marschner, H. (1995). Mineral nutrition of higher plants 2nd Edn, Academic Press, Hacourt Brace and Company, LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM.
- Mengel, K., Kirkby, E.A., Kosegarten, H. and Appel, T. (2001). Principles of plant nutrition. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
- Sawargaonkar, G.L., Shelke, D.K. and Shinde, S.A. (2008). Influence of cropping systems and fertilizer doses on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake by maize (Zea mays L.). Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 4 (1): 45-50.
- Sekhon, N.K. and Singh, C.B. (2013). Plant nutrient status during boll development and seed cotton yield as affected by foliar application of different sources of potassium. American J. Plant Sci., 4 : 1409-1417.
- Senthil Kumar, P.S., Geetha, S. Aruna, Savithri, P., Jagadeeswaran, R. and Ragunath, K.P. (2004). Effect of Zn enriched organic manures and zinc solubilizer application on the yield, curcumin content and nutrient status of soil under turmeric cultivation. J. Appl. Hort., 6 (2) : 82-86.
- Influence of Organic Manures, Micronutrients and Arbuscular Mycoriza on Quality Parameters of (Maize and Sunflower) under Residual Effect of Maize-Sunflower Cropping System
Abstract Views :239 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agriculture (S.S. & L.U.O.), Vellore (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of e-Extension Center, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
4 Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai (T.N.), IN
1 Department of Agriculture (S.S. & L.U.O.), Vellore (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
3 Department of e-Extension Center, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
4 Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai (T.N.), IN