Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
EL-Masry, Eman M.
- Biofilms: the Microbial Castle of Resistance
Abstract Views :581 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology-Faculty of Pharmacy-Zagazig University- Zagazig, EG
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology-Faculty of Pharmacy-Zagazig University- Zagazig, EG
Source
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, Vol 6, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 1-3Abstract
Biofilms are highly resistant to antimicrobial agents. As a consequence, biofilm-based infections are recalcitrant and their treatment is very difficult. Many factors contribute to the biofilm resistance to antimicrobials. The mechanisms of resistance include delayed diffusion of antibiotics through the biofilm matrix, low oxygen and nutrient, reduced growth rates and metabolism. Other resistance mechanisms involved are biofilm-specific phenotypic variants, stress response activation, over expression of efflux pumps, formation of persisters and quorum sensing.Keywords
Biofilm, Antimicrobial Resistance, Biofilm Matrix, Quorum Sensing, Persister Cells, Phenotypic Variants, Efflux PumpsReferences
- Costerton, JW et al. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 284; 1999: 1318–1322.
- Branda SS et al. Biofilms: The matrix revisited. Trends in Microbiology. 13; 2005: 20–26.
- Bjarnsholt T and Givskov M. Quorum-sensing blockade as a strategy for enhancing host defenses against bacterial pathogens. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 362; 2007: 1213–1222.
- Hall-Stoodley L and Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cellular Microbiology. 11; 2009: 1034–1043.
- Mah TF and O’Toole GA. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends in Microbiology. 9; 2001: 34–39.
- Costerton J W et al. Microbial biofilms. Annual Review of Microbiology. 49; 1995: 711–745.
- Xu KD et al. Spatial physiological heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm is determined by oxygen availability. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 64; 1998: 4035– 4039.
- Walters M C et al. Contributions of antibiotic penetration, oxygen limitation, and low metabolic activity to tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 47; 2003: 317–323.
- Werner E et al. Stratified growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 70; 2004: 6188–6196.
- Pamp SJ et al. Tolerance to the antimicrobial peptide colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms is linked to metabolically active cells, and depends on the prm and mexAB-oprM genes. Molecular Microbiology. 68; 2008: 223–240.
- Molin S and Tolker-Nielsen T. Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 14; 2003: 255–261.
- Driffield K et al. Increased mutability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 61; 2008:1053–1056.
- Jalal S et al. Molecular mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 44; 2000: 710–712.
- Islam S et al. Chromosomal mechanisms of aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 15; 2009: 60–66.
- Dibdin GH et al. Mathematical model of -lactam penetration into a biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa while undergoing simultaneous inactivation by released -lactamases. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 38; 1996: 757–769.
- Donlan RM and Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 15; 2002: 167–193.
- Lewis K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 45; 2001: 999–1007.
- Stewart PS. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 292; 2002: 107–113.
- Gillis RJ et al. Molecular basis of azithromycin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49; 2005: 3858–3867.
- Zhang L and Mah TF. 2008. Involvement of a novel efflux system in biofilm-specific resistance to antibiotics. Journal of Bacteriology. 190; 2008: 4447–4452.
- Drenkard E. Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microbes and Infection. 5; 2003:1213- 1219.
- Sauer K et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. Journal of Bacteriology. 184; 2002: 1140–1154.
- Whiteley M et al. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 413; 2001: 860–864.
- Spoering AL and Lewis K. Biofilms and planktonic cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa have similar resistance to killing by antimicrobials. Journal of Bacteriology. 183; 2001: 6746–6751.
- Lewis, K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 45; 2001: 999–1007.
- Brooun A et al. A dose-response study of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. . Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 44; 2000: 640–646.
- De Gischolar_maine et al. Novel persistence genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa identified by high throughput screening. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 297; 2009: 73–79.
- Drenkard E and Ausubel FM. Pseudomonas biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance are linked to phenotypic variation. Nature. 416; 2002: 740–743.
- Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in Gram-negative bacteria. American Society of Microbiology News. 63; 1997: 371–377.
- Lindum PW et al. N-acyl-homoserine lactone autoinducers control production of an extracellular lipopeptide biosurfactant required for swarming motility of Serratia liquefaciens MG1. Journal of Bacteriology. 180; 1998: 6384–6388.
- Williams P et al. 2000. Quorum sensing and the populationdependent control of virulence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences. 355; 2000: 667–680.
- Davies DG et al. 1998. The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science. 280; 1998: 295– 298.
- Bjarnsholt T et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa tolerance to tobramycin, hydrogen peroxide and polymorphonuclear leukocytes is quorum-sensing dependent. Microbiology. 151; 2005: 373–383.
- Comparative Assessment of Biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates by Crystal Violet Assay and Viable Count Assay
Abstract Views :223 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EG
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EG
Source
Research Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 4, No 5 (2012), Pagination: 181-184Abstract
This study was performed to detect biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa by qualitative and quantitative methods. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were tested for their ability to form biofilm by the tube method, the spectrophotometric and the viable count methods. Sixteen isolates (69.6%) were strong biofilm forming; two isolates (8.7%) were moderate biofilm forming, while five isolates (21.7%) were weak biofilm forming by both the tube and spectrophotometric methods. On the other hand, the viable count method was poorly correlated with either of the tube and spectrophotometric methods. High viable counts were recorded for biofilms formed by thirteen isolates (56.5%), one of which was moderate biofilm forming by the spectrophotometric method. Intermediate viable counts were found for biofilms formed by seven isolates (30.4%) including three strong biofilm forming isolates by the tube method, four strong biofilm forming isolates by the spectrophotometric method and two moderate biofilm forming isolates by both the spectrophotometric and the tube methods. This discrepancy of results may be attributed to the fact that, the matrix material and dead cells, in addition to the viable cells, are measured by the tube and spectrophotometric method, while the viable count method detects only viable cells within the biofilm.Keywords
Biofilm, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Biofilm Assessment, Tube, Spectrophotometric, Viable Count.- Combating Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms by Potential Biofilm Inhibitors
Abstract Views :203 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EG
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EG
Source
Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol 2, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 66-72Abstract
Ten potential antibiofilm agents (N-acetylcysteine (NAC), ambroxol, piroxicam, diclofenac sodium, ketoprofen, 4- nitropyrdidine-N-oxide (4NPO), sodium ascorbate, sucralose, xylitol and sorbitol) showed varied activity against preformed biofilms formed by twenty clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as demonstrated by minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration (MBIC). 4NPO was the most active; Diclofenac sodium, ketoprofen, N-acetylcysteine, ambroxol, sodium ascorbate and piroxicam showed moderate activity, while sucralose, xylitol, and sorbitol demonstrated weak activity.Keywords
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Biofilm Inhibition, Antibiofilm Agents.- Synergic Interaction between Antibiotics and the Artificial Sweeteners Xylitol and Sorbitol against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms
Abstract Views :224 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EG
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EG