Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Dhruv
- Comparison Between Percutaneous Release and Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Trigger Digits
Abstract Views :339 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthopaedics, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Dermatology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, IN
1 Department of Orthopaedics, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Dermatology, ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 7, No 9 (2016), Pagination: 903-908Abstract
Trigger finger is basically caused by the mismatch between the volume of the flexor tendon sheath and its contents resulting in a narrowed tunnel for tendon excursion. Treatment modalities includes conservative management and Surgical management (open or percutaneous Al pulley release). To compare clinical and functional outcome of percutaneous release and corticosteroid injection in management of trigger digits. Inclusion criteria- Adults aged more than 18 years with Qumnell grade I III. Sixty patients were divided into two groups, Group 1 (n = 30) treated with percutaneous release and Group 2 (n = 30) treated with percutaneous triamcinolone injections. Mean age of patients in group 1 was 43.83 years and in group 2 was 41.87 years. Thumb was the most commonly affected digit and little finger, the least commonly affected digit. Significant improvement (p value <0.001) in the VAS score was seen in group 1 when compared with group 2 from 1st week of follow up till the end of the study. Percutaneous release was found superior to Corticosteroid group regards of VAS score, Roles and Maudsley score and residual triggering.Keywords
Percutaneous Release, Corticosteroid Injection, Trigger Digit.- To Compare the Effect of Different Time Ratio of Heat and Cold in Contrast Bath on Clinical Improvement in Plantar Fascitis
Abstract Views :331 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthopedics, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Physiotherapy Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi, IN
3 Department of Dermatology, ESIC PGIMER Basaidarapur, New Delhi, IN
1 Department of Orthopedics, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Physiotherapy Holy Family Hospital, New Delhi, IN
3 Department of Dermatology, ESIC PGIMER Basaidarapur, New Delhi, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 7, No 10 (2016), Pagination: 966-969Abstract
Contrast bath is commonly used therapy in plantar fascitis. However there is no standard regimen followed as to the order and time ratio of hot and cold fomentation. This study was conducted to establish a standard hot: cold fomentation ratio to achieve maximum efficacy of contrast bath in plantar fascitis. 75 patients of plantar fasciitis were equally divided into three groups, A: 3 cycles of alternate 3 minutes hot fomentation and 1 minute of cold fomentation, B: hot fomentation for 3 minutes followed by 1 minute cold fomentation followed by a sustained 12 minutes of hot fomentation and C: cold fomentation for 5 minutes followed by 21/2 minutes of hot and again 5 minutes cold fomentation. Thrice daily regimen was followed. VAS score was used to note the initial pain, pain relief at 1 week and 1 month. The mean pain value in group A was 7.52±1.27 SD on initial evaluation, was 6.32±1.31 SD at 1 week and 2.8±1.42 SD at 1 month. Respective values in group B was 6.8±1.37 SD, 5.8±1.25 SD and 2.6±1.31 SD and in group C was 7.81±1.43 SD, 6.37±1.09 SD and 3.1±1.49 SD. In plantar fascitis, only temperature fluctuations at subcutaneous level are required to bring a local pumping effect. This needs only alternation of hot and cold fomentation, the order of fomentation and time duration of each cycle is not specific. No time ratio is superior to another.Keywords
Hot Fomentation, Cold Fomentation, Plantar Fascitis.- Rehabilitation of Exenterated Right Eye:A Prosthetic Challenge
Abstract Views :231 |
PDF Views:140
Authors
Dushyant Chauhan
1,
Ashish Thakur
1,
M. Viswambaran
1,
R. K. Yadav
1,
Amit Khattak
1,
A. Gopi
1,
Dhruv Sharma
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge & Implantology Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi – 110010, IN
1 Department of Prosthodontics Crown and Bridge & Implantology Army Dental Centre (Research & Referral), Delhi Cantt, New Delhi – 110010, IN
Source
International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 1709-1714Abstract
Background: Facial defects can be acquired or congenital, but irrespective of etiology, any maxillofacial structure if damaged or missing will result in an unaesthetic and unappealing personality of individual. Orbital defects are very evident and effect the appearance and social front of the individual. Many modalities are available to rehabilitate the defect of an orbit but prosthetic rehabilitation with silicone prosthesis is a simple and effective approach. Retention is generally achieved by engaging available undercuts or using mechanical accessories or skin adhesives etc. This case report describes successful rehabilitation of right orbital defect using a non-surgical approach with room temperature vulcanized silicone and skin adhesives. Case Report: A 45 yr old male reported with, chief complaint of missing right orbit and unaesthetic appearance secondary to gunshot wound. Patient was not ready for any more surgical procedures or additional accessories and available retentive undercuts were minimal. Hence, conventional silicone prosthesis was made using stock eye shell and room temperature vulcanized silicone retained with skin adhesives. The approach was simple to a complex problem and gave reliable result in very limited time. Conclusion: With extensive orbital defect, rehabilitation is difficult and complex as retention is compromised and it is difficult to match the shade of the prosthesis.This case represents a simple and predictable approach to a case of exenterated right orbit with conventional roomtemperature vulcanized silicone and silicone skin adhesives.Keywords
Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Orbital Prosthesis, Orbital Exenteration, Orbital Defect, Silicone Elastomers.References
- Nath K, Gogi R. The orbit (a review). Indian J. Ophthalmol. 1976; 24:1–14.
- Perman K, Baylis HI. Evisceration, enucleation, and exenteration. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1988 Feb; 21(1):171–82. PMid:3277114
- Nakra T, Simon GJ, Douglas RS, Schwarcz RM, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Comparing outcomes of enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec; 113(12):2270–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.021 PMid:16996606
- Stanley JR. Orbital rehabilitation: Surgical and prosthetic. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 1988 Feb; 21(1):189–98. PMid:3277116
- Bindhoo YA, Aruna U. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an orbital defect: A case report. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2011; 11:258–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-0110093-6 PMid:23204738 PMCid:PMC3205171
- Lemon JC, Kiat-amnuay S, Gettleman L, Martin JW, Chambers MS. Facial prosthetic rehabilitation: preprosthetic surgical techniques and biomaterials. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. 2005 Aug 1; 13(4):255–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. moo.0000172805.48758.0c PMid:16012251
- Shifman A. Simplified fabrication of orbital prostheses using posterior attachment for the artificial eye. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1993 Jan 1; 69(1):73–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90244-I
- Jooste CH. A method for orienting the ocular portion of an orbital prosthesis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984 Mar 1; 51(3):380–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/00223913(84)90226-9
- Chalian VA, Drane JB, Standish SM. Maxillofacial prosthetics: Multidisciplinary practice. Williams & Wilkins Company; 1972. PMid:4560447
- Beumer J, Curtis TA, Firtill DN. Maxillofacial rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and surgical considerations. CV Mosby: St Louis; 1979. p. 364-71.
- Mathews MF, Smith RM, Sutton AJ, Hudson R. The ocular impression: A review of the literature and presentation of an alternate technique. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2000 Dec; 9(4):210–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532849X.2000.00210.x PMid:11320473
- Pow EH, McMillan AS. Functional impression technique in the management of an unusual facial defect: A clinical report. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2000 Oct 1; 84(4):458–61. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108724 PMid:11044855
- Manvi S, Ghadiali B. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with an orbital defect using a simplified approach. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2008 Apr 1; 8(2):116. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.43616
- Guttal SS, Patil NP, Nadiger RK, Rachana KB, Basutkar N. Use of acrylic resin base as an aid in retaining silicone orbital prosthesis. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2008 Apr 1; 8(2):112. https://doi.org/10.4103/09724052.43615
- Taylor TD, editor. Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics. Berlin; 2000.
- Jebreil K. Acceptability of orbital prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1980 Jan 1; 43(1):82–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90358-3
- Thanawala SK, Chaudhury MK. Surface modification of silicone elastomer using perfluorinated ether. Langmuir. 2000 Feb 8; 16(3):1256–60. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9906626