Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Duggi, Deepti B.
- Decisional and Emotional forgiveness in People of Three Religious Groups in India
Abstract Views :412 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 5, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 24-29Abstract
The present study is conducted to find the significant difference between Individualistic Forgivers (Hindu Muslim and Christian) and collectivistic Forgivers (Hindu Muslim and Christian) on their Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness. Quota sampling technique was used to collect one hundred and seventy two, Hindu Muslim and Christian Post-Graduate Students (Hindus=30, Muslims=30, Christians=28) from various departments of Karnatak University, Dharwad and Religious Members (Hindus=28, Muslims=28, Christians=28) from Church, Temples and Mosques, from Hubli-Dharwad city for this study. Individualism-Collectivism Scale (Triandis et al., 1988), Religious Commitment Inventory,(Worthington et al., 2003) and Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness Scale( Worthington 2007) were measures to test hypotheses. By providing some conditions, respondents were asked to give current intentions and emotions towards a person who has hurt them. Results revealed that Individualistic forgivers and Collectivistic forgivers (Muslims) have shown more decisional and emotional forgiveness compared to individualistic and collectivistic forgivers (Hindus and Christians).We live in a society increasingly characterized by conflict among religious people. The present research suggests that how people perceive their and an offender's religious groups can affect whether and to what degree they forgive or do not.Keywords
No Keywords
- Optimism, Home environment and depression of urban and rural school children
Abstract Views :706 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology Karnatak University Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
2 PG Department of Psychology Karnataka University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Psychology Karnatak University Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
2 PG Department of Psychology Karnataka University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 5, No 6 (2014), Pagination: 676-680Abstract
The present study was taken with objective to study the difference between optimism, home environment and depression of rural and urban children. 120 tenth standard students, 60 from rural (30 male and 30 female) and 60 from urban (30 male and 30 female) were selected for the study. Optimism Children attribution style questionnaire (CASQ) by Seligman, Kaslow, Ally, Peterson, Tannenbaum and Abrahson (1984), Home environment scale by Sarla Jawa (1997), Depression CES-DC scale developed by Weissman, Orvaschell and Pandian (1980) were administered on students. 't' test was used to analyze the data. Significant difference found between the overall rural and urban students on home environment and depression, but not in optimism. As far as rural male and female children are concerned significant difference found in personal freedom and negligence, dimensions of home environment and in depression. Difference found in more dimensions of home environment, and depression of urban male and female children. Further discussion was made.Keywords
No Keywords- Forgiveness and State Anger of Students from Three Religious Groups
Abstract Views :329 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Kamatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Psychology, Kamatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 6, No 3 (2015), Pagination: 243-248Abstract
This study investigated the difference between forgiveness and state anger among post graduate students from various departments of Karnatak University, Dharwad, and belonging to Hindu, Muslim and Christian religion. An equal number of students were selected (Hindu=50, Muslim=50 and Christian=50) from each religion by using quota sampling technique. Forgiveness was measured by, the Decisional and Emotional Forgiveness Scale developed by Worthington Jr, et al. (2007) and State anger was measured by State anger scale developed by Spielberger et al. (1988). Results indicated a significant difference among three groups on their decisional and emotional forgiveness and state anger. Further stepwise multiple regression analysts revealed the factors significantly contributed to decisional and emotional forgiveness and state anger of the students. Findings of the study have social implications.Keywords
Forgiveness, State Anger, Students and Religion.- Well-Being in People Living with HIV/AIDS in Relation to Belief in Just World
Abstract Views :292 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 PG Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 PG Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 9, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 38-43Abstract
The just-world hypothesis is the assumption that a person's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, to the end of all noble actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished. The present study is counted to find out the significance of the relationship of well-being of men and women living with HIV/AIDS with their personal and general belief in just world. A purposive sample of 100 male and 100 female people living with HIV/AIDS are selected for the study. The sample was selected for the study from Positive People Network, NGOs and ART centers. The sample was collected from Hubli-Dharwad Corporation and Gadag. Personal Belief in Just World Scale developed by Claudia Dalbert (1999); The General Belief in Just World Scale developed by Dalbert and Schmitt (1987); and Trait Well Being Inventory developed by Dalbert (1992) measures were used to test the hypotheses. Results of the present study revealed that, General belief and Personal belief of just world of men living with HIV/AIDS have positive correlation mood level and satisfaction level. Further, General belief and Personal belief of just world of men living with HIV/AIDS have also had positive and significant relationship with overall mood and satisfaction level. Contrary to this, General belief and Personal belief of just world women living with HIV/AIDS has no relation with mood level, but has relationship with satisfaction level and overall mood and satisfaction level of women living with HIV/AIDS.Keywords
Well-Being, Mood Level, Satisfaction Level and Belief in Just Worlds.References
- Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R., & Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. Journal of Personality, 59, 263-280.
- Dalbert, C., & Donat, M. (2015). Belief in a just world. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 487-492). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
- Dalbert, C. (1992). Subjektives wohlbefinden junger erwachsener: Theoretische und empirische analysen der struktur und stabilität young adults subjective well-being: Theoretical and empirical analyses of its structure and stability. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 13, 207-220.
- Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Belief in a Just World Scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.
- Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: Dealing with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
- Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Alaube an eine jerechte welt also motive: Validierungskorrelat zweier skalen. Journal of Psychological Beitrdge, 29, 596-615.
- Diner, E., & Biswas-Diner, R. (2003). Will money increase subjective well being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119-169.
- Hafer, C. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059-1073.
- Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
- Lerner, M. J., & Goldberg, J. H. (1999). When do decent people blame victims? The differing effects of the explicit-rational and implicit-experiential cognitive system.
- In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 627-640). New York: Guilford.
- Lerner, M. J., & Matthews, J. (1967). Reactions to suffering of others under conditions of indirect responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 319-325.
- Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.
- Lerner, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer reaction to the innocent victim: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
- Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.
- Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347-413
- Montada, L., Schmitt, M., & Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with ones own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum Press.
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993b). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1-20.
- Coping and Belief Injust World in People Living with HIV/AIDS
Abstract Views :238 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Psychology, Karnatak University, Dharwad, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 9, No 3 (2018), Pagination: 355-362Abstract
The present study is conducted to find out the significance of the relationship of coping of men and women living with HlV/AlDS with their personal and general belief injust world. A purposive sample of 100 male and 100 female people living with HlV/AlDS are selected for the study. The sample was selected for the study trom Positive People Network, NGOs and ART centers. The sample was collected trom Hubli-Dharwad Corporation and Gadag. Personal Belief in Just World Scale developed by Claudia Dalbert (1999); The General Belief in Just World Scale developed by Dalbert and Schmitt (1987); and Ways of Coping developed by Susan Folkman and Richard Lazarus in (1985) scales were used to test the hypotheses. Results of the present study revealed that, all dimensions of coping- Controntive Coping, Distancing, Self Controlling, Social Support, Accepting Responsibility, Escape Avoidance, Planful Problem Solving, Positive Reappraisal are positively and significantly related to General belief and Personal belief of just world of men living with HlV/AlDS. Accept Accepting Responsibility, all other dimensions of coping are positively and significantly related to General belief and Personal belief ofjust world women living with HlV/AlDS.Keywords
Coping, Belief Injust Worlds and Men and Women.References
- Bierhoff, H. W., Klein, R., & Kramp, P. (1991). Evidence for the altruistic personality from data on accident research. Journal of Personality, 59, 263-280.
- Dalbert, C., & Donat, M. (2015). Belief in a just world. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia ofthe social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 487-492). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
- Dalbert, C. (1992). Subjective well-being in a just world: Theoretical and empirical analyses their structure and stability for differentiate and diagnostic psychology, Zeitschrift fiir. Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 13, 207-220.
- Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the Personal Beliefin a Just World Scale's validity. SocialJustice Research, 12, 79-98.
- Dalbert, C. (2001). The justice motive as a personal resource: dealing -with challenges and critical life events. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
- Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Alaube an eine jerechte welt also motive: Validierungskorrelat zweier skalen. Journal of Psychological Beitrdge, 29, 596-615
- Diner, E., & Biswas-Diner, R. (2003). Will money increase subjective well being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57, 119169.
- Hafer, C. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1059-1073.
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, Springer.
- Lazarus, R. S. {99). E-motion and adaptation. New York, Oxford University press.
- Lemer, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45,1-52.
- Lemer, M. J., & Goldberg, J. H. (1999). When do decent people blame victims? The differing effects of the explicit/rational and implicit/experiential cognitive system. In S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 627-640). New York: Guilford.
- Lemer, M. J., & Matthews, J. (1967). Reactions to suffering of others under conditions of indirest responsibility. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5,319-325.
- Lemer, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Pshycological Bulletin, 85,1030-1051.
- Lemer, M. J., & Simmons, C. H. (1966). The observer's reaction to the “innocent victim”: Compassion or rejection? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 203-210.
- Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77,616-628.
- McParland, J. L., & Knussen, C. (2010). Just world beliefs moderate the relationship of pain intensity and disability with psychological distress in chronic pain support group members, European Journal of Pain, 14,1532-2149.
- Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347-413.
- Montada, L., Schmitt, M., & Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's ownprivileges:Astudy of existential guilt. InH. W. Bierhoff,R. L. Cohen, and J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum Press.
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993b). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28,1-20.