Refine your search
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Chandra Shekhar
- Career Challenges for Young Independent Researchers in India
Abstract Views :334 |
PDF Views:124
Authors
Deepa Agashe
1,
Sugandha Maheshwary
2,
Jitendra Kumar Pattanaik
3,
Jai Prakash
4,
Pragya Bhatt
5,
S. S. Arya
6,
Sriparna Chatterjee
7,
Pankaj Kumar
5,
Paramdeep Singh
8,
Nazia Abbas
9,
Chandra Shekhar Sharma
10,
Chirasree Roy Chaudhuri
11,
Pooja Devi
12
Affiliations
1 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru 560 065, IN
2 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Indian Institute of Science Education & Research, Mohali 140 306, IN
3 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151 401, IN
4 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202 002, IN
5 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Inter University Accelerator Centre, New Delhi 110 067, IN
6 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Institute of Chemical Technology, NM Parikh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai 400 019, IN
7 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 013, IN
8 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda 151 001, IN
9 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; CSIR-Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Kashmir 190 015, IN
10 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502 284, IN
11 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur 711 103, IN
12 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; CSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh 160 030, IN
1 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bengaluru 560 065, IN
2 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Indian Institute of Science Education & Research, Mohali 140 306, IN
3 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Central University of Punjab, Bathinda 151 401, IN
4 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202 002, IN
5 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Inter University Accelerator Centre, New Delhi 110 067, IN
6 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Institute of Chemical Technology, NM Parikh Marg, Matunga, Mumbai 400 019, IN
7 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar 751 013, IN
8 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda 151 001, IN
9 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; CSIR-Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine, Kashmir 190 015, IN
10 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502 284, IN
11 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur 711 103, IN
12 Indian National Young Academy of Sciences, New Delhi 110 002; CSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh 160 030, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 122, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 135-143Abstract
The scientific enterprise in India has grown dramatically in the past few decades, with research emerging as a viable and important career option for students of science. The country thus has a large population of young scientists in the early stages of establishing their independent research careers. While this demographic is arguably the most important group that will determine the future of scientific research in India, their status and concerns are poorly understood. The Indian National Young Academy of Sciences conducted a national survey to better understand and present the challenges faced by them. Through a structured questionnaire, we sought the views of researchers below 45 years of age. Here, we summarize the responses from 854 participants across multiple early career stages. We highlight key challenges faced by these scientists in establishing an independent research career, and suggest steps to address them.Keywords
Academia, Career Opportunities, Challenges, Scientific Enterprise, STEM, Young Researchers.References
- Funk, C., Tyson, A., Kennedy, B. and Johnson, C., Science and scientists held in high esteem across global publics. Pew Research Center, 2020, pp. 1–133.
- https://www.pewresearch.org/science/fact-sheet/public-views-about-science-in-india/ (accessed on 25 April 2021).
- DST, Research and Development Statistics at a Glance 2019–20, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (GoI), 2019; https://dst.gov.in/document/reports/research-develop-ment-statistics-glance-2019-20 (accessed on 2 May 2021).
- Pain, E., An emerging global picture of early-career scientists. Sci. Careers, 2014, 3–21.
- Costanguay, S., Early career scientists. World Meteorol. Organ. Bull., 2014, 63(2); https://public.wmo.int/en/resources/bulletin/early-career-scientists 6. Jayaram, K. S. and Priyadarshini, S., Indian scientists concerned over funding crisis. Nature India, 2018.
- Lowe, D., India’s research culture. Sci. Transl. Med., 2010; https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2010/05/26/indias_research_culture
- Raman, C. V., Transforming science and technology in India. Econ. Surv., 2017, 18, 119–130.
- Powell, K., How junior scientists can land a seat at the leadership table. Nature, 2021, 592, 475–477.
- Grover, P., Being highly educated doesn’t guarantee you jobs in India anymore. ThePrint, 2018; https://theprint.in/india/gover-nance/being-highly-educated-doesnt-guarantee-you-jobs-in-india-anymore/125011/
- Shrivastava, A., Abraham, R. and Basole, A., What do household surveys reveal about employment in India since 2016? State of Work-ing India 2019, Centre for Sustainable Employment Report, Azim Premji University, Bengaluru, 2019, pp. 21–36; https://cse.azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/state-of-working-india/
- Aboelela, S. W. et al., Defining interdisciplinary research: conclu-sions from a critical review of the literature. Health Serv. Res., 2007, 42, 329–346.
- Bililign, S., The need for interdisciplinary research and education for sustainable human development to deal with global challenges. Int. J. Afr. Dev., 2013, 1, 82–90.
- Brown, R., Werbeloff, L. and Raven, R., Interdisciplinary research and impact (global challenges 4/2019). Global Challenges, 2019, 3, 1900020.
- Carr, G., Loucks, D. P. and Blöschl, G., Gaining insight into inter-disciplinary research and education programmes: a framework for evaluation. Res. Policy, 2018, 47, 35–48.
- Kumar, N., Gender and science in India. Indian Sci. Technol., 2008; https://nistads.res.in/all-html/Gender%20and%20Science%-20in%20India.html
- DST, Evaluating and enhancing women’s participation in scientific and technological research: the Indian initiatives. Report of the National Task Force for Women in Science, Department of Sci-ence and Technology, GoI; https://www.insaindia.res.in/pdf/ws_anx_1a.pdf
- DST, Women scientists scheme. Department of Science and Tech-nology, GoI; http://online-wosa.gov.in/wosa (accessed on 30 May 2021).
- Powell, K., The parenting penalties faced by scientist mothers. Nature, 2021, 595(7868), 611–613.
- GoI, The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017, Registered no. DL-(N) 04/0007/2003-17; http://labour.gov.in
- Trust in Leader, Organisational Culture, and Employee Creativity: Understanding the Interplay
Abstract Views :160 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
2 Professor, Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
1 Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
2 Professor, Shri Ram College of Commerce, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
Source
International Journal on Leadership, Vol 9, No 1&2 (2021), Pagination: 35-44Abstract
Organisations in todays neck-breaking competitive environment are continuously marching towards attaining a sustainable competitive advantage. Creativity is one such component that can increase the probability of the organisation in staying ahead. The importance of creativity is significantly evident by the available literature on creativity. This paper aims to explore the relationship between employees’ trust in the leader and employee creativity, and the influence of organisational culture on this relationship, based on the review of the literature. This study explores the moderating effect of different dimensions of organisational culture on the relationship between trust in the leader and employee creativity. By integrating literature on trust, organisational culture, and creativity, this paper aims at advancing our understanding of creativity, considering the employees’ trust in the leader and culture within the organisation. Based on the review of literature, propositions have been stated in this study, which can be empirically tested in further studies.Keywords
Trust in Leader, Organisational Culture, Employee CreativityReferences
- Agars, M. D., Kaufman, J. C., Deane, A., & Smith, B. (2012). Fostering individual creativity through organizational context: A review of recent research and recommendations for organizational leaders.
- M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of Organizational Creativity (pp. 271-294). New York: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-374714-3.00012-4
- Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185-201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(93)90012-S
- Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
- Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0001-4273%28199610%2939%3A5% 3C1154%3AATWEFC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W
- Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157-183.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
- Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102-1119. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470
- Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed., pp. 40-63). San Francisco: Wiley.
- Chen, C., Su, T. S., Cui, X., Yang, C., & Ma, W. (2020). Consistency at different levels: A meta-analytic examination of organizational trust and performance. Nankai Business Review International, 11(4), 2040-8749.
- Denison, D. R., & Speitzer, G. M. (1991). Organizational culture and organizational development: A competing values approach. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5(1), 1-21.
- Furnham, A. (2016). The relationship between cognitive ability, emotional intelligence and creativity. Psychology, 7(2), 193-197. doi:10.4236/ psych.2016.72021
- Gallagher, S., Brown, C., & Brown, L. (2008). A strong market culture drives organizational performance and success. Employment Relations Today, 35(1), 25-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.20185
- George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439-477. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/078559814
- Gillespie, N. (2003). Measuring trust in working relationships: The behavioural trust inventory. Paper presented at The Academy of Management Conference, Seattle, WA.
- Gillespie, N. (2012). Measuring trust in organizational context: An overview of survey based measures. In F. Lyon, G. Möllering & M. N. K. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods on Trust. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Gillespie, N., & Mann, L. (2004). Transformational leadership and shared values: The building blocks of trust. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588-607. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940410551507 Gupta, B. (2011). Organizational culture and creative behaviour: Moderating role of creative style preference.
- International Journal Innovation and Learning, 10(4), 429-441. doi:10.1504/IJIL.2011.043100 Hon, A. H., Hon, A. H., Lui, S. S., & Lui, S. S. (2016). Employee creativity and innovation in organizations: Review, integration, and future directions for hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 862885. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-09-2014-0454
- Jain, R., & Jain, C. (2017). Employee creativity: A conceptual framework. Management and Labour Studies, 41(4), 294-313. Retrieved from https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:manlab:v:41:y:20 16:i:4:p:294-313
- Javed, B., Yarawwas, M., Khandai, S., Shahid, K., & Tayyeb, H. H. (2018). Ethical leadership, trust in leader and creativity: The mediated mechanism and an interacting effect. Journal of Management and Organization, 24(3), 388-405.
- Joseph, E. E., & Winston, B. E. (2005). A correlation of servant leadership, leader trust, and organizational trust. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 6-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730510575552
- Khazanchi, S., & Masterson, S. S. (2011). Who and what is fair matters: A multi-foci social exchange model of creativity. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 32(1), 86-106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/job.682
- Krishnakumar, S. (2017). Organization culture on innovation: Understanding the influence using its variables. FIIB Business Review, 6(3), 61-70. doi:10.1177/2455265820170309 Le, P. B., & Lei, H. (2018). Fostering knowledge sharing behaviours through ethical leadership practice: The mediating roles of disclosure-based trust and reliancebased trust in leadership. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(2), 183-195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1445426
- Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D.,Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2019). Leadership, creativity and innovation: A meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1-35. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837
- Lee, J., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Moon, S. (2019). Enhancing employee creativity for a sustainable competitive advantage through perceived human resource management practices and trust in management. Sustainability, 11(8). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11082305
- Li, M., & Zhang, P. (2016). Stimulating learning by empowering leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1168-1186. doi:10.1108/LODJ-01-2015-0007
- Lukic, T., Dzamic, V., Knezevic, G., Alcakovic, S., & Boskovic, V. (2014). The influence of organizational culture on business creativity. Innovation and Satisfaction Management, 73, 49-57. doi:10.7595/ management.fon.2014.0027
- Madjar, N., & Ortiz-Walters, R. (2008). Customers as contributors and reliable evaluators of creativity in the service industry. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 29(7), 949-966. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/30163358
- Mainemelis, C., Kark, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2015). Creative leadership: A multi-context conceptualization. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 393-482. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2 015.1024502
- Masood, K., Shahzad, C., Nosheen, R., & Awais, K. (2011). Effects of self-leadership, knowledge management and culture on creativity. European Journal of Business and Management, 3(8), 1-12.
- Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. doi:https:// doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
- Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? The Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 874-888. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803928
- McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246. doi:10.1177/1523422305274528
- Nienaber A. M., Hofeditz M., & Romeike P. D. (2015). Vulnerability and trust in leader-follower relationships. Personnel Review, 44(4), 567-591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2013-0162
- Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., & Peng, T. L. (2018). An organizational culture and trustworthiness multidimensional model to engender employee creativity. American Journal of Business, 33(4), 179-202.
- Oomsels, P., Callens, M., Vanschoenwinkel, J., & Bouckaert, G. (2016). Functions and dysfunctions of interorganizational trust and distrust in the public sector. Administration & Society, 51(4), 516-544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716667973
- Puccio, G. J., & Cabra, J. F. (2010). Organizational creativity: A systems approach. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 145-173). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Rouse, E. D. (2020). Where you end and I begin: Understanding intimate co-creation. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 181-204. doi:https:// doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0388
- Schoorman, D. F., Wood, M. M., & Breuer, C. (2015). Would trust by any other name smell as sweet? Reflections on the meanings and uses of trust across disciplines and context. In B. Bornstein & A. Tomkins (Eds.), Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (vol. 62). Cham: Springer.
- Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrated model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-354. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/ amr.2007.24348410
- Song, Z., Gu, Q., & Wang, B. (2019). Creativity-oriented HRM and organizational creativity in China: A complementary perspective of innovativeness. International Journal of Manpower, 40(5), 834-849. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2016-0108
- Van de Walle, S., & Six, F. (2014). Trust and distrust as distinct concepts: Why studying distrust in institutions is important. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 158-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.785146
- Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behaviour. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 24(4), 279-290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1990.tb00549.x
- Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/258761
- Yu, M., Mai, Q., Tsai, S. B., & Dai, Y. (2018). An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee-organization relationship and innovative behaviour from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability, 10(3), 864. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030864
- Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393957
- Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Bavato, D., Tasselli, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2570-2595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319827088