Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- P. Hari Krishna
- K. R. L. Saranya
- C. S. Jha
- V. K. Dadhwal
- Kalloli Dutta
- Subrat Sharma
- K. V. Satish
- S. Vazeed Pasha
- C. S.
- Chandra Shekhar Jha
- Rajashekar Gopalakrishnan
- Kiran Chand Thumaty
- Jayant Singhal
- Jyoti Singh
- Suresh Middinti
- Mutyala Praveen
- Arul Raj Murugavel
- S. Yugandhar Reddy
- Mani Kumar Vedantam
- Anil Yadav
- G. Srinivasa Rao
- Gururao Diwakar Parsi
- Vinay Kumar Dadhwal
- G. Manaswini
- V. V. L. Padma Alekhya
- P. G. Diwakar
- Anuja Joseph
- Gija Anna Abraham
- Minu Merin Sabu
- Rahul Bodh
- Hitendra Padalia
- Divesh Pangtey
- Ishwari Datt Rai
- Subrata Nandy
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sudhakar Reddy, C.
- Assessment and Monitoring of Deforestation from 1930 to 2011 in Andhra Pradesh, India Using Remote Sensing and Collateral Data
Abstract Views :316 |
PDF Views:130
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
1 National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 107, No 5 (2014), Pagination: 867-875Abstract
Deforestation is one of the greatest threats to the world's forest ecosystems. The present study has utilized remote sensing and GIS techniques to quantify changes in forest cover and to map patterns of deforestation in Andhra Pradesh, India during 1930-2011. Andhra Pradesh has the second largest recorded forest area and ranks sixth with an actual forest cover amongst all Indian states. Forest cover maps from seven temporal datasets were prepared based on interpretation of multi-source topographical maps and satellite data. A representative set of landscape indices has been used to study landscape-level changes over time. The mapping for the period of 1930, 1960, 1975, 1985, 1995, 2005 and 2011 indicates that the forest cover accounts for 85,392, 68,063, 46,940, 45,520, 44,409, 43,577 and 43,523 sq. km of the study area respectively. The study found the net forest cover declined as 49% of the total forest area during the last eight decades. The annual rate of estimated deforestation during 2005-2011 was 0.02%. Annual rate of deforestation of teak mixed forests was relatively higher (0.76) followed by mangroves (0.58%), semi-evergreen forests (0.43%), dry deciduous forests (0.21%), moist deciduous forests (0.09%) and dry evergreen forests (0.07%) during 1975-2011. The landscape analysis shows that the number of forest patches was 3,981 in 1930, 5,553 in 1960, 8,760 in 1975, 9,412 in 1985, 9,646 in 1995 and 10,597 in 2011, which indicates ongoing anthropogenic pressure on the forests. The mean patch size (sq. km) of forest decreased from 21.5 in 1930 to 12.3 in 1960 and reached 3.9 by 2011. The analysis of historical forest cover changes provides a basis for management effectiveness and future research on various components of biodiversity, climate change and accounting of carbon.Keywords
Collateral Data, Deforestation, Landscape Metrics, Remote Sensing.- Quantification and Monitoring of Forest Cover Changes in Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India (1920-2012)
Abstract Views :431 |
PDF Views:186
Authors
Affiliations
1 Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
2 G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora 263 643, IN
1 Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
2 G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora 263 643, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 4 (2016), Pagination: 508-520Abstract
Protected areas need to be monitored regularly to realize the effectiveness of conservation measures. In this study, Agasthyamalai Biosphere Reserve of Western Ghats has been monitored for deforestation in a historic time frame. The study attempted to identify the changes that occurred within the Biosphere Reserve from the early 1920s to the recent by mapping the land use/land cover and quantifying the forest cover changes that have occurred in the Biosphere Reserve individually for each conservation zone and protected area. Multi-temporal satellite datasets and topographical maps were used for mapping the forest cover of the study area. Visual interpretation technique involving on screen digitization was used for mapping and post-classification comparison method was used for carrying out change detection process. In addition, grid wise spatial tracking was carried out for the periods of 1920-1973 and 1973-2012 to prioritize change areas. Results showed that 747.1 km2 of forests have been lost during the period of 1920-2012. The present study demonstrates the importance of long-term land use/land cover information to examine conservation effectiveness by utilizing remote sensing and GIS techniques to carry out best management practices.Keywords
Conservation, Deforestation, Land Use/Land Cover, Long-Term Study, Protected Area.References
- Lambin, E. F., Geist, H. J. and Lepers, E., Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 2003, 28, 205–241.
- Geist, H. J. and Lambin, E. F., What drives tropical deforestation? a meta-analysis of proximate and underlying causes of deforestation based on subnational case study evidence. LUCC Rep. Ser., 2001, 4, 116.
- Kadiogullari, A. I., Sayin, M. A., Celįk, D. A., Borucu, S., Cil, B. and Bulut, S., Analysing land cover changes for understanding of forest dynamics using temporal forest management plans. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186, 2089–2110.
- Parrish, J. D., Braun, D. P. and Unnasch, R. S., Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience, 2003, 53, 851–860.
- Das, A., Krishnaswamy, J., Bawa, K. S., Kiran, M. C., Srinivas, V., Kumar, N. and Karanth, K. U., Prioritisation of conservation areas in the Western Ghats, India. Biol. Conserv., 2006, 133, 16– 31.
- Huxel, G. R. and Hastings, A., Habitat loss, fragmentation and restoration. Restor. Ecol., 1999, 7, 309–315.
- Lovett, G. M. et al., Who needs environmental monitoring? Front. Ecol. Environ., 2007, 5, 253–260.
- Levine, C. R., Yanai, R. D., Lampman, G. G., Burns, D. A., Driscoll, C. T., Lawrence, G. B. and Schoch, N., Evaluating the efficiency of environmental monitoring programs. Ecol. Indic., 2014, 39, 94–101.
- Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. State of the World’s Forests, FAO, Rome, 2010.
- Foster, D. R. and Forest, H., Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J. Ecol., 1992, 80, 753–771.
- Stibig, H. J., Achard, F., Carboni, S., Rasi, R. and Miettinen, J., Change in tropical forest cover of Southeast Asia from 1990 to 2010. Biogeosci. Discuss., 2013, 10, 12625–12653.
- Snoo, G. R., Naus, N., Verhulst, J., Ruijven, J. and Schaffers, A. P., Long-term changes in plant diversity of grasslands under agricultural and conservation management. Appl. Veg. Sci., 2012, 15, 299–306.
- Townshend, J., Hansen, M., Sohlberg, R., Defries, R. and Schleeweis, K., Towards a community protocol for validating global climate data records representing sub-pixel land cover components and changes through time using AVHRR, MODIS and VIIRS. InAGU Fall Meeting Abstr., 2005, 1, 8.
- Chape, S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M. and Lysenko, I., Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 2005, 360, 443–455.
- Wang, Y., Mitchell, B. R., Marzilli, J. N., Bonynge, G., Zhou, Y. and Shriver, G., Remote sensing of land-cover change and landscape context of the National Parks: A case study of the Northeast Temperate Network. Remote. Sens. Environ., 2009, 113, 1453–1461.
- Huang, X. and Friedl, M. A., Distance metric-based forest cover change detection using MODIS time series. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf., 2014, 29, 78–92.
- Kennedy, R. E., Townsend, P. A., Gross, J. E., Cohen, W. B., Bolstad, P., Wang, Y. Q. and Adams, P., Remote sensing change detection tools for natural resource managers: understanding concepts and tradeoffs in the design of landscape monitoring projects. Remote. Sens. Environ., 2009, 113, 1382–1396.
- Wiens, J. et al., Selecting and conserving lands for biodiversity: the role of remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ., 2009, 113, 1370–1381.
- Ramesh, B. R., Menon, S. and Bawa, K. S., A vegetation-based approach to biodiversity gap analysis in the Agastyamalai region, Western Ghats, India. Ambio, 1997, 26, 529–536.
- Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Assessment and monitoring of long-term forest cover changes in Odisha, India using remote sensing and GIS. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2013, 185, 4399–4415.
- Satish, K. V., Saranya, K. R. L., Reddy, C. S., Krishna, P. H., Jha, C. S. and Rao, P. P., Geospatial assessment and monitoring of historical forest cover changes (1920–2012) in Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, Western Ghats, India. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186, 8125–8140.
- Hari Krishna, P., Saranya, K. R. L., Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Assessment and monitoring of deforestation from 1930 to 2011 in Andhra Pradesh, India using remote sensing and collateral data. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107, 867–875.
- Menon, S. and Bawa, K. S., Applications of geographic information systems, remote-sensing, and a landscape ecology approach to biodiversity conservation in the Western Ghats. Curr. Sci., 1997, 73, 134–145.
- Jha, C. S., Dutt, C. B. S. and Bawa, K. S., Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India. Curr. Sci., 2000, 79, 231– 238.
- Sheeja, R. V., Joseph, S., Jaya, D. S. and Baiju, R. S., Land use and land cover changes over a century (1914–2007) in the Neyyar River Basin, Kerala: a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int. J. Digital. Earth., 2011, 4, 258–270.
- Palni, L. M. S., Rawal, R. S., Rai, R. K. and Reddy, S. V., Compendium on Indian biosphere reserves – progression during two decades of conservation, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi and G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment & Development, Uttarakhand, 2012.
- Ministry of Environment and Forests, Protection, development, maintenance and research in biosphere reserves in India, Guidelines and Performance, MOEF, Government of India, New Delhi, 2007.
- Pascal, J. P., Bioclimates of the Western Ghats at 11,250,000 (2 sheets), French Institute, Pondicherry, India, 1982.
- Henry, A. N., Chandrabose, M., Swaminathan, M. S. and Nair, N. C., Agasthyamalai and its environs: a potential area for Biosphere Reserve. J. Bombay. Nat. Hist. Soc., 1984, 81, 282–290.
- MacKinnon, J. and MacKinnon, K., Review of the protected areas system in the Indo-Malayan realm. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1986.
- Collins, N. M., Sayer, J. A. and Whitmore, T. C., The Conservation Atlas of Tropical Forests: Asia and the Pacific, MacMillan Press, London, 1991.
- Ramesh, B. R. and Pascal, J. P., Distribution of endemic, arborescent evergreen species in the Western Ghats. In Proceedings of the symposium on rare endangered and endemic plants of the Western Ghats, Kerala Forest Department, Trivandrum, 30–31 August 1991, pp. 20–29.
- http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu (accessed on 10 January 2013).
- http://sunsite/berkeley.edu/EART/India/250k (accessed on 10 June 2013).
- http://indiabiodiversity.org (accessed on 8 February 2013)
- Jensen, J. R., Introductory Digital Image Processing – A Remote Sensing Perspective, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2nd edn, 1996.
- http://www.cbd.int/forest/definitions.shtml (accessed on 20 March 2014).
- Puyravaud, J. P., Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. For. Ecol. Manage., 2003, 177, 593–596.
- Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Manager of Publications, Government of India, 1968, p. 404.
- Reddy, C. S., Dutta, K. and Jha, C. S., Analysing the gross and net deforestation rates in India. Curr. Sci., 2013, 105, 1492–1500.
- Chandran, M. S., On the ecological history of the Western Ghats. Curr. Sci., 1997, 73, 146–155.
- George, P. S. and Chattopadhyay, S., Population and land use in Kerala, growing populations, changing landscapes: studies from India, China and the United States. Nat. Acad. Sci., 2001, 1, 79– 106.
- Ramesh, B. R., Seen, D. L., Karunakaran, P. V., Balasubramanian, M. and Sankar, M., Conservation review for rationalization of protected area network in Kerala. Final report of the consultancy under the Kerala Forestry project funded by the World Bank, French Institute of Pondicherry, Pondicherry, 2003, p. 112.
- http://www.irrigation.kerala.gov.in (accessed on 1 September 2014).
- Richardson, D. M., Pysek, P., Rejmanek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D. and West, C. J., Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib., 2000, 6, 93–107.
- Assessment and Monitoring of Deforestation and Land-Use Changes (1976-2014) in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India Using Remote Sensing and GIS
Abstract Views :360 |
PDF Views:147
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
1 National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 111, No 9 (2016), Pagination: 1492-1499Abstract
Andaman and Nicobar Islands are part of Indo- Burma and Sundaland global biodiversity hotspots. This study provides spatial information on forest types, deforestation and associated land-use changes in Andaman and Nicobar Islands during 1976 to 2014. Satellite remote sensing and geographical information system (GIS) techniques have been used to analyse forest cover changes, rate of deforestation and to map patterns of forest cover distribution in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Classified maps prepared for 1976, 1989, 1993, 2000, 2006 and 2014 indicate that the forest cover accounts for an area of 7086.1 (85.9%), 6969.2 (84.5%), 6941.1 (84.1%), 6934.6 (84.1%), 6617.8 (80.2%) and 6407.3 sq. km (77.7%) respectively. It was found that the area occupied by evergreen forests is very high, consisting of 3065.1 sq. km (32.2%) followed by semi-evergreen (1531.6 sq. km), moist deciduous (1133.4 sq. km) and mangrove forest (677.2 sq. km) in 2014. There is large-scale deforestation in Andaman and Nicobar Islands which has been estimated as 678.8 sq. km during the last four decades. The loss of forest cover is high in moist deciduous forests which has been estimated as 312.2 sq. km in Andaman Islands; whereas in Nicobar Islands, the highest loss was found in evergreen forests (244.6 sq. km). The rate of deforestation in Andaman and Nicobar Islands was high during 2000-2006 (0.78) indicating major influence of the tsunami of 26 December 2004. The annual rate of deforestation from 2006 to 2014 was 0.40. The geospatial analysis of areas of forest cover change provides baseline information for restoration and conservation planning.Keywords
Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Deforestation, Forest, GIS, Remote Sensing, Land Use.References
- Feddema, J. J., Oleson, K. W., Bonan, G. B., Mearns, L. O., Buja, L. E., Meehl, G. A. and Washington, W. M., The importance of land-cover change in simulating future climates. Science, 2005, 310, 1674–1678.
- Mayaux, P., Holmgren, P., Achard, F., Eva, H., Stibig, H. J. and Branthomme, A., Tropical forest cover change in the 1990s and options for future monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci., 2005, 360(1454), 373–384.
- Geist, H. J. and Lambin, E. F., Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations. BioScience, 2002, 52, 143–150.
- Houghton, R. A., Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850–2000. Tellus, 2002, 55B, 378–390.
- CBD, Island biodiversity: island bright spots in conservation and sustainability. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Canada, 2014, ISBN 92-9225-525-8.
- Wilkie, D. S. and Finn, J. T., Remote sensing imagery for natural resources monitoring: a guide for first-time users, New York, Columbia University Press, 1996.
- Prasad, P. R. C., Reddy, C. S., Rajan, K. S., Raza, S. H. and Dutt, C. B. S., Assessment of tsunami and anthropogenic impacts on the forest of the North Andaman Islands, India. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2009, 30(5), 1235–1249.
- Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V. and Potapov, P. V., Quantification of global gross forest cover loss. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 2010, 107, 8650–8655.
- Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Assessment and monitoring of long-term forest cover changes in Odisha, India using remote sensing and GIS. Environ. Monitor. Assess, 2013, 185, 4399–4415.
- Reddy, C. S., Dutta, K. and Jha, C. S., Analysing the gross and net deforestation rates in India. Curr. Sci., 2013, 105(11), 1492–1500.
- IIRS, Biodiversity Characterization at Landscape Level in Andaman and Nicobar Islands using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad, 2003.
- Roy, P. S. et al., Biodiversity Characterization at Landscape Level: National Assessment, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehra Dun, 2012, pp. 1–254; ISBN 81-901418-8-0.
- Harikrishna, P., Saranya, K. R. L., Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Assessment and monitoring of deforestation from 1930s to 2011 in Andhra Pradesh, India using remote sensing and collateral data. Curr. Sci., 2014, 107(5), 867–875.
- Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Spatial dynamics of deforestation and forest fragmentation (1930–2013) in Eastern Ghats, India. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sensing Spatial Inf. Sci., 2014, XL-8, 637–644; doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-8-637-2014.
- Reddy, C. S., Rajashekar, G., Hari Krishna, P., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Multi-source and multi-date mapping of deforestation in Central India (1935–2010) and its implication on standing phytomass carbon pool. Ecol. Ind., 2015, 57, 219–227.
- FSI, India State of Forest Report, Forest Survey of India, Dehra Dun, 2013.
- Reddy, C. S., Prasad, P. R. C., Murthy, M. S. R. and Dutt, C. B. S., Census of endemic flowering plants of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot., 2004, 28(3), 712–728.
- Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Manager of Publications, Delhi, 1968.
- Reddy, C. S., Flora of North Andaman Islands, India. Biodiversity in India (eds Pullaiah, T. and Reddy, K. J.), 2013, vol. 6, pp. 111–208; Regency Publications, New Delhi, ISBN 978-81-89233.
- http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/india/Final_ PPT_2011_chapter3.pdf
- Saldanha, C. J., Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshadweep: An Environmental Impact Assessment, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 1989.
- http://glcfapp.umiacs.umd.edu:8080/esdi (accessed on 8 November 2013).
- http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 28 June 2013).
- Puyravaud, J. P., Standardizing the calculation of the annual rate of deforestation. For. Ecol. Manage., 2003, 177, 593–596.
- http://earth.google.com/
- http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/
- Porwal, M. C., Padalia, H. and Roy, P. S., Impact of tsunami on the forest and biodiversity richness in Nicobar Islands (Andaman and Nicobar Islands), India. Biodiver. Conserv., 2012, 21(5), 1267–1287.
- Roy, S. D. and Sankar, K. R., Impacts of climate change and sea level rise on biodiversity and livelihood of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 2014; http://www.upsbdb.org/pdf/Souvenir2014/ch-2.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2015).
- Ramachandran, S. et al., Ecological impact of tsunami on Nicobar Islands (Camorta, Katchal, Nancowry and Trinkat). Curr. Sci., 2005, 89(1), 195–200.
- Monitoring of forest Fires from Space-ISRO's Initiative for near Real-Time Monitoring of the Recent forest Fires in Uttarakhand, India
Abstract Views :430 |
PDF Views:132
Authors
Chandra Shekhar Jha
1,
Rajashekar Gopalakrishnan
1,
Kiran Chand Thumaty
1,
Jayant Singhal
1,
C. Sudhakar Reddy
1,
Jyoti Singh
1,
S. Vazeed Pasha
1,
Suresh Middinti
1,
Mutyala Praveen
1,
Arul Raj Murugavel
1,
S. Yugandhar Reddy
1,
Mani Kumar Vedantam
1,
Anil Yadav
1,
G. Srinivasa Rao
1,
Gururao Diwakar Parsi
1,
Vinay Kumar Dadhwal
1
Affiliations
1 Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Centre (ISRO), Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
1 Forestry and Ecology Group, National Remote Sensing Centre (ISRO), Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 11 (2016), Pagination: 2057-2060Abstract
ecological, economic and social effects worldwide. Globally, forest fires are considered as one of the major drivers of climate change having deleterious impacts on the earth and environment as studies reveal their significance in producing large amounts of trace gases and aerosol particles, which play a pivotal role in tropospheric chemistry and climate.- Nationwide Assessment of Forest Burnt Area in India Using Resourcesat-2 AWiFS Data
Abstract Views :348 |
PDF Views:133
Authors
C. Sudhakar Reddy
1,
C. S. Jha
1,
G. Manaswini
1,
V. V. L. Padma Alekhya
1,
S. Vazeed Pasha
1,
K. V. Satish
1,
P. G. Diwakar
1,
V. K. Dadhwal
1
Affiliations
1 National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
1 National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 07 (2017), Pagination: 1521-1532Abstract
This study provides application of Resourcesat-2 AWiFS satellite imagery for forest burnt area assessment in India. AWiFS datasets covering peak forest fire months of 2014 have been analysed. The total burnt area under vegetation cover (forest, scrub and grasslands) of India was estimated as 57,127.75 sq. km. In 2014, 7% of forest cover of India was affected by fires. Of the major forest types, dry deciduous forests are affected by the highest burnt area, followed by moist deciduous forests. Among the biogeographic zones, the highest forest burnt area was recorded in Deccan followed by North East and Western Ghats. The highest burnt area was recorded in Odisha followed by Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Telangana, Jharkhand, Manipur and Karnataka. Spatial analysis shows that 232 grid cells in India have a burnt area greater than 20 sq. km. The database generated would be useful in ecological damage assessment, fire risk modelling, carbon emissions accounting and biodiversity conservation.Keywords
AWiFS, Forest Fire, Forest Type, India, Remote Sensing.References
- Beringer, J., Hutley, L. B., Tapper, N. J., Coutts, A., Kerley, A. and O’Grady, A. P., Fire impacts on surface heat, moisture and carbon fluxes from a tropical savanna in northern Australia. Int. J. Wildland Fire, 2003, 12, 333–340.
- FAO, 2003; http://www.fao.org/english/newsroom/news/2003/21962-en.html
- Puyravaud, J. P., Pascal, J. P. and Dufour, C., Ecotone structure as an indicator of changing forest-savanna boundaries (Linganamakki Region, southern India). J. Biogeogr., 1994, 21(6), 581–593.
- Kucera, J. and Yasuoka, Y., Retrieval of forest fire history in Far East Asia by remote sensing and its analysis with biomass burning Simulation and climate anomalies. Global Environ. Change Ocean and on Land. Terrapub. Tokyo, 2004, 411–424.
- IPCC, Fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007.
- Meyn, A., White, P. S., Buhk, C. and Jentsch, A., Environmental drivers of large, infrequent wildfires: the emerging conceptual model. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 2007, 31(3), 287–312.
- Kraus, D. and Goldammer, J. G., Fire regimes and ecosystems: an overview of fire ecology in tropical ecosystems. Forest fires in India – workshop proceedings (ed. Schmerbeck, J., Hiremath, A. and Ravichandran, C.). ATREE, Bangalore, India and Institute of Silviculture, Freiburg, Germany, 2007, pp. 9–13.
- Oliver, J. G. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M. and Peters, J., Trends in global CO2 emissions; 2013 Report, The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; ISPRA: Joint Research Centre, 2013.
- Schmerbeck, J., Hiremath, A. and Ravichandran, C., Forest fires in India – Workshop Proceedings. ATREE, Bangalore, India & Institute of Silviculture, Freiburg, Germany, 2007.
- Jaiswal, R. K., Mukherjee, S., Raju, K. D. and Saxena, R., Forest fire risk zone mapping from satellite imagery and GIS. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 2002, 4(1), 1–10.
- Gubbi, S., Fire, fire burning bright. Deccan Herald, Bangalore, India, 2003; http://www. Wildlife first.info/images/worldfiles/fire.doc (accessed on 15 August 2014).
- Satendra and Kaushik, A. D., Forest fire disaster management. National Institute of Disaster Management, Delhi, 2012.
- Joseph, S., Anitha, K. and Murthy, M. S. R., Forest fire in India: a review of the knowledge base. J. For. Res., 2009, 14, 127–134.
- Badarinath, K. V. S. and Prasad, K. V., Carbon dioxide emissions from forest biomass burning in India. Global Environ. Res., 2011, 15, 45–52.
- Eva, H. and Lambin, E. F., Burnt area mapping in Central Africa using ATSR data. Int. J. Remote Sens., 1998, 19, 3473–3497.
- Chuvieco, E., Deshayes, M., Stach, N., Cocero, D. and Riano, D., Short-term fire risk: foliage moisture content estimation from satellite data. In Remote Sensing of Large Wildfires in the European Mediterranean Basin (ed. Chuvieco, E.), Berlin, SpringerVerlag, 1999, pp. 17–38.
- Roy, P. S., Forest fire and degradation assessment using satellite remote sensing and geographic information system. Proceedings of a Training Workshop Satellite Remote Sensing and GIS Applications in Agricultural Meteorology, 2003, pp. 361–400.
- Lentile, L. B., Holden, Z. A., Smith, A. M., Falkowski, M. J., Hudak, A. T., Morgan, P. and Benson, N. C., Remote sensing techniques to assess active fire characteristics and post-fire effects. Int. J. Wildland Fire, 2006, 15(3), 319–345.
- Sedano, F., Kempeneers, P., Strobl, P., McInerney, D. and San Miguel, J., Increasing spatial detail of burned scar maps using IRS–AWiFS data for Mediterranean Europe. Remote Sensing, 2012, 4(3), 726–744.
- Chirici, G. and Corona, P., An overview of passive remote sensing for post-fire monitoring. Forest, 2005, 2(3), 282–289.
- NRSA, Perspectives of geoinformatics in forest fire management (Indian Forest Fire Response and Assessment System). Technical Report, National Remote Sensing Agency, Hyderabad, 2006.
- MoEF, 2014; http://www.icfre.gov.in/UserFiles/File/Institute-ICFRE/2013/Stat/section (accessed on 12 January 2015).
- FSI, State of Forest Report. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, 1995.
- IFFN, Fire situation in India, 2002, pp. 23–27.
- Chand, K. T. R., Badarinath, K. V. S., Prasad, K. V., Murthy, M. S. R., Elvidge, C. D. and Tuttle, B. T., Monitoring forest fires over the Indian region using DMSP-OLS nighttime satellite data. Remote Sens. Environ., 2006, 103, 165–178.
- Harikrishna, P. and Reddy, C. S., Assessment of increasing threat of forest fires in Rajasthan, India using multi-temporal remote sensing data (2005–2010). Curr. Sci., 2012, 102(9), 1288–1297.
- Giriraj, A., Shilpa, B., Jentsch, A., Sudhakar, S. and Murthy, M. S. R., Tracking fires in India using advanced along track scanning radiometer (A) ATSR data. Remote Sensing, 2010, 2, 591–610.
- Badarinath, K. V. S., Sharma, A. R. and Kharol, S. K., Forest fire monitoring and burnt area mapping using satellite data: a study over the forest region of Kerala State, India. Int. J. Remote Sens., 2011, 32, 85–102.
- Reddy, C. S., Harikrishna, P., Anitha, K. and Joseph, S., Mapping and inventory of forest fires in Andhra Pradesh, India: current status and conservation needs. ISRN Forestry, 2012; doi:10.5402/2012/380412
- Sharma, R. K., Sharma, N., Shrestha, D. G., Luitel, K. K., Arrawatia, M. L. and Pradhan, S., Study of forest fires in Sikkim Himalayas, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Climate Change in Sikkim – Patterns, Impacts and Initiatives, 2012, 233–244.
- Reddy, C. S., Khuroo, A. A., Hari Krishna, P., Saranya, K. R. L., Jha, C. S. and Dadhwal, V. K., Threat evaluation for biodiversity conservation of forest ecosystems using geospatial techniques: a case study of Odisha, India. Ecol. Eng., 2014, 69, 287–303.
- Reddy, C. S., Navatha, K., Rachel, B., Murthy, M. S. R. and Manikya Reddy, P., Forest fire monitoring in Sirohi district, Rajasthan using remote sensing data. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(9), 1287–1290.
- Kodandapani, N., Cochrane, M. A. and Sukumar, R., Conservation threat of increasing fire frequencies in the Western Ghats, India. Conser. Biol., 2004, 18, 1553–1561.
- Somashekar, R. K., Ravikumar, P., Kumar, C. M., Prakash, K. L. and Nagaraja, B. C., Burnt area mapping of Bandipur National Park, India using IRS 1C/1D LISS III data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 2009, 37(1), 37–50.
- Kodandapani, N., Contrasting fire regimes in a seasonally dry tropical forest and a savanna ecosystem in the Western Ghats, India. Fire Ecol., 2013; doi:10.4996/fireecology.0902102
- Sowmya, S. V. and Somashekar, R. K., Application of remote sensing and geographical information system in mapping forest fire risk zone at Bhadra wildlife sanctuary, India. J. Environ. Biol., 2010, 31(6), 969–974.
- Sudeesh, S. and Reddy, C. S., Forest fire monitoring in NagarjunasagarSrisailam Tiger Reserve, Andhra Pradesh, India using geospatial techniques. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett., 2013, 36(4), 437–446.
- Saranya, K. R. L., Reddy, C. S., Prasada Rao, P. V. V. and Jha, C. S., Decadal time scale monitoring of Forest Fires in Similipal Biosphere Reserve, India using Remote sensing and GIS. Environ. Monit. Assess., 2014, 186, 3283–3296.
- FSI, State of Forest Report, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, 2009.
- Anon., 2011; http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/CensusData Summary.html
- Rodgers, W. A. and Panwar, H. S., Planning a Wildlife Protected Area Network in India. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, 1988.
- MoEF, 2011; http://www.icfre.gov.in/UserFiles/File/Institute-ICFRE/2013/Stat/section (accessed on 12 January 2015).
- http://glcf.umiacs.umd.edu/
- Chavez, P. S., Image-based atmospheric corrections – revisited and improved. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 1996, 62, 1025–1036.
- NRSC. Natural Resources Census: National land use and land cover mapping using multi-temporal AWiFS data. Technical report. National Remote Sensing Centre, Hyderabad, India, 2013.
- Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Diwakar, P. G. and Dadhwal, V. K., Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS Environ. Monitor. Assess., 2015; doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4990-8.
- Farr, T. G. et al., The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys., 2007, 45, RG2004.
- https://earthdata.nasa.gov/data/near-real-time-data/firms/active-firedata
- Dawson, T. P., Butt, N. and Miller, F., The ecology of forest fires. ASEAN Biodiversity, 2002, 1, 18–21.
- IMD, 2014; http://www.imd.gov.in/doc/report2014.pdf (accessed on 2 April 2015).
- IMD, 2009; http://www.imd.gov.in/doc/warm2009 (accessed on 8 February 2013).
- FSI, State of Forest Report. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, 2013.
- Manhas, R. K., Negi, J. D. S., Kumar, R. and Chauhan, P. S., Temporal assessment of growing stock, biomass and carbon stock of Indian forests. Climatic Change, 2006, 74, 191–221.
- MoEF, National Biodiversity Action Plan, New Delhi, India, Ministry of Environment and Forests. Government of India, 2009.
- Srivastava, S. K., Saran, S., Rolf A. de By and Dadhwal, V. K., A geo-information system approach for forest fire likelihood based on causative and anti-causative factors. Int. J. Geographical Inf. Sci., 2014, 28(3), 427–454.
- Chuvieco, E. et al., Development of a framework for fire risk assessment using remote sensing and geographic information system technologies. Ecol. Modelling, 2010, 221, 46–58.
- Martínez, J., Vega-Garcia, C. and Chuvieco, E., Human-caused wildfire risk rating for prevention planning in Spain. J. Environ. Manage., 2009, 90, 1241–1252.
- Prasad, V. K., Badarinath, K. V. S. and Eaturu, A., Biophysical and anthropogenic controls of forest fires in the Deccan Plateau, India. J. Environ. Manage., 2007, 86(1), 1–13.
- Vadrevu, K. P., Eaturu, A. and Badarinath, K. V. S., Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis – a case study. Environ. Modeling Assess., 2009. 166(1–4), 223–239.
- Micro Hotspots of New Species Discoveries in India: Flora and Fauna
Abstract Views :368 |
PDF Views:114
Authors
Affiliations
1 Forest Biodiversity and Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
1 Forest Biodiversity and Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Balanagar, Hyderabad 500 037, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 119, No 9 (2020), Pagination: 1408-1410Abstract
No Abstract.- Deciphering Tropical Tree Communities Using Earth Observation Data and Machine Learning
Abstract Views :252 |
PDF Views:131
Authors
Rahul Bodh
1,
Hitendra Padalia
1,
Divesh Pangtey
1,
Ishwari Datt Rai
1,
Subrata Nandy
1,
C. Sudhakar Reddy
2
Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (ISRO), Dehradun 248 001, IN
2 National Remote Sensing Centre (ISRO), Hyderabad 500 037, IN
1 Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (ISRO), Dehradun 248 001, IN
2 National Remote Sensing Centre (ISRO), Hyderabad 500 037, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 6 (2023), Pagination: 704-712Abstract
Publicly available EO datasets offer new possibilities to generate biodiversity information at the community composition level, an essential biodiversity variable, beyond forest type. We demonstrated the potential of Sentinel-2, GEDI LiDAR canopy height and ALOSDEM in discriminating and classifying tropical tree communities in the Western Himalayas, India. For this, tree communities were first identified based on the ordination of field data and subsequently classified using satellite data applying machine learning, i.e. random forest (RF). From the three forest types in the study area, eight distinct tree communities were identified for which classification accuracy increased from single date (75.17%) to multi-date images (85.33%) and further by applying feature selection (88.17%). Whereas the best classification accuracy of 94.66% was achieved when canopy height and topographic variables were also considered. The findings suggest that RF is suitable for mapping tree communities by combining Sentinel-2 with GEDI and DEM parameters.Keywords
Biodiversity, Canopy Height, Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, Tropical Forest.References
- Giam, X., Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2017, 114, 5775–5777.
- Barlow, J. et al., Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature, 2016, 535, 144–147.
- Imai, N. et al., Tree community composition as an indicator in biodiversity monitoring of REDD+. For. Ecol. Manage., 2014, 313, 169–179.
- Ferrier, S., Mapping spatial pattern in biodiversity for regional conservation planning: where to from here? Syst. Biol., 2002, 51, 331–363.
- Pettorelli, N. et al., Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions. Remote Sensing Ecol. Conserv., 2016, 2, 122–131.
- Vihervaara, P. et al., How essential biodiversity variables and remote sensing can help national biodiversity monitoring. Global Ecol. Conserv., 2017, 10, 43–59.
- Erinjery, J. J., Singh, M. and Kent, R., Mapping and assessment of vegetation types in the tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats using multispectral Sentinel-2 and SAR Sentinel-1 satellite imagery. Remote Sensing Environ., 2018, 216, 345–354.
- Macintyre, P., van Niekerk, A. and Mucina, L., Efficacy of multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery for compositional vegetation classification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2020, 85, 101980.
- Breidenbach, J. et al., National mapping and estimation of forest area by dominant tree species using Sentinel-2 data. Can. J. For. Res., 2021, 51, 365–379.
- Young, B., Yarie, J., Verbyla, D., Huettmann, F. and Herrick, K. C. F., Modeling and mapping forest diversity in the boreal forest of interior Alaska. Landsc. Ecol., 2017, 32, 397–413.
- Nordkvist, K., Granholm, A. H., Holmgren, J., Olsson, H. and Nilsson, M., Combining optical satellite data and airborne laser scanner data for vegetation classification. Remote Sensing Lett., 2012, 3, 393–401.
- Rees, H., Nyström, M., Nordkvist, K. and Olsson, H., Combining airborne laser scanning data and optical satellite data for classification of alpine vegetation. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2014, 27, 81–90.
- Abdollahnejad, A., Panagiotidis, D., Joybari, S. S. and Surovỳ, P., Prediction of dominant forest tree species using QuickBird and environmental data. Forests, 2017, 8, 42.
- Hościło, A. and Lewandowska, A., Mapping forest type and tree species on a regional scale using multi-temporal Sentinel-2 data. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11, 929.
- Dorigo, W., Lucieer, A., Podobnikar, T. and Čarni, A., Mapping invasive Fallopia japonica by combined spectral, spatial, and temporal analysis of digital orthophotos. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2012, 19, 185–195.
- Khatami, R., Mountrakis, G. and Stehman, S. V., A meta-analysis of remote sensing research on supervised pixel-based land-cover image classification processes: general guidelines for practitioners and future research. Remote Sensing Environ., 2016, 177, 89–100.
- Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. and Mcmahon, T. A., Hydrology and earth system sciences updated world map of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 2007, 11, 1633–1644.
- Champion, H. G. and Seth, S. K., A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India, Manager of Publication, 1968.
- Chacko, V. J., A Manual on Sampling Techniques for Forest Surveys, Manager of Publications, Government of India, New Delhi, 1965.
- http://www.rainfor.org/ (accessed on 2 April 2019).
- Hill, M. O., A FORTRAN Program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Twinspan, 1979.
- https://scihub.copernicus.eu/ (accessed on 16 December 2019).
- Breiman, L., Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat. Sci., 2001, 16, 199–215.
- Rapinel, S., Rossignol, N., Hubert-Moy, L., Bouzillé, J. B. and Bonis, A., Mapping grassland plant communities using a fuzzy approach to address floristic and spectral uncertainty. Appl. Veg. Sci., 2018, 21, 678–693.
- Ramoelo, A., Cho, M., Mathieu, R. and Skidmore, A., Potential of Sentinel-2 spectral configuration to assess rangeland quality. J. Appl. Remote Sensing, 2015, 9, 094096.
- Immitzer, M., Vuolo, F. and Atzberger, C., First experience with Sentinel-2 data for crop and tree species classifications in central Europe. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8, 166.
- Clerici, N., Valbuena Calderón, C. A. and Posada, J. M., Fusion of Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-2A data for land cover mapping: a case study in the lower Magdalena region, Colombia. J. Maps, 2017, 13, 718–726.
- Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Miller, J. R., Noland, T. L., Mohammed, G. H. and Sampson, P. H., Scaling-up and model inversion methods with narrowband optical indices for chlorophyll content estimation in closed forest canopies with hyperspectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 2001, 39, 1491–1507.
- Dorren, L. K. A., Maier, B. and Seijmonsbergen, A. C., Improved landsat-based forest mapping in steep mountainous terrain using object-based classification. For. Ecol. Manage., 2003, 183, 31–46.
- Rouse, J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A. and Deering, D. W., Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS, NASA Special Publication, USA, 1974, vol. 351(1), p. 309.
- Jiang, Z., Huete, A. R., Didan, K. and Miura, T., Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sensing Environ., 2008, 112, 3833–3845.
- Gitelson, A. and Merzlyak, M. N., Spectral reflectance changes associated with autumn senescence of Aesculus hippocastanum L. and Acer platanoides L. leaves. Spectral features and relation to chlorophyll estimation. J. Plant Physiol., 1994, 143, 286–292.
- Gitelson, A. A., Gritz, Y. and Merzlyak, M. N., Relationships between leaf chlorophyll content and spectral reflectance and algorithms for non-destructive chlorophyll assessment in higher plant leaves. J. Plant Physiol., 2003, 160, 271–282.
- Tucker, C. J., Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing Environ., 1979, 8, 127–150.