Refine your search
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kannan, C.
- Systemic Induction of Defense Enzymes by Rhizosphere Microbes in Cocoa Seedlings
Abstract Views :262 |
PDF Views:142
Authors
C. Kannan
1,
M. Karthik
1
Affiliations
1 Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Vittal 574243, Karnataka, IN
1 Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Vittal 574243, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 23, No 4 (2009), Pagination: 427-431Abstract
Certain rhizosphere organisms called plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are capable of inducing systemic defense in plants by enhancing the activity of defense enzymes produced in the plant system. In an experiment conducted in pot cultured seedlings of cocoa, three biocontrol agents, viz., Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma viride, were able to promote the activity of the defense enzymes (called PR proteins), viz., peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, phenyl alanine ammonia lyase, catalase and chitinase in the plants when applied in the soil. The results showed that the biocontrol agents varied in their ability to activate different enzymes and sustain their persistence in the seedlings, P. fluorescens being the best in inducing the defense enzymes.Keywords
Induced Resistance, PGPR, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma viride, Rhizosphere, Biocontrol.References
- Boller, T. and Mauch, F. 1988. Colorimetric assayfor chitinase. Methods in Enzymology,161: 430–435.
- Borneman, J. and Becker, J. O. 2007. Identifyingmicroorganisms involved in specific pathogensuppression in soil. Annual Review ofPhytopathology, 45:153–172.
- Bostock, R. M. 1999. Signal conflicts and synergies ininduced resistance to multiple attackers. Physiologyand Molecular Plant Pathology, 55: 99–109.
- Chen, C., Belanger, R., Benhamou, N. and Paultiz,T. C. 2000. Defense enzymes induced incucumber ischolar_mains by treatment with plant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythiumaphanidermatum. Physiology and MolecularPlant Pathology, 56: 13–23.
- DCCD, 2009. http://www.dacnet.nic.in/cashewcocoa/stat2.htm#Area.
- Dickerson, D. P., Pascholati, S. F., Hagerman, A. E., Butler,L. G. and Nicholson, R. L. 1984. Phenylalanineammonia-lyase and hydroxy cinnamate: CoAligase in maize mesocotyls inoculated withHelminthosporium maydis or Helminthosporiumcarbonum. Physiological Plant Pathology,25: 111–123.
- Diffco Manual. 1953. Diffco laboratories, Inc., Detroit,Michigan. Dingra, O. D. and Sinclair, B. J. 1995. Biological control,pp. 287–305. In: Basic plant pathology methods. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, 452 p.
- Elad, Y., Chet, I. and Henis, Y. 1981. A selective mediumfor .improving quantitative isolation ofTrichoderma spp. from soil. Phytoparasitica, 9: 59–67.
- Hammerschmidt, R., Nuckles, E. M. and Kuc, J. 1982. Association of enhanced peroxidase activitywith induced systemic resistance of cucumber toColletotrichum lagenarium. Physiological PlantPathology, 20: 73–82.
- Kannan, C., Karthik, M. and Priya, K. 2009. Lasiodiplodiatheobromae causes a damaging dieback of cocoain India. Plant Pathology (In press).
- Karthikeyan, M., Radika, K., Mathiyazhagan, S.,Bhaskaran, R., Samiyappan, R. and Velazhahan,R. 2006. Induction of phenolics and defenserelated enzymes in coconut (Cocos nucifera L.)ischolar_mains treated with biocontrol agents. BrazilianJournal of Plant Pathology, 18: 367–377.
- Kerry, B. R. 2000. Rhizosphere interactions and theexploitation of microbial agents for the biologicalcontrol of plant pathogenic fungi. Annual Reviewof Phytopathology, 38: 423–441.
- Krause, M. S., De Ceuster, T. J. J., Tiquia, S. M., Michel, F. C., Jr., Madden, L. V., and Hoitink, H. A. J. 2003. Isolation and characterization of rhizobacteriafrom composts that suppress the severity ofbacterial leaf spot of radish. Phytopathology,93: 1292–1300.
- Krieg, N. R. and Holt, J. G. 1984. Bergey’s Manual ofSystematic Bacteriology, Vol. I. 9th ed., TheWilliams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore.
- Meyer, U. M., Spotts, R. A. and Dewey, F. M. 2000. Detection and quantification of Botrytis cineraby ELISA in pear stems in cold storage. PlantDisease, 84: 1099–1103.
- Rifai, M. A. 1969. A revision of the genus Trichoderma. Mycological Papers 116. CommonwealthMycological Institute, Association of AppliedBiologists, Kew, Surrey, England.
- Roiger, D. J. and Jeffers, S. N. 1991. Evaluation ofTrichoderma spp. for biological control ofPhytophthora crown and ischolar_main rot of apple seedlings. Phytopathology, 81: 910–917.
- Utkhede, R. S. 1984. Antagonism of isolates of Bacillussubtilis to Phytophthora cactorum. CanadianJournal of Botany, 62: 1032–1035.
- Van Loon, L. C. 1997. Induced resistance in plants and therole of pathogenesis–related proteins. EuropeanJournal of Plant Pathology, 103: 753–765.
- Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., and Pietrse, C. M. J. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizospherebacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology,36: 453–483.
- Viswanathan, R. and Samiyappan, R. 2001. Antifungalactivity of chitinases produced by some fluorescentpseudomonads against Colletotrichum falcatumWent causing red rot disease in sugarcane. Microbiological Research, 155: 309–314.
- A Report on the Natural Incidence of Puccinia noccae on the Exotic Weed Lagascea mollis in India
Abstract Views :294 |
PDF Views:117
Authors
Affiliations
1 Directorate of Weed Science Research, Jabalpur 482 001, Madhya Pradesh, IN
1 Directorate of Weed Science Research, Jabalpur 482 001, Madhya Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 26, No 3 (2012), Pagination: 285–287Abstract
Lagascea mollis (=Nocca mollis (Cav.) Jacq. commonly known as Velvet weed or Silk leaf weed) is native of Tropical Central America and is an invasive annual herb belonging to the family Asteraceae. It is found to occur in most parts of the country, grows on cultivated land and in pastures along field bunds, roadsides and channels. It grows throughout the year but appears severe in the late Kharif (monsoon) and early Rabi (winter) seasons (July to November) natural infection by the rust pathogen, identified as Puccinia noccae was found to occur on the weed in and around the fields of Jabalpur district. The pathogen survives as dormant teliospores and on favorable climatic conditions produces the uredospores, which are the pathogenic stage of its life cycle. The disease appears as scattered dull brown individual spots on the underside of the leaves, which later develops into rusty brown raised spots containing the urediniospores. The pathogen affects the green leaves and the bracts. General observations and host range studies indicated that P. noccae is highly specific on L. mollis and hence may be used as a biocontrol agent against L. mollis.Keywords
Lagascea mollis, Puccinia noccae, Silk Leaf Weed, Velvet Weed, Weed Biocontrol.References
- Ahrekar SC, Nimbalkar SA, Tikkar SN. 1999. Lagascamollis – an alternate host for Helicoverpa armigera(Hub.). Insect Environ. 4(1): 120–121.
- Arthur JC. 1905. Terminology of the spore structures inthe Uredinales. Bot Gaz. 39: 219–222.
- Bushnell WR, Bosacker PL. 1982. Nuclear volume andnumber in long-term in vitro cultures of Pucciniagraminis. Can J Bot. 60(9): 1827–1836.
- Chandrabhanu. 2009. Puccinia jabalpurensis sp. Nov. onexotic weed Lagascea mollis from India. IndianPhytopath. 62(3): 365–368.
- Charudattan R, Dinoor A. 2000. Biological control ofweeds using plant pathogens: accomplishments andlimitations. Crop Prot. 19(3): 691–695.
- Joe FH, Hector M, Leon-Gallegos, Cummins GB. 1972. The rust fungi (Uredinales) on Compositae in Mexico. Southwestern Nat. 16(2): 357–386.
- Khuspe VS, Subbaiah R, Mande JV. 1982. A compendiumof Indian weed science research (1950-1981) Vol.-I(Weed control in crops). Metropolitan Books Co. (P.)Ltd., New Delhi. pp. 871.
- Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JV, Stalpers JA. 2001. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, ninthedition, pp. 569, 610, 624. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
- Krishna KR. 2010. Agroecosystems of South India: Nutrientdynamics, ecology and productivity. Brown WalkerPress, Florida, USA. pp. 296.
- Kuhl JL, Maclean DJ, Scott KJ, Williams PG. 1971. Theaxenic culture of Puccinia species from uredospores:experiments on nutrition and variation. Can J Bot. 49(2): 201–209.
- Parmelle JA. 1967. The autoecious species of Puccinia onHeliantheae in North America. Can J Bot. 45(12):2267–2327.
- Pulliah T, Ramakrishnaiah V, Sandhya RS, Rao PN. 2000. Flora of Guntur district, Andra Pradesh. RegencyPublications, New Delhi, India.
- Design and Architecture for Moonlight Web Applications Test Automation
Abstract Views :203 |
PDF Views:4
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of CSE, Dr. Pauls Engineering College, Anna University of Technology-Chennai, Villupuram, Tamilnadu, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry, IN
1 Dept. of CSE, Dr. Pauls Engineering College, Anna University of Technology-Chennai, Villupuram, Tamilnadu, IN
2 Department of Computer Science, Pondicherry University, Pondicherry, IN
Source
Automation and Autonomous Systems, Vol 2, No 9 (2010), Pagination: 81-88Abstract
The main objectives of Test Automation are minimizing cost, time and man power. Initially web pages are developed by HTML pages. But now web applications are developed by new technologies like Moonlight, Silverlight, JAVAFX, FLEX, etc. Accessing and automating of Silverlight and moonlight controls are not so easy because of their security and technology. The manually testing of complex software becomes more difficult and challenging task. Moonlight is a new Micro Soft .NET technology to develop rich interactive and attractive Internet web applications with the collaboration of Novel Corporation with Linux support. Testing these kinds of applications are not so easy, especially the User interface test automation is very difficult for these kinds of web applications. In this paper we propose a framework for moonlight web applications test automation. It has the capability to decrease the overall cost of testing and improve software quality, but most testing organizations have not been able to achieve the full potential of test automation. Sometimes test automation programs run into a number of common pitfalls because of its design and architecture failure. In this paper we first discussed some of the key benefits of software test automation, and then examine the most common techniques used to implement software test automation of Moonlight web applications Test Automation and their potentials. Finally, The Architecture design and implementation of Test Automation for Moonlight web applications.Keywords
Graphical User Interface Test Automation, Moonlight Web Applications Automation.- Pedalium murex Linn Leaves against LPS-Induced Oxidative Stress, Anxiety and Depression Behavioural Alterations in Rats
Abstract Views :247 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JKK Nattraja College of Pharmacy, Komarapalayam, Namakkal (Dist), Tamil Nadu - 638183, IN
2 Department of Pharmacology, JKK Nattraja College of Pharmacy, Komarapalayam, Namakkal (Dist), Tamil Nadu - 638183, IN
3 Department of Pharmaceutics, JKK Nattraja College of Pharmacy, Komarapalayam, Namakkal (Dist), Tamil Nadu - 638183, IN
1 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, JKK Nattraja College of Pharmacy, Komarapalayam, Namakkal (Dist), Tamil Nadu - 638183, IN
2 Department of Pharmacology, JKK Nattraja College of Pharmacy, Komarapalayam, Namakkal (Dist), Tamil Nadu - 638183, IN
3 Department of Pharmaceutics, JKK Nattraja College of Pharmacy, Komarapalayam, Namakkal (Dist), Tamil Nadu - 638183, IN