Refine your search
Co-Authors
- R. Vadivel
- J. Ramkumar
- Subimal Ghosh
- Subhankar Karmakar
- Anamitra Saha
- Mohit Prakash Mohanty
- Shees Ali
- Satya Kiran Raju
- Vrinda Krishnakumar
- Maneesha Sebastian
- Manasa Ranjan Behera
- R. Ashrit
- P. L. N. Murty
- K. Srinivas
- Tune Usha
- M. V. Ramana Murthy
- P. Thiruvengadam
- J. Indu
- D. Thirumalaivasan
- John P. George
- S. Gedam
- A. B. Inamdar
- B. S. Murty
- P. P. Mujumdar
- M. Mohapatra
- Arun Bhardwaj
- Swati Basu
- Shailesh Nayak
- B. Karthikeyan
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Narasimhan, B.
- Reliable Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (RDSRP) for Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks
Abstract Views :293 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
B. Narasimhan
1,
R. Vadivel
2
Affiliations
1 Department of Computer Technology, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, IN
2 Department of Information Technology, Bharathiar University, IN
1 Department of Computer Technology, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, IN
2 Department of Information Technology, Bharathiar University, IN
Source
ICTACT Journal on Communication Technology, Vol 6, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 1053-1056Abstract
Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) carry noteworthy pros over traditional communication. Though, unkind and composite environments fake great challenges in the reliability of WSN communications. It is more vital to develop a reliable unipath dynamic source routing protocol (RDSRP)l for WSN to provide better quality of service (QoS) in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks (EH-WSN). This paper proposes a dynamic source routing approach for attaining the most reliable route in EH-WSNs. Performance evaluation is carried out using NS-2 and throughput and packet delivery ratio are chosen as the metrics.Keywords
Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks (EH-WSN), Routing, Reliability.- Constrained Cuckoo Search Optimization Based Protocol for Routing in Cloud Network
Abstract Views :323 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 PG and Research Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Information Technology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Technology, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 PG and Research Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Information Technology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Computer Technology, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications, Vol 8, No 6 (2021), Pagination: 795-803Abstract
Cloud Computing (CC) is the process of providing on-demand data to the user via the internet. In CC, users don't need to manage data storage and computational power actively. Finding the best route in a cloud network is entirely different from other general networks which it is due to high scalability. Protocols developed for other general networks will never suit or give better performance in cloud networks due to its scalability. This paper proposes a bio-inspired protocol for routing in a cloud network, namely Constrained Cuckoo Search Optimization-based Protocol (CCSOP). The routing strategy of CCSOP is inspired by the natural characteristics of the cuckoo bird towards finding a nest to lay its eggs. Levy Flight concept is applied with different constraints to enhance optimization performance towards finding the best route in a cloud network that minimizes energy consumption. CCSOP is evaluated in Greencloud using benchmark network performance metrics against the current routing protocols. The efficacy of CCSOP is evaluated using benchmark performance measures. CCSOP appears to outperform current cloud network routing protocols in terms of energy consumption.Keywords
Cuckoo, Cloud, Energy, Flight, Levy, Optimization, Routing, Scalability.References
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “CSIP—cuckoo search inspired protocol for routing in cognitive radio ad hoc networks,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2017, vol. 556, pp. 145–153, doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-3874-7_14.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Meticulous elephant herding optimization based protocol for detecting intrusions in cognitive radio ad hoc networks,” Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Res., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 4549–4554, 2020, doi: 10.30534/ijeter/2020/82882020.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Bee inspired secured protocol for routing in cognitive radio ad hoc networks,” INDIAN J. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 30, pp. 3059–3069, 2020, doi: 10.17485/IJST/v13i30.1152.
- M. Faheem, R. A. Butt, R. Ali, B. Raza, M. A. Ngadi, and V. C. Gungor, “CBI4.0: A Cross-layer Approach for Big Data Gathering for Active Monitoring and Maintenance in the Manufacturing Industry 4.0,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., p. 100236, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100236.
- C. Y. Huang and Y. J. Chang, “An adaptively multi-attribute index framework for big IoT data,” Comput. Geosci., p. 104841, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104841.
- J. Qu, “Research on mobile learning in a teaching information service system based on a big data driven environment,” Educ. Inf. Technol., pp. 1–19, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10614-z.
- R. Vadivel and J. Ramkumar, “QoS-Enabled Improved Cuckoo Search-Inspired Protocol (ICSIP) for IoT-Based Healthcare Applications,” pp. 109–121, 2019, doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1090-2.ch006.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Multi-Adaptive Routing Protocol for Internet of Things based Ad-hoc Networks,” Wirel. Pers. Commun., pp. 1–23, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08495-z.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Improved Wolf prey inspired protocol for routing in cognitive radio Ad Hoc networks,” Int. J. Comput. Networks Appl., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 126–136, 2020, doi: 10.22247/ijcna/2020/202977.
- J. Ramkumar and R. Vadivel, “Performance modeling of bio-inspired routing protocols in Cognitive Radio Ad Hoc Network to reduce end-to-end delay,” Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 221–231, 2019, doi: 10.22266/IJIES2019.0228.22.
- R. R. Hoy, “Quantitative skills in undergraduate neuroscience education in the age of big data,” Neurosci. Lett., p. 136074, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136074.
- P. L. Martínez, R. Dintén, J. M. Drake, and M. Zorrilla, “A big data-centric architecture metamodel for Industry 4.0,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.06.020.
- M. Rhahla, S. Allegue, and T. Abdellatif, “Guidelines for GDPR compliance in Big Data systems,” J. Inf. Secur. Appl., vol. 61, p. 102896, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2021.102896.
- A. Sevtsuk, R. Basu, X. Li, and R. Kalvo, “A big data approach to understanding pedestrian route choice preferences: Evidence from San Francisco,” Travel Behav. Soc., vol. 25, pp. 41–51, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.010.
- V. Keskar, J. Yadav, and A. Kumar, “Perspective of anomaly detection in big data for data quality improvement,” Mater. Today Proc., 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.597.
- T. G. Kim and S. Yu, “Big Data Analysis of the Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Korean Populations Taking Low-Dose Aspirin,” J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis., vol. 30, no. 8, p. 105917, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105917.
- D. Balazka, D. Houtman, and B. Lepri, “How can big data shape the field of non-religion studies? And why does it matter?,” Patterns, vol. 2, no. 6, p. 100263, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100263.
- Y. Su and X. Wang, “Innovation of Agricultural Economic Management in the Process of Constructing Smart Agriculture by Big Data,” Sustain. Comput. Informatics Syst., p. 100579, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2021.100579.
- C. Wen, J. Yang, L. Gan, and Y. Pan, “Big data driven Internet of Things for credit evaluation and early warning in finance,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 124, pp. 295–307, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.06.003.
- M. Nilashi et al., “Big social data and customer decision making in vegetarian restaurants: A combined machine learning method,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 62, p. 102630, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102630.
- N. B. Long, H. Tran-Dang, and D. Kim, “Energy-Aware Real-Time Routing for Large-Scale Industrial Internet of Things,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 2190–2199, 2018, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2827050.
- Y. Xu, Z. Yue, and L. Lv, “Clustering Routing Algorithm and Simulation of Internet of Things Perception Layer Based on Energy Balance,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 145667–145676, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944669.
- H. A. Omar, W. Zhuang, and L. Li, “Gateway Placement and Packet Routing for Multihop In-Vehicle Internet Access,” IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 335–351, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TETC.2015.2395077.
- Z. Ding, L. Shen, H. Chen, F. Yan, and N. Ansari, “Energy-Efficient Relay-Selection-Based Dynamic Routing Algorithm for IoT-Oriented Software-Defined WSNs,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 9050–9065, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.3002233.
- J. V. V Sobral, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, R. A. L. Rabêlo, K. Saleem, and S. A. Kozlov, “Improving the Performance of LOADng Routing Protocol in Mobile IoT Scenarios,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 107032– 107046, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932718.
- T. Mick, R. Tourani, and S. Misra, “LASeR: Lightweight Authentication and Secured Routing for NDN IoT in Smart Cities,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 755–764, 2018, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2725238.
- Q. Zhang, M. Jiang, Z. Feng, W. Li, W. Zhang, and M. Pan, “IoT Enabled UAV: Network Architecture and Routing Algorithm,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3727–3742, 2019, doi:10.1109/JIOT.2018.2890428.
- Z. Zhou, B. Yao, R. Xing, L. Shu, and S. Bu, “E-CARP: An Energy Efficient Routing Protocol for UWSNs in the Internet of Underwater Things,” IEEE Sens. J., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4072–4082, 2016, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2015.2437904.
- C. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Li, and C. Jiang, “SDCoR: Software Defined Cognitive Routing for Internet of Vehicles,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 3513–3520, 2018, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2812210.
- K. Z. Ghafoor, L. Kong, D. B. Rawat, E. Hosseini, and A. S. Sadiq, “Quality of Service Aware Routing Protocol in Software-Defined Internet of Vehicles,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2817–2828, 2019, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2875482.
- W. Itani, C. Ghali, R. Bassil, A. Kayssi, and A. Chehab, “ServBGP: BGP-inspired autonomic service routing for multi-provider collaborative architectures in the cloud,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 32, pp. 99–117, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.05.013.
- T. Baker, B. Al-Dawsari, H. Tawfik, D. Reid, and Y. Ngoko, “GreeDi: An energy efficient routing algorithm for big data on cloud,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 35, pp. 83–96, Dec. 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.06.008.
- S. Kaja, E. M. Shakshuki, and A. Yasar, “Long Short-Term Memory Approach for Routing Optimization in Cloud ACKnowledgement Scheme for Node Network,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 184, pp. 461–468, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.058.
- X. Peng and Y. Chang, “Energy-efficient routing technique for reliable data transmission under the background of big data for disaster region,” Comput. Intell., vol. 36, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1111/coin.12294.
- L. Zhao, Z. Bi, M. Lin, A. Hawbani, J. Shi, and Y. Guan, “An intelligent fuzzy-based routing scheme for software-defined vehicular networks,” Comput. Networks, vol. 187, p. 107837, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.107837.
- Development of India’s First Integrated Expert Urban Flood Forecasting System for Chennai
Abstract Views :457 |
PDF Views:141
Authors
Subimal Ghosh
1,
Subhankar Karmakar
2,
Anamitra Saha
1,
Mohit Prakash Mohanty
3,
Shees Ali
1,
Satya Kiran Raju
4,
Vrinda Krishnakumar
1,
Maneesha Sebastian
1,
Manasa Ranjan Behera
1,
R. Ashrit
5,
P. L. N. Murty
6,
K. Srinivas
6,
B. Narasimhan
7,
Tune Usha
4,
M. V. Ramana Murthy
4,
P. Thiruvengadam
1,
J. Indu
1,
D. Thirumalaivasan
8,
John P. George
5,
S. Gedam
9,
A. B. Inamdar
9,
B. S. Murty
7,
P. P. Mujumdar
10,
M. Mohapatra
11,
Arun Bhardwaj
12,
Swati Basu
12,
Shailesh Nayak
13
Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
2 Interdisciplinary Program in Climate Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
3 Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
4 National Centre for Coastal Research, NIOT Campus, Velacherry–Tambaram Main Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100, IN
5 National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, A-50, Sector-62, Noida 201 309, IN
6 Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services, Pragathi Nagar (BO), Nizampet (SO), Hyderabad 500 090, IN
7 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, IN
8 Institute of Remote Sensing, Anna University, Chennai 600 040, IN
9 Centre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
10 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
11 India Meteorological Department, New Delhi 110 003, IN
12 Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, Vigyan Bhavan Annexe, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi 110 011, IN
13 National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
2 Interdisciplinary Program in Climate Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
3 Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
4 National Centre for Coastal Research, NIOT Campus, Velacherry–Tambaram Main Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100, IN
5 National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India, A-50, Sector-62, Noida 201 309, IN
6 Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services, Pragathi Nagar (BO), Nizampet (SO), Hyderabad 500 090, IN
7 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, IN
8 Institute of Remote Sensing, Anna University, Chennai 600 040, IN
9 Centre of Studies in Resources Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400 076, IN
10 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
11 India Meteorological Department, New Delhi 110 003, IN
12 Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser to the Government of India, Vigyan Bhavan Annexe, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi 110 011, IN
13 National Institute of Advanced Studies, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bengaluru 560 012, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 117, No 5 (2019), Pagination: 741-745Abstract
Floods are the most common and recurring natural hazards faced by humans since time immemorial. They pose a severe threat to the population, environment and economy in many places across the world, especially urban areas. Urbanization caused due to increasing migration into the floodplains has substantially increased the trend of devastation due to floods in a developing country like India. In Chennai and the surrounding suburban areas, torrential rainfall associated with low-pressure systems engulfed the city during December 2015, affecting more than 4 million people along with economic damages that cost around 3 billion USD.References
- Sarkar, A., Paromita Chakraborty, John P. George and Rajagopal, E. N., Report, NMRF/TR/02/2016, 2016; https://www.ncmrwf.gov.in/Reports-eng/NMRF_TR2_ 2016.pdf
- Shastri, H., Ghosh, S. and Karmakar, S., J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 2017, 122(3), 1617–1634.
- Thiruvengadam, P., Indu, J. and Ghosh, S., Adv. Water Resour., 2019, 126, 24–39.
- Luettich Jr, R. A. and Westerink, J. J., Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 1991, 12(10), 911–928; https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1650121002.
- Mohanty, M. P., Sherly, M. A., Karmakar, S. and Ghosh, S., Water Resour. Manage., 2018, 32(14), 4725–4746.
- Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization based Load Balancing with Geographic Routing using Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (EPSOGPSR) for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs)
Abstract Views :149 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor (SG), Department of Computer Science, Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology, Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, IN
1 Assistant Professor (SG), Department of Computer Science, Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology, Nehru Arts and Science College, Coimbatore, IN
Source
International Journal of Advanced Networking and Applications, Vol 15, No 4 (2023), Pagination: 6028 - 6033Abstract
EPSO-GPSR (Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization-based Load Balancing with Geographic Routing using Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing), a unique strategy designed specifically for WSNs, is presented in this work. Using Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization (EPSO) to provide load balancing across sensor nodes, the proposed EPSO-GPSR technique reduces energy disparities and increases the operational lifetime of the network. Additionally, it interfaces with the geographic routing protocol Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) to enable effective data forwarding based on geographic locations, minimizing communication overhead and improving scalability. EPSO-GPSR's efficacy is shown against traditional load balancing and routing methods via comprehensive simulations and performance assessments. The network lifetime, energy efficiency, throughput, packet delivery ratio, and delay have all significantly showed better performance, according to the results. Additionally, the EPSO-GPSR algorithm demonstrates robustness against node failures and issues related to scalability, indicating a significant potential for real-world implementation in various WSN scenarios.Keywords
Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks, load balancing, network lifetime, throughput, delay, packet delivery ratio, routing, greedy perimeter, stateless routing.References
- Qian, L., Wu, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Greedy perimeter stateless routing (GPSR) based on energy balance for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Networking, SENSORS and Applications (ICNSA) (pp. 211-215). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICNSA.2008.4588605
- Xu, Y., Zhang, D., & Hu, L. (2006). Energy-efficient greedy perimeter stateless routing for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2006 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WICNM 2006) (pp. 89-92). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WICNM.2006.4698389
- Lin, C., & Sun, Y. (2009). An improved GPSR routing protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks based on energy balance. In 2009 Second International Conference on Networks and Communication (NeTCom '09) (pp. 174-178). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/NeTCOM.2009.4799641
- Chen, C., & Yu, Z. (2010). A novel energy-efficient GPSR routing protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks based on adaptive multi-level clustering. In 2010 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM '10) (pp. 468-472). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WiCOM.2010.5679330
- Zong, K., Xu, X., Xu, W., & Zhang, H. (2011). An improved GPSR routing protocol based on energy balance and multi-hop for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM '11) (pp. 449-453). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WiCOM.2011.6014133
- Wang, J., & Li, J. (2012). An improved GPSR routing protocol based on energy balance and ant colony optimization for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Engineering (CSIE 2012) (pp. 166-170). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/CSIE.2012.6896350
- Kumar, D., & Lohan, A. (2013). An energy-efficient GPSR routing protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks based on fuzzy logic. In 2013 10th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM 2013) (pp. 641-645). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WiCOM.2013.6755724
- Bera, S., & Sahu, P. K. (2014). An enhanced GPSR routing protocol based on hybrid clustering and multi-path routing for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2014 International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS 2014) (pp. 227-232). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICACCS.2014.6810410
- Al-Jarrah, A. A., & Mourad, H. (2016). A hybrid GPSR-AODV routing protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2016 International Conference on Networked Systems (NETSYS) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/NETSYS.2016.7713382
- Ali, M. Y. M., & Shehab, M. A. (2017). An improved GPSR routing protocol based on energy efficiency and load balancing for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. In 2017 IEEE 6th International Conference on Wireless & Mobile Computing, Networking & Communication (WiMob) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. doi: 10.1109/WiMob