Refine your search
Collections
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ponnudurai, Arangannal
- Comparison of the Characteristics of Dental Stem Cells vs. Umbilical Cord Stemcells
Abstract Views :115 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Pedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
2 Professor and Head of the Department, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
3 Professor, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
4 Senior Lecturer, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
5 Reader, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Pedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
2 Professor and Head of the Department, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
3 Professor, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
4 Senior Lecturer, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
5 Reader, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 10, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 2876-2878Abstract
Mesenchymal Stem cells-have been considered a promising tool for tissue repair and regeneration. Different sources of mesenchymal stem cells may differ in their biological characteristics and clinical applications. This short communication gives an over view about the isolation, characterization, multi lineage and proliferation capacity of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED).The differences may be associated with different levels of cytokines, growth factors, surface markers, fibroblast growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factor expression and receptor activity.Keywords
Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Dental Stem Cells, Umbilical Cord Stem Cells, Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth.- An Update of Pulpotomy Medicaments in Primary Molars and Shift to Nature
Abstract Views :126 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
R. Ishwarya
1,
J. Aarthi
2,
Arangannal Ponnudurai
3,
J. Jeevarathan
4,
S. Amudha
5,
M. Vijayakumar
5
Affiliations
1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Pedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
2 Reader, Department of Pedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
3 Professor and Head of the Department, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
4 Professor, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
5 Reader, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Pedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
2 Reader, Department of Pedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
3 Professor and Head of the Department, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
4 Professor, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
5 Reader, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 10, No 11 (2019), Pagination: 2879-2882Abstract
Over the years several products have been proposed and testified as pulpotomy medicaments for primary teeth. Formocresol has been considered as gold standard for this procedure. Despite its clinical success, the use of formocresol has declined due to its apparent mutagenic and carcinogenic property. Controversies regarding the use of formocresol has urged the researchers to constantly pursuit for a promising alternative. Phytotherapy has been a recent trend. The aim of this paper is to analyse the existing literature on the various pulpotomy medicaments available for primary teeth and the evolution of natural products for the same.Keywords
Pulpotomy Medicaments, Formocresol, Controversies, Phytotheraphy.- Shortcomings of Caries Vaccination
Abstract Views :117 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Paedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
2 Senior Lecturer, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
3 Professor and Head of the Department, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
4 Professor, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
5 Reader, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
1 Post Graduate Student, Department of Paedodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
2 Senior Lecturer, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
3 Professor and Head of the Department, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
4 Professor, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN
5 Reader, Sree Balaji Dental College, BIHER, Pallikarani, Chennai, IN