Refine your search
Co-Authors
- Rajashree Madabushi
- M. C. Ramadevi
- S. Seetha
- Dipankar Bhattacharya
- B. T. Ravishankar
- N. Sitaramamurthy
- G. Meena
- M. Ramakrishna Sharma
- Ravi Kulkarni
- V. Chandra Babu
- Kumar
- Brajpal Singh
- Anand Jain
- Reena Yadav
- S. Vaishali
- B. N. Ashoka
- K. Balaji
- Manoj Kumar
- Prashanth Kulshresta
- Pankaj Agarwal
- Mathew Sebastian
- K. Sankarasubramanian
- Manju Sudhakar
- Anuj Nandi
- Abhijit Avinash Adoni
- Ankur Kushwaha
- Arjun Dey
- Bhuwan Joshi
- V. Girish
- Ishan Tomar
- Kamal Kumar Majhi
- Manjunath Olekar
- Monoj Bug
- Manohar Pala
- Mukund Kumar Thakur
- Rajeev R. Badagandi
- Sarthak Garg
- N. Sridhara
- C. N. Umapathy
- Vinod Kumar Gupta
- Vivek Kumar Agrawal
- B. Yougandar
- V. Radhakrishna
- A. Tyagi
- S. Narendranath
- Koushal Vadodariya
- G. Balaji
- Neeraj Satya
- Akash Shetty
- H. N. Suresha Kumar
- Netra S. Pillai
- S. Tadepalli
- Venkata Raghavendra
- P. Sreekumar
- N. Valarmathi
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Agarwal, Anil
- Elements of Global Environmental Democracy
Abstract Views :212 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Source
Indian Forester, Vol 118, No 5 (1992), Pagination: 317-326Abstract
Environmental problems can be divided into two categories namely those which can be managed by local communities and the second category includes those problems which can be managed at global level. Both types of problems need support of local community, national as well as global. Environmental problems can be solved by new concepts of citizenship, global compactness and community, national and global environmental democracy. Environment can be protected in a better way by providing global right for survival, information, atmosphere and appropriate compensation for community biological knowledge.- Recent Advances in Labour Analgesia
Abstract Views :299 |
PDF Views:150
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IN
1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IN
Source
Central Journal of ISA, Vol 1, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 8-14Abstract
Pain of labour is said to be one of the most intense on the pain scale. Experience of labour varies among women, and even among different pregnancies in the same woman depending on various factors. Offering of analgesia to labouring women has become the standard of care across the globe. Since the earliest days when labour analgesia was initiated, multiple non pharmacological methods have been described. Different forms of exercises performed antenatally also have shown some benefit in labouring women. However pharmacological methods are more efficacious with higher chance of success compared to nonpharmacological methods. Systemic analgesics include administration of opioids and inhaled anaesthetics. Of special mention in recent times is the advantageous use of remifentanil for alleviating pain of labour. Inhaled anaesthetics are being less favoured due to their effects like amnesia. Neuraxial blockade remains to be the gold standard form of labour analgesia. Of the various methods, the most commonly followed forms include epidural analgesia and combined spinal epidural analgesia. Various new technological advances have been made to make administering analgesia via epidural easier, such as computer integrated patient controlled epidural analgesia and programmed intermittent epidural boluses which have been detailed in the review. Other newer technologies such as virtual reality are also described as newer forms of painless labour. Despite multiple options that are available, it must be borne in mind that each labouring woman and every birth is special. Hence, these options need to be tailored to suit every woman's needs during childbirth.Keywords
Labour, Pain Pathways, Analgesia, Epidural.References
- Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975 Sep; 1(3):277–99.
- Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S. Expectant fathers’ experience during labor with or without epidural analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 2007; 16:110–15.
- Hiltunen P, Raudaskoski T, Ebeling H, Moilanen I. Does pain relief during delivery decrease the risk of postnatal depression? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83:257–61.
- Wong CA. Advances in labor analgesia. Int J Womens Health 2010; 1:139–54.
- Carvalho B, Zheng M, Aiono-Le Tagaloa L. A prospective observational study evaluating the ability of prelabor psychological tests to predict labor pain, epidural analgesic consumption, and maternal satisfaction. Anesth Analg 2014; 119(3):632–40.
- Jouppila R, Hollmen A. The effect of segmental epidural analgesia on maternal and foetal acid-base balance, lactate, serum potassium and creatine phosphokinase during labour. Acta Anaesth Scand 1976; 20:259–68.
- Lederman RP, Lederman E, Work B, McCann DS. Anxiety and epinephrine in multiparous labor: relationship to duration of labor and fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 153:870–7.
- Levinson G, Shnider SM, deLorimier AA, Steffenson JL. Effects of maternal hyperventilation on uterine blood flow and fetal oxygenation and acid-base status. Anesthesiology 1974; 40:340–7.
- Shnider SM, Abboud T, Artal R, Henriksen EH, Stefani SJ, Levinson G. Maternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983; 147:13–5.
- Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar; 14(3):CD009234.
- Fogel ST, Shyken JM, Leighton BL, Mormol JS, Smeltzer J. Epidural labor analgesia and the incidence of Cesarean delivery for dystocia. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:119–23.
- Gribble RK, Meier PR. Effect of epidural analgesia on the primary cesarean rate. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:231–4.
- Johnson S, Rosenfield JA. The effect of epidural anesthesia on the length of labor. J Fam Pract 1995; 40:244–7.
- Lyon DS, Knuckles G, Whitaker E, Salgado S. The effect of instituting an elective labor epidural program on the operative delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:135–41.
- Socol ML, Garcia PM, Peaceman AM, Dooley SL. Reducing caesarean births at a primarily private university hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:1748–58.
- Segal S, Su M, Gilbert P. The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:974–8.
- Ohel G, Gonen R, Vaida S, Barak S, Gaitini L. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:600–5.
- Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM et al. The risk of caesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:655–65.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obsteteric Practice. Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 339, June 2006. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:1487.
- Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial Study Group UK. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditional epidural techniques on mode of delivery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 358:19–23
- Babbar S, Parks-Savage A, Chauhan S. Yoga during pregnancy: a review. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(06):459–64.
- Makvandi S, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Sadeghi R, Karimi L. Effect of birth ball on labor pain relief: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41(11):1679–86.
- Cluett ER, Burns E. Immersion in water in labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009. Art. No.: CD000111 .
- Ullman R, Smith LA, Burns E, Mori R, Dowswell T. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (9):CD007396.
- Bricker L, Lavender T. Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5 Suppl Nature):S94–109.
- Anderson D. A review of systemic opioids commonly used for labor pain relief. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011; 56(3):222–39.
- Solek-Pastuszka J, Zagrodnik-Ulan E, Bohatyrewicz R, Celewicz Z. Remifentanil for labour pain relief. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2015; 47(1):82–6.
- Schnabel A, Hahn N, Broscheit J et al. Remifentanil for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29:177−85.
- Marwah R, Hassan S, Carvalho JC, Balki M. Remifentanil versus fentanyl for intravenous patient-controlled labour analgesia: an obserwational study. Can J Anaesth 2012; 59:246−54.
- Likis FE, Andrews JC, Collins MR, Lewis RM, Seroogy JJ, Starr SA et al. Nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2014; 118(1):153–67.
- Koyyalamudi V, Sidhu G, Cornett EM, Nguyen V, Labrie-Brown C, Fox CJ, Kaye AD. New Labor Pain Treatment Options. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2016 Feb; 20(2):11.
- Yeo ST, Holdcroft A, Yentis SM, Stewart A, Bassett P. Analgesia with sevoflurane in labour. II. Sevoflurane compared with entonox for labour analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2007; 98:110–5.
- Pandya ST. Labour analgesia: Recent advances. Indian J Anaesth. 2010 Sep; 54(5):400–8.
- Simmons SW, Taghizadeh N, Dennis AT, et al. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 10:CD003401.
- Heesen M, Van de Velde M, Klöhr S, et al. Meta-analysis of the success of block following combined spinal-epidural vs epidural analgesia during labour. Anaesthesia 2014; 69:64.
- Perlas A, Chaparro LE, Chin KJ. Lumbar Neuraxial Ultrasound for Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41:251.
- Van de Velde M, Berends N, Kumar A, Devroe S, Devlieger R, Vandermeersch E, et al. Effects of epidural clonidine and neostigmine following intrathecal labour analgesia: a randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Int J Obstet Anaesth 2009; 18:207–14.
- Wallet F, Clement HJ, Bouret C, Lopez F, Broisin F, Pignal C et al. Effects of a continuous low-dose clonidine epidural regimen on pain, satisfaction and adverse events during labour: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27:441–7.
- Sng BL, Zhang Q, Leong WL, Ocampo C, Assam PN, Sia AT. Incidence and characteristics of breakthrough pain in parturients using computerintegrated patient-controlled epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth 2015 Jun; 27(4):277–84.
- Kaynar AM, Shankar KB. Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus? Anesth Analg 1999; 89:534
- Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:270.
- Nelson KE, Rauch T, Terebuh V, D’Angelo R. A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and sufentanil for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 May; 96(5):1070–3.
- Cappiello E, O’Rourke N, Segal S, Tsen LC. A randomized trial of dural puncture epidural technique compared with the standard epidural technique for labor analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008; 107(5):1646–51
- Hoffman HG, Chambers GT, Meyer WJ, Arceneaux LL, Russell WJ, Seibel EJ et al. Virtual reality as an adjunctive nonpharmacologic analgesic for acute burn pain during medical procedures. Ann Behav Med 2011; 41(2):183–91
- Scanning Sky Monitor On-Board AstroSat
Abstract Views :244 |
PDF Views:82
Authors
M. C. Ramadevi
1,
S. Seetha
2,
Dipankar Bhattacharya
3,
B. T. Ravishankar
1,
N. Sitaramamurthy
1,
G. Meena
1,
M. Ramakrishna Sharma
1,
Ravi Kulkarni
1,
V. Chandra Babu
1,
Kumar
1,
Brajpal Singh
1,
Anand Jain
1,
Reena Yadav
1,
S. Vaishali
1,
B. N. Ashoka
1,
Anil Agarwal
1,
K. Balaji
4,
Manoj Kumar
5,
Prashanth Kulshresta
5,
Pankaj Agarwal
6,
Mathew Sebastian
6
Affiliations
1 Space Astronomy Group, SSIF, ISITE Campus, Karthik Nagar, Outer Ring Road, ISRO Satellite Centre, Bengaluru 560 037, IN
2 Indian Space Research Organisation Headquarters, Department of Space, Antariksh Bhavan, New BEL Road, Bengaluru 560 231, IN
3 Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, IN
4 Spacecraft Mechanisms Group, ISAC, Old Airport Road, Vimanapura Post, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
5 Control and Digital Electronics Group, ISAC, Old Airport Road, Vimanapura Post, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
6 Vikram Sarabhai Space Center, Thiruvananthapuram 695 022, IN
1 Space Astronomy Group, SSIF, ISITE Campus, Karthik Nagar, Outer Ring Road, ISRO Satellite Centre, Bengaluru 560 037, IN
2 Indian Space Research Organisation Headquarters, Department of Space, Antariksh Bhavan, New BEL Road, Bengaluru 560 231, IN
3 Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, IN
4 Spacecraft Mechanisms Group, ISAC, Old Airport Road, Vimanapura Post, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
5 Control and Digital Electronics Group, ISAC, Old Airport Road, Vimanapura Post, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
6 Vikram Sarabhai Space Center, Thiruvananthapuram 695 022, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 04 (2017), Pagination: 599-601Abstract
Scanning Sky Monitor (SSM) on-board AstroSat is a wide-field imager to monitor the X-ray sky in the energy band 2.5-10 keV. The primary science objective of SSM is to detect and locate transient X-ray sources in the sky. Once detected the information is to be provided to the astronomical community for follow-up observations to do a more detailed study of the source. Long-term monitoring of known X-ray transient sources is also one of the science objectives of SSM. The instrument constitutes three units of 1D positionsensitive propotional counters with coded masks on each, all three mounted on a platform capable of rotation to scan about 50% of the sky in one full rotation. The angular resolution of each unit in SSM is 12' x 2.5°. Sensitivity of SSM is ~30 milliCrab at 3 sigma in 10 min integration time. This article briefly discusses the instrument and a few early results since the launch of AstroSat.Keywords
AstroSat, Crab, Scanning Sky Monitor, X-Ray Transient Sources.References
- Agrawal, P. C., A broad spectral band Indian Astronomy satellite AstroSat. Adv. Space Res., 2006, 38, 29892994.
- Singh, K. P. et al., AstroSat mission. Proc. SPIE, 2014, 91442T, 9144-100; doi:10.1117/12.2062667.
- Levine, A. M. et al., First results from the All-Sky Monitor on the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer. ApJ, 1996, 469, L33.
- Seetha, S. et al., The Scanning Sky Monitor (SSM) on AstroSat. Adv. Space Res., 2006, 38, 2995–2998.
- Matsuoka, M. et al., The MAXI mission on the ISS: science and instruments for monitoring All-sky X-ray images. PASJ, 2009, 61, 999.
- Balaji, K., Narendra, S., Nagesh, G., Sridharamurthy, V. and Bhat, N. C., Development of mechanisms for AstroSat. In Proceedings of the 5th National Seminar and Exhibition on Aerospace and Related Mechanisms, ISRO Satellite Centre, Bengaluru, 18–19 November 2005, ARMS-05-MSA-02, pp. 67–73.
- Ramadevi, M. C., Seetha, S., Babu, V. C., Ashoka, B. N. and Sreekumar, P., Optimization of gas proportional counters for Scanning Sky Monitor (SSM) onboard AstroSat. Adv. Space Res., 2006, 38, 3002–3004.
- Ramadevi, M. C. et al., Scanning sky monitor (SSM) on-board AstroSat. Exp. Astron., 2017, doi:10.1007/s10686-017-9536-3.
- Ramadevi, M. C. et al., Early in-orbit performance of Scanning Sky Monitor onboard AstroSat. J. Astrophys. Astr., 2016; doi:12.3456/s78910-011-012-3.
- Ramadevi, M. C. et al., Detection of beta-class variability in black hole source GRS 1915+105 by AstroSat Scanning Sky Monitor. The Astronomer’s Telegram ATel #8185, 2015.
- X-Ray Spectrometers On-Board Aditya-L1 for Solar Flare Studies
Abstract Views :199 |
PDF Views:58
Authors
K. Sankarasubramanian
1,
Manju Sudhakar
1,
Anuj Nandi
1,
M. C. Ramadevi
1,
Abhijit Avinash Adoni
1,
Ankur Kushwaha
1,
Anil Agarwal
1,
Arjun Dey
1,
Bhuwan Joshi
2,
Brajpal Singh
1,
V. Girish
1,
Ishan Tomar
1,
Kamal Kumar Majhi
1,
Kumar
1,
Manjunath Olekar
1,
Monoj Bug
1,
Manohar Pala
1,
Mukund Kumar Thakur
1,
Rajeev R. Badagandi
1,
B. T. Ravishankar
1,
Sarthak Garg
1,
N. Sitaramamurthy
1,
N. Sridhara
1,
C. N. Umapathy
1,
Vinod Kumar Gupta
1,
Vivek Kumar Agrawal
1,
B. Yougandar
1
Affiliations
1 ISITE Campus, ISRO Satellite Centre, Outer Ring Road, Marathahalli, Bengaluru 560 037, IN
2 Udaipur Solar Observatory, Physical Research Laboratory, Udaipur 313 004, IN
1 ISITE Campus, ISRO Satellite Centre, Outer Ring Road, Marathahalli, Bengaluru 560 037, IN
2 Udaipur Solar Observatory, Physical Research Laboratory, Udaipur 313 004, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 04 (2017), Pagination: 625-627Abstract
Aditya-L1 mission will carry two high-spectral resolution X-ray spectrometers to study solar flares. The soft X-ray spectrometer will cover the energy range from 1 to 30 keV, while the hard X-ray spectrometer will cover from 10 to 150 keV. These two instruments together will provide opportunities to study the plasma parameters during solar flares as well as acceleration mechanisms of energetic particles during the flaring time.Keywords
Coronal Heating, Solar Flares, X-Ray Spectrometers.References
- Benz, A. O., Flare observations. Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2017, 14(2), 1–59.
- Hannah, I. G. et al., Microflares and the statistics of X-ray flares. Space Sci. Rev., 2011, 159, 263–300.
- Narendranath, S. et al., Elemental abundances in the solar corona as measured by the X-ray solar monitor onboard Chandrayaan-1. Sol. Phys., 2014, 289, 1585–1595.
- Joshi, B. et al., Pre-flare activity and magnetic reconnection during the evolutionary stages of energy release in a solar eruptive flare. ApJ, 2011, 743, 195–208.
- Rao, A. R. et al., RT-2 detection of quasi-periodic pulsations in the 2009 July 5 solar hard X-ray flare. ApJ, 2010, 714, 1142–1148.
- Yashiro, S. et al., Spatial relationship between solar flares and coronal mass ejections. ApJ, 2008, 673, 1174–1180.
- Chifor, C. et al., The early phases of a solar prominence eruption and associated flare: a multi-wavelength analysis. A&A, 2006, 458, 965–973.
- Warmuth, A. et al., Rapid changes of electron acceleration characteristics at the end of the impulsive phase of an X-class solar flare. ApJ, 2009, 699, 917.
- SoLEXS Team, SoLEXS PDR document, ISRO-ISACADITYA-L1RR-1343, 2016.
- HEL1OS Team, HEL1OS PDR document, ISRO-ISAC-ADITYA-L1RR-1342, 2016.
- Chandrayaan-2 Large Area Soft X-ray Spectrometer
Abstract Views :257 |
PDF Views:78
Authors
V. Radhakrishna
1,
A. Tyagi
1,
S. Narendranath
1,
Koushal Vadodariya
1,
Reena Yadav
1,
Brajpal Singh
1,
G. Balaji
1,
Neeraj Satya
1,
Akash Shetty
1,
H. N. Suresha Kumar
1,
Kumar
1,
S. Vaishali
1,
Netra S. Pillai
1,
S. Tadepalli
1,
Venkata Raghavendra
1,
P. Sreekumar
2,
Anil Agarwal
1,
N. Valarmathi
1
Affiliations
1 U.R. Rao Satellite Centre, ISRO, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
2 Space Science Programme Office, ISRO Head Quarters, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
1 U.R. Rao Satellite Centre, ISRO, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
2 Space Science Programme Office, ISRO Head Quarters, Bengaluru 560 017, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 118, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 219-225Abstract
Chandrayaan-2 Large Area Soft X-ray Spectrometer (CLASS) is an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer experiment aimed at mapping the abundances of major rock-forming elements on the lunar surface. The instrument consists of swept charge devices with a passive collimator, visible light blocking filters and signal processing electronics designed and built at U.R. Rao Satellite Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation. CLASS will be the largest collecting area spectrometer flown to the Moon, and thus is expected to map the abundances of lunar elements with a higher sensitivity than ever at soft X-ray energies.Keywords
Moon, Rock-forming Elements, Spectrometer, X-ray Fluorescence.References
- Adler, I. et al., Apollo 15 and 16 results of the integrated geochemical experiment. Moon, 1973, 7, 487–504.
- Clarke, P. E. and Hawke, B. R., The lunar farside: the nature of the highlands east of Mare smythii. Earth, Moon Planets, 1991, 53, 93–107.
- Lawrence, D. J., Feldman, W. C., Barraclough, B. L. and Binder, A. B., Global elemental maps of the Moon: the Lunar Prospector Gamma Ray Spectrometer. Science, 1998, 281, 1484– 1489.
- Prettyman, T. H., Jagerty, J. J., Elphic, R. C., Feldman, W. C., Lawrence, D. J., Mckinney, M. K. and Vaniman, D. T., Elemental composition of the lunar surface: analysis of gamma ray spectroscopy data from Lunar Prospector. JGR, 2006, 111, E12007 (1–41).
- Hasebe, N., Yamashita, N., Karouji, Y., Kobayashi, S., Hareyama, M., Komatsu, S. and Kim, K. J., Lunar gamma-ray observation by Kaguya GRS, 2010. In Advances in Geosciences, 2010, Volume 19: Planetary Science, pp. 57–67.
- Grande, M. et al., The D-CIXS X-ray spectrometer on the SMART-1 mission to the Moon – first results. Planet. Space Sci., 55, 494–502.
- Swinyard, B. M. et al., X-ray fluorescence observations of the Moon by SMART-1/D-CIXS and the first detection of Ti-Ka from the lunar surface. Planet. Space Sci., 2009, 57, 744–750.
- Okada, T. et al., X-ray fluorescence experiments on the SELENE (KAGUYA) spacecraft. 2008, In 39th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Abstr., 1966.
- Dong, W.-D., Zhang, X., Zhu, M.-H., Xu, A. A. and Tang, Z. S., Global Mg/Si and Al/Si distributions on lunar surface derived from Chang E-2 X-ray spectrometer. Res. Astron. Astrophys., 2015, 16; 10.1088/1674-4527/16/1/004.
- Narendranath, S. et al., Lunar X ray fluorescence observations by the Chandrayaan 1 X-ray spectrometer (C1XS): results from the nearside southern highlands. Icarus, 2011, 214, 53–66.
- Athiray, P. S., Narendranath, S., Sreekumar, P. and Grande, M., C1XS results – first measurement of enhanced sodium on the lunar surface, PSS, 2014, 104, 279–287.
- Radhakrishna, V. et al., The Chandrayaan-2 Large area X-ray Spectrometer. In Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, abstr. no. 1708, 2011.
- Shanmugam, M., Vadawale, S., Acharya, Y. B., Goyal, S. K., Patel, A., Shah, B. and Murthy, S. V. S., The solar X-ray monitor on Chandrayaan-2. In 43rd LPSC, abstr. no. 1858, 2012.
- Lowe, B. G., Holland, A. D., Hutchinson, I. B., Burt, D. J. and Pool, P. J., The Swept Charge Devices, a novel CCD – Based EDX detector: first results, NIM A, 2001, 458, 568–579.
- Wu, Y. P., Dahai, R. and You, Z., HXMT satellite for space hard X-ray observations. Adv. Space. Res., 2004, 34, 2667–2672.
- Space Environment Information System; http://spenvis.oma.be.
- Agostinelli, S. et al., Geant4: a simulation Toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 2003, 506, 250–303.
- Arnaud, K. A., Astronomical data analysis software and systems. Astron. Softw. Proc., 1996, 101, 17–20.
- Athiray, P. S. et al., Experimental validation of XRF inversion code for Chandrayaan-1. Planet. Space Sci., 2013, 89, 183–187.
- Athiray, P. S., Narendranath, S., Sreekumar, P., Dash, S. K. and Babu, B. R. S., Validation of methodology to derive elemental abundances from X-ray observations on Chandrayaan-1. Planet. Space Sci., 2013, 75, 188–194.