Refine your search
Collections
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
A. Mandavkar, Adish
- Examination and Analysis of Effect of Printing Parameters on Roundness of Fused Deposition Modeling (Fdm) Parts
Abstract Views :53 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Sairaj B. Patil
1,
Tejas U. Mohite
1,
Tushar A. Patole
1,
Chinmay V. Sutar
1,
Adish A. Mandavkar
1,
Sunil J. Raykar
1
Affiliations
1 D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, IN
1 D.Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, Kasaba Bawada, Kolhapur, IN
Source
Manufacturing Technology Today, Vol 21, No 9-10 (2022), Pagination: 17-22Abstract
The focus of the current research is on how different process variables affect geometrical tolerance, specifically how round a cylindrical PLA component is when printed using fused deposition modelling. Layer Thickness, Infill Percentage, and Print Speed are the three process parameters chosen for the current investigation. Examination and Analysis of Effect of Printing Parameters on Roundness of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Parts is presented. It is found during investigation that layer height is most significant aspect for roundness of fused deposition modelling printed parts. From current analysis, it is found that the minimum roundness value is at 0.12 mm Layer Height, 90% Infill Density and Print Speed 60 mm/s.Keywords
3D Printing, Roundness, Fused Deposition Modelling, Dimensional Accuracy, Geometric Tolerance.
References
- AS1100 (1984) Technical Drawing, Part 201–1984, Mechanical Drawing, Standards Australia, Sydney.
- ASME Y14.5 (2009) Dimensioning and Tolerancing, ASME, New York.
- Boschetto., A, & Bottini L. (2014). Accuracy prediction in Fused Deposition Modeling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 73, 913-928.
- Boschetto, A., & Bottini, L. (2016). Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 103-114.
- Chinmay, V. S., Mandavkar, A. A., Patil, S. B., Mohite, T. U., Patole, T. A., & Raykar, S. (2022). Analysis and prediction of working range of process parameters for surface roughness of 3D printed parts with fused deposition modelling. Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 17(2), 044–050. https://doi.org/10.37255/jme.v17i2pp044-050.
- D’Addona, D. M., Raykar, S. J., Singh, D., & Kramar, D. (15-17 July 2020). 14th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering. CIRP ICME ´20.
- Deomore, S. A., Raykar, S. J. (2020). Multi-criteria decision making paradigm for selection of best printing parameters of fused deposition modeling. Materials Today. Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.632
- Lieneke, T., Adam, G., Leuders, S., Knoop, F., Josupeit, S., Delfs, P., Funke, N., & Zimmer, D. (2015). Systematical determination of tolerances for additive manufacturing by measuring linear dimensions. International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, 371-384. Mahesh, M., Wong, Y. S., FuhJ, .Y. H., & Loh, H. T. (2004). Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 10(2), 123–135.
- Nagendra, J., & Ganesha Prasad, M. S. (2020). FDM process parameter optimization by taguchi technique for augmenting the mechanical properties of nylon-aramid composite used as filament material. Institution of Engineers (India): Ser. C, 101(2), 313-322.
- Nagendra, J., Ganesha Prasad, M. S., Shashank, S., Syed, M. A. (2018). Comparison of tribiological behavior of Nylon Aramid Polymer Composite Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling and Injection Molding Process. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 720-728.
- Ollison, T., & Berisso, K. (2010). Three-dimensional printing build variables that impact cylindricity. Journal of Industrial Technology, 26(1), 1-10.
- Patil, P., Raykar, S. J., Bhamu, J., & Singh, D. (2022).Modeling and analysis of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling based on infill patterns. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 29, February 2022, 92-99.
- Patil, P., Singh, D., Raykar, S. J., Bhamu, J. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of process parameters of fused deposition modeling (FDM) for printing polylactic acid (PLA) polymer components. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 4880-4885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.353
- Raykar S. J., & D’Addona, D. M., (2020). Selection of best printing parameters of fused deposition modeling using VIKOR. Materials Today: Proceedings, 27, 344-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.104
- Raykar S. J., Narke M. M., Desai S. B., & Warke S. S. (2020). Manufacturing of 3d printed sports helmet. Techno-Societal 2018, 771-778. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16962-6_77
- Sood A. K. (2011). Study on parametric optimization of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process. National Institue of Technology Rourkela, India.
- Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2009). Improving dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method. Materials and Design, 30, 4243-4252.