A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jaiswal, Arun Kumar
- Standardization and Validation of Hindi Version of Positive Metacognitions and Meta-Emotions Questionnaire
Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 8, No 4 (2017), Pagination: 547-553Abstract
The Positive Metacognitions and Meta-emotions Questionnaire (PMCEQ) developed by Beer and Moneta (2010) measures adaptive metacognitive beliefs when facing challenging situations. The cultural adaptation of Hindi version of PMCEQ was conducted in 17 to 75 years old (n = 838) Hindi speaking men and women participants of Varanasi city of Uttar Pradesh of India. The psychometric properties of the PMCEQ-H (Hindi version of PMCEQ) indicated good internal consistency with fairly high reliability and little different factor structure than that of original PMCEQ and acceptable construct and convergent validity. The CFA indicated that PMCEQ-H had an adequate and acceptable model fit indicating good construct validity. The three factors extracted were 'Confidence in Setting Flexible and Feasible Hierarchies of Goals (PMCEQ-H 1)', 'Confidence in Interpreting Own Emotions as Cues, Restraining from Immediate Reaction and Mind-Setting for Problem-Solving, (PMCEQ-H2)' and 'Confidence in Extinguishing Perseverative Thoughts and Emotions (PMCEQ-H3)'. The gender and age differences analyses also indicated that the instrument has good predictive validity. The PMCEQ-H1 and PMCEQ-H2 factors correlated positively with satisfaction with life, and all the three factors of PMCEQ-H correlated negatively with negative affect and BDI-II indicating good convergent validity of the instrument, thus, the PMCEQ-H produces a reliable and valid measurement of adaptive metacognitive beliefs in Hindi speaking Indian cultural milieu.Keywords
Metacognitions and Meta-Emotions, PMCEQ, Hindi Version (PMCEQ-H), Positive, Factor Analysis.- Role of Positive Meta-Cognitions and Meta-Emotions in Satisfaction with Life
Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 8, No 4 (2017), Pagination: 616-620Abstract
Objective of this study was to examine the effect of positive meta-cognition and meta-emotions (PMCEQ-H) on satisfaction with life. The study was conducted on 20 to 50 years old 300 (150 men & 150 women) conveniently sampled participants from the Chowk area of Varanasi city of India. The participants were individually administered Hindi versions of: (1) Positive Metacognitions and Meta-emotions Questionnaire (PMCEQ-H; Jaiswal et al., 2017) and (2) Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Singh & Rani, 2011). To elucidate the predictability of satisfaction with life by facets of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions and causal effects of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions on satisfaction with life, initially the data were analyzed by stepwise regression analysis with SWLS as criterion variable and facets of PMCEQ-H as predictors variable, and then the data were analyzed by 2 X 2 analysis of variance [2 gender (men & women) X 2 levels of facets of PMCEQ-H (high & low)] to delineate the main and interaction effects of'gender' and levels of facets of PMCEQ-H' on satisfaction with life. The results indicated PMCEQ-H 1 and PMCEQ-H2 significant as significant predictors of life satisfaction. The ANOVA revealed significant main effects of'gender' for PMCEQ-H1 and PMCEQ-H2, and 'levels' of PMCEQ-H1, PMCEQ-H2 and PMCEQ-H3 on satisfaction with life, and significant interaction effects of gender X levels of PMCEQ-H 1 and PMCEQ-H2 on satisfaction with life. Post hoc analyses demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction with life in men than in women with respect to PMCEQ-H 1 and PMCEQ-H2 facets of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions. Moreover, high than low scorer participants on the three facets of PMCEQ-H, displayed significantly higher satisfaction with life. The findings indicated facilitating effects of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions on life satisfaction.Keywords
Positive Metacognitions and Meta-Emotions, PMCEQ, PMCEQ-H, Life Satisfaction.- Evaluation of Psychometric Adequacy of Metacognitive Awareness Inventory in Indian Sample
Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Spicer Adventist University, Pune, Maharashtra, IN
2 Department of Psychology, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 11, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 64-70Abstract
The Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) developed by Schraw and Dennison (1994) assesses metacognitive awareness of individuals in terms of 'knowledge of metacognitions' and 'regulation of cognitions'. In an attempt to ascertain psychometric adequacy and factor structure of MAI in Indian cultural setting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed by administering 52 items of MAI on 15 to 17 years old students (n = 326) of English medium School in Roorkee city of Uttrakhand, India. The obtained results indicated good internal consistency with fairly good reliability indices of the two factors extracted and the whole scale and an acceptable construct and convergent validity. However, out of 52 items only 25 items meaningfully loaded on two factors in EFA followed by CFA by AMOS, and the two factors were assigned their original names 'knowledge of cognition' (KC) and 'regulation of cognition' (RC). The CFA indicated that 25-items MAI had an acceptable model fit indicating good construct validity in Indian setting, and the scale was named as 'MAI-short version'. The gender and streams of education differences also demonstrated that the scale has good predictive validity. The KC, RC subscales as well as whole MAI-short version correlated significantly positively with academic grade percentages of the students, however, the 'r' values were low indicating an acceptable convergent validity of the instrument.Keywords
Metacognition, Metacognitive Awareness, MAI.- Psychometric Properties and Factor Analysis of Hindi Version of the Meta-Emotion Scale
Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 11, No 4 (2020), Pagination: 383-388Abstract
This study was carried out to establish the construct, convergent and predictive validity of Hindi translation of Meta-emotions Scale in Hindi speaking Indian cultural context. For the purpose 16 to 78 years old 1324 men and women participants with High School education from Chowk and adjoining areas of Varanasi city of Uttar Pradesh, India, completed the Hindi version of 28-items Metaemotions Scale (MES). Factor analysis (principal components) on Hindi version of MES (MES-H) by applying Varimex rotation method with the loading equal to or more than 0.400, Eigen value equal to 1.00, and Scree plot suggested two to three factors, and finally, confirmatory factor analysis by AMO Sindicated a two factor model with an acceptable goodness of model fit on 19 items. The content of 10 items of the first factor and 9 items of second factor yielded two behavioral components, i.e., Positive Meta-emotions and Negative Meta-emotions. The psychometric properties of the MES-H demonstrated good internal consistency with acceptable reliability, construct and convergent validity. The gender and age differences analyses also indicated that women manifested significantly higher positive meta-emotions and negative meta-emotions in comparison to men, and older as compared to younger participants demonstrated significantly high levels of positive meta-emotions indicating good predictive validity. These findings indicated that the MES-Hindi may be considered as a reliable and valid measurement of meta-emotions in Hindi speaking Indian cultural context.Keywords
Positive Meta-Emotions, Negative Meta-Emotions, Meta-Emotions, MES-Hindi.- Effects of Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta-emotions on Perceived Stress in Adolescents
Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 13, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 244-248Abstract
The present study was conducted to elucidate the effects of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions on perceived stress in adolescents. The sample consisted of 300 adolescents (150 boys & 150 girls) studying in Standard X and XII in schools of Varanasi city and preparing for competitive examinations. The participants were individually administered Hindi version of Positive Metacognitions and Meta-emotions Questionnaire and Perceived Stress Scale. The participants scoring below and up to 25th percentile and scoring above 75th percentile on the facets of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions were respectively designated as low and high scorer participants (boys & girls) were screed out. The effects of levels (low & high) of facets of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions on measures of perceived stress (uncontrollable perceived stress & controllable perceived stress) were analysed by applying 2 × 2 ANOVA (2 genders × 2 levels of facets of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions). Results revealed significant main effects of gender on uncontrollable perceived stress with respect to PMCEQ-H1 facet of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions and significant main effects of levels of PMCEQ-H3 and PMCEQ-H Total facets of positive metacognitions and positive meat-emotions on uncontrollable perceived stress and significant main effects of levels of PMCEQ-H1, PMCEQ-H2 and PMCEQ-H Total on controllable perceived stress. Boys as compared to girls exhibited enhanced uncontrolled perceived stress with respect to PMCEQ-H1. High scorer than low scorer participants on facets of PMCEQ-H displayed significantly lower levels of uncontrollable perceived stress and controllable perceived stress. The findings indicated that high levels of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions caused reduced uncontrollable and controllable perceived stress.
Keywords
Positive Metacognitions And Positive Meta-Emotions, Marital Communication, Perceived Stress.References
- Bailey, R., & Wells, A. (2013). Does metacognition make a unique contribution to health anxiety when controlling for neuroticism, illness cognition, and somatosensory amplification. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27, 327-337. Doi:10.1891/0889- 8391.27.4.327
- Beer, N., & Moneta, G. B. (2010). Construct and concurrent validity of the positive meta- cognitions and positive meta-emotions questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 977-982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.008.
- Bennett, H., & Wells, A. (2010). Metacognition, memory disorganization and rumination in post-traumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14, 318- 325. Doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.01.004
- Bouman, T. K., & Meijer, K. J. (1999). A preliminary study of worry and metacognitions in hypochondriasis. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 6(2), 96-101.
- Cohen, S., Kamarack, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385-396. DOI 10.2307/2136404.
- Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. M. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample in theUnited States. In S. Spacapan and S. Oskamp (Eds.,), The social psychology of health, (pp. 31-67) Newbury Park: CA, Sage.
- Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Aardema, A. (1999).Metacognition, specific obsessive-compulsive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive behavior. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6(2), 139-145.
- Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
- Ha, J., & Hyunn-Ie, A. (2013). Multiple mediator effect of meta-cognition on the relation of perceived stress, anxiety and generalized problematic internet use. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotheraphy, 25, 251-273.
- Holeva, V., Tarrier, N., & Wells, A. (2001). Prevalence and predictors of acute stress disorder and PTSD following road traffic accidents: Thought control strategies and social support. Behavior Therapy, 32(1), 65-83.
- Jaiswal, A. K., Singh, L. N., Rani, R., Sarraf, S. R., & Pandey, D. (2017). Standardization and validation of Hindi version of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions questionnaire. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 547-553.
- Jaiswal, A. K., Meshram, S., Pandey, V., & Singh, A. (2021). Standardization and validation of Hindi version of Perceived Stress Scale in Indian sample. Indian
- Journal of Health and Well-being, 12, 386-390.
- Kim, Y., & Jun, Y. (2015). Role of positive meta-cognition and negative meta-cognition in employment stress among college students. International Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences (ICSHSS'15 ) July 29-30, 2015, Phuket (Thailand).
- Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
- Leung, D., Lam, T., & Chan, S. (2010). Three versions of perceived stress scale: Validation in a sample of Chinese cardiac patients who smoke. BMC Public Health, 10, 513.
- Matthews, G., Hillyard, E. J., & Campbell, S. E. (1999). Metacognition and maladaptive coping as components of test anxiety. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 111-125.
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe and A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
- Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A. (2003). An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 261-273. doi:10.1023/ A:1023962332399.
- Park, K. (2010). The moderating effect of meta-cognition and mindfulness on the relation between perceived stress and depression. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 617-634.
- Remor, E. (2006). Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Spanish Journal of Psychology, 9, 86-93.
- Roussis, P., & Wells, A. (2006). Post-traumatic stress symptoms: Tests of relationships with thought control strategies and beliefs as predicted by the metacognitive model. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 111-122. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.019
- Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: Goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational
- Psychology, 91, 251-260.
- Spada, M. M., & Wells, A. (2006). Metacognitions about alcohol use in problem drinkers. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory and Practice, 13(2), 138 -143. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.478
- Spada, M. M., Hiou, K., & Nikcevic, A. V. (2006). Metacognitions, emotions, and procrastination. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20, 319-326. Doi:10.1891/jcop.20.3.319
- Spada, M. M., Nikcevic, A. V., Moneta, G. B., & Wells, A. (2008). Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1172-1181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.010.
- Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Meta-cognition, mindfulness and the modification of mood disorders. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 146-156. (Special Issue, Meta-cognition and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy).
- Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: A cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301-320.
- Wells, A. (2000a). Emotional disorders and metacognition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Wells, A. (2000b). Meta-cognitive theory for anxiety and depression. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Wells, A., & Carter, K. (1999). Preliminary test of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 585-594. Doi:10
- .1016/S00057967(98)00156-9
- Wells, A., & Carter, K. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and non-patients. Behavior Therapy, 32, 85-102. Doi:10.1016/S00057 894(01)80045-9
- Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
- Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Social phobia: Effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking. Behavior Therapy, 29(3), 357-370. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(98)80037-3.
- Effects of Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta-emotions on Marital Communication
Authors
1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Vol 13, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 202-206Abstract
The present study was planned to explore the effects of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions in marital communication. The sample consisted of 300 married couples (300 husbands and 300 wives) chosen from Chowk and adjoining areas of Varanasi city of Uttar Pradesh, India. The participants were individually administered Hindi version of Positive Metacognitions and Positive Meta-emotions Questionnaire and Marital Communication Inventory. The participants falling below Mean-1SD and above Mean+1SD on the facets of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions were respectively designated as low and high scorer participants (husbands & wives) were screed out. The effects of levels (low & high) of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions on marital communications (supportive & aversive) were analyzed by applying 2 × 2 ANOVA (2 spouses × 2 levels of facets of positive metacognitions & positive meta-emotions). Results revealed non-significant main effects of spouses on supportive and aversive communications, and significant main effects of levels of PMCEQ-H1, PMCEQ-H2 and PMCEQ-H3 on supportive and aversive communications, except non-significant main effect of levels of PMCEQ- H3 on supportive communication. Participants who scored higher on the PMCEQ-H aspects exhibited significantly higher levels of supportive communication and lower levels of aversive communication than participants who scored lower. The results showed that more supporting communication and lower aversive communication were both caused by high levels of positive metacognitions and positive meta-emotions, respectively.
Keywords
Positive Metacognitions And Positive Meta-Emotions, Marital Communication, Supportive Communication.References
- Adamczyk, K. (2013). Inteligencja małzonkow i system wartosci małzonkow, a ich Komunikacja [Emotional intelligence and the spouses' system of values vs. their interpersonal communication]. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 14(2), 72- 101.
- Batool, S.S., & Khalid, R. (2009). Role of emotional intelligence in marital relationship. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 24(1⁄2), 43-62.
- Beer, N., & Moneta, G. B., (2010). Construct and concurrent validity of the positive meta-cognitions and positive meta-emotions questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 977-982.
- Carstensen, L. L., Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10, 140-149.
- Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The meta-cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279-296.
- Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Aardema, A. (1999). Metacognition, specific obsessive- compulsive beliefs and obsessive-compulsive behaviour. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6(2), 139-145.
- Fade, A. (2010). Causes of marital communication breakdown and how to deal with them. http://EzineArticles.com/3862555 - Mar 03, 2010
- Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Roberts, N. (1998). Emotion, attachment, and satisfaction in close relationships. In P. A. Anderson (Ed.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 473-505). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Fernandez-Duque, D., Baired, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Conscious Cognition, 9, 288-307.
- Gill, D. S., Christensen, A., & Fincham, F. D. (1999). Predicting marital satisfaction from behavior: Do all roads really lead to Rome? Personal Relationships, 6, 369- 387.
- Goli, Z. S., & Fard, L. S. M. (2021). The role of metacognitive beliefs and resilience on predicting marital adjustment in both groups of patients with chronic and acute pain. Journal of Assessment and Research in Counselling and Clinical Psychology, 3, 55- 63.
- Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
- Grundland, D. (2016). The lived experience of long-term happily married heterosexual individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University. Retrieved from https://search1proquest1com1sqye6jlz070d.han.uni.opole.pl/results/3FD34DE6B4FD4E65 PQ/1?accountid=12995#mlditem6.
- Haring, M., Hewitt, P., & Flett, G.L. (2003). Perfectionism, coping, and quality of intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 143-158.
- Hojati, N., Yousen, Z., & Sajadian, E. (2014). Predicting marital satisfaction: Metacognition, thought control and resiliency. Comprehensive Research Journal of
- Education and General Studies (CRJEGS), 2(6), 138-143.
- Jaiswal, A. K., Singh, L. N., Rani, R., Sarraf, S. R., & Pandey, D. (2017). Standardization and validation of Hindi version of positive metacognition and meta-
- emotions questionnaire. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(4), 547-553.
- Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. (2005). Sex, communication, and their relation to marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 409-424.
- Markman, H. J. (1984). The longitudinal study of couples' interactions: Implications for
- understanding and predicting the development of marital distress. In K. Hahlweg and N. S. Jacobson (Eds), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 253- 281). New York: Guilford Press.
- Matthews, C. G., Hillyard, E. J., & Campbell, S. E. (1999). Metacognition and maladaptive coping as component of test anxiety. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 111-126.
- Omrani, S., Jomehri, F., & Ahadi H. (2018). Prediction of marital adjustment based on metacognitive beliefs with mediating effect of marital conflicts. Journal of Psychological Science, 17, 501-508.
- Parvaz, Y., Bakhtiari, M., Masjedi Arani, A., & Asle Zaker, M. (2020). Predicting emotional divorce based on metacognitive beliefs and psychological flexibility. Researcher Bulletin of Medical Sciences, 24(1), e14. Retrieved from https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/index.php/rbms/article/view/32248
- Platsidou, M., & Tsirogiannidou, E. (2016). Enhancement of emotional intelligence. Family communication, and family satisfaction via a parent educational program. Journal of Adult Development, 23, 245-253.
- Rani, R., Sarraf, S. R., Pandey, D., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2017). Positive meta-cognitions and meta-emotions facilitate marital adjustment. Indian Journal of Health and Well- being, 8(11), 1409-1413.
- Rani, R., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2018). Role of positive metacognitions and meta-emotions in marital satisfaction. International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 7(3), 196-203.
- Rani, R., Jaiswal, A. K., & Singh, L. N. (2020). Assessment of psychometric properties and validation of Hindi version of marital communication inventory. Indian Journal of Health and Well-being, 11(7-9), 419-425.
- Schaap, C. (1984). A comparison of distressed and non-distressed married couples in a laboratory situation: Literature survey, methodological issues, and an empirical investigation. In K. Hahlweg and N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Marital interaction: Analysis and modification (pp. 133-158). New York: Guilford Press.
- Smith, L., Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. (2008). Trait emotional intelligence, conflict communication patterns, and relationship satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1314-1325.
- Spada, M. M., Hiou, K. & Nikcevic, A. V. (2006). Metacognitions, emotions, and procrastination. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20(3), 319-326.
- Stolarski, M., Postek, S., & Smieja, M. (2011). Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution strategies in romantic heterosexual couples. Studia Psychologiczne, 49(5), 65-76.
- Uwom-Ajaegbu,O.O.,Ajike,E.O.,Fadolapo,L.,& Ajaegbu,C.(2015).Anempirical study on the causes and effects of communication breakdown in marriages. Journal of Philosophy, Culture and Religion, 11, 1-9.
- Van Pelt, N. L. (1997). Heart to Heart: The Art of Communication. Madrid, Spain: Editorial Safeliz.
- Wells, A., & Carter, K. (2001). Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and non-patients. Behaviour and Therapy, 32, 85-102.
- Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1996). Modelling cognition in emotional disorder: The SREFmodel.BehaviourResearchandTherapy,34(11-12),881-888.
- Wells, A., & Papageorgiou, C. (1998). Relationships between worry, obsessive- compulsive symptoms and meta-cognitive beliefs. Behaviour Research and
- Therapy, 36, 899-913.
- Wells, A., & Matthews, G. (1994). Attention and emotion. A clinical perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.