A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ibrahimi, N.
- Effect of Sitting Balance Training under Varied Sensory Input on Balance and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients
Authors
1 Jamia Hamdard, IN
2 Neurophysiotherapy HOD AIIMS, New Delhi, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal, Vol 4, No 2 (2010), Pagination: 40-45Abstract
Background
Balance is the most common problem occurs in stroke patients. Most of the work done in balance training is focused on giving balance training once the standing position is achieved. It is also seen that task related balance training with altered sensory input is better than task related training without altered sensory input. So this study is directed toward giving balance training in sitting position under varied sensory for improving balance and quality of life in stroke patients.
Methods
30 subjects of stroke were selected and randomized into an experimental and control group. The experimental group participated in sitting balance training under varied sensory input and control group were given sitting balance training without varied sensory input. Performance of training were measured before and after sitting balance training using berg balance scale, stroke specific quality of life questionnaire and sitting and sit to stand component of motor assessment scale.
Results
After training both experimental and control group improved significantly in balance and quality of life but more significant improvement was seen in experimental group.
Conclusion
Balance training can be started early in rehabilitation program once sitting is achieved with altered sensory input for improving balance and quality of life.
Keywords
Balance, Varied Sensory Input, Sitting Balance TrainingReferences
- Patricia AD, Cash textbook of neurology for physiotherapist 4th edition, Japee brothers medical publishers 1993
- Banerjee TK, Das SK, Epidemiology of stroke in India. Neurology Asia 2006; 11: 1-4
- Shumway –Cook A, Woollacott MH, Motor control theory and practical applications 2nd edition, Lippincott Williams and wilkins 2001
- Kauhamen ML, Korpelianen JT, Hiltumen P, Neiemien P, Sotaniemi KA. Domains and determinants of quality of life after stroke caused by brain infaction. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2000; 81: 1541- 1546
- Robinson-smith G, Johnston MV. Self care efficacy, quality of life and depression after stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2000; 81:460-464
- Astrom M, Asplund K, Astrom T. Psychosocial function and life satisfaction after stroke. Stroke 1992; 23 :527-531
- Langhammer B , Stanghelle JK, Landmark B. Exercise and health related quality of life during first year following stroke. A randomized control trail. Brain injury 2008; 22(2) : 135-45
- Barclay –Goddard R, Poluha W, Stevenson T et.al. Cochrane database systematic review 2004; 18(4) : CD004129
- Yelnik AP, Le Breton F, Colle FM et al. Rehabilitation of balance after stroke with multisensorial training, a single blind randomized control study. Neurorehabilitation neural repair 2008; 22(5) : 468-476
- Bayouk JF, Boucher JP, Leroux A. Balance training following stoke: effect of task oriented exercise with and without altered sensory input. International journal rehabilitation research 2006; 29(1) : 51-59
- Catherine M Dean, Elizabeth F Channon and Jillian M Hall, Sitting training early after stroke improves sitting balance and quality and carries over to standing up but not to walking. Australian J. of physiotherapy 2007; 53: 97-102
- Catherine M Dean, Roberta B Shephard, Task related training improve performance of seated reaching task after stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 722-728
- Janet H. Carr, Robert B. Shepard, Denise Lymne, Investigation of new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical therapy 1985; 65: 175-179
- Mao HF, Hsueh IP et al, Analysis of comparison of psychometric property of three balance measure for stroke patients . Stroke 2002; 33: 1022-1027
- Williams LS, Weinberger M, et al, Development of stroke specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999; 30: 1362-1369.
- Williams LS, Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale: Test of reliability and validity of the Danish version. Clinical rehabilitation 2007; 21: 620-627
- Janet H. Carr, Robert B. Shepard, Denise Lymne, Investigation of new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Physical therapy 1985; 65: 175-179
- Dietrichs E et al, Brain plasticity after strokeimplications for post stroke rehabilitation. Tidsskr nor laegeforen 2007; 127(9): 1228-1231
- Kreisel SH, Hennerici MG, Pathophysiology of stroke rehabilitation: the natural course of clinical recovery, use dependent plasticity and rehabilitation outcome. Cerebrovascular disease 2007; 23(4): 243-255
- Nudo RJ, Friel KM, cortical plasticity after stroke: Implication for rehabilitation. Rev neurology (paris) 1999; 155(9): 713-717
- O dell, MW Lincc, Harrison V, Stroke rehabilitation: Strategies to enhance motor recovery. Annu Rev Med 2008; 17
- Isabella V Bonen, Alian P Yelnik, et al, Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part II: Effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program with visual cue deprivation after stroke: A randomized controlled trail. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2004; 85: 274-278
- Ming Hsia Hu, Woollacott MH, multisensory training of standing balance in older adults I postural stability and one leg stance balance. Journal of gerontology1994; 49: M52-M61
- Aprile at al, Effects of rehabilitation on quality of life in patient with chronic stroke. Brain injury 2008; 22(6): 451-456